Profiling Malt Enzymes Related to Impact on Malt Fermentability, Lautering and Beer Filtration Performance of 94 Commercially Produced Malt Batches

Literature cited

• Evans, D. E.; Goldsmith, M.; Dambergs, R.; Nischwitz, R. A Comprehensive Reevaluation of the Small-Scale Congress Mash Protocol Parameters for Determination of Extract and Fermentability. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 2011, 69, 13–27. DOI: 10.1094/ASBCJ-2011-0111-01.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payen, A.; Persoz, J. F. Memoire Sur la Diastase, Les Principaux Produits de Ses Reactions, et Leurs Applications Aux Arts Industriels. Ann. Chim. 1833, 53, 73–92.
   Google Scholar
• Axcell, B. C. Malt Analysis – Prediction or Predicament. Tech. Quart. Master Brew. Ass. Am. 1998, 35, 28–30.
   Google Scholar
• Axcell, B. C. Don’t Let Sleeping Dogmas Lie - a Personal Journey in Brewing. Brewer and Distiller Int. 2018, 14, 28–33.
   Google Scholar
• Axcell, B. C.; Morrall, P.; Tulej, R.; Murray, J. Malt Quality specifications - A Safeguard or Restriction on Quality. Tech. Quart. Master Brew. Ass. Am. 1984, 21, 101–106.
   Google Scholar
• Back, W.; Narziss, L. Malt Parameters and Beer Quality. Brauwelt Int. 1997, 15, 29–37.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, D. E. Mashing. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem., and Mast. Brew. Am. Ass., Pilot Knob, Minneapolis, MN, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• American Society of Brewing Chemists ASBC Methods of Analysis; American Society of Brewing Chemists: Pilot Knob; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• European Brewery Convention Analytica - EBC, ed. E.A. Committee. Vol. 7th Edition. Verlag Hans Carl: Nurnberg, Germany, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• ANON. Malt Analysis: Industry-Wide Change in Analysis Approach for Barley Malt 5 EBC. Brauwelt Int. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Cornaggia, C.; Evans, D. E.; Draga, A.; Mangan, D.; McCleary, B. V. Prediction of Potential Malt Extract and Beer Filterability from Conventional and Novel Malt Quality Assessment Parameters. J. Inst. Brew. 2019, 125, 294–309. DOI: 10.1002/jib.567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gastl, M.; Knofel, T.; Becker, T. Conversion of Isothermal 65 °C Mash-Measurement of Quality Characteristics. Brauwelt 2014, 154, 274–276.
   Google Scholar
• Stenholm, K.; Home, S.; Pietila, K.; Jaakkola, N.; Leino, E. Are the Days of Congress Mashing over? Proc. Barley Malt Wort Symp., Inst. Brew.; Central and South African Section: Zimbabwe, 1996; pp. 149–163.
   Google Scholar
• Bamforth, C. W. Barley and Malt Starch in Brewing: A General Review. Tech. Quart. Master Brew. Ass. Am. 2003, 40, 89–97.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, D. E.; Collins, H. M.; Eglinton, J. K.; Wilhelmson, A. Assessing the Impact of the Level of Diastatic Power Enzymes and Their Thermostability on the Hydrolysis of Starch during Wort Production to Predict Malt Fermentability. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 2005, 63, 185–198. DOI: 10.1094/ASBCJ-63-0185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, D. E.; Redd, K.; Haraysmow, S. E.; Elvig, N.; Metz, N.; Koutoulis, A. Small Scale Comparison of the Influence of Malt Quality on Malt Brewing with Barley Quality on Barley Brewing Using Ondea Pro. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 2014, 72, 192–207. DOI: 10.1094/ASBCJ-2014-0630-01.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardie, D. G. Control of Carbohydrate Formation by Gibberellic Acid in Barley Endosperm. Phytochem. 