What is fair? Proxy discrimination vs. demographic disparities in insurance pricing

References

• Agarwal, A., Dudik, M., & Wu, Z. S. (2019). Fair regression: Quantitative definitions and reduction-based algorithms. arXiv: 1905.12843.
   Google Scholar
• Araiza Iturria, C. A., Hardy, M., & Marriott, P. (2022). A discrimination-free premium under a causal framework (SSRN Manuscript ID 4079068).
   Google Scholar
• Avraham, R., Logue, K. D., & Schwarcz, D. B. (2014). Understanding insurance anti-discrimination laws. Southern California Law Review, 87(2), 195–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awasthi, P., Cortes, C., Mansour, Y., & Mohri, M. (2020). Beyond individual and group fairness. arXiv: 2008.09490.
   Google Scholar
• Barocas, S., Hardt, M., & Narayanan, A. (2019). Fairness and machine learning: Limitations and opportunities. https://fairmlbook.org/
   Google Scholar
• Binns, R. (2020). On the apparent conflict between individual and group fairness. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (pp. 514–524). Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Buolamwini, J., & Gebru, T. (2018). Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. In Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research (Vol. 81, pp. 77–91). PMLR.
   Google Scholar
• Charpentier, A. (2022). Insurance: Discrimination, biases & fairness. In Institut Louis Bachelier, Opinions & Débates, No25, July 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Charpentier, A., Hu, F., & Ratz, P. (2023). Mitigating discrimination in insurance with Wasserstein barycenters. arXiv: 2306.12912.
   Google Scholar
• Chiappa, S., Jiang, R., Stepleton, T., Pacchiano, A., Jiang, H., & Aslanides, J. (2020). A general approach to fairness with optimal transport. In Proceedings of the 34th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 34, No. 04). AAAI-20 Technical Tracks 4 .
   Google Scholar
• Chibanda, K. F. (2021). Defining discrimination in insurance. In CAS research papers: A special series on race and insurance pricing. https://www.casact.org/publications-research/research/research-paper-series-race-and-insurance-pricing
   Google Scholar
• Chzhen, E., Denis, C., Hebiri, M., Oneto, L., & Pontil, M. (2020). Fair regression with Wasserstein barycenters. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, 7321–7331.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, T., Greenall, A., & Sheehy, E. (2022). Discriminatory pricing: Exploring the ‘ethnicity penalty’ in the insurance market. Citizens Advice. https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/Global/CitizensAdvice/Consumer%20publications/Report%20cover/Citizens%20Advice%20-%20Discriminatory%20Pricing%20report%20(4).pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cuturi, M., & Doucet, A. (2014). Fast computation of Wasserstein barycenters. In Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR.
   Google Scholar
• Delbaen, F., & Majumdar, C. (2023). Approximation with independent random variables. Frontiers of Mathematical Finance, 2/2, 141–149. https://doi.org/10.3934/fmf.2023011
   Google Scholar
• del Barrio, E., Gamboa, F., Grodaliza, P., & Loubes, J.-P. (2019). Obtaining fairness using optimal transport theory. In Proceedings of the 36st International Conference on Machine Learning, Long Beach, California. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research (Vol. 97, pp. 2357–2365). PMLR.
   Google Scholar
• Djehiche, B., & Löfdahl, B. (2016). Nonlinear reserving in life insurance: Aggregation and mean-field approximation. Insurance: Mathematics & Economics, 69, 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwork, C., Hardt, M., Pitassi, T., Reingold, O., & Zemel, R. (2012). Fairness through awareness. In Proceedings of the 3rd Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (pp. 214–226). Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• EIOPA (2021). Artificial intelligence governance principles: Towards ethical and trustworthy artificial intelligence in the European insurance sector (A report from EIOPA's Consultative Expert Group on Digital Ethics in Insurance).
   Google Scholar
• EIOPA (2023). EIOPA supervisory statement takes aim at unfair ‘price walking’ practices. March 16, 2023. https://www.eiopa.europa.eu/eiopa-supervisory-statement-takes-aim-unfair-price-walking-practices-2023-03-16_en
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2012). Guidelines on the application of COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 2004/113/EC to insurance, in the light of the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Case C-236/09 (Test-Achats). Official Journal of the European Union (Vol. C11, pp. 1–11).
   Google Scholar
• European Council (2004). COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 2004/113/EC – implementing the principle of equal treatment between men and women in the access to and supply of goods and services. Official Journal of the European Union (Vol. L 373, pp. 37–43).
   Google Scholar
• Financial Conduct Authority (2021). General insurance pricing practices market study: Feedback to CP20/19 and final rules (Policy Statement PS21/5).
   Google Scholar
• Frees, E. W. J., & Huang, F. (2022). The discriminating (pricing) actuary. North American Actuarial Journal, 27(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/10920277.2021.1951296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedler, S., Scheidegger, C., & Venkatasubramanian, S. (2016). On the (im)possibility of fairness. arXiv: 1609.07236.
