1,035
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Graduate teaching assistants: motives, difficulties and professional interactions and their relationship to perceived benefits

&
Pages 546-560 | Received 18 Dec 2018, Accepted 26 Jun 2019, Published online: 28 Oct 2019

References

  • Becker, E. A., Easlon, E. J., Potter, S. C., Guzman-Alvarez, A., Spear, J. M., Facciotti, M. T., … Pagliarulo, C. (2017). The effects of practice-based training on graduate teaching assistants’ classroom practices. CBE – Life Sciences Education, 16(4), 1–14.
  • Chadha, D. (2013). Reconceptualising and reframing graduate teaching assistant (GTA) provision for a research-intensive institution. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(2), 205–217.
  • Cho, Y. J., Kim, M., Svinicki, M. D., & Decker, M. L. (2011). Exploring teaching concerns and characteristics of graduate teaching assistants. Teaching in Higher Education, 16(3), 267–279.
  • Crimmins, G. (2016). The spaces and places that women casual academics (often fail to) inhabit. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(1), 45–57.
  • Douglas, J., Powell, D. N., & Rouamba, N. H. (2016). Assessing graduate teaching assistants’ beliefs and practices. Journal of Excellence in College Teaching, 27(3), 35–61.
  • Flaherty, A. A., & Overton, T. L. (2018). Transforming laboratory teaching assistants as teaching leaders. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(7), 1380–1394.
  • Gilmore, J., Maher, M. A., Feldon, D. F., & Timmerman, B. (2014). Exploration of factors related to the development of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics graduate teaching assistants’ teaching orientations. Studies in Higher Education, 39(10), 1910–1928.
  • Harland, T., & Planngger, G. (2004). The post-graduate chameleon: Changing roles in doctoral education. Active Learning in Higher Education, 5(1), 73–86.
  • Hitch, D., Mahoney, P., & Macfarlane, S. (2018). Professional development for sessional staff in higher education: A review of current evidence. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(2), 285–300.
  • Hoessler, C., & Godden, L. (2015). The visioning of policy and the hope of implementation: Support for graduate students’ teaching at a Canadian institution. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 45(1), 83–101.
  • Johnson, I. Y. (2011). Contingent instructors and student outcomes: An artifact or fact? Research in Higher Education, 52, 761–785.
  • Justice, N., Zieffler, A., & Garfield, J. (2017). Statistics graduate teaching assistants’ beliefs, practices and preparation for teaching introductory statistics. Statistics Education Research Journal, 17(1), 294–319.
  • Lee, H. J., Hong, Y., & Choi, H. (2017). Perceptions of tutoring roles and psychological distance among instructors, tutors and students at a Korean university. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(1), 143–157.
  • Luo, J., Bellows, L., & Grady, M. (2000). Classroom management issues for teaching assistants. Research in Higher Education, 41(3), 353–383.
  • Muzaka, V. (2009). The niche of graduate teaching assistants (GTAs): Perceptions and reflections. Teaching in Higher Education, 14(1), 1–12.
  • Myers, S. A. (1995, November 18–21). Exploring the assimilation stage of GTA socialization: A preliminary investigation. Paper presented at the 81st Annual Meeting of the Speech communication association, San Antonio, TX.
  • Park, C. (2002). Neither fish nor fowl? The perceived benefits and problems of using graduate teaching assistants (GTAs) to teach undergraduate students. Higher Education Review, 35(1), 50–62.
  • Park, C. (2004). The graduate teaching assistant (GTA): Lessons from North American experience. Teaching in Higher Education, 9(3), 349–361.
  • Parker, M. A., Ashe, D., Boersma, J., Hicks, R., & Bennett, V. (2015). Good teaching starts here: Applied learning at the graduate teaching assistant institute. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 45(3), 84–110.
  • Prieto, L. R., & Meyers, S. A. (1999). Effects of training and supervision on the self-efficacy of psychology graduate teaching assistants. Teaching of Psychology, 26(4), 264–266.
  • Prieto, L. R., Scheel, K. R., & Meyers, S. A. (2001). Psychology graduate teaching assistants’ preferences for supervisory style. Journal of Graduate Teaching Assistant Development, 8(1), 37–40.
  • Pytlak, M. A., & Houser, M. L. (2014). Because I’m the teacher and I said so: GTA use of behavior alteration techniques to establish power and credibility in the college classroom. Western Journal of Communication, 78(3), 287–309.
  • Reeves, T. D., Hake, L. E., Chen, X., Frederick, J., Rudenga, K., Ludlow, L. H., & O’Connor, C. M. (2018). Does context matter? Convergent and divergent findings in the cross-institutional evaluation of graduate teaching assistant professional development programs. CBE – Life Sciences Education, 17(1), 1–13.
  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67.
  • Schussler, E. E., Read, Q., Marbach-Ad, G., Miller, K., & Ferzli, M. (2015). Preparing biology graduate teaching assistants for their roles as instructors: An assessment of institutional approaches. CBE – Life Sciences Education, 14(3), doi: 10.1187/cbe.14-11-0196.
  • Sprague, J., & Nyquist, J. D. (1989). TA supervision. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, (39), 37–53.
  • Staton, A. Q., & Darling, A. L. (1989). Socialization of teaching assistants. In J. D. Nyquist, R. D. Abbott, & D. H. Wulff (Eds.), Teaching assistant training in the 1990s. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, No. 39 (pp. 15–22). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Sutherland, K. A. (2009). Nurturing undergraduate tutors’ role in the university teaching community. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 17(2), 147–164.
  • Wise, A. (2011). Supporting future faculty in developing their teaching practices: An exploration of communication networks among graduate teaching assistants. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 23(2), 135–149.
  • Wulff, D. H., Austin, A. E., Nyquist, J. D., & Sprague, J. (2004). The development of graduate students as teaching scholars: A four-year longitudinal study. In D. Wulff & A. Austin (Eds.), Paths to the professoriate: Strategies for enriching the preparation of future faculty (pp. 46–73). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.