1975, 14, 1719–1722. DOI: 10.1016/0031-9422(75)85281-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arends, A. M.; Fox, G. P.; Henry, R. J.; Marschke, R. J.; Symons, M. H. Genetic and Environmental Variation in the Diastatic Power of Australian Barley. J. Cereal Sci. 1995, 21, 63–70. DOI: 10.1016/S0733-5210(95)80009-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, D. E.; Dambergs, R.; Ratkowsky, D.; Li, C.; Harasymow, S.; Roumeliotis, S.; Eglinton, J. K. Refining the Prediction of Potential Malt Fermentability by Including an Assessment of Limit Dextrinase Thermostability and Additional Measures of Malt Modification, Using Two Different Methods for Multivariate Model Development. J. Inst. Brew. 2010, 116, 86–97. DOI: 10.1002/j.2050-0416.2010.tb00403.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eglinton, J. K.; Langridge, P.; Evans, D. E. Thermostability Variation in Alleles of Barley Beta-Amylase. J. Cereal Sci. 1998, 28, 301–309. DOI: 10.1016/S0733-5210(98)90010-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duke, S. H.; Henson, C. A. Tracking the Progress of Wort Sugar Production during Congress Mashing with North American Barley Cultivars and Comparisons to Wort Osmolyte Concentration and Malt Extract. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 2011, 69, 200–213. DOI: 10.1094/ASBCJ-2011-0829-01.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duke, S. H.; Henson, C. A.; Vinje, M. A. Comparisons of Barley Malt Amylolytic Enzyme Thermostabilities to Work Osmolyte Concentrations, Malt Extract and ASBC Measures of Malt Quality, and Intial Enzyme Activities. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 2014, 72, 271–284. DOI: 10.1094/ASBCJ-2014-1027-01.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henson, C. A.; Duke, S. H. A Comparison of Standard and Nonstandard Measures of Malt Quality. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 2008, 66, 11–19. DOI: 10.1094/ASBCJ-2007-1210-01.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinje, M. A.; Duke, S. H.; Henson, C. A. Comparison of Factors Involved in Starch Degradation in Barley under Laboratory and Malting Conditions. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 2015, 73, 195–205. DOI: 10.1094/ASBCJ-2015-0318-01.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arakawa, T.; Timasheff, S. N. Stabilization of Protein Structure by Sugars. Biochemistry 1982, 21, 6536–6544. DOI: 10.1021/bi00268a033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Back, J. F.; Oakenfull, D.; Smith, M. B. Increased Thermal Stability of Proteins in the Presence of Sugars and Polyols. Biochemistry 1979, 18, 5191–5196. DOI: 10.1021/bi00590a025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frigon, R. P.; Lee, J. C. The Stabilization of Calf-Brain Microtubule Protein by Sucrose. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1972, 153, 587–589. DOI: 10.1016/0003-9861(72)90376-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bamforth, C. W.; Fox, G. P. Critical Aspects of Starch in Brewing. Brewing Sci. 2020, 73, 126–139. DOI: 10.23763/BrSc20-16bamforth.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, G. P. Starch in Brewing Applications. In Starch in Food, Sjöö, M., Nilsson, L., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing Series in Food Sci. Tech. Nut.: Sawston, Cambridge, 2018; pp 633–659. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-08-100868-3.00016-0.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, D. E.; Li, C.; Eglinton, J. K. A Superior Prediction of Malt Attenuation. Eur. Brew. Conv. 31st Congr. Proc. 2007, Venice, presentation #4. CD Fachverlag Hans Carl, Nürenberg.