   Google Scholar
• Grari, V., Charpentier, A., Lamprier, S., & Detyniecki, M. (2022). A fair pricing model via adversarial learning. arXiv: 2202.12008v2.
   Google Scholar
• Hardt, M., Price, E., & Srebro, N. (2016). Equality of opportunity in supervised learning. In Advances in neural information processing systems (pp. 3315–3323). Curran Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Hedden, B. (2021). On statistical criteria of algorithmic fairness. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 49(2), 209–231. https://doi.org/10.1111/papa.v49.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilbertus, N., Rojas Carulla, M., Parascandolo, G., Hardt, M., Janzing, D., & Schölkopf, B. (2017). Avoiding discrimination through causal reasoning. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (pp. 656–666). Curran Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Kleinberg, J., Mullainathan, S., & Raghavan, M. (2016). Inherent trade-offs in the fair determination of risk scores. arXiv: 1609.05807.
   Google Scholar
• Kusner, M. J., Loftus, J., Russell, C., & Silva, R. (2017). Counterfactual fairness. In Advances in neural information processing systems (pp. 4066–4076). Curran Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Lahoti, P., Gummadi, K. P., & Weikum, G. (2019). iFair: Learning individually fair data representations for algorithmic decision making. In IEEE 35th International Conference on Data Engineering (pp. 1334–1345).
   Google Scholar
• Lindholm, M., Richman, R., Tsanakas, A., & Wüthrich, M. V. (2022). Discrimination-free insurance pricing. ASTIN Bulletin, 52(2), 55–89. https://doi.org/10.1017/asb.2021.23
   Google Scholar
• Lindholm, M., Richman, R., Tsanakas, A., & Wüthrich, M. V. (2023). A multi-task network approach for calculating discrimination-free insurance prices. European Actuarial Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13385-023-00367-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loader, C., Sun, J., & Liaw, A., & Lucent Technologies (2022). locfit: Local regression, likelihood and density estimation. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/locfit/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Maliszewska-Nienartowicz, J. (2014). Direct and indirect discrimination in European union law – how to draw a dividing line?. International Journal of Social Sciences, III(1), 41–55.
   Google Scholar
• Mehrabi, N., Morstatter, F., Sexana, N., Lerman, K., & Galstyan, A. (2019). A survey on bias and fairness in machine learning. arXiv: 1908.09635v3.
   Google Scholar
• Pearl, J. (2009). Causality: Models, reasoning, and inference (2nd ed.).Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pessach, D., & Erez Shmueli, E. (2022). A review on fairness in machine learning. ACM Computing Survey, 55(3), Article 51. https://doi.org/10.1145/3494672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prince, A. E. R., & Schwarcz, D. (2020). Proxy discrimination in the age of artificial intelligence and big data. Iowa Law Review, 105(3), 1257–1318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qureshi, B., Kamiran, F., Karim, A., & Ruggieri, S. (2016). Causal discrimination discovery through propensity score analysis. arXiv: 1608.03735.
   Google Scholar
• Ravfogel, S., Elazar, Y., Gonen, H., Twiton, M., & Goldberg, Y. (2020). Null it out: Guarding protected attributes by iterative nullspace projection. arXiv: 2004.07667.
   Google Scholar
• Ravfogel, S., Twinton, M., Goldberg, Y., & Cotterell, R. (2022). Linear adversarial concept erasure. arXiv: 2201.12091.
   Google Scholar
• Shimao, H., & Huang, F. (2022). Welfare cost of fair prediction and pricing in insurance market (SSRN Manuscript ID 4225159).
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, R. G. (2012). Non-risk price discrimination in insurance: Market outcomes and public policy. Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance – Issues and Practice, 37, 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1057/gpp.2011.32
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, R. G. (2022). Discussion on ‘The discriminating (pricing) actuary’, by E. W. J. Frees and F. Huang. North American Actuarial Journal, in press.
   Google Scholar
• Tschantz, M. C. (2022). What is proxy discrimination? In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (pp. 1993–2003). Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Vallance, C. (2021). Legal action over alleged Uber facial verification bias. BBC News. Retrieved April 28, 2023, from https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-58831373.
   Google Scholar
• Wüthrich, M. V., & Merz, M. (2015). Stochastic claims reserving manual: Advances in dynamic modeling (SSRN Manuscript ID 264905).
   Google Scholar
• Wüthrich, M. V., & Merz, M. (2023). Statistical foundations of actuarial learning and its applications. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12409-9
   Google Scholar
• Wüthrich, M. V., & Ziegel, J. (2024). Isotonic recalibration under a low signal-to-noise ratio. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, in press.
   Google Scholar
• Xin, X., & Huang, F. (2021). Anti-discrimination insurance pricing: Regulations, fairness criteria, and models (SSRN Manuscript ID 3850420).
   Google Scholar
• Zemel, R., Wu, Y., Swersky, K., Pitassi, T., & Dwork, C. (2013). Learning fair representations. In Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Machine Learning, PMLR (Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 325–333). PMLR.
   Google Scholar