Relational Organizational Development

References

• Armstrong, D. (2005). Organization in the mind: Psychoanalysis, group relations, and organizational consultancy: Occasional papers 1989–2003. London: Karnac Books.
   Google Scholar
• Balling, R. (2005). Diagnosis of organizational cultures. Transactional Analysis Journal, 35, 313–320. doi:10.1177/036215370503500404
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, J. (2013). Prinzip Menschlichkeit: Warum wir von Natur aus kooperieren (6th ed.) [The principle of humanity: Why we cooperate by nature]. Munich: Wilhelm Heyne.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, J. (2019). Wie wir werden, wer wir sind: Die Entstehung des menschlichen Selbst durch Resonanz [How we become what we are: The origin of human self through resonance]. Munich: Blessing.
   Google Scholar
• Berne, E. (1963). The structure and dynamics of organizations and groups. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott.
   Google Scholar
• Bion, W. R. (1961). Experiences in groups and other papers. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Blakeney, R. (1983). The organizational, group, and individual levels of analysis in organizational behavior. Transactional Analysis Journal, 13, 58–64. doi:10.1177/036215378301300112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollas, C. (1987). The shadow of the object: Psychoanalysis of the unthought known. London: Free Association Books.
   Google Scholar
• Cornell, W. F. (2019). Deidealizing relational theory: A critique from within. Transactional Analysis Journal, 49, 60–66. doi:10.1080/03621537.2019.1544779
   Google Scholar
• Cornell, W. F., & Hargaden, H. (2005). From transactions to relations: The emergence of a relational tradition in transactional analysis. Chadlington, England: Haddon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cozolino, L. (2014). The neuroscience of human relationships: Attachment and the developing social brain (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• de Graaf, A. (2013). The group in the individual: Lessons learned from working with and in organizations and groups. Transactional Analysis Journal, 43, 311–320. doi:10.1177/0362153713516447
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, M. A. (2007). Organizational change and the analytic third: Locating and attending to unconscious organizational psychodynamics. Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society, 12(2), 142–164. doi:10.1057/palgrave.pcs.2100116
   Google Scholar
• Dürr, H.-P. (2012). Teilhaben an einer unteilbaren Welt: Das ganzheitliche Weltbild der Quantenphysik [Participating in an undividable world: The holistic worldview of quantum physics]. In G. Hüther & C. Spannbauer (Eds.), Connectedness: Warum wir ein neues Weltbild brauchen [Connectedness: Why we need a different view of the world] (pp. 15–28). Bern, Switzerland: Hans Huber.
   Google Scholar
• Fowlie, H., & Sills, C. (2011). Relational transactional analysis: Principles in practice. London: Karnac Books.
   Google Scholar
• French, R. B., & Simpson, P. (2010). The ‘work group’: Redressing the balance in Bion’s experiences in groups. Human Relations, 63(12), 1859–1878. doi:10.1177/0018726710365091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French, R. B., & Simpson, P. (2015). Attention, cooperation, purpose: An approach to working in groups using insights from Wilfred Bion. London: Karnac Books.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, T. (2017). Das Gehirn – ein Beziehungsorgan. Eine phänomenologisch-ökologische Konzeption (5th ed.) [The brain—A relational organ: A phenomenologic-ecological concept]. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
   Google Scholar
• Gergen, K. J. (2009). Relational being: Beyond self and community. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gergen, K. J., & Walter, R. (1998). Real/Izing the relational. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15(1), 110–126. doi:10.1177/0265407598151007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargaden, H., & Sills, C. (2002). Transactional analysis: A relational perspective. Hove, England: Brunner-Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hinshelwood, R. D. (2007). Bion and Foulkes: The group-as-a-whole. Group Analysis, 40(3), 344–356. doi:10.1177/0533316407076115
   Google Scholar
• Hüther, G. (2013). Die biologischen Grundlagen der Spiritualität [The biological foundations of spirituality]. In G. Hüther, W. Roth, & M. von Brück (Eds.), Damit das Denken Sinn bekommt. Spiritualität, Vernunft und Selbsterkenntnis (6th ed., pp. 25–37). Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany: Herder.
   Google Scholar
• Hüther, G. (2015). Die Macht der inneren Bilder: Wie Visionen das Gehirn, den Menschen und die Welt verändern (9th ed.) [The power of inner pictures: How visions modify the brain, human beings and the world]. Göttingen, Germany: Vandenhoek & Ruprecht.
   Google Scholar
• Hüther, G., & Spannbauer, C. (Eds.). (2012). Connectedness: Warum wir ein neues Weltbild brauchen [Connectedness: Why we need a different view of the world]. Bern, Switzerland: Hans Huber.
   Google Scholar
• Hutton, J., Bazalgette, J., & Reed, B. (1997). Organisation-in-the-mind. In K. Neumann, K. Kellner, & A. Dawson-Shepherd (Eds.), Developing organisational consultancy (pp. 113–126). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Korpiun, M. (2015). Dialog als Beziehungsgeschehen [Dialogue as a relational phenomenon]. In D. Riess-Berger (Ed.), Zukunft denken—Wandel gestalten: Perspektiven zu persönlicher Entwicklung, gesellschaftlicher Veränderung und ökonomischem Erfolg (pp. 167–179). Lengerich, Germany: Pabst Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Korpiun, M., & Korpiun, S. (2017). Relationale Identität: Was uns als Menschen besonders und einzigartig macht [Relational identity: What makes us special and unique]. In M. Korpiun, N. Tchelebi, & M. Thiele (Eds.), Vom ICH zum WIR: Warum wir ein neues Menschenbild brauchen (Vol. 2, pp. 59–121). Hamburg, Germany: In Relation Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Korpiun, M., & Thiele, M. (2016). Organisationen als sinnorientierte Konstitution kollektiver Beziehungsbilder - Grundlagen eines beziehungsorientierten Organisationsverständnisses [Organizations as purpose-oriented constitutions of collective imagoes]. In L. Lohkamp & H. Raeck (Eds.), Tore und Brücken zur Welt. Willkommen in bewegten Zeiten (pp. 180–200). Lengerich, Germany: Pabst Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Korpiun, M., & Thiele, M. (2017). Am Ende des Individualismus: Warum wir ein neues Menschenbild brauchen [The ending of individuality: Why we need a new concept of humankind]. In M. Korpiun, N. Tchelebi, & M. Thiele (Eds.), Vom ICH zum WIR: Warum wir ein neues Menschenbild brauchen (Vol. 2, pp. 17–57). Hamburg, Germany: In Relation Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Korpiun, M., & Thiele, M. (2018). Relationale Identität: Ein Beitrag zum Verständnis des Menschen als wesenhaft Bezogenem [Relational identity: A contribution to understanding humans as related beings by nature]. In G. Franzen (Ed.), Relationalität – Festschrift zum 70. Geburtstag von Matthias Sell (pp. 114–140). Hanover, Germany: INITA.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, W. G., Bain, A., & Gould, L. (1996). The fifth basic assumption. Free Association, 6(7), 28–55.
   Google Scholar
• Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics: Concept, method and reality in social science; Social equilibria and social change. Human Relations, 1(5), 5–41. doi:10.1177/001872674700100103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, R. (2006). Ego state relational units and resistance to change. Transactional Analysis Journal, 36, 7–19. doi:10.1177/036215370603600103
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1978). Organisation und Entscheidung [Organization and decision]. Opladen, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1984). Soziale Systeme: Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie [Social systems: Outline of a general theory]. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Mohr, G. (2011). Individual and organisational TA for the 21st century. Berlin: Pro BUSINESS.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, G. (1997). Images of organizations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Nossal, B. S. (2007). Systems psychodynamics and consulting to organizations in Australia. Melbourne, Australia: RMIT University.
   Google Scholar
• Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi, L., & Gallese, V. (2001). Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 661–670. doi:10.1038/35090060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosa, H. (2016). Resonanz: Eine Soziologie der Weltbeziehung [Resonance: A sociology of the relation to the world]. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Schein, E. H. (1980). Organizational psychology (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Scheurle, H. J. (2013). Das Gehirn ist nicht einsam: Resonanzen zwischen Gehirn, Leib und Umwelt [The brain is not isolated: Resonances between brain, body and environment]. Stuttgart, Germany: Kohlhammer.
   Google Scholar
• Sell, M. (2009). Beziehungsformen als Element konsequenter transaktionaler Denkweise [Different types of relations as elements of consequent transactional thinking]. Zeitschrift für Transaktionsanalyse, 26(2), 101–115.
   Google Scholar
• Sell, M. (2015). Das Ich wird am Du—Das Ich wird am Wir [I become self through You—I become self through us]. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, E. R., & Carr, A. W. (1991). Lost in familiar places: Creating new connections between the individual and society. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shmukler, D. (2001). Reflections on transactional analysis in the context of contemporary relational approaches. Transactional Analysis Journal, 31, 94–102. doi:10.1177/036215370103100204
   Google Scholar
• Simon, F. B. (2007). Einführung in die systemische Organisationstheorie [Introduction to systemic organizational theory]. Heidelberg, Germany: Carl-Auer.
   Google Scholar
• Sinek, S. (2009). Start with why: How great leaders inspire everyone to take action. New York, NY: Portfolio.
   Google Scholar
• Soth, M. (2013). We are all relational, but are some more relational than others? Completing the paradigm shift toward relationality. Transactional Analysis Journal, 43, 122–137. doi:10.1177/0362153713499542
   Google Scholar
• Stapeley, L. (2006). Individuals, groups, and organizations beneath the surface: An introduction. New York, NY: Karnac Books.
   Google Scholar
• Steinert, T. (2006). Structural organizational consulting and advanced role management. In G. Mohr & T. Steinert (Eds.), Growth and change for organizations: Transactional analysis, new developments 1995–2006 (pp. 102–137). Pleasanton, CA: International Transactional Analysis Association.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, D. N. (2004). The present moment in psychotherapy and everyday life. New York, NY: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Summers, G., & Tudor, K. (2000). Cocreative transactional analysis. Transactional Analysis Journal, 30, 23–40. doi:10.1177/036215370003000104
   Google Scholar
• Tchelebi, N. R. (2013). ‘Us’ versus ‘them’: Exploring the dynamics of projections in organisations. Bristol: University of the West of England.
   Google Scholar
• Tennes, M. (2007). Beyond intersubjectivity: The transpersonal dimension of the psychoanalytic encounter. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 43(4), 505–525. doi:10.1080/00107530.2007.10745929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turquet, P. M. (1985). Leadership: The individual and the group. In A. D. Colman & M. H. Geller (Eds.), Group relations reader (Vol. 2, pp. 71–88). Washington, DC: A. K. Rice Institute.
   Google Scholar
• van Beekum, S. (2006). The relational consultant. In G. Mohr & T. Steinert (Eds.), Growth and change for organizations: Transactional analysis, new developments 1995–2006 (pp. 12–31). Pleasanton, CA: International Transactional Analysis Association.
   Google Scholar
• van Beekum, S. (2015). A relational approach in consulting: A new formulation of transactional analysis theory in the field of organizations. Transactional Analysis Journal, 45, 167–178. doi:10.1177/0362153715598148
   Google Scholar
• Wilber, K. (2001). A theory of everything: An integral vision for business, politics, science and spirituality. Boulder, CO: Shambhala Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Wilber, K. (2007). Integral spirituality: A startling new role for religion in the modern and postmodern world. Boulder, CO: Shambhala Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Worms, F. (2013). Über Leben [About life/sur vival]. Berlin: Merve.
   Google Scholar