   Google Scholar
• Burton, R. A.; Fincher, G. B. Evolution and Development of Cell Walls in Cereal Grains. Front Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 456–471. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fincher, G. B. Molecular and Cellular Biology Associated with Endosperm Mobilization in Germinating Cereal Grains. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 1989, 40, 305–346. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.pp.40.060189.001513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, I. W. The Effect of β-Glucan Molecular Weight on the Sensitivity of Dye Hinding Assay Procedures for β-Glucan Estimation. J. Inst. Brew. 1990, 96, 323. DOI: 10.1002/j.2050-0416.19–90.tb01038.x.326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manzanares, P.; Navarro, A.; Sendra, J. M.; Carbonell, J. V. Selective Determination of β-Glucan of Differing Molecular Size, Using the Calcofluor-Fluourimetric Flow-Injection-Analysis (FIA) Method. J. Inst. Brew. 1991, 97, 101–104. DOI: 10.1002/j.2050-0416.1991.tb01057.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manzanares, P.; Navarro, A.; Sendra, J. M.; Carbonell, J. V. Determination of the Average Molecular Weight of Barley β-Glucan within the Range 30-100k by the Calcofluor-FIA Method. J. Cereal Sci. 1993, 18, 211–223. DOI: 10.1006/jcrs.1993.1048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, D. C.; Hawthorne, D.; Evans, D. E. Cold Sterile Filtration: A Small Scale Filtration Test and Investigation of Membrane Plugging. J. Inst. Brew. 1998, 104, 321–326. DOI: 10.1002/j.2050-0416.1998.tb01003.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, S. C. A Rapid Method for the Determination of Pentosans in Wheat Flour. Food Chem. 1981, 7, 139–145. DOI: 10.1016/0308-8146(81)90059-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, D. C.; Freeman, G.; Evans, D. E. Development and Assessment of a Small-Scale Wort Filtration Test for the Prediction of Beer Filtration Efficiency. J. Inst. Brew. 2000, 106, 361–366. DOI: 10.1002/j.2050-0416.2000.tb00526.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, D. E. A More Cost and Labour Efficient Assay for the Combined Measurement of the Diastatic Power Enzymes, β-Amylase, β-Amylase and Limit Dextrinase. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 2008, 66, 215–222. DOI: 10.1094/ASBCJ-2008-0909-01.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanauchi, M.; Bamforth, C. W. The Relevance of Different Enzymes for the Hydrolysis of β-Glucans in Malting and Mashing. J. Inst. Brew. 2008, 114, 224–229. DOI: 10.1002/j.2050-0416.2008.tb00332.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gastl, M.; Kupetz, M.; Becker, T. Determination of Cytolytic Malt Modification – Part I: Influence of Variety Characteristics. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 2021, 79, 53–65. DOI: 10.1080/03610470.2020.1796156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, D. E.; Hamet, M. A. G. The Selection of a Dried Yeast Strain for Use in the Apparent Attenuation Limit Malt Analysis (AAL) Procedure. J. Inst. Brew. 2005, 111, 209–214. DOI: 10.1002/j.2050-0416.2005.tb00668.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, H.; Rogers, P. Novel Recovery of Malt Flavours from Their Glycosidically Bound Precursors. Tech. Quart. Master Brew. Ass. Am. 2000, 37, 79–83.
   Google Scholar
• Liang, Z.; Zhongxiang Fang, Z.; Pai, A.; Luo, J.; Gan, R.; Gao, Y.; Lu, J.; Zhang, P. Glycosidically Bound Aroma Precursors in Fruits: A Comprehensive Review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 60, 1–29. DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2020.1813684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, D. E. The Impact of Malt Blending on Extract, Lautering Efficiency and Fermentability. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 2012, 70, 50–54. DOI: 10.1094/ASBCJ-2011-1208-01.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennemann, M.; Gastl, M.; Becker, T. Inhomogeneity in the Lauter Tun: A Chromatographic View. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2019, 245, 521–533. DOI: 10.1007/s00217-018-03226-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kupetz, M.; Gastl, M. Arabioxylan - a Cytolytic Parameter Often Times Disregarded?! Brauwelt Intl. 2020, 38, 10–14.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Y.; Lu, J.; Gu, G. Control of Arabinoxylan Solubilization and Hydrolysis in Mashing. Food Chem. 2005, 90, 101–108. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.03.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadosky, P.; Schwarz, P. B.; Horsley, R. D. Effect of Arabinoxylans, β-Glucans and Dextrins on the Viscosity and Membrane Filterability of a Beer Model System. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 2002, 60, 153–162. DOI: 10.1094/ASBCJ-60-0153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, J.; Lu, J.; Xie, G. Secretome Analysis of Trichoderma reesei CICC41495 for Degradation of Arabinoxylan in Malted Barley. J. Inst. Brew. 2018, 124, 352–358. DOI: 10.1002/jib.505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langenaeken, N. A.; Schutter, D. P.; Courtin, C. M. Arabinoxylan from Non-Malted Cereals Can Act as Mouthfeel Contributor in Beer. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 239, 116257. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krebs, G.; Becker, T.; Gastl, M. Characterization of Polymeric Substance Classes in Cereal-Based Beverages Using Asymmetrical Flow Field-Flow Fractionation with a Multi-Detection System. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2017, 409, 5723–5734. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-017-0512-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, D. E.; Li, C.; Eglinton, J. K. Improved Prediction of Malt Fermentability by the Measurement of the Diastatic Power Enzymes, β-Amylase, α-Amylase and Limit Dextrinase. I. Survey of the Levels of Diastatic Power Enzymes in Commercial Malts. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 2008, 66, 223–232. DOI: 10.1094/ASBCJ-2008-0909-02.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yousif, A. M.; Evans, D. E. Changes in Malt Quality during Production in Two Commercial Maltings. J. Inst. Brew. 2020, 126, 233–252. DOI: 10.1002/jib.609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, D. E.; Fox, G. P. The Comparison of DP Enzyme Release and Persistence with the Production of Yeast Fermentable Sugars during Modified IoB 65 °C and Congress Programmed Mashes. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 2017, 75, 302–311. DOI: 10.1094/ASBCJ-2017-4707-01.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verstrepen, K. J.; Derdelinckx, G.; Dufour, J.-P.; Winderickx, J.; Thevelein, J. M.; Pretorius, I. S.; Delvaux, F. R. Flavor-Active Esters: Adding Fruitiness to Beer. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2003, 96, 110–118. DOI: 10.1016/S1389-1723(03)90112-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krebs, G.; Müller, M.; Becker, T.; Gastl, M. Characterization of the Macromolecular and Sensory Profile of Non-Alcoholic Beers Produced With Various Methods. Food Res. Int. 2019, 116, 508–517. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.08.067.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langstaff, S. A.; Lewis, M. J. The Mouthfeel of Beer - a Review. J. Inst. Brew. 1993, 99, 31–37. DOI: 10.1002/j.2050-0416.1993.tb01143.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragot, F.; Guinard, J. X.; Shoemaker, C. F.; Lewis, M. J. The Contribution of Dextrins to Beer Sensory Properties. Part 1 Mouthfeel. J. Inst. Brew. 1989, 95, 427–430. DOI: 10.1002/j.2050-0416.1989.tb04650.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubsam, H.; Gastl, M.; Becker, T. Influence of the Range of Molecular Weight Distribution of Beer Components on the Intensity of Palate Fullness. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2013, 236, 65–75. DOI: 10.1007/s00217-012-1861-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCafferty, C. A.; Perch-Nielsen, N.; Bryce, J. H. Effects of Aerobic and Anaerobic Germination on the Debranching Enzyme, Limit Dextrinase, in Barley Malt. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 2000, 58, 47–50. DOI: 10.1094/ASBCJ-58-0047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axcell, B. C.; Tulej, R.; Mulder, C. J. The Influence of the Malting Process on Malt Fermentability Performance. In Proc. Inst. Brew. (Australia & New Zealand) 19th Conv. Hobart, 1986, 63–69.
   Google Scholar
• Axcell, B. C.; Van Nierop, S.; Vundla, W. Malt Induced Premature Flocculation. Tech. Quart. Master Brew. Ass. Am. 2000, 37, 501–507.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, S.; Fan, W.; Dong, J.; Yin, H.; Yu, J.; Liu, J.; Huang, S.; Huang, S.; Zhang, C. Validation and Application of Osmolyte Concentration as an Indicator to Evaluate Fermentability of Wort and Malt. J. Inst. Brew. 2017, 123, 488–496. DOI: 10.1002/jib.454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, G. P.; Staunton, M.; Agnew, E.; D’Arcy, B. Effect of Varying Starch Properties and Mashing Conditions on Wort Sugar Profiles. J. Inst. Brew. 2019, 125, 412–421. DOI: 10.1002/jib.585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, S.; Yu, J.; Dong, J.; Evans, D. E.; Liu, J.; Huang, S.; Huang, S.; Fan, W.; Yin, H.; Li, M. Relationship between Levels of Diastatic Power Enzymes and Wort Sugar Production from Different Barley Cultivars during the Commercial Mashing Process of Brewing. Starch 2014, 66, 615–623. DOI: 10.1002/star.201300152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langenaeken, N. A.; De Schepper, C. F.; De Schutter, D. P.; Courtin, C. M. Different Gelatinization Characteristics of Small and Large Barley Starch Granules Impact Their Enzymatic Hydrolysis and Sugar Production during Mashing. Food Chem. 2019, 295, 138–146. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.05.045.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langenaeken, N. A.; de Schepper, C. F.; de Schutter, D. P.; Courtin, C. M. Carbohydrate Content and Structure during Malting and Brewing: A Mass Balance Study. J. Inst. Brew. 2020, 126, 253–262. DOI: 10.1002/jib.619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balet, S.; Guelpa, A.; Fox, G. P.; Manley, M. Rapid Visco Analyser (RVA) as a Tool for Measuring Starch-Related Physiochemical Properties in Cereals: A Review. Food Anal. Methods 2019, 12, 2344–2360. DOI: 10.1007/s12161-019-01581-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, G. P.; Visser, J.; Skov, T.; Meijering, I.; Manley, M. Effect of Different Analysis Conditions of a Rapid Visco Analyser Malt Viscograms in Relation to Malt of Varying Fermentability. J. Inst. Brew. 2014, 120, 183–192. DOI: 10.1002/jib.137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacGregor, A. W.; Bazin, S. L.; Macri, L. J.; Babb, J. C. Modelling the Contribution of Alpha-Amylase, Beta-Amylase and Limit Dextrinase to Starch Degradation during Mashing. J. Cereal Sci. 1999, 29, 161–169. DOI: 10.1006/jcrs.1998.0233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edney, M. J.; Eglinton, J. K.; Collins, H. M.; Barr, A. R.; Legg, W. G.; Rossnagel, B. G. Effects of the High Heat Stable Beta-Amylase Allele on Fermentability of Malts with Low vs High Diastatic Power. Eur. Brew. Conv. 31st Cong. Proc 2007, Venice, paper #50 CD Fachverlag Hans Carl, Nürenberg.
   Google Scholar
• Erdal, K.; Jensen, M. O.; Kristensen, M.; Krough, J. J.; Riis, P.; Vaag, P. Total β-Amylase in Barley Used as a Screening Criteria for Combined Amylolytic Activity in Malt. Eur. Brew. Conv. Cong. Proc. Oslo; IRL Press: Oxford, 1993; pp 147–154.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, T. S.; Solah, V.; Glennie Holmes, M. R.; Taylor, H. R. Diastatic Power in Malted Barley: contributions of Malt Parameters to Its Development and the Potential of Barley Grain β-Amylase to Predict Malt Diastatic Power. J. Inst. Brew. 1995, 101, 277–280. DOI: 10.1002/j.2050-0416.1995.tb00867.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, Y. K.; Yu, Z. L. Correction Analysis of Beta-Amylase Activity in Mature Barley Seeds and Malt Diastatic Power. Hereditas - Beijing 1990, 12, 12–14.
   Google Scholar
• Santos, M. M. M.; Riis, P. Optimized McCleary Method for Measurement of Total β-Amylase in Barley and Its Applicability. J. Inst. Brew. 1996, 102, 271–275. DOI: 10.1002/j.2050-0416.1996.tb00912.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ioannidis, J. P. A. Why Most Published Research Findings Are False. PLoS Med. 2005, 2, e124. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huerta-Zurita, R.; Barr, J.; Horsley, R. D.; Schwarz, P. B. Predicting Malt Fermentability in Malting Barley Breeding Lines. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 2020, 78, 50–62. DOI: 10.1080/03610470.2019.1670037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghahramani, Z. Probabilistic Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence. Nature (London) 2015, 521, 452–459. DOI: 10.1038/nature14541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, M. I.; Mitchell, T. M. Machine Learning: Trends, Perspectives, and Prospects. Science 2015, 349, 255–260. DOI: 10.1126/science.aaa8415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, C.; Evans, D. E.; Yousif, A.; Metz, N.; Koutoulis, A. Comparison of the Impact on Performance of Small-Scale Mashing with Different Proportions of Unmalted Barley, Ondea Pro®, Malt and Rice. J. Inst. Brew. 2016, 122, 218–227. DOI: 10.1002/jib.325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar