LeaD-In: a cultural change model for peer review of teaching in higher education

References

• Appelbaum, S.H., Habashy, S., Malo, J.L., & Shafiq, H. (2012). Back to the future: Revisiting Kotter's 1996 change model. The Journal of Management Development, 31(8), 764–782. doi:10.1108/02621711211253231
   Google Scholar
• Barnard, A., Croft, W., Irons, R., Cuffe, N., Bandara, W., & Rowntree, P. (2011). Peer partnership to enhance scholarship of teaching: A case study. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(4), 435–448. doi:10.1080/07294360.2010.518953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, M. (2001). Supported reflective practice: A programme of peer observation and feedback for academic teaching development. International Journal for Academic Development, 6(1), 29–39. doi:10.1080/13601440110033643
   Google Scholar
• Bell, M. (2002). Peer observation partnerships in higher education. Milperra: HERDSA.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, N., Wise, C., Woods, P., & Harvey, J. (2003). Distributed leadership: A review of literature. National College for School Leadership. Retrieved from www.ncsl.org.uk
   Google Scholar
• Bento, F. (2011). A discussion about power relations and the concept of distributed leadership in higher education institutions. The Open Education Journal, 4, 17–23. doi: 10.2174/1874920801104010017
   Google Scholar
• Blackmore, J.A. (2005). A critical evaluation of peer review via teaching observation within higher education. The International Journal of Educational Management, 19(2/3), 218–232. doi: 10.1108/09513540510591002
   Google Scholar
• de Boer, H., & Goedegebuure, L. (2009). The changing nature of the academic deanship. Leadership, 5(3), 347–364. doi: 10.1177/1742715009337765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolden, R. (2011). Distributed leadership in organizations: A review of theory and research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13(3), 251–269. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00306.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolden, R., Petrov, G., & Gosling, J. (2009). Distributed leadership in higher education: Rhetoric and reality. Educational Management Administration Leadership, 37(2), 257–277. doi: 10.1177/1741143208100301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolt, S., & Atkinson, D. (2010, July 6–9). Voluntary peer review of face-to-face teaching in higher education. In M. Devlin, J. Nagy, & A. Lichtenberg (Eds.), Research and development in higher education: Reshaping higher education (Vol. 33, pp. 83–92). Milperra: HERDSA.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. (2009). Effective leadership in higher education. London: Leadership Foundation for Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, D., Addicott, R., Fitzgerald, L. Ferlie, E., & Baeza, J. (2007). Nobody in charge: Distributed change agency in healthcare. Human Relations, 60(7), 1065–1090. doi: 10.1177/0018726707081158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butt, G., & Gunter, H. (2005). Challenging modernization: Remodeling the education workforce. Educational Review, 57(2), 131–137. doi: 10.1080/0013191042000308314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calás, M., Smircich, L., Willmott, Parker, M., & Morgan, G. (2003). Why neo-disciplinary? Why now? Organization, 10(3), 403–420. doi: 10.1177/13505084030103001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chester, A. (2012). Peer partnerships in teaching: Evaluation of a voluntary model of professional development in tertiary education. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 12(2), 94–108.
   Google Scholar
• Currie, G., & Lockett, A. (2011). Distributing leadership in health and social care: Concertive, conjoint or collective? International Journal of Management Reviews, 13(3), 286–300. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00308.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davison, A., Pharo, E., & Warr, K. (2011). Demonstrating distributed leadership through cross-disciplinary peer networks: Responding to climate change complexity. Sydney: Australian Learning and Teaching Council.
   Google Scholar
• Feenberg, A. (2002). Transforming technology: A critical theory revisited. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2012). Habermas and Foucault: Thinkers for civil society? In M. Haugaard & S.R. Clegg (Eds.), Power and politics, vol. 2 (pp. 117–140). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fryer, M. (2011a). Ethics and organizational leadership: Developing a normative model. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fryer, M. (2011b). Facilitative leadership: Drawing on Jurgen Habermas’ model of ideal speech to propose a less impositional way to lead. Organization, 19(1), 25–43. doi: 10.1177/1350508411401462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furco, A., & Moely, B. (2012). Using learning communities to build faculty support for pedagogical innovation: A multi-campus study. The Journal of Higher Education, 83(1), 128–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosling, D. (2002). Models of peer observation of teaching. Learning and Teaching Support Network Generic Centre. Retrieved February 3, 2013, from http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/York/documents/resources/resourcedatabase/id200_Models_of_Peer_Observation_of_Teaching.rtf
   Google Scholar
• Gosling, J., Bolden, R., & Petrov, G. (2009). Distributed leadership in higher education: What does it accomplish? Leadership, 5(3), 299–310. doi: 10.1177/1742715009337762
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(4), 423–451. doi: 10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00120-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1975). Legitimation crisis. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1984 [1981]). The theory of communicative action, volume one: Reason and the rationalisation of society. (T. McCarthy Trans.). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1987 [1981]). The theory of communicative action: Volume 2: Lifeworld and system: A critique of functionalist reason. (T. McCarthy Trans.). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hammersley-Fletcher, L., & Orsmond, P. (2004). Evaluating our peers: Is peer observation a meaningful practice? Practice in Higher Education, 29(4), 489–503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, A. (2004). Distributed leadership and school improvement: Leading or misleading? Educational management administration. Leadership, 32(1), 11–24.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, K-L., Farrell, K., Bell, M., Devlin, M., & James, R. (2008). Peer review of teaching in Australian higher education. Sydney: Australian Learning and Teaching Council.
