522
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Do academic developers’ conceptions support an integrated academic practice? A comparative case study from Hong Kong and Singapore

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 606-620 | Received 31 Jan 2019, Accepted 21 Jul 2019, Published online: 10 Nov 2019

References

  • Adcroft, A., & Lockwood, A. (2010). Enhancing the scholarship of teaching and learning: An organic approach. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(5), 479–491.
  • Amundsen, C., & Wilson, M. (2012). Are we asking the right questions? A conceptual review of the educational development literature in higher education. Review of Educational Research, 82(1), 90–126.
  • Bilbow, G. T., Hounsell, D., & Zou, T. X. P. (2017). Fostering dialogue about practices. In B. Stensaker, G. T. Bilbow, L. Breslow, & R. van der Vaart (Eds.), Strengthening teaching and learning in research universities (pp. 161–185). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Blackmore, P., & Blackwell, R. (2006). Strategic leadership in academic development. Studies in Higher Education, 31(3), 373–387.
  • Booth, S., & Woollacott, L. C. (2017). On the constitution of SoTL: Its domains and contexts. Higher Education, 75(3), 537–551.
  • Boshier, R. (2009). Why is the scholarship of teaching and learning such a hard sell? Higher Education Research & Development, 28(1), 1–15.
  • Boud, D., & Brew, A. (2013). Reconceptualising academic work as professional practice: Implications for academic development. International Journal for Academic Development, 18(3), 208–221.
  • Boyer, E. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities for the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
  • Brew, A. (2012). Teaching and research: New relationships and their implications for inquiry-based teaching and learning in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(1), 101–114.
  • Challis, D., Holt, D., & Palmer, S. (2009). Teaching and learning centres: Towards maturation. Higher Education Research & Development, 28(4), 371–383.
  • Chalmers