Evaluating the efficacy of Masters coursework criteria sheets using a 10 question framework

References

• Australian Qualifications Framework Council. 2011. Australian Qualifications Framework. Australian Qualifications Framework Council. https://www.aqf.edu.au/Portals/0/Documents/Handbook/AustQuals%20FrmwrkFirstEditionJuly2011_FINAL.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, John B., Catherine So-kum Tang, and Society for Research into Higher Education. 2011. Teaching for Quality Learning at University : What the Student Does. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Bloxham, Sue, Birgit den-Outer, Jane Hudson, and Margaret Price. 2015. “Let’s Stop the Pretence of Consistent Marking: Exploring the Multiple Limitations of Assessment Criteria.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education: 1–16. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2015.1024607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloxham, Sue, Clair Hughes, and Lenore Adie. 2015. “What’s the Point of Moderation? A Discussion of the Purposes Achieved through Contemporary Moderation Practices.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education: 1–16. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2015.1039932.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud, David, and Associates. 2010. Assessment 2020: Seven Propositions for Assessment Reform in Higher Education. Sydney: Australian Learning and Teaching Council.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, David, and Elizabeth Molloy. 2013. “Rethinking Models of Feedback for Learning: The Challenge of Design.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 38 (6): 698–712. doi:10.1080/02602938.2012.691462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, David. 2006. “Differing Perceptions in the Feedback Process.” Studies in Higher Education 31 (2): 219–233. doi:10.1080/03075070600572132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castle, Paul, and Vancessa Incledon. 2008. “Enhancing Feedback: The Development of a Criterion-Based Marking Template for Students on a Sport Degree Programme.” The Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism (Oxford Brookes University) 7 (1):89–98. doi:10.3794/johlste.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christie, Michael, Peter Grainger, Robert Dahlgran, Kairen Call, Deborah Heck, and Susan E Simon. 2015. “Improving the Quality of Assessment Grading Tools in Master of Education Courses: A Comparative Case Study in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.” Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 15 (5):22–35. doi: 10.14434/josotl.v15i5.13783.
   Google Scholar
• Crimmins, G., G. Nash, F. Oprescu, K. Alla, G. Brock, B. Hickson-Jamieson, and C. Noakes. 2016. “Can a Systematic Assessment Moderation Process Assure the Quality and Integrity of Assessment Practice While Supporting the Professional Development of Casual Academics?” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 41 (3). doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1017754.
   Google Scholar
• Grainger, Peter, and Katie Weir. 2016. “An Alternative Grading Tool for Enhancing Assessment Practice and Quality Assurance in Higher Education.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 53 (1):73–83. doi: 10.1080/14703297.2015.1022200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grainger, Peter, Ken Purnell, and Reyna Zipf. 2008. “Judging Quality through Substantive Conversations between Markers.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 33 (2): 133–142. doi: 10.1080/02602930601125681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grainger, Peter, Lenore Adie, and Katie Weir. 2015. “Quality Assurance of Assessment and Moderation Discourses Involving Sessional Staff.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education: 41 (4): 548–559. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2015.1030333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendry, Graham D., Nikki Bromberger, and Susan Armstrong. 2011. “Constructive Guidance and Feedback for Learning: The Usefulness of Exemplars, Marking Sheets and Different Types of Feedback in a First Year Law Subject.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 36 (1):1–11. doi: 10.1080/02602930903128904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, Jean, and Etienne Wenger. 1991. Situated Learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511815355
   Google Scholar
• Li, J., and R. De Luca. 2014. “Assessment Feedback.” Studies in Higher Education 39 (2): 378–393. doi:10.1080/03075079.2012.709494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newmann, F. M., M. B. King, and D. L. Carmichael. 2009. Teaching for Authentic Intellectual Work: Standards and Scoring Criteria for Teachers’ Tasks, Student Performance, and Instruction. Minneapolis, MN: Tasora Books.
   Google Scholar
• Orsmond, Paul, Stephen J. Maw, Julian R. Park, Stephen Gomez, and Anne C. Crook. 2013. “Moving Feedback Forward: Theory to Practice.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 38 (2): 240–252. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2011.625472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, K., and N. Pilcher. 2014. “Contextualising Higher Education Assessment Task Words with an ‘Anti-Glossary’ Approach.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 27 (5): 604–625. doi:10.1080/09518398.2013.805443.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. Royce. 2010. “Fidelity as a Precondition for Integrity in Grading Academic Achievement.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (6): 727–743. doi: 10.1080/02602930902977756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwandt, Thomas A. 2007. The SAGE Dictionary of Qualitative Inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. doi: 10.4135/9781412986281.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, David W., Prem N. Shamdasani, and Dennis W. Rook. 2007. Focus Groups. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd. doi: 10.4135/9781412991841.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., and J. Corbin. 1990. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 2nd ed. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar