The Leadership Triad: A Relational Model

References

• Avolio, B. J., Walumbwa, F. O., & Weber, T. J. (2009). Leadership: Current theories, research, and future directions. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 421–449. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163621
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berne, E. (1963). The structure and dynamics of organizations and groups. Lippincott.
   Google Scholar
• Bjerke, B. (1999). Business leadership and culture: National management styles in the global economy. Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Bly, R. (2001). Iron John: A book about men. Rider.
   Google Scholar
• Bradbury, H., & Lichtenstein, B. M. B. (2000). Relationality in organizational research: Exploring the space between. Organization Science, 11(5), 551–564. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.11.5.551.15203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campos, L. P. (1971). Transactional analysis group leadership operations. Transactional Analysis Journal, 1(4), 21–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/036215377100100406
   Google Scholar
• Campos, L. P. (2012). Cultivating cultures of courage with transactional analysis. Transactional Analysis Journal, 42(3), 209–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/036215371204200307
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, J. I. (1996). The synergistic use of five transactional analysis concepts by educators. Transactional Analysis Journal, 26(3), 214–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/036215379602600304
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. A. (2010). Heroic leadership: Leading with integrity and honor. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Collinson, D. (2005). Dialectics of leadership. Human Relations, 58(11), 1419–1442. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726705060902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crevani, L., Lindgren, M. E., & Packendorff, J. (2007). Shared leadership: A post-heroic perspective on leadership as a collective construction. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 3(1), 40–67.
   Google Scholar
• Day, D. V. (2013). Training and developing leaders: Theory and research. In M. G. Rumsey (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of leadership (pp. 76–93). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195398793.013.0006
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, G. (2015). Anthropological accounts of leadership: Historical and geographical interpretations from indigenous cultures. Leadership, 11(3), 335–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715014536920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairhurst, G. T. (2001). Dualisms in leadership research. In F. M. Jablin & L. L. Putnam (Eds.), The new handbook of organizational communication (pp. 379–439). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412986243.n11
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, J. K. (2004). The paradox of post-heroic leadership: An essay on gender, power, and transformational change. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(5), 647–661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, E. M. (1975). Eric Berne’s theory of organizations. Transactional Analysis Journal, 5(4), 345–353. https://doi.org/10.1177/036215377500500404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, R. D. (2002). Conceptualizing leadership with respect to its historical-contextual antecedents to power. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(2), 151–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00095-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graen, G., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader–member exchange theory of leadership over 25 years. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grint, K. (2000). The arts of leadership. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gronn, P. C. (2002). Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(4), 423–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00120-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurowitz, E. M. (1975). Group boundaries and leadership potency. Transactional Analysis Journal, 5(2), 183–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/036215377500500224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosking, D. M. (2007). Not leaders, not followers: A post-modern discourse of leadership processes. In B. Shamir, R. Pillai, M. Bligh, & M. Uhl-Bien (Eds.), Follower-centered perspectives on leadership: A tribute to the memory of James R. Meindl (pp. 2–36). Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Jellinek, G. (1900). Allgemeine Staatslehre. Reprint des 5. Neudrucks der 3. Auflage (1976), bearbeitet von Walter Jellinek [General political science] (3rd ed.). (Reprint of the fifth reprint of the third edition, 1976, W. Jellinek, E.). Athenäum.
   Google Scholar
• Joines, V. S. (2010). Combining one-to-one and group-as-a-whole work in redecision group therapy. Transactional Analysis Journal, 40(2), 144–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/036215371004000209
   Google Scholar
• Jones, A. M. (2005a). The elementary structures of the family firm: An anthropological perspective. Human Organization, 64(3), 276–285. https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.64.3.a6ccd3nev1bc2k1y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, A. M. (2005b). The anthropology of leadership: Culture and corporate leadership in the American South. Leadership, 1(3), 259–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715005054437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley, R. E. (2004). Followership. In G. R. Goethals, G. J. Sorenson, & J. M. Burns (Eds.), Encyclopedia of leadership (pp. 504–513). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Korpiun, M. (2019). Das Menschenbild hinter Neuer Arbeit: warum es mehr um Haltung als um Methoden und Tools geht [The concept of man behind new work. Why attitudes matter more than methods and tools]. In C. Scheurenbrand (Ed.), Halt und Haltung. Kongressreader zum 39. Fachkongress der DGTA (pp. 184–193). Pabst Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Korpiun, M. (2020). Relational organizational development. Transactional Analysis Journal, 50(3), 207–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/03621537.2020.1771030
   Google Scholar
• Korpiun, M. (2023a). Beziehungsorientierung als Handlungsperspektive der Persönlichkeits-, Team- und Organisationsentwicklung [Relationship orientation as an action paradigm to develop people, teams, and organizations]. Zeitschrift für Transaktionsanalyse, 40(2), 155–172. https://doi.org/10.3262/ZTA2302155
   Google Scholar
• Korpiun, M. (2023b). Beziehungsorientierte Persönlichkeits-, Team und Organisationsentwicklung in der Praxis [Relationship-oriented personality, team and organizational development in practice]. Zeitschrift für Transaktionsanalyse, 40(3), 285–300. https://doi.org/10.3262/ZTA2303285
   Google Scholar
• Kouwenhoven, M. (2018). Values-based leadership and the organizational parent system. Transactional Analysis Journal, 48(4), 350–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/03621537.2018.1505131
   Google Scholar
• Krausz, R. R. (1986). Power and leadership in organizations. Transactional Analysis Journal, 16(2), 85–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/036215378601600202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacy, M. (2012). Learning transactional analysis through cognitive apprenticeship. Transactional Analysis Journal, 42(4), 265–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/036215371204200405
   Google Scholar
• Laloux, F. (2014). Reinventing organizations. A guide to creating organizations inspired by the next stage in human consciousness. Nelson Parker.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, A. (2014). The development of a process group. Transactional Analysis Journal, 44(1), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0362153714527424
   Google Scholar
• Meindl, J., Ehrlich, S. B., & Dukerich, J. M. (1985). The romance of leadership. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30(1), 78–102. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohr, G. J. (2019). An application of Berne’s organizational boundary theory and a quota for women on company boards. Transactional Analysis Journal, 49, 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/03621537.2019.1544777
   Google Scholar
• Novellino, M. (1985). Antileadership in TA groups. Transactional Analysis Journal, 15(2), 164–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/036215378501500209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connell, P. K. (2014). A simplified framework for 21st century leader development. Leadership Quarterly, 25(2), 183–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, C. L., & Conger, J. A. (2003). Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452229539
   Google Scholar
• Prince, L. (2005). Eating the menu rather than the dinner: Tao and leadership. Leadership, 1(1), 105–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715005049355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray, T., Clegg, S., & Gordon, R. (2004). A new look at dispersed leadership: Power, knowledge and context. In J. Storey (Ed.), Leadership in organizations: Current issues and key trends (pp. 319–336). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Takala, T. A. (1998). Plato on leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(7), 785–798. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005789531144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uhl-Bien, M. (2006). Relational leadership theory: Exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 654–676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Poelje, S. (2004). Learning for leadership. Transactional Analysis Journal, 34(3), 223–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/036215370403400306
   Google Scholar
• van Vugt, M. (2006). Evolutionary origins of leadership and followership. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(4), 354–371. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1004_5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Vugt, M., Hogan, R., & Kaiser, R. B. (2008). Leadership, followership, and evolution: Some lessons from the past. American Psychologist, 63(3), 182–196. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.63.3.182
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Vugt, M., & Schaller, M. (2008). Evolutionary approaches to group dynamics: An introduction. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 12(6), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.12.11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar