The influence of disciplinary assessment patterns on student learning: a comparative study

References

• Akcan, S., and S. Tatar. 2010. “An Investigation of the Nature of Feedback Given to Pre-service English Teachers During their Practice Teaching Experience.” Teacher Development: An International Journal of Teachers’ Professional Development 14 (2): 153–72. doi: 10.1080/13664530.2010.494495
   Google Scholar
• Ashford-Rowe, K., J. Herrington, and C. Brown. 2014. “Establishing the Critical Elements that Determine Authentic Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 39 (2): 205–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becher, T. 1987. “Disciplinary Discourse.” Studies in Higher Education 12 (3): 261–74. doi: 10.1080/03075078712331378052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becher, T. 1989. Academic Tribes and Territories. 1st ed. Maidenhead: SRHE and Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Becher, T. 1994. “The Significance of Disciplinary Differences.” Studies in Higher Education 19 (2): 151–61. doi: 10.1080/03075079412331382007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becher, T., and P. Trowler. 2001. Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. 2003. Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biglan, A. 1973a. “The Characteristics of Subject Matter in Different Academic Areas.” Journal of Applied Psychology 57 (3): 195–203. doi: 10.1037/h0034701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biglan, A. 1973b. “Relationships between Subject Matter Characteristics and the Structure and Output of University Departments.” Journal of Applied Psychology 57 (3): 204–13. doi: 10.1037/h0034699
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, P., and D. William. 1998. “Assessment and Classroom Learning.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice 5 (1): 7–74. doi: 10.1080/0969595980050102
   Google Scholar
• Blair, A., and S. McGinty. 2013. “Feedback-dialogues: Exploring the Student Perspective.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 38 (4): 466–76. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2011.649244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crisp, B. R., P. Green Lister, and K. Dutton. 2006. “Not Just Social Work Academics: The Involvement of Others in the Assessment of Social Work Students.” Social Work Education: The International Journal 25 (7): 723–34. doi: 10.1080/02615470600905952
   Google Scholar
• Fanghanel, J. 2009. “The Role of Ideology in Shaping Academics’ Conceptions of their Discipline.” Teaching in Higher Education 14 (5): 565–77. doi: 10.1080/13562510903186790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G., and H. Dunbar-Goddet. 2009. “Characterising Programme-level Assessment Environments that Support Learning.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 34 (4): 481–89. doi: 10.1080/02602930802071114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G., and H. Dunbar-Goddet. 2012. “A Research Tool for Evaluating the Effects of Programme Assessment Environments on Student Learning: The Assessment Experience Questionnaire (AEQ).” Accessed November 29, 2012. http://www.testa.ac.uk/resources/publications
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G., and C. Simpson. 2004. “Conditions under which Assessment Supports Students’ Learning.” Learning and Teaching in Higher Education 1 (1): 3–31.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. 2009. “The Black Box of Tertiary Assessment: An Impending Revolution.” Accessed October 12, 2013. http://akoaotearoa.ac.nz/ako-aotearoa/ako-aotearoa/resources/pages/black-box-tertiary-assessment-impending-revolution
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, T., Y. El Hakim, and G. Gibbs. 2011. “TESTA: Research Inspiring Change.” Educational Developments 12 (4): 12–16.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, T., Y. El Yakim, and G. Gibbs. 2013. “The Whole is Greater than the Sum of its Parts: A Large-scale Study of Students’ Learning in Response to Different Programme Assessment Patterns.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. Published online 29 April 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.792108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, A. 2009. “Redisciplining Generic Attributes: The Disciplinary Context in Focus.” Studies in Higher Education 34 (1): 85–100. doi: 10.1080/03075070802602018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. 1981. “Learning Styles and Disciplinary Differences.” Chap. 10 in The Modern American College, 232–256. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Krause, K. L. 2014. “Challenging Perspectives on Learning and Teaching in the Disciplines: The Academic Voice.” Studies in Higher Education 39 (1): 2–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lattuca, L. R., and J. S. Stark. 1994. “Will Disciplinary Perspectives Impede Curricular Reform?” The Journal of Higher Education 65 (4): 401–26. doi: 10.2307/2943853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. and E. Guba. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lindblom-Ylänne, S., K. Trigwell, A. Nevgi, and P. Ashwin. 2006. “How Approaches to Teaching Are Affected by Discipline and Teaching Context.” Studies in Higher Education 31 (3): 285–98. doi: 10.1080/03075070600680539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyers, N. M., and D. D. Nulty. 2009. “How to Use (five) Curriculum Design Principles to Align Authentic Learning Environments, Assessment, Students’ Approaches to Thinking and Learning Outcomes.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 34 (5): 565–77. doi: 10.1080/02602930802226502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, C. M. L., and M. Parlett. 1974. Up to the Mark: A Study of the Examination Game. London: Study for Research in Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, R. 2001. “Disciplinary Differences and University Teaching.” Studies in Higher Education 26 (2): 135–46. doi: 10.1080/03075070120052071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann, R., S. Parry, and T. Becher. 2002. “Teaching and Learning in their Disciplinary Contexts: A Conceptual Analysis.” Studies in Higher Education 27 (4): 405–17. doi: 10.1080/0307507022000011525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newstead, S. 2002. “Examining the Examiners: Why Are We so Bad at Assessing Students?” Psychology Learning and Teaching 2 (2): 70–75. doi: 10.2304/plat.2002.2.2.70
   Google Scholar
• NUS (National Union of Students). 2010. “NUS Charter on Feedback and Assessment and Ten Principles.” Accessed October 17, 2013. http://www.nusconnect.org.uk/asset/news/6010/FeedbackCharter-toview.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pryor, J., and B. Crossouard. 2008. “A Socio-cultural Theorisation of Formative Assessment.” Oxford Review of Education 34 (1): 1–20. doi: 10.1080/03054980701476386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pryor, J., and B. Crossouard. 2010. “Challenging Formative Assessment: Disciplinary Spaces and Identities.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (3): 265–76. doi: 10.1080/02602930903512891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsden, P. 1992. Learning to Teach in Higher Education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. 1989. “Formative Assessment and the Design of Instructional Systems.” Instructional Science 18 (2): 119–44. doi: 10.1007/BF00117714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. 1993. “Teaching as Community Property: Putting an End to Pedagogical Solitude.” Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning 25 (6): 6–7. doi: 10.1080/00091383.1993.9938465
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. 2005. “Signature Pedagogies in the Professions.” Daedalus 134 (3): 52–59.
   Google Scholar
• Smeby, J. C. 1996. “Disciplinary Differences in University Teaching.” Studies in Higher Education 21 (1): 69–79. doi: 10.1080/03075079612331381467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wareing, S. 2009. “Disciplines, Discourse and Orientalism: The Implications for Postgraduate Certificates in Learning and Teaching in Higher Education.” Studies in Higher Education 34 (8): 917–28. doi: 10.1080/03075070902929519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren Piper, D., D. D. Nulty, and G. O'Grady. 1996. “Examination Practices and Procedures in Australian Universities.” Higher Education Division, Department of Employment Education and Training. Evaluations and Investigations Program. AGPS, Canberra.
   Google Scholar