153
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Using an ‘effective’ model of professional development in science education to improve primary teachers’ classroom practice: the CSSP experience

ORCID Icon &
Received 11 Jul 2023, Accepted 27 May 2024, Published online: 03 Jun 2024

References

  • Abell, S. K., M. A. P. Rogers, D. L. Hanuscin, M. H. Lee, and M. J. Gagnon. 2009. “Preparing the Next Generation of Science Teacher-Educators: A Model for Developing PCK for Teaching Science Teachers.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 20 (1): 77–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-008-9115-6
  • Brookfield, S. 1995. Becoming a Critically Reflective Teacher. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
  • Conway, P. F., R. Murphy, A. Rath, and K. Hall. 2009. Learning to Teach and its Implications for Continuum of Teaching Education: A Nine-Country Cross-National Study. Maynooth: Teaching Council of Ireland.
  • Darling-Hammond, L., M. E. Hyler, and M. Gardner. 2017. Effective Teacher Professional Development. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute. Available at: https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/sites/default/files/product-files/Effective_Teacher_Professional_Development_REPORT.pdf.
  • Darling-Hammond, L., R. C. Wei, A. Andree, N. Richardson, and S. Orphanos. 2009. “State of the Profession: Study Measures Status of Professional Development.” Journal of Staff Development 30 (2): 42–50.
  • Daza, V., G. B. Gudmundsdottir, and A. Lund. 2021. “Partnerships as Third Spaces for Professional Practice in Initial Teacher Education: A Scoping Review.” Teaching and Teacher Education 102: 103338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103338
  • Delahunty, T., M. Prendergast, and M. Ní Ríordáin. 2021. “Teachers’ Perspectives on Achieving an Integrated Curricular Model of Primary STEM Education in Ireland: Authentic or Utopian Ideology.” Frontiers in Education 6. ISSN 2504-284X
  • De Paor, C. 2016. “The Impact of School-Based Continuing Professional Development: Views of Teachers and Support Professionals.” Irish Educational Studies 35 (3): 289–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2016.1192482
  • Department of Education and Science (DES). 1999. Primary School Curriculum: Science. Dublin: The Stationery Office.
  • Department of Education and Skills (DES). 2016. STEM Education in the Irish School System: A Report on Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Education. Dublin: Government Publications.
  • Department of Education and Skills (DES). 2017a. STEM Education Policy Statement 2017–2026. Dublin: Government Publications.
  • Department of Education and Skills (DES). 2017b. STEM Education Implementation Plan: 2017-2019. Dublin: Government Publications.
  • Desimone, L. M. 2009. “Improving Impact Studies of Teachers’ Professional Development: Toward Better Conceptualizations and Measures.” Educational Researcher 38 (3): 181–199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140
  • Dogan, S., R. Pringle, and J. Mesa. 2016. “The Impact of Professional Learning Communities on Science Teachers’ Knowledge, Practice and Student Learning: A Review.” Professional Development in Education 42 (4): 569–588. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2015.1065899
  • Gess-Newsome, J. 2013. “Pedagogical Content Knowledge.” In International Guide to Student Achievement, edited by J. Hattie, and E. M. Anderman, 257–259. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Giordano, E. A. 2008. School Clusters and Teacher Resource Centres. UNESCO. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0015/001597/159776e.pdf.
  • Glaser, B. G., and A. L. Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
  • Goodnough, K., S. Pelech, and M. Stordy. 2014. “Effective Professional Development in STEM Education: The Perceptions of Primary/Elementary Teachers.” Teacher Education and Practice 27 (2/3): 402–423.
  • Gough, A. 2015. “STEM Policy and Science Education: Scientistic Curriculum and Sociopolitical Silences.” Cultural Studies of Science Education 10 (2): 445–458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-014-9590-3
  • Guskey, T. R. 2002. “Professional Development and Teacher Change.” Teachers and Teaching 8 (3): 381–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/135406002100000512
  • Guskey, T. R. 2003. “What Makes Professional Development Effective?” Phi Delta Kappan 84 (10): 748–750. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170308401007. http://tguskey.com/wp-content/uploads/Professional-Learning-6-What-Makes-Professional-Development-Effective.pdf.
  • Hargreaves, A., and M. T. O’Connor. 2018. Leading Collaborative Professionalism. California: California Corwin Press.
  • Hogan, P., A. Brosnan, B. deRóiste, A. MacAlister, A. Malone, N. Quirke-Bolt, and G. Smith. 2007. Learning Anew: Final Report of the Teaching and Learning for the 21st Century, Project 2003-2007. Maynooth: NUI Maynooth.
  • Hord, S. M. 2009. “Professional Learning Communities.” National Staff Development Council 30 (1): 40–43.
  • Hourigan, M., A. O’Dwyer, A. M. Leavy, and E. Corry. 2022. “Integrated STEM – a Step Too far in Primary Education Contexts?” Irish Educational Studies 41 (4): 687–711. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2021.1899027.
  • INTO (Irish National Teachers Organisation). 2016. “Teaching in the 21st Century: 100 Years of Teaching 1916–2016.” Discussion document and proceedings of the consultative conference on education 2016.
  • INTO (Irish National Teachers Organisation). 2023. The Future of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) in Irish Education. https://www.google.ie/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwiYxcOZ_uD_AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.into.ie%2Fpublication%2Finto-submission-on-the-future-of-science-technology-engineering-and-mathematics-stem-in-irish-education%2F&psig=AOvVaw3wElH9LREOvZtroefStKY6&ust=1687870551775977&opi=89978449.
  • Kennedy, A. 2005. “Models of Continuing Professional Development: A Framework for Analysis.” Journal of In-Service Education 31 (2): 235–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674580500200277
  • Kennedy, A. 2014. “Understanding Continuing Professional Development: The Need for Theory to Impact Policy and Practice.” Professional Development in Education 40 (5): 688–697. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2014.955122
  • Lodge, A., and D. Tuohy. 2016. Value for Learning: Study of Small Irish Protestant Primary Schools. Summary Report. Dublin: Dublin City University (DCU).
  • Loucks-Horsley, S., N. Love, K. E. Stiles, S. E. Mundry, and P. Hewson. 2010. Designing Professional Development for Teachers of Science and Mathematics (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  • Malone, A., and G. Smith. 2010. “Developing Schools as Professional Learning Communities: The TL21 Experience.” US-China Education Review 7 (9): 106–114.
  • McLoughlin, E., D. Butler, S. Kaya, and E. Costello. 2020. “STEM Education in Schools: What Can We Learn from the Research?” ATS STEM Report #1. Ireland: Dublin City University. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3673728.
  • Mulryan-Kyne, C. 2005. “The Grouping Practices of Teachers in Small two-Teacher Schools in the Republic of Ireland.” Journal of Research in Rural Education 20 (17): 1–14.
  • Murphy, C., N. Broderick, and B. Mallon. 2020. “Primary Science in Ireland – 17 Years on.” Irish Teachers’ Journal 8: 141–155.
  • Murphy, C., C. Murphy, and K. Kilfeather. 2011. “Children Making Sense of Science.” Research in Science Education 41 (2): 283–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-010-9165-6
  • Murphy, C., H. Venkat, M. Leahy, N. Broderick, O. Kelly, D. Butler, L. Harbison, C. Lawlor, and Y. Naughton. 2023. STEM Education: Curriculum & Literature Overview & Primary Science Education: Systematic Literature Review. Dublin: National Council for Curriculum and Assessment.
  • NCCA (National Council for Curriculum and Assessment). 2023. Primary Curriculum Framework for Primary and Special Schools. Dublin: NCCA. https://www.curriculumonline.ie/getmedia/84747851-0581-431b-b4d7-dc6ee850883e/2023-Primary-Framework-ENG-screen.pdf.
  • O'Meara, N., and F. Faulkner. 2021. “Professional Development for out-of-Field Post-Primary Teachers of Mathematics: An Analysis of the Impact of Mathematics Specific Pedagogy Training.” Irish Educational Studies 41 (2): 389–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2021.1899026.
  • Opfer, V. D., and D. Pedder. 2011. “The Lost Promise of Teacher Professional Development in England.” European Journal of Teacher Education 34 (1): 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2010.534131
  • O’Sullivan, H., B. McConnell, and D. McMillan. 2011. Unpublished Report: Continuous Professional Development and its Impact on Practice: A North-South Comparative Study of Irish Teachers’ Perceptions, Experiences and Motivations. Armagh: ScoTENS.
  • Patton, M. Q. 2002. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Robson, C. 2002. Real World Research. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Schön, D. A. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.
  • Shulman, L. S. 1986. “Those who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching.” Educational Researcher 15 (2): 4–14. https://doi.org/10.2307/1175860
  • Smith, G. 2014. “An Innovative Model of Professional Development to Enhance the Teaching and Learning of Primary Science in Irish Schools.” Professional Development in Education 40 (3): 467–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2013.830274
  • Smith, G. 2015. “The Impact of a Professional Development Programme on Primary Teachers’ Classroom Practice and Pupils’ Attitudes to Science.” Research in Science Education 45 (2): 215–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-014-9420-3
  • Stoll, L., R. Bolam, A. McMahon, S. Thomas, and M. Wallace. 2005. “Creating and Sustaining Effective Professional Learning Communities: A Review of the Literature.” Journal of educational change 7 (4): 221–258.
  • Teaching Council of Ireland. 2011. Policy on the continuum of teacher education [online]. http://www.teachingcouncil.ie/_fileupload/Teacher%20Education/FINAL%20TC_Policy_Paper_SP.pdf.
  • UNESCO. 2015. Incheon Declaration and SDGE - Education 2030 Framework for Action. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0024/002456/245656E.pdf.
  • Varley, J., C. Murphy, and O. Veale. 2008. Science in Primary Schools: Phase 1 Final Report. Dublin: NCCA. http://www.ncca.ie/uploadedfiles/primary/Binder1.pdf.