Valuation of variable annuities with guaranteed minimum maturity benefits and periodic fees

References

• Ai, M. & Zhang, Z. (2022). Pricing some life-contingent lookback options under regime-switching Lévy models. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 407(2), 114082.
   Google Scholar
• Ai, M., Zhang, Z. & Zhu, D. (2023). Valuing variable annuities with path-dependent surrender guarantees under regime-switching Lévy models. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal 2023(4), 330–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alonso-García, J., Wood, O. & Ziveyi, J. (2018). Pricing and hedging guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefits under a general Lévy framework using the COS method. Quantitative Finance 18(6), 1049–1075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asmussen, S. (2008). Applied probability and queues. Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Bacinello, A. R., Millossovich, P. & Montealegre, A. (2016). The valuation of GMWB variable annuities under alternative fund distributions and policyholder behaviours. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal 2016(5), 446–465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, D., Kling, A. & Russ, J. (2008). A universal pricing framework for guaranteed minimum benefits in variable annuities. ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA 38(2), 621–651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard, C., Cui, Z. & Vanduffel, S. (2017). Impact of flexible periodic premiums on variable annuity guarantees. North American Actuarial Journal 21(1), 63–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard, C., Hardy, M. & MacKay, A. (2014). State-dependent fees for variable annuity guarantees. ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA 44(3), 559–585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard, C. & MacKay, A. (2015). Reducing surrender incentives through fee structure in variable annuities. In Innovations in quantitative risk management. Cham: Springer. P. 209–223.
   Google Scholar
• Bernard, C., MacKay, A. & Muehlbeyer, M. (2014). Optimal surrender policy for variable annuity guarantees. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 55, 116–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard, C. & Moenig, T. (2019). Where less is more: reducing variable annuity fees to benefit policyholder and insurer. Journal of Risk and Insurance 86(3), 761–782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buffington, J. & Elliott, R. J. (2002). American options with regime switching. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance 5(05), 497–514.
   Google Scholar
• Cui, Z., Feng, R. & MacKay, A. (2017). Variable annuities with VIX-linked fee structure under a Heston-type stochastic volatility model. North American Actuarial Journal 21(3), 458–483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui, Z., Kirkby, J. L. & Nguyen, D. (2017). Equity-linked annuity pricing with cliquet-style guarantees in regime-switching and stochastic volatility models with jumps. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 74, 46–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui, Z., Lars Kirkby, J. & Nguyen, D. (2019). Continuous-time Markov Chain and regime switching approximations with applications to options pricing. In Modeling, stochastic control, optimization, and applications. Springer. P. 115–146.
   Google Scholar
• Cui, Z. & Taylor, S. (2021). Pricing discretely monitored barrier options under Markov processes through Markov Chain approximation. The Journal of Derivatives 28(3), 8–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui, Z. & Yu, Z. (2021). A model-free Fourier cosine method for estimating the risk-neutral density. The Journal of Derivatives 29(2), 149–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai, M., Kuen Kwok, Y. & Zong, J. (2008). Guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefit in variable annuities. Mathematical Finance: An International Journal of Mathematics, Statistics and Financial Economics 18(4), 595–611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, F. & Oosterlee, C. W. (2008). A novel pricing method for European options based on Fourier-cosine series expansions. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 31(2), 826–848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, F. & Oosterlee, C. W. (2009). Pricing early-exercise and discrete barrier options by Fourier-cosine series expansions. Numerische Mathematik 114(1), 27–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, R. (2018). An introduction to computational risk management of equity-linked insurance. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Feng, R., Gan, G. & Zhang, N. (2022). Variable annuity pricing, valuation, and risk management: a survey. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal 2022(10), 867–900.
   Google Scholar
• Feng, R. & Volkmer, H. W. (2012). Analytical calculation of risk measures for variable annuity guaranteed benefits. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 51(3), 636–648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber, H. U., Shiu, E. S. & Yang, H. (2012). Valuing equity-linked death benefits and other contingent options: a discounted density approach. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 51(1), 73–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber, H. U., Shiu, E. S. & Yang, H. (2013). Valuing equity-linked death benefits in jump diffusion models. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 53(3), 615–623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeon, J. & Kwak, M. (2018). Optimal surrender strategies and valuations of path-dependent guarantees in variable annuities. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 83, 93–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, Z., Qian, L., Wang, W. & Wang, R. (2016). Pricing dynamic fund protections with regime switching. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 297, 13–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, B., Shen, Y., Zhu, D. & Ziveyi, J. (2022). Valuation of guaranteed minimum maturity benefits under generalised regime-switching models using the Fourier cosine method. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 105, 96–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kélani, A. & Quittard-Pinon, F. (2017). Pricing and hedging variable annuities in a Lévy market: a risk management perspective. Journal of Risk and Insurance 84(1), 209–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkby, J. L. (2023). Hybrid equity swap, cap, and floor pricing under stochastic interest by Markov Chain approximation. European Journal of Operational Research 305(2), 961–978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkby, J. & Aguilar, J.-P. (2023). Valuation and optimal surrender of variable annuities with guaranteed minimum benefits and periodic fees. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal 2023(6), 624–654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkby, J. L. & Nguyen, D. (2020). Efficient asian option pricing under regime switching jump diffusions and stochastic volatility models. Annals of Finance 16(3), 307–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkby, J. L. & Nguyen, D. (2021). Equity-linked guaranteed minimum death benefits with dollar cost averaging. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 100, 408–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolkiewicz, A. W. & Lin, F. S. (2017). Pricing surrender risk in ratchet equity-index annuities under regime-switching Lévy processes. North American Actuarial Journal 21(3), 433–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landriault, D., Li, B., Li, D. & Wang, Y. (2021). High-water mark fee structure in variable annuities. Journal of Risk and Insurance 88(4), 1057–1094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, X., Tsai, C. C.-L. & Lu, Y. (2016). Valuing guaranteed equity-linked contracts under piecewise constant forces of mortality. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 70, 150–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longstaff, F. A. & Schwartz, E. S. (2001). Valuing American options by simulation: a simple least-squares approach. The Review of Financial Studies 14(1), 113–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milevsky, M. A. & Posner, S. E. (2001). The titanic option: valuation of the guaranteed minimum death benefit in variable annuities and mutual funds. The Journal of Risk and Insurance 68(1), 93–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, Y., Sherris, M. & Ziveyi, J. (2016). Valuation of guaranteed minimum maturity benefits in variable annuities with surrender options. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 69, 127–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siu, C. C., Yam, S. C. P. & Yang, H. (2015). Valuing equity-linked death benefits in a regime-switching framework. ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA 45(2), 355–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tour, G., Thakoor, N., Khaliq, A. & Tangman, D. (2018). COS method for option pricing under a regime-switching model with time-changed Lévy processes. Quantitative Finance 18(4), 673–692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., Zhang, Z. & Yu, W. (2021). Pricing equity-linked death benefits by complex fourier series expansion in a regime-switching jump diffusion model. Applied Mathematics and Computation 399, 126031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, W. & Zhu, D. (2022). Generic improvements to least squares Monte Carlo methods with applications to optimal stopping problems. European Journal of Operational Research 298(3), 1132–1144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, J. & Zhang, Z. (2021). Finite-time dividend problems in a Lévy risk model under periodic observation. Applied Mathematics and Computation 398, 125981.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., Su, W. & Zhang, Z. (2019). Estimating the discounted density of the deficit at ruin by Fourier cosine series expansion. Statistics & Probability Letters 146, 147–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z. (2017). Approximating the density of the time to ruin via Fourier-cosine series expansion. ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA 47(1), 169–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z. & Yong, Y. (2019). Valuing guaranteed equity-linked contracts by Laguerre series expansion. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 357, 329–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z., Yong, Y. & Yu, W. (2020). Valuing equity-linked death benefits in general exponential Lévy models. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 365, 112377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar