Patterns of talk in Foundation Year small group interaction: making the case for educational dialogue

References

• Alexander, R. 2020. A Dialogic Teaching Companion. London, UK/New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, R. A., and F. C. Hardman 2017. Changing Talk, Changing Thinking: Interim Report from the In-House Evaluation of the CPRT/UoY Dialogic Teaching Project. Research Report. University of York and Cambridge Primary Review Trust. http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/151061/1/Alexander_Hardman_hardman_2017_.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Austen, L., N. Pickering, and M. Judge. 2021. “Student Reflections on the Pedagogy of Transitions into Higher Education, Through Digital Storytelling.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 45: 337–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, M. J. 2020. “Types of Types of Educational Dialogue.” Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 100387. doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2020.100387.
   Google Scholar
• Berland, L. K., and B. J. Reiser. 2011. “Classroom Communities’ Adaptations of the Practice of Scientific Argumentation.” Science Education 95 (2): 191–216. doi:10.1002/sce.20420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanchette, J. 2009. “Characteristics of Teacher Talk and Learner Talk in the Online Learning Environment.” Language and Education 23 (5): 391–407. doi:10.1080/09500780802691736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brookfield, S. D., and S. Preskill. 2012. Discussion as a Way of Teaching: Tools and Techniques for Democratic Classrooms. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Calcagni, E., and L. Lago. 2018. “The Three Domains for Dialogue: A Framework for Analysing Dialogic Approaches to Teaching and Learning.” Learning 18: 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Chipperfield, S R. 2012. “The Effect of Group Diversity on Learning on a University-Based Foundation Course.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 36: 333–350.
   Google Scholar
• Chivers, E. 2019. “The Trials and Tribulations of Transition into Foundation Year Study.” Journal of the Foundation Year Network 69–78.
   Google Scholar
• Dafouz, E., J. Hüttner, and U. Smit. 2018. “New Contexts, New Challenges for TESOL: Understanding Disciplinary Reasoning in Oral Interactions in English‐Medium Instruction.” TESOL Quarterly 52 (3): 540–563. doi:10.1002/tesq.459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dampier, G., L A. Baker, C. Spencely, N J. Edwards, E. White, and A M. Taylor. 2019. “Avoiding the Deficit Model and Defining Student Success: Perspectives from a New Foundation Year Context.” Journal of the Foundation Year Network 41–52.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, W. M. 2009. “Groupwork as a Form of Assessment: Common Problems and Recommended Solutions.” Higher Education 58 (4): 563–584. doi:10.1007/s10734-009-9216-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doherty, C., M. Kettle, L. May, and E. Caukill. 2011. “Talking the Talk: Oracy Demands in First Year University Assessment Tasks.” Assessment in Education: Principles 18 (1): 27–39.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, ML, BB Epstein, and GM. Brosvic. 2001. “Immediate Feedback during Academic Testing.” Psychological Reports 88 (3): 889–894. doi:10.2466/pr0.2001.88.3.889.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felton, M., A. Crowell, M. Garcia-Mila, and C. Villarroel. 2019. “Capturing Deliberative Argument: An Analytic Coding Scheme for Studying Argumentative Dialogue and Its Benefits for Learning.” Learning, Culture and Social Interaction. doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.100350.
   Google Scholar
• Gravett, K., and R. Ajjawi. 2021. “Belonging as Situated Practice.” Studies in Higher Education 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardman, J. 2016. “Tutor–Student Interaction in Seminar Teaching: Implications for Professional Development.” Active Learning in Higher Education 17: 63–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennessy, S., E. Calcagni, A. Leung, and N. Mercer. 2021. “An Analysis of the Forms of teacher-student Dialogue that are Most Productive for Learning.” Language and Education 1–26. doi:10.1080/09500782.2021.1956943.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennessy, S., C. Howe, N. Mercer, and M. Vrikki. 2020. “Coding Classroom Dialogue: Methodological Considerations for Researchers.” Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 25: 100404. doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2020.100404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennessy, S., S. Rojas-Drummond, R. Higham, A. M. Márquez, F. Maine, R. M. Ríos, R. García-Carrión, O. Torreblanca, and M J. Barrera. 2016. “Developing a Coding Scheme for Analysing Classroom Dialogue across Educational Contexts.” Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 9: 16–44. doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2015.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heron, M. 2018. “Dialogic Stance in Higher Education Seminars.” Language and Education 32 (2): 112–126. doi:10.1080/09500782.2017.1417425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heron, M. 2019. “Pedagogic Practices to Support International Students in Seminar Discussions.” Higher Education Research & Development 38 (2): 266–279. doi:10.1080/07294360.2018.1512954.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heron, M., and D. Dippold. 2021. “Overview of classroom interaction: Definitions, models, practices and challenges.” In Meaningful Teaching Interaction at the Internationalised University, edited by D. Dippold and M. Heron, 3–12. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Heron, M., and D M. Palfreyman. 2021. Exploring Higher-Order Thinking in Higher Education Seminar Talk. College Teaching. doi:10.1080/87567555.2021.2018397.
   Google Scholar
• Hodges, C., S. Moore, B. Lockee, T. Trust, and A. Bond. 2020. “The Difference between Emergency Remote Teaching and Online Learning.” Educause Review 27 (1): 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Howe, C., S. Hennessy, N. Mercer, M. Vrikki, and L. Wheatley. 2019. “Teacher–student Dialogue during Classroom Teaching: Does It Really Impact on Student Outcomes?” Journal of the Learning Sciences 28 (4–5): 462–512. doi:10.1080/10508406.2019.1573730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe, C., A. Tolmie, A. Thurston, K. Topping, D. Christie, K. Livingston, E. Jessiman, and C. Donaldson. 2007. “Group Work in Elementary Science: Towards Organisational Principles for Supporting Pupil Learning.” Learning and Instruction 17 (5): 549–563. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leese, M. 2010. “Bridging the Gap: Supporting Student Transitions into Higher Education.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 34 (2): 239–251. doi:10.1080/03098771003695494.
   Google Scholar
• Lefstein, A. 2010. “More Helpful as Problem than Solution: Some Implications of Situating Dialogue in Classrooms.” In Educational Dialogues: Understanding and Promoting Productive Interaction, edited by K. Littleton and C. Howe, 170–191. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Liang, W., and D. Fung. 2021. “Fostering Critical Thinking in English-as-a-second-language Classrooms: Challenges and Opportunities.” Thinking Skills and Creativity 39: 100769. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludvigsen, K., R. Johan Krumsvik, and J. Breivik. 2020. “Behind the Scenes: Unpacking Student Discussion and Critical Reflection in Lectures.” British Journal of Educational Technology 51 (6): 2478–2494. doi:10.1111/bjet.12922.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McBrien, J. L., R. Cheng, and P. Jones. 2009. “Virtual Spaces: Employing a Synchronous Online Classroom to Facilitate Student Engagement in Online Learning.” International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 10 (3). doi:10.19173/irrodl.v10i3.605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, N. 2004. “Sociocultural Discourse Analysis: Analysing Classroom Talk as a Social Mode of Thinking.” Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice 1 (2): 137–168. doi:10.1558/japl.2004.1.2.137.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., and L. Dawes. 2008. “The Value of Exploratory Talk.” Exploring Talk in School 55–71.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., L. Dawes, R. Wegerif, and C. Sams. 2004. “Reasoning as a Scientist: Ways of Helping Children to Use Language to Learn Science.” British Educational Research Journal 30 (3): 359–377. doi:10.1080/01411920410001689689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., and C. Howe. 2012. “Explaining the Dialogic Processes of Teaching and Learning: The Value and Potential of Sociocultural Theory.” Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 12–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., and K. Littleton. 2007. Dialogue and the Development of Children's Thinking: A Sociocultural Approach. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Michaels, S., C. O’Connor, and L B. Resnick. 2008. “Deliberative Discourse Idealized and Realized: Accountable Talk in the Classroom and in Civic Life.” Studies in Philosophy and Education 27: 283–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monrouxe, L. V., and C. E. Rees. 2020. “When I Say … Quantification in Qualitative Research.” Medical Education 54 (3): 186–187. doi:10.1111/medu.14010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan, K, N Birda, J Robson, and N Winters. 2019. “Academic Identity, Confidence and Belonging: The Role of Contextualised Admissions and Foundation Years in Higher Education.” British Educational Research Journal 45 (3): 554–575. doi:10.1002/berj.3513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnick, L. B., C. S. Asterhan, and S. N. Clarke. 2018. Accountable Talk: Instructional Dialogue that Builds the Mind. Geneva, Switzerland: International Academy of Education (IAE) and the International Bureau of Education (IBE) of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).
   Google Scholar
• Ruthven, K., N. Mercer, K. S. Taber, P. Guardia, R. Hofmann, S. Ilie, S. Luthman, and F. Riga. 2017. “A research-informed dialogic-teaching Approach to Early Secondary School Mathematics and Science: The Pedagogical Design and Field Trial of the epiSTEMe Intervention.” Research Papers in Education 32 (1): 18–40. doi:10.1080/02671522.2015.1129642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, L., and A. Daly. 2013. “Building a Successful Foundation?: The Role of Foundation Year Courses in Preparing Students for Their Degree.” Widening Participation and Lifelong Learning 14: 42–56.
   Google Scholar
• Stokoe, E. H. 2000. “Constructing Topicality in University Students’ small-group Discussion: A Conversation Analytic Approach.” Language and Education 14 (3): 184–203. doi:10.1080/09500780008666789.
   Google Scholar
• Tenenbaum, H. R., N. E. Winstone, P. J. Leman, and R. E. Avery. 2020. “How Effective Is Peer Interaction in Facilitating Learning? A meta-analysis.” Journal of Educational Psychology 112 (7): 1303. doi:10.1037/edu0000436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrikki, M., R. Kershner, E. Calcagni, S. Hennessy, L. Lee, F. Hernández, N. Estrada, and F. Ahmed. 2019. “The Teacher Scheme for Educational Dialogue Analysis (T-SEDA): Developing a research-based Observation Tool for Supporting Teacher Inquiry into Pupils’ Participation in Classroom Dialogue.” International Journal of Research & Method in Education 42 (2): 185–203. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2018.1467890.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, P., and D. F. Treagust. 2006. “Using Exploratory Talk to Enhance problem-solving and Reasoning Skills in Grade-7 Science Classrooms.” Research in Science Education 36 (4): 381–401. doi:10.1007/s11165-005-9011-4.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. M., and A. Tolmie. 2000. “Conceptual Change in Biology: Group Interaction and the Understanding of Inheritance.” British Journal of Developmental Psychology 18 (4): 625–649. doi:10.1348/026151000165896.
   Google Scholar
• Winter, J., and H. Dismore. 2010. “Investigating the Experiences of Foundation Degree Students Progressing to an Honours Degree: An Integrated Approach.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 34: 253–270.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, N., P. Ghislandi, and S. Dellantonio. 2018. “Online Collaboration in a Large University Class Supports Quality Teaching.” Educational Technology Research and Development 66 (3): 671–691. doi:10.1007/s11423-017-9564-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar