Can tablet computers enhance learning in further education?

References

• Bangkok Post. 2012. First tablets distributed, 8 June. http://www.bangkokpost.com/learning/learning-from-news/297151/first-tablets-distributed.
   Google Scholar
• Bassey, M. 1995. Creating education through research. Edinburgh: BERA.
   Google Scholar
• BECTA. 2010a. Progress through harnessing technology: A year in the FE and skills sector. Coventry: BECTA.
   Google Scholar
• BECTA. 2010. Next generation learning: The implementation plan for 2010–2013. Coventry: Becta.
   Google Scholar
• Connelly, S., and P. Gregory. 2012. Instructor use of tablet PCs in a college pre-calculus course: Implementation and assessment. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching 31 (4): 415–432.
   Google Scholar
• Couse, L., and D. Chen. 2010. A tablet computer for young chlldren? Exploring its viability for early childhood education. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 43 (1): 75–98.
   Google Scholar
• Culen, A., and A. Gasparini. 2012. Situated techno-cools: Factors that contribute to making technology cool in a given context of use. PsychoNology Journal 10 (2): 117–39.
   Google Scholar
• Daily Telegraph. 2013. Pupils given free iPad minis. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/10046016/Pupils-given-free-iPad-minis.html.
   Google Scholar
• Denholm, A. 2013. Tablet computers provided for pupils. Herald and Sunday Herald (Glasgow), 9 May. http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/education/tablet-computers-provided-for-pupils.21026973.
   Google Scholar
• Enriquez, A. 2010. Enhancing student performance using tablet computers. College Teaching 58: 77–84.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, N., S. Smolnik, and D. Galletta. 2013. Examining the potential for tablet use in a higher education context. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik, 21 February–1 March, Leipzig, Germany, 9–22.
   Google Scholar
• Fons, J. 2010. A year without paper: Tablet computers in the classroom. Physics Teacher 48 (7): 481–83.
   Google Scholar
• Gikas, J., and M. Grant. 2013. Mobile computing devices in higher education: Student perspectives on learning with cell phones, smartphones and social media. The Internet and Higher Education 19: 18–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, K., C. Gibson, F. Gibb, and F. 2013. The impact of tablet computers on students with disabilities in a higher education setting. Technology & Disability 25 (2): 61–76.
   Google Scholar
• Kitzinger, J. 1994. The methodology of focus groups: The importance of interaction between research participants. Sociology of Health 16 (1): 103–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koole, M. 2009. A model for framing mobile learning. In M. Ally, ed. Mobile learning: Transforming the delivery of education and training. Edmonton: Athabasca University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laurillard, D. 2002. Rethinking university teaching: A conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mang, C. and L. Wardley. 2012. Effective adoption of tablets in post-secondary education: Recommendations based on a trial of iPads in university classes. Journal of Information Technology Education 11: 301–17.
   Google Scholar
• Mifsud, L. 2013. Mobile learning and the socio-materiality of classroom practices. Learning, Media and Technology. DOI:10(1080/17439884),2013,817420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connell, S. 2012. Local colleges exploring potential of tablet computers. Metro West Daily News. http://www.metrowestdailynews.com/news/x814446791/Local-colleges-exploring-potential-of-tablet-computers.
   Google Scholar
• Park, Y. 2011. A pedagogical framework for mobile learning: Categorising educational applications of mobile technologies into four types. International Review of Research into Open and Distance Learning Worldwide 12 (2): 78–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parnell, W., and J. Bartlett. 2012. How smartphones and tablets are changing documentation in pre-school and primary classrooms. Young Children 67 (3): 50–57.
   Google Scholar
• Price, F., and Kadi-Hanifi, 2011. E-motivation! The role of popular technology in student motivation and retention. Research in Post-Compulsory Education. 16, no.2: 73–87.
   Google Scholar
• Savill-Smith, C., and P. Kent. 2003. The use of palmtop computers for learning: A review of the literature. London: LSDA.
   Google Scholar
• Scheckelhoff, T. 2007. Adolescent girls and technology: Tablet PC computers as learning tools. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences 68 (4–A): 1425. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/dissertations/AAI3259073.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Government. 2012. Tablet computer piloting in schools. 17 May. http://www.scotland.gov.uk/News/Releases/2012/05/school-tablet-piloting16052012.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, R. 2013. The tablet inscribed: Writing instruction with the iPad. College Teaching 61 (1): 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Twining, P., R. Broadie, D. Cook, K. Ford, D. Morris, A. Twiner, and J. Underwood. 2006. Educational change and ICT. Coventry: Becta.
   Google Scholar
• Welham, H. 2012. Go on – take the pill and join the tablet revolution says Clay. FE Week, 17 September.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, V. 1997. Focus groups: A useful qualitative method for educational research? British Educational Research Journal 23 (2): 209–24.
   Google Scholar