   Google Scholar
• Hoch, J., Pearce, C.L., & Welzel, L. (2010). Is the most effective team leadership shared? The impact of shared leadership, age diversity, and coordination on team performance. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 9(3), 105–116. doi: 10.1027/1866-5888/a000020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, S., Lefoe, G., Harvey, M., & Ryland, K. (2012). Distributed leadership: A collaborative framework for academics, executives and professionals in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 34(1), 67–78. doi: 10.1080/1360080X.2012.642334
   Google Scholar
• Kell, C., & Annetts, S. (2009). Peer review of teaching embedded practice or policy-holding complacency? Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46(1), 61–70. doi: 10.1080/14703290802646156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning as the science of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kotter, J. (1996). Leading change. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lefoe, G., & Parrish, D. (2012). The GREEN report: Growing, reflecting, enabling, networking: The development of leadership capacity in higher education. Sydney: Australian Learning and Teaching Council.
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., Mascall, B., Strauss, T., Sacks, R., Memon, N., & Yashkina, A. (2007). Distributing leadership to make schools smarter. Toronto: OISE, University of Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, M. (2001). Using observational feedback to promote academic development. International Journal for Academic Development, 6(1), 21–28. doi: 10.1080/13601440110033689
   Google Scholar
• Magin, D. (1998). Rewarding good teaching: A matter of demonstrated proficiency or documented achievement? The International Journal for Academic Development, 3(2), 124–135. doi: 10.1080/1360144980030205
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, J., & Star, C. (2010). Identifying, building and sustaining leadership capacity for communities of practice in higher education. Australian Learning & Teaching Council (ALTC) report.
   Google Scholar
• McKenzie, J. (2011). Peer review in online and blended learning environments. Australian Learning & Teaching Council (ALTC) report.
   Google Scholar
• Middlehurst, R., Goreham, H., & Woodfield, S. (2009). Why research leadership in higher education? Exploring contributions from the UK's leadership foundation for higher education. Leadership, 5(3), 311–329. doi: 10.1177/1742715009337763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Connor, P.M.G., & Day, D.V. (2007). A case for shifting the emphasis of leadership development: From ‘me’ to ‘all of us’. In J.A. Conger & R.E. Riggio (Eds.), The practice of leadership: Developing the next generation of leaders (pp. 64–85). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Parry, K., & Bryman, A. (2006). Leadership in organizations. In S. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. Lawrence, & W. Nord (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organization studies (2nd ed., pp. 447–468). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, C.L. (2008, July 7). Follow the leaders. You've created a team to solve a problem. Here's some advice: Don't put one person in charge. Wall Street Journal, R8. Retrieved February 3, 2013, from http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121441363110903891.html
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, C.L., & Conger, J.A. (2003). All those years ago: The historical underpinnings of shared leadership. In C.L. Pearce & J.A. Conger (Eds.), Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership (pp. 1–8). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, C.L., & Sims, H.P. Jr. (2002). Vertical versus shared leadership as predictors of the effectiveness of change management teams: An examination of aversive, directive, transactional, transformational, and empowering leader behaviors. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6(2), 172–197. doi: 10.1037/1089-2699.6.2.172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajasekaran, K., Fairbanks, R., & Shah, M. (2008). No more blame & shame [corrected] [published erratum appears in EMS MAG 2008, Oct: 37(20):18]. EMS Magazine, 37(9), 61–67.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ramsden, P. (1998). Learning to lead in higher education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Riggio, R.E., Chaleff, I., & Lipman-Blumen, J. (2008). The art of followership: How great followers create great leaders and organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, C. (1998). When women lead: Integrative leadership in state legislature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, G., Coates, H., & Anderson, M. (2008). Academic leadership capabilities for Australian higher education. Sydney: Australian Learning and Teaching Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Smigiel, H., Pannan, L., Szorenyi-Reischl, N., & Donnan, P. (2011). Sustaining distributive leadership in learning and teaching: Cascade and perpetual effectiveness of the faculty scholar model. Australian Learning & Teaching Council (ALTC) report.
   Google Scholar
• Spillane, J., & Diamond, J. (Eds.). (2007). Distributed leadership in practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spillane, J.P. (2005). Distributed leadership. The Educational Forum, 69(2), 143–150. doi: 10.1080/00131720508984678
   Google Scholar
• Stoll, L., & Louis, L. (2007). Professional learning communities. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, A., Cocklin, C., Brown, R., & Wilson-Evered, E. (2011). An investigation of champion-driven leadership processes. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(2), 412–433. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.02.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, R., & Canfield, P. (2007). Learning to be a scholarly teaching faculty: Cultural change through shared leadership. In A. Brew & J. Sachs (Eds.), Transforming a university: The scholarship of teaching and learning in practice (pp. 233–247). Sydney, NSW: Sydney University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Timperley, H.S. (2005). Distributed leadership: Developing theory from practice. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(4), 395–420. doi: 10.1080/00220270500038545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wicks, P.G., & Reason, P. (2009). Initiating action research: Challenges and paradoxes of opening communicative space. Action Research, 7(3), 243–262. doi:10.1177/1476750309336715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yukl, G., & Rubina, M. (2010). Why flexible and adaptive leadership is essential. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 62(2), 81–93. doi: 10.1037/a0019835
   Google Scholar