Reimagining a framework for teachers’ continuous professional development during curriculum reform

References

• Allen, D. 2013. “Reconstructing Professional Learning Community as Collective Creation.” Improving Schools 16 (3): 191–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480213501056.
   Google Scholar
• Altinyelken, H. K. 2010. “Curriculum Change in Uganda: Teacher Perspectives on the new Thematic Curriculum.” International Journal of Educational Development 30 (2): 151–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2009.03.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appova, A., and F. Arbaugh. 2018. “Teachers’ Motivation to Learn: Implications for Supporting Professional Growth.” Professional Development in Education 44 (1): 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2017.1280524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority. 2022. “Australian Curriculum: Foundation-Year 10 (Version 9.0).” https://v9.australiancurriculum.edu.au/.
   Google Scholar
• Borko, H. 2004. “Professional Development and Teacher Learning: Mapping the Terrain.” Educational Researcher 33 (8): 3–15. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033008003.
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, Glenn A. 2009. “Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method.” Qualitative Research Journal 9 (2): 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027.
   Google Scholar
• Bredeson, P. V. 2000. “The School Principal's Role in Teacher Professional Development.” Journal of In-Service Education 26 (2): 385–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674580000200114.
   Google Scholar
• Broadhead, P. 2001. “Curriculum Change in Norway: Thematic Approaches, Active Learning and Pupil Cooperation - from Curriculum Design to Classroom Implementation.” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 45 (1): 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830020023375.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, D. 2014. “Audit of Mathematics Curriculum Policy Across 12 Jurisdictions”. https://ncca.ie/media/2031/audit-mathematics-curriculum-policy.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Connolly, C., E. Carr, and S. Knox. 2021. “Diving Deep Into Numeracy, Cross-Curricular Professional Development.” International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology 54 (6): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739x.2021.1986160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creemers, B., L. Kyriakides, and P. Antoniou. 2012. Teacher Professional Development for Improving Quality of Teaching.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., and M. W. McLaughlin. 2011. “Policies That Support Professional Development in an Era of Reform.” Phi Delta Kappan 92 (6): 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171109200622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department for Education. 2021. “The National Curriculum in England: Science and Programmes of Study.” https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-curriculum-in-england-science-programmes-of-study.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education. 2016. “Looking at Our School a Quality Framework for Primary Schools.” https://assets.gov.ie/25260/4a47d32bf7194c9987ed42cd898e612d.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education. 2017. “National Strategy: Literacy and Numeracy for learning and life 2011-2020.” https://assets.gov.ie/24960/93c455d4440246cf8a701b9e0b0a2d65.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education. 2021. “Preparation for Teaching and Learning - Guidance for All Primary and Special Schools.” https://ncca.ie/en/primary/preparation/.
   Google Scholar
• Desimone, L. M., and K. Pak. 2017. “Instructional Coaching as High-Quality Professional Development.” Theory Into Practice 56 (1): 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2016.1241947.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dooley, T., E. Dunphy, G. Shiel, M. O’Connor, and J. Travers. 2014. “Mathematics in Early Childhood and Primary Education (3-8 Years).” Teaching and Learning 18: 164. https://ncca.ie/media/2147/ncca_research_report_18.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• DuFour, R., and R. DuFour. 2013. Learning by Doing: A Handbook for Professional Learning Communities at Work TM. Bloomington: Solution Tree Press.
   Google Scholar
• Du Plessis, E. 2013. “Insights from Returning Teachers’ Exposure to Curriculum Change and Professional Development.” Acta Academica 45 (1): 58–78.
   Google Scholar
• European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training. 2008. The Shift to Learning Outcomes: Conceptual, Political and Practical Developments in Europe. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publication of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• Garet, M. S., A. C. Porter, L. Desimone, B. F. Birman, and K. S. Yoon. 2001. “What Makes Professional Development Effective? Results from a National Sample of Teachers.” American Educational Research Journal 38 (4): 915–945. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038004915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilleece, L., S. Nelis, C. Fitzgerald, and J. Cosgrove. 2020. “Reading, Mathematics and Science Achievement in DEIS Schools: Evidence from PISA, 2018.” https://www.erc.ie/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/ERC-DEIS-PISA-2018-Report1_Sept-2020_A4_Website.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. R. 1999. Evaluating Professional Development. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nuig/detail.action?docID=6261895.
   Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. R. 2003. “What Makes Professional Development Effective?” Phi Delta Kappan 84 (10): 748–750. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170308401007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy, I., and K. Rönnerman. 2011. “The Value and Valuing of Continuing Professional Development: Current Dilemmas, Future Directions and the Case for Action Research.” Cambridge Journal of Education 41 (4): 461–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2011.625004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harford, J. 2010. “Teacher Education Policy in Ireland and the Challenges of the Twenty-First Century.” European Journal of Teacher Education 33 (4): 349–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2010.509425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A. 2014. Handbook of Professional Development in Education: Successful Models and Practices, PreK-12. New York: Guilford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, E., R. Berry, Y. C. Lai, P. Leung, D. Scott, and G. Stobart. 2013. “Teachers’ Experiences of Autonomy in Continuing Professional Development: Teacher Learning Communities in London and Hong Kong.” Teacher Development 17 (1): 19–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2012.748686.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A, and M Jones. 2015. “Beyond Four Walls?: Professional Learning Communities within and Between Schools.” Australian Educational Leader 37 (4): 10–12.
   Google Scholar
• Hertz, B., H. Grainger Clemson, D. Tasic Hansen, D. Laurillard, M. Murray, L. Fernandes, A. Gilleran, D. Rojas Ruiz, and D. Rutkauskiene. 2022. “A Pedagogical Model for Effective Online Teacher Professional Development—Findings from the Teacher Academy Initiative of the European Commission.” European Journal of Education 57 (1): 142–159. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunzicker, J. 2011. “Effective Professional Development for Teachers: A Checklist.” Professional Development in Education 37 (2): 177–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2010.523955.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, A. 2005. “Models of Continuing Professional Development: A Framework for Analysis.” Journal of In-Service Education 31 (2): 235–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674580500200277.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, A. 2014. “Understanding Continuing Professional Development: The Need for Theory to Impact on Policy and Practice.” Professional Development in Education 40 (5): 688–697. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2014.955122.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, M. 2016. “How Does Professional Development Improve Teaching?” Review of Educational Research 86 (4): 945–980. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, D. S. 2012. “Assessing the Cost of Instructional Coaching.” Journal of Education Finance 38 (1): 52–80.
   Google Scholar
• LaChausse, R. G., K. R. Clark, and S. Chapple. 2014. “Beyond Teacher Training: The Critical Role of Professional Development in Maintaining Curriculum Fidelity.” Journal of Adolescent Health 54 (3, Supplement): S53–S58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.12.029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieber, J., G. Butera, M. Hanson, S. Palmer, E. Horn, C. Czaja, K. Diamond, et al. 2009. “Factors That Influence the Implementation of a New Preschool Curriculum: Implications for Professional Development.” Early Education & Development 20 (3): 456–481. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409280802506166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López-Pastor, V. M., R. Monjas, and J. C. Manrique. 2011. “Fifteen Years of Action Research as Professional Development: Seeking More Collaborative, Useful and Democratic Systems for Teachers.” Educational Action Research 19 (2): 153–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2011.569190.
   Google Scholar
• Loucks-Horsley, S., K. E. Stiles, S. E. Mundry, N. B. Love, and P. W. Hewson. 2009. Designing Professional Development for Teachers of Science and Mathematics. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nuig/detail.action?docID=996256.
   Google Scholar
• McMillan, D. J., B. McConnell, and H. O’Sullivan. 2016. “Continuing Professional Development – Why Bother? Perceptions and Motivations of Teachers in Ireland.” Professional Development in Education 42 (1): 150–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2014.952044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNiff, J., and J. Whitehead. 2009. “Demonstrating Quality in Educational Research for Social Accountability.” In The Sage Handbook of Educational Action Research, edited by Susan Noffke and Bridget Somekh, 313–323. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education, M. 2020. “The Ontario Curriculum Grades 1-8: Mathematics.” https://www.dcp.edu.gov.on.ca/en/curriculum/elementary-mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Murchan, D., A. Loxley, and K. Johnston. 2009. “Teacher Learning and Policy Intention: Selected Findings from an Evaluation of a Large-Scale Programme of Professional Development in the Republic of Ireland.” European Journal of Teacher Education 32 (4): 455–471. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619760903247292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. 2014. Principles to Actions: Ensuring Mathematical Success for All.
   Google Scholar
• NCCA. 1999. “Primary School Curriculum: Mathematics.” https://www.curriculumonline.ie/getmedia/9df5f3c5-257b-471e-8d0f-f2cf059af941/PSEC02_Mathematics_Curriculum.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• NCCA. 2005. “Primary Curriculum Review, Phase 1 Final Report with Recommendations.” https://ncca.ie/media/1497/primary_curriculum_review_phase_1_final_report_with_recommendations_8.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• NCCA. 2016. “Background Paper and Brief for the development of a new Primary Mathematics Curriculum.” https://ncca.ie/media/1341/maths_background_paper_131016_tc.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• NCCA. 2022. Primary Mathematics Curriculum Draft Specification for Consultation.” https://ncca.ie/en/resources/draft-primary-mathematics-curriculum-dr%C3%A9acht-churaclam-matamaitice-na-bunscoile/.
   Google Scholar
• O'Connor, E. 2023. Primary Mathematics Curriculum–Initial Information. Dublin: Department of Education. https://www.ippn.ie/images/Esceal/Initial_Communication_Primary_Mathematics_Curriculum_Eng.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. 2010. Teaching and Learning International Survey. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264079861-en
   Google Scholar
• O’Shea, J., and A. M. Leavy. 2013. “Teaching Mathematical Problem-Solving from an Emergent Constructivist Perspective: The Experiences of Irish Primary Teachers.” Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 16 (4): 293–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-013-9235-6.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, L. C., and W. Moomaw. 2005. “The Relationship Between Teacher Autonomy and Stress, Work Satisfaction, Empowerment, and Professionalism.” Educational Research Quarterly 29 (1): 38–54.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, R., and A. Clerkin. (2020). TIMSS 2019: Ireland's Results in Mathematics and Science.
   Google Scholar
• Postholm, M. B. 2018. “Teachers’ Professional Development in School: A Review Study.” Cogent Education 5 (1): 1522781. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1522781.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power, K., and K. Goodnough. 2019. “Fostering Teachers’ Autonomous Motivation During Professional Learning: A Self-Determination Theory Perspective.” Teaching Education 30 (3): 278–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2018.1465035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prendergast, M., and P. Treacy. 2018. “Curriculum Reform in Irish Secondary Schools – a Focus on Algebra.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 50 (1): 126–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2017.1313315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roehrig, G. H., and R. A. Kruse. 2005. “The Role of Teachers’ Beliefs and Knowledge in the Adoption of a Reform-Based Curriculum.” School Science and Mathematics 105 (8): 412–422. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2005.tb18061.x.
   Google Scholar
• Sarakar, A. M. 2008. Japan's National Curriculum Reforms: Focus on Integrated Curriculum Approach.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, G. 2015. “The Impact of a Professional Development Programme on Primary Teachers’ Classroom Practice and Pupils’ Attitudes to Science.” Research in Science Education 45 (2): 215–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-014-9420-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugrue, C. 2011. “Irish Teachers’ Experience of Professional Development: Performative or Transformative Learning?” Professional Development in Education 37 (5): 793–815. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2011.614821.
   Google Scholar
• Tam, A. C. F. 2015. “The Role of a Professional Learning Community in Teacher Change: A Perspective from Beliefs and Practices.” Teachers and Teaching 21 (1): 22–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2014.928122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teemant, A. 2014. “A Mixed-Methods Investigation of Instructional Coaching for Teachers of Diverse Learners.” Urban Education 49 (5): 574–604. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085913481362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warnock, J. M., M. Gibson-Sweet, and C. J. Van Nieuwerburgh. 2022. “The Perceived Benefits of Instructional Coaching for Teachers.” International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education 11 (3): 328–334. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijmce-01-2021-0030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yigit, C., and B. Bagceci. 2017. “Teachers’ Opinions Regarding the Usage of Action Research in Professional Development.” Journal of Education and Training Studies 5 (2): 243–252. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v5i2.1878.
   Google Scholar
• Zehetmeier, S., I. Andreitz, W. Erlacher, and F. Rauch. 2015. “Researching the Impact of Teacher Professional Development Programmes Based on Action Research, Constructivism, and Systems Theory.” Educational Action Research 23 (2): 162–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2014.997261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar