Learning together: a transdisciplinary approach to student–staff partnerships in higher education

References

• Armitage, D., Berkes, F., & Doubleday, N. (2007). Adaptive co-management and complexity: Exploring the many faces of co-management. In D. Armitage, F. Berkes, & N. Doubleday (Eds.), Adaptive co-management (pp. 1–15). Vancouver: UBC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Armitage, D., Marschke, M., & Plummer, R. (2008). Adaptive co-management and the paradox of learning. Global Environmental Change, 18(1), 86–98. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, C. (2008). Some reflections on student movements of the 1960s and early 1970s. Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais, 81, 43–91.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, R. (2000). Realizing the university in an age of supercomplexity. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education & the Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berkes, F. (2009). Evolution of co-management: Role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(5), 1692–1702. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.12.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkes, F., George, P., & Preston, R. (1991, September 26–29). Co-management: The evolution of the theory and practice of joint administration of living resources. Proceedings of the Second Biennial Conference of the International Association for the Study of Common Property, Winnipeg, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, C. (2006, February). The social turn: Collaboration and Its Discontents. Artforum, 179–185.
   Google Scholar
• Bovill, C., & Bulley, C. J. (2011). A model of active student participation in curriculum design: Exploring desirability and possibility. In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving student learning (ISL) 18: Global theories and local practices: Institutional, disciplinary and cultural variations (pp. 176–188). Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development.
   Google Scholar
• Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., & Felten, P. (2011). Students as co-creators of teaching approaches, course design and curricula: Implications for academic developers. International Journal for Academic Development, 16(2), 133–145.
   Google Scholar
• Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., Felten, P., Millard, L., & Moore-Cherry, N. (2016). Addressing potential challenges in co-creating learning and teaching: Overcoming resistance, navigating institutional norms and ensuring inclusivity in student–staff partnerships. Higher Education, 71(2), 195–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovill, C., Felten, P., & Cook-Sather, A. (2014, June 16–18). Engaging students as partners in learning and teaching (2): Practical guidance for academic staff and academic developers. ICED Conference 2014: Educational development in a Changing world, Stockholm, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Bovill, C., & Woolmer, C. (2019). How conceptualisations of curriculum in higher education influence student–staff co-creation in and of the curriculum. Higher Education, 78(3), 407–422. doi:10.1007/s10734-018-0349-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson, L., & Berkes, F. (2005). Co-management: Concepts and methodological implications. Journal of Environmental Management, 75(1), 65–76. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.11.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers, R. (1994). The origins and practice of participatory rural appraisal. World Development, 22(7), 953–969. doi: 10.1016/0305-750X(94)90141-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collini, S. (2012). What are universities for? London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather, A., & Agu, P. (2013). Students of color and faculty members working together toward culturally sustaining pedagogy. To Improve the Academy, 32, 271–285. doi: 10.1002/j.2334-4822.2013.tb00710.x
   Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather, A., & Alter, Z. (2011). What is and what can be: How a liminal position can change learning and teaching in higher education. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 42(1), 37–53. doi: 10.1111/j.1548-1492.2010.01109.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather, A., Bovill, C., & Felton, P. (2014). Engaging students as partners in learning and teaching: A guide for faculty. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather, A., Matthews, K. E., Ntem, A., & Leathwick, S. (2018). What we talk about when we talk about students as partners. International Journal for Students as Partners, 2(2), 1–9. doi: 10.15173/ijsap.v2i2.3790
   Google Scholar
• de Bie, A., Marquis, E., Cook-Sather, A., & Luqueño, L. (2019). Valuing knowledge(s) and cultivating confidence: Contributions of student–faculty pedagogical partnerships to epistemic justice. In J. Hoffman, P. Blessinger, & M. Makhanya (Eds.), Strategies for fostering inclusive classrooms in higher education: International perspectives on equity and inclusion (pp. 35–48). Innovations in higher education teaching and learning, Vol. 16. Bingley: Emerald.
   Google Scholar
• Dressler, W., Büscher, B., Schoon, M., Brockington, D. A. N., Hayes, T., Kull, C. A., … Shrestha, K. (2010). From hope to crisis and back again? A critical history of the global CBNRM narrative. Environmental Conservation, 37(1), 5–15. doi: 10.1017/S0376892910000044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehn, P., & Sjogren, D. (1991). From system descriptions to scripts for action. In J. Greenbaum & M. Kyng (Eds.), Design at work: Cooperative design of computer design (pp. 241–268). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, T. L. (2015). Transdisciplinary collaborations for sustainability education: Institutional and intragroup challenges and opportunities. Policy Futures in Education, 13(1), 70–96. doi: 10.1177/1478210314566731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gale, T., & Parker, S. (2014). Navigating change: A typology of student transition in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 39(5), 734–753. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2012.721351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haklay, M. (2013). Neogeography and the delusion of democratisation. Environment and Planning A, 45(1), 55–69. doi: 10.1068/a45184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2014). Engagement through partnership: Students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. York: Higher Education Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, M., & Healey, R. (2018). ‘It depends’: Exploring the context-dependent nature of students as partners practices and policies. International Journal for Students as Partners, 2(1), 1–10. doi: 10.15173/ijsap.v2i1.3472
   Google Scholar
• Helguera, P. (2011). Education for socially engaged art. New York: Jorge Pinto Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, D. L. (2016). Popular culture and public health: A fresh approach to transdisciplinary public health education. Pedagogy in Health Promotion, 2(4), 251–255. doi: 10.1177/2373379916650691
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, S. (2011). Social works: Performing art, supporting publics. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jantsch, E. (1972). Towards interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in education and innovation. In L. Apostel, G. Berger, A. Briggs, & G. Michaud (Eds.), Interdisciplinarity, problems of teaching and research in universities (pp. 97–121). Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, P. E. (2014). Theorising student engagement in higher education. British Educational Research Journal, 40(6), 1005–1018. doi: 10.1002/berj.3121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kester, G. H. (2011). The one and the many: Contemporary collaborative art in a global context. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kligyte, G., Baumber, A., van der Bijl-Brouwer, M., Dowd, C., Hazell, N., Le Hunte, B., … Pratt, S. (2019). ‘Stepping in and stepping out’: Enabling creative third spaces through transdisciplinary partnerships. International Journal for Students as Partners, 3(1), 5–21. doi:10.15173/ijsap.v3i1.3735.
   Google Scholar
• Könings, K. D., Seidel, T., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2014). Participatory design of learning environments: Integrating perspectives of students, teachers, and designers. Instructional Science, 42(1), 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, K. (2016). Students as partners as the future of student engagement. Student Engagement in Higher Education Journal, 1(1), 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, K. E., Cook-Sather, A., Acai, A., Dvorakova, S. L., Felten, P., Marquis, E., & Mercer-Mapstone, L. (2018). Toward theories of partnership praxis: An analysis of interpretive framing in literature on students as partners in teaching and learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 1–14. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2018.1530199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, K. E., Cook-Sather, A., & Healey, M. (2018). Connecting learning, teaching, and research through student–staff partnerships: Toward universities as egalitarian learning communities. In V. Tong, A. Standen, & M. Sotiriou (Eds.), Shaping higher education with students: Ways to connect research and teaching (pp. 957–971). London: University College of London Press.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, K. E., Dwyer, A., Hine, L., & Turner, J. (2018). Conceptions of students as partners. Higher Education. doi: 10.1007/s10734-018-0257-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Max-Neef, M. A. (2005). Foundations of transdisciplinarity. Ecological Economics, 53(1), 5–16. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.01.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Measham, T. G., & Lumbasi, J. A. (2013). Success Factors for community-based natural resource management (CBNRM): Lessons from Kenya and Australia. Environmental Management, 52(3), 649–659. doi: 10.1007/s00267-013-0114-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer-Mapstone, L., Dvorakova, S. L., Matthews, K., Abbot, S., Cheng, B., Felten, P., … Swaim, K. (2017). A systematic literature review of students as partners in higher education. International Journal for Students As Partners, 1(1). doi: 10.15173/ijsap.v1i1.3119
   Google Scholar
• Muller, M., & Druin, A. (2002). Participatory design: The third space in HCI. In J. A. Jacko (Eds.), The human-computer interaction handbook (pp. 1125–1154). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Muller, M. J., & Kuhn, S. (1993). Participatory design. Communications of the ACM, 36(6), 24–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penaluna, A., & Penaluna, K. (2009). Creativity in business/business in creativity: Transdisciplinary curricula as an enabling strategy in enterprise education. Industry and Higher Education, 23(3), 209–219. doi: 10.5367/000000009788640314
   Google Scholar
• Polk, M. (2015). Transdisciplinary co-production: Designing and testing a transdisciplinary research framework for societal problem solving. Futures, 65, 110–122. doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2014.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polk, M., & Knutsson, P. (2008). Participation, value rationality and mutual learning in transdisciplinary knowledge production for sustainable development. Environmental Education Research, 14(6), 643–653. doi: 10.1080/13504620802464841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsey, K. (2009). GIS, modeling, and politics: On the tensions of collaborative decision support. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(6), 1972–1980. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.08.029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, H., Grant, C., Robinson, C. J., Izurieta, A., Smyth, D., & Rist, P. (2009). Co-management and Indigenous protected areas in Australia: Achievements and ways forward. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management, 16(4), 242–252. doi: 10.1080/14486563.2009.9725240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, E. B.-N., & Stappers, P. J. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign, 4(1), 5–18. doi: 10.1080/15710880701875068
   Google Scholar
• Scholz, R., & Steiner, G. (2015). The real type and ideal type of transdisciplinary processes: Part I—Theoretical foundations. Sustainability Science, 10(4), 527–544. doi: 10.1007/s11625-015-0326-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, N. (2012). Living as form. In N. Thompson (Ed.), Living as form: Socially engaged art from 1991–2011 (pp. 16–33). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• van der Bijl-Brouwer, M., & Dorst, K. (2017). Advancing the strategic impact of human-centred design. Design Studies, 53, 1–23. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2017.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wixon, D. (2003). Evaluating usability methods, why the current literature fails the practitioner. Interactions, 10(4), 28–34.
   Google Scholar
• Zepke, N. (2018). Student engagement in neo-liberal times: What is missing? Higher Education Research & Development, 37(2), 433–446. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2017.1370440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar