Language–content partnership in higher education: development and opportunities

References

• Akkerman, S. F., & Bakker, A. (2011). Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 132–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazerman, C., Little, J., Bethel, L., Chavkin, T., Fouquette, D., & Garufis, J. (2005). Reference guide to writing across the curriculum. West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press. Retrieved from The WAC Clearinghouse http://wac.colostate.edu/
   Google Scholar
• Beck, A. (2006). Adventures in team teaching: Integrating communications into an engineering curriculum. Teaching English in the Two Year College, 34(1), 59–69.
   Google Scholar
• Bizzell, P. (1982). Cognition, convention, and certainty: What we need to know about writing. PREITEXI, 3(3), 213–244.
   Google Scholar
• Brammer, C., Amare, N., & Campbell, K. S. (2008). Culture shock: Teaching writing within interdisciplinary contact zones. Across the Disciplines, 5. Retrieved from https://wac.colostate.edu/atd/articles/brammeretal2008.cfm
   Google Scholar
• Brinton, D., Snow, M. A., & Wesche, M. B. (1989). Content-based second language instruction. New York: Newbury House Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Brooman-Jones, S., Cunningham, G., & Hanna, L. (2011). Embedding academic literacy – A case study in Business at UTS:Insearch. Journal of Academic Language & Learning, 5(2), A1–A13.
   Google Scholar
• Bruce, I. (2011). Theory and concepts of English for academic purposes. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Cargill, M., & O’Connor, P. (2013). Writing scientific research articles: Strategy and steps (2nd ed.). Hackensack, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Cargill, M., & Smernik, R. (2016). Embedding publication skills in science research training: A writing group programme based on applied linguistics frameworks and facilitated by a scientist. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(2), 229–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chanock, K. (2007). What academic language and learning advisers bring to the scholarship of teaching and learning: Problems and possibilities for dialogue with the disciplines. Higher Education Research & Development, 26(3), 269–280.
   Google Scholar
• Chanock, K. (2013). Teaching subject literacies through blended learning: Reflections on a collaboration between academic learning staff and teachers in the disciplines. Journal of Academic Language Learning, 7(2), A106–A119.
   Google Scholar
• Chanock, K. (2017). Learning specialists working with faculty to embed development of academic literacies in disciplinary subjects. In S. Plane, C. Bazerman, F. Rondelli, C. Donahue, A. N. Applebee, C. Boré, P. Carlino, M. M. Larruy, P. Rogers, & D. Russell (Eds.), Research on writing: Multiple perspectives (pp. 243–262). Fort Collins, CO: The WAC Clearinghouse and Centre de Recherche sur les Médiations (CREM).
   Google Scholar
• Chanock, K., Horton, C., Reedman, M., & Stephenson, B. (2012). Collaborating to embed academic literacies and personal support in first year discipline subjects. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 9(3). Retrieved from http://ro.uow.edu.au/jutlp/vol9/iss3/3
   Google Scholar
• Crosling, G., & Wilson, A. V. (2005). Creating a rich environment: Co-operation between academic support and disciplinary teaching staff. Paper presented at the LAS2005: Critiquing and Reflecting.
   Google Scholar
• Deane, M., & O’Neill, P. (2011a). Writing in the disciplines: Universities into the 21st century. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Deane, M., & O’Neill, P. (2011b). Conclusion: Ways forward for WiD. In M. Deane & P. O’Neill (Eds.), Writing in the disciplines: Universities into the 21st century (pp. 265–272). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ding, A., & Bruce, I. (2017). The English for academic purposes practitioner: Operating on the edge of academia. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dudley-Evans, T. (1998). An overview of ESP in the 1990s. In The Japan Conference on English for Specific Purposes Proceedings (pp. 5–11). Paper presented at the Japan Conference on English for Specific Purposes, Aizuwakamatsu City, Fukushima, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, E., Tindale, J., Cable, D., & Hamil Mead, S. (2009). Collaborative teaching in a linguistically and culturally diverse higher education setting: A case study of a postgraduate accounting program. Higher Education Research & Development, 28(6), 597–613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, G. (1997). Teacher education and LSP: The role of specialised knowledge. In R. Howard & G. Brown (Eds.), Teacher education for languages for specific purposes (pp. 80–89). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Harper, R., & Vered, K. O. (2017). Developing communication as a graduate outcome: Using ‘writing across the curriculum’ as a whole-of-institution approach to curriculum and pedagogy. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(4), 688–701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, A. J., & Ashton, J. (2011). Embedding and integrating language and academic skills: An innovative approach. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 5(2), A73–A87.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, J. C. (2017). Teaching writing for publication in English to engineering students: Implications from a collaborative course in Taiwan. In M. J. Curry & T. Lillis (Eds.), Global academic publishing: Policies, perspectives and pedagogies (pp. 217–232). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (2016). General and specific EAP. In K. Hyland & P. Shaw (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of English for academic purposes (pp. 17–29). London & New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, C. (2005). On being an insider on the outside: New spaces for integrating academic literacies. Teaching in Higher Education, 10(4), 475–487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaidev, R., & Chan, P. (2018). Embedding communication in the disciplines: A tale of two faculties. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 12(3), 199–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johns, T. F., & Dudley-Evans, A. (1980). An experiment in team teaching overseas postgraduate students of transportation and plant biology. In Team teaching in ESP (ELT Documents No. 106, pp. 6–23). London: British Council.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, J., Bonanno, H., & Scouller, K. (2001). Staff and student roles in central and faculty-based learning support: Changing partnerships. Retrieved from https://learning.uow.edu.au/LAS2001/selected/jones_1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, R. R. (2002). The growth of EAP in Britain. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 1, 69–78.
   Google Scholar
• Lasagabaster, D. (2018). Fostering team teaching: Mapping out a research agenda for English-medium instruction at university level. Language Teaching, 51(3), 400–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Y., & Cargill, M. (2019). Seeking supervisor collaboration in a school of sciences at a Chinese university. In K. Hyland & L. Wong (Eds.), Specialised English: New directions in ESP and EAP research and practice (pp. 240–252). London & New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Y., Cargill, M., Gao, X., Wang, X., & O’Connor, P. (2019). A scientist in interdisciplinary team-teaching in an English for research publication purposes classroom: Beyond a ‘cameo role’. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 40, 129–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., Flowerdew, J., & Cargill, M. (2018). Teaching English for research publication purposes to science students in China: A case study of an experienced teacher in the classroom. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 35, 116–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lillis, T. (2006). Moving towards an academic literacies pedagogy: ‘Dialogues of participation’. In L. Ganobscik-Williams (Ed.), Teaching academic writing in UK higher education: Theories, practices and models (pp. 30–45). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, S., & Evison, A. (2006). Exploring the potential of writing for educational change at Queen Mary University of London. In L. Ganobcsik-Williams (Ed.), Teaching academic writing in UK higher education (pp. 68–84). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, E., Ploettner, J., & Deal, M. (2015). Exploring professional collaboration at the boundary between content and language teaching from a CHAT approach. Ibérica, 30, 85–104.
   Google Scholar
• Morley, J. (2008). Writing support in British higher education: An institutional case study. In P. Friedrich (Ed.), Teaching academic writing (pp. 125–146). London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Paretti, M. (2011). Interdisciplinarity as a lens for theorizing language/content partnerships. Across the Disciplines, 8(3). Retrieved from http://wac.colostate.edu/atd/clil/paretti.cfm
   Google Scholar
• Pratt, M. L. (1991). Arts of the contact zone. Profession, 91, 33–40.
   Google Scholar
• Purser, E. (2011). Developing academic literacy in context: Trends in Australia. In M. Deane & P. O’Neill (Eds.), Writing in the disciplines: Universities into the 21st century (pp. 30–47). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Purser, E. R., Skillen, J., Deane, M., Donohue, J., & Peake, K. (2008). Developing academic literacy in context. Retrieved from University of Wollongong Research Online.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz de Zarobe, Y., & Lyster, R. (2018). Content and language integration in higher education: Instructional practices and teacher development. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 21(5), 523–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, S., Caplan, N. A., Cox, M., & Phillips, T. (Eds.). (2016). Supporting graduate student writers: Research, curriculum, & program design. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skillen, J., Merten, M., Trivett, N., & Percy, A. (1998). The IDEALL approach to learning development: A model for fostering improved literacy and learning outcomes for students. Paper presented at the AARE 1998, University of Adelaide. Retrieved from http://www.aare.edu.au/98pap/ski98343.htm
   Google Scholar
• Sloan, D., & Porter, E. (2009). The management of English language support in postgraduate business education: The CEM Model (contextualisation, embedding and mapping). International Journal of Management Education (Oxford Brookes University), 7(2), 51–58.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, T., & Perry, B. (2005). Interdisciplinary team teaching as a model for teacher development. TESL-EJ, 9(2), 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thies, L. C. (2012). Increasing student participation and success: Collaborating to embed academic literacies into the curriculum. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 6(1), A15–A31.
   Google Scholar
• Veitch, S., Johnson, S., & Mansfield, C. (2016). Collaborating to embed the teaching and assessment of literacy in education: A targeted unit approach. Journal of Academic Language Learning, 10(2), A1–A10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts, J., & Burnett, R. E. (2012). Pairing courses across the disciplines: Effects on writing performance. Written Communication, 29(2), 208–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wingate, U. (2011). A comparison of ‘additional’ and ‘embedded’ approaches to teaching writing in the disciplines. In M. Deane & P. O’Neill (Eds.), Writing in the disciplines: Universities into the 21st century (pp. 65–87). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wingate, U., Andon, N., & Cogo, A. (2011). Embedding academic writing instruction into subject teaching: A case study. Active Learning in Higher Education, 12, 69–81.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfswinkel, J. F., Furtmueller, E., & Wilderom, C. P. M. (2013). Using grounded theory as a method for rigorously reviewing literature. European Journal of Information Systems, 22(1), 45–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zappa-Hollman, S. (2018). Collaborations between language and content university instructors: Factors and indicators of positive partnerships. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 21(5), 591–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar