A longitudinal analysis of students’ motives for communicating with their instructors

References

• Frey, L. R., Botan, C. H., & Kreps, G. L. (2000). Investigating communication: An introduction to research methods (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Frymier, A. B. (1993). The impact of teacher immediacy on students’ motivation: Is it the same for all students? Communication Quarterly, 41, 454–464. doi:10.1080/01463379309359905
   Google Scholar
• Frymier, A. B. (1994). The use of affinity-seeking in producing liking and learning in the classroom. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 22, 87–105. doi:10.1080/0090988940365391
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, Z. W., & Martin, M. M. (2014). College students’ academic beliefs and their motives for communicating with their instructor. Communication Research Reports, 31, 316–328. doi:10.1080/08824096.2014.9244341
   Google Scholar
• Grimm, K. J., Ram, N., & Estabrook, R. (2017). Growth modeling: Structural equation and multilevel modeling approaches. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Horan, S. M., Houser, M. L., Goodboy, A. K., & Frymier, A. B. (2011). Students’ early impressions of instructors: Understanding the role of relational skills and messages. Communication Research Reports, 28, 74–85. doi:10.1080/08824096.2011.541362
   Google Scholar
• Little, T. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mansson, D. H. (2014). Students’ expressed academic concern, learning outcomes, and communication motives. Western Journal of Communication, 78, 274–286. doi:10.1080/10570314.2014.904521
   Google Scholar
• Martin, M. M., Mottet, T. P., & Myers, S. A. (2000). Students’ motives for communicating with their instructors and affective and cognitive learning. Psychological Reports, 87, 830–834. doi:10.2466/pr0.2000.87.3.830
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, M. M., Myers, S. A., & Mottet, T. P. (1999). Students’ motives for communicating with their instructors. Communication Education, 48, 155–164. doi:10.1080/03634529900370163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C., & McCroskey, L. L. (2006). Instructional communication: The historical perspective. In T. P. Mottet, V. P. Richmond, & J. C. McCroskey (Eds.), Handbook of instructional communication: Rhetorical and relational perspectives (pp. 33–47). Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• McGlone, E. L., & Anderson, L. J. (1973). The dimensions of teacher credibility. The Speech Teacher, 22, 196–200. doi:10.1080/03634527309378015
   Google Scholar
• Myers, S. A., & Claus, C. J. (2012). The relationship between students’ motives to communicate with their instructors and classroom environment. Communication Quarterly, 60, 386–402. doi:10.1080/01463373.2012.688672
   Google Scholar
• Myers, S. A., Tindage, M. F., & Atkinson, J. (2016). The evolution of instructional communication research. In P. L. Witt (Ed.), Handbooks of communication and science: Communication and learning (Vol. 16, pp. 13–42). Berlin: DeGruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Preiss, R. W., & Wheeless, L. R. (2014). Perspectives on instructional communication’s historical path to the future. Communication Education, 63, 308–328. doi:10.1080/03634523.2014.910605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prisbell, M. (1990). Classroom communication satisfaction, teacher uncertainty and course certainty over time. Communication Research Reports, 7, 20–24. doi: 10.1080/08824099009359849
   Google Scholar
• Rindfleisch, A., Malter, A. J., Ganesan, S., & Moorman, C. (2008). Cross-sectional versus longitudinal survey research: Concepts, findings, and guidelines. Journal of Marketing Research, 45, 261–279. doi:10.1509/jmkr.45.3.261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldeck, J. H., & LaBelle, S. (2016). Theoretical and methodological approaches to instructional communication. In P. L. Witt (Ed.), Handbooks of communication and science: Communication and learning (Vol. 16, pp. 67–101). Berlin: DeGruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar