“He shouldn't have put it that way!” How face threats and mitigation strategies affect person perception in online tutoring

References

• Abele, A. E., & Bruckmüller, S. (2011). The bigger one of the “big two”? Preferential processing of communal information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(5), 935–948. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.03.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aronsson, K., & Sätterlund-Larsson, U. (1987). Politeness strategies and doctor–patient communication: On the social choreography of collaborative thinking. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 6(1), 1–27. doi:10.1177/0261927X8700600101
   Google Scholar
• Bonnefon, J.-F., Feeney, A., & De Neys, W. (2011). The risk of polite misunderstandings. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(5), 321–324. doi:10.1177/0963721411418472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyer, K. E., Phillips, R., Wallis, M. D., Vouk, M. A., & Lester, J. C. (2009). Investigating the role of student motivation in computer science education through one-on-one tutoring. Computer Science Education, 19(2), 111–135. doi:10.1080/08993400902937584
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, S. E., & Clark, H. H. (1996). Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(6), 1482–1493. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.22.6.1482
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bromme, R., Brummernhenrich, B., Becker, B.-M., & Jucks, R. (2012). The effects of politeness-related instruction on medical tutoring. Communication Education, 61(4), 358–379. doi:10.1080/03634523.2012.691979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bromme, R., Jucks, R., & Runde, A. (2005). Barriers and biases in computer-mediated expert-layperson-communication. An overview and insights into the field of medical advice. In R. Bromme, F. W. Hesse, & H. Spada (Eds.), Barriers, biases and opportunities of communication and cooperation with computers—and how they may be overcome (pp. 89–118). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brummernhenrich, B., & Jucks, R. (2013). Managing face threats and instructions in online tutoring. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 341–350. doi:10.1037/a0031928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, C. K., Paré, D. E., Collimore, L., & Joordens, S. (2011). Assessing the effectiveness of a voluntary online discussion forum on improving students’ course performance. Computers and Education, 56(1), 253–261. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H., Siler, S. A., Jeong, H., Yamauchi, T., & Hausmann, R. G. M. (2001). Learning from human tutoring. Cognitive Science, 25(4), 471–533. doi:10.1016/S0364-0213(01)00044-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, H. H., & Schunk, D. H. (1980). Polite responses to polite requests. Cognition, 8(2), 111–143. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(80)90009-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Cromley, J. G., & Azevedo, R. (2005). What do reading tutors do? A naturalistic study of more and less experienced tutors in reading. Discourse Processes, 40(2), 83–113. doi:10.1207/s15326950dp4002_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cupach, W. R., & Carson, C. L. (2002). Characteristics and consequences of interpersonal complaints associated with perceived face threat. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19(4), 443–462. doi:10.1177/0265407502019004047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demeure, V. (2010). Facework and utilitarian relevance in the disambiguation of statements with two indirect interpretations. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29(4), 443–457. doi:10.1177/0261927X10377990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duthler, K. W. (2006). The politeness of requests made via email and voicemail: Support for the hyperpersonal model. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(2), 500–521. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00024.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erceg-Hurn, D. M., & Mirosevich, V. M. (2008). Modern robust statistical methods: An easy way to maximize the accuracy and power of your research. American Psychologist, 63(7), 591–601. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.63.7.591
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feeney, A., & Bonnefon, J.-F. (2013). Politeness and honesty contribute additively to the interpretation of scalar expressions. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 32(2), 181–190. doi:10.1177/0261927X12456840
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., D'Mello, S., & Cade, W. (2011). Instruction based on tutoring. In R. E. Mayer & P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning and instruction (pp. 408–426). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, J. T., & Dunham, P. J. (2001). Impression formation in computer-mediated communication revisited. Communication Research, 28(3), 325–347. doi:10.1177/009365001028003004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holtgraves, T. (1999). Comprehending indirect replies: When and how are their conveyed meanings activated? Journal of Memory and Language, 41(4), 519–540. doi:10.1006/jmla.1999.2657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holtgraves, T. (2005). Social psychology, cognitive psychology, and linguistic politeness. Journal of Politeness Research, 1(1), 73–93. doi:10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.73
   Google Scholar
• Holtgraves, T., & Yang, J. (1992). Interpersonal underpinnings of request strategies: General principles and differences due to culture and gender. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(2), 246–256. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.62.2.246
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. I. (2007). Politeness theory and conversational refusals: Associations between various types of face threat and perceived competence. Western Journal of Communication, 71(3), 196–215. doi:10.1080/10570310701518427
   Google Scholar
• Jucks, R., Päuler, L., & Brummernhenrich, B. (2014). “I need to be explicit: You're wrong”: Impact of face threats on social evaluations in online instructional communication. Interacting with Computers. Advance Online Publication. doi:10.1093/iwc/iwu032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jucks, R., & Paus, E. (2012). What makes a word difficult? Insights into the mental representation of technical terms. Metacognition and Learning, 7(2), 91–111. doi:10.1007/s11409-011-9084-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerssen-Griep, J., Trees, A. R., & Hess, J. A. (2008). Attentive facework during instructional feedback: Key to perceiving mentorship and an optimal learning environment. Communication Education, 57(3), 312–332. doi:10.1080/03634520802027347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerssen-Griep, J., & Witt, P. L. (2012). Instructional feedback II: How do instructor immediacy cues and facework tactics interact to predict student motivation and fairness perceptions? Communication Studies, 63(4), 498–517. doi:10.1080/10510974.2011.632660
   Google Scholar
• Kerssen-Griep, J., & Witt, P. L. (2015). Instructional feedback III: How do instructor facework tactics and immediacy cues interact to predict student perceptions of being mentored? Communication Education, 64(1), 1–24. doi:10.1080/03634523.2014.978797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laplante, D., & Ambady, N. (2003). On how things are said: Voice tone, voice intensity, verbal content, and perceptions of politeness. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 22(4), 434–441. doi:10.1177/0261927X03258084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepper, M. R., & Woolverton, M. (2002). The wisdom of practice: Lessons learned from the study of highly effective tutors. In J. Aronson (Ed.), Improving academic achievement: Impact of psychological factors on education (pp. 135–158). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Linguistic Politeness Research Group (Ed.). (2011). Discursive approaches to politeness. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Linnemann, G., Brummernhenrich, B., & Jucks, R. (2014). A matter of politeness? On the role of face-threatening acts in online tutoring. In K. Bedijs, G. Held, & C. Maaß (Eds.), Face work and social media (pp. 423–440). Münster, Germany: LIT.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., Johnson, W. L., Shaw, E., & Sandhu, S. (2006). Constructing computer-based tutors that are socially sensitive: Politeness in educational software. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(1), 36–42. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C., & Teven, J. J. (1999). Goodwill: A reexamination of the construct and its measurement. Communication Monographs, 66(1), 90. doi:10.1080/03637759909376464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaren, B. M., DeLeeuw, K. E., & Mayer, R. E. (2011). Polite web-based intelligent tutors: Can they improve learning in classrooms? Computers & Education, 56(3), 574–584. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogiermann, E. (2009). Politeness and in-directness across cultures: A comparison of English, German, Polish and Russian requests. Journal of Politeness Research, 5(2), 189–216. doi:10.1515/JPLR.2009.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Person, N. K., Kreuz, R. J., Zwaan, R. A., & Graesser, A. C. (1995). Pragmatics and pedagogy: Conversational rules and politeness strategies may inhibit effective tutoring. Cognition and Instruction, 13(2), 161–188. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1302_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pieschl, S., Stahl, E., & Bromme, R. (2008). Epistemological beliefs and self-regulated learning with hypertext. Metacognition and Learning, 3(1), 17–37. doi:10.1007/s11409-007-9008-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roche, J. M., Dale, R., & Caucci, G. M. (2010). Doubling up on double meanings: Pragmatic alignment. Language and Cognitive Processes, 27(1), 1–24. doi:10.1080/01690965.2010.509929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trad, L., Katt, J., & Neville Miller, A. (2014). The effect of face threat mitigation on instructor credibility and student motivation in the absence of instructor nonverbal immediacy. Communication Education, 63(2), 136–148. doi:10.1080/03634523.2014.889319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanLehn, K. (2011). The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems. Educational Psychologist, 46(4), 197–221. doi:10.1080/00461520.2011.611369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, N., Johnson, W. L., Mayer, R. E., Rizzo, P., Shaw, E., & Collins, H. (2008). The politeness effect: Pedagogical agents and learning outcomes. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 66(2), 98–112. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2007.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witt, P., & Kerssen-Griep, J. (2011). Instructional feedback I: The interaction of facework and immediacy on students’ perceptions of instructor credibility. Communication Education, 60(1), 75–94. doi:10.1080/03634523.2010.507820
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar