To grade or not to grade: balancing formative and summative assessment in post-16 teacher trainee observations

References

• Avis, J. 2003. Re-thinking trust in a performative culture: The case of education. Journal of Education Policy 18, no. 3: 315–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avis, J. 2005. Beyond performativity: Reflections on activist professionalism and the labour process in further education. Journal of Education Policy 20, no. 2: 209–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S. 2003. The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy 18, no. 2: 215–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S. 2004. Education reform as social Barberism: Economism and the end of authenticity. Scottish Educational Review 37, no. 1: 4–16.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P. and D. Wiliam. 1998. Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. London: Department of Education and Professional Studies, King's College.
   Google Scholar
• Bousted, M. and R. Hobby. 2012. This is your profession – so take charge of it. Times Educational Supplement, 12 October.
   Google Scholar
• Cockburn, J. 2005. Perspectives and politics of classroom observation. Research and Development Bulletin 3, no. 2: 45–56.
   Google Scholar
• Coffield, F. and B. Williamson. 2011. From exam factories to communities of discovery: The democratic route. London: Institute of Education, University of London.
   Google Scholar
• Cosh, J. 1998. Peer observation in higher education: A reflective approach. Innovations in Education and Training International 35, no. 2: 171–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fawbert, F. ed. 2003. Teaching in post-compulsory education: Learning skills and standards. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Gleeson, D., J. Davies, and E. Wheeler. 2005. On the making and taking of professionalism in the further education workplace. British Journal of Sociology of Education 26, no. 4: 445–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosling, D. 2005. Peer observation of teaching. Seda paper 118. London: Staff and Educational Development Association Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, C. and A. Noyes. 2009. New regimes of truth: The impact of performative school self-evaluation systems on teachers’ professional identities. Teaching and Teacher Education 25, no. 6: 850–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardman, J. 2007. The use of teaching observations in higher education. York: Education Subject Centre Advancing Learning and Teaching (ESCalate).
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A. and M. Fullan. 2012. Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harkin, J., R. Clow, and Y. Hillier. 2003. Recollected in tranquillity: FE teachers’ perceptions of their Initial Teacher Training. London: Learning and Skills Development Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins, D. 1993. A teacher’s guide to classroom research, 2nd ed. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. 2007. Are you being observed? Times Educational Supplement, Further Education, p. 1, 15 June.
   Google Scholar
• Nasta, T. 2007. Translating national standards into practice for the initial training of further education FE teachers in England. Research in Post-Compulsory Education 12, no. 1: 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Norrish, J. 1996. Mind the gap: Thoughts on self-help and non-judgmental observation in the classroom. http://www.zait.uni-bremen.de/wwwgast/tesl/_ej/ej05/a3.html.
   Google Scholar
• Ofsted. 2003. The initial training of further education teachers. London: Ofsted.
   Google Scholar
• Ofsted. 2006. The initial training of further education teachers: 1st annual report. London: Ofsted.
   Google Scholar
• Ofsted. 2009. The initial training of further education teachers: An overview 2004–2008. London: Ofsted.
   Google Scholar
• O’Leary, M. 2006. Can inspectors really improve the quality of teaching in the PCE sector? Classroom observations under the microscope. Research in Post-Compulsory Education 1, no. 2: 191–98.
   Google Scholar
• O’Leary, M. 2012. Surveillance, performativity and normalised practice: The use and impact of graded lesson observations in further education colleges. www.academia.edu.
   Google Scholar
• Ollin, R. 2009a. The grading of teaching observations: Implications for teacher educators in higher education partnership. Final report. Huddersfield: University of Huddersfield.
   Google Scholar
• Ollin, R. 2009b. What factors do tutors take into account when deciding whether a trainee’s teaching is outstanding? Journal of Vocational Education and Training Eighth International Conference, Researching Vocational Education and Training, 3–5 July. http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/55343.
   Google Scholar
• Orr, K. and R. Simmons. 2010. Dual identities: The in-service teacher training experience in the English further education sector. Journal of Vocational Education and Training 62, no. 1: 75–88.
   Google Scholar
• Peake, G. 2006. Observation of the practice of teaching. Consortium for Post-16 Compulsory Education and Training – Final report. Huddersfield: University of Huddersfield.
   Google Scholar
• Sachs, J. 2000. The activist professional. Journal of Educational Change 1: 77–95.
   Google Scholar
• Sachs, J. 2001. Teacher professional identity: Competing discourses, competing outcomes. Journal of Education Policy 16, no. 2: 149–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shortland, S. 2004. Peer observation: A tool for staff development or compliance? Journal of Further and Higher Education 28, no. 2: 219–28.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, P., C. Hall, and K. Jones. 2010. Maggie’s Day: A small scale analysis of English education policy. Journal of Education Policy 25, no. 5: 639–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, M. 1989. Developmental classroom observation. English Language Observation Journal 43, no. 2: 85–91.
   Google Scholar
• Wragg, E. 1994. An introduction to classroom observation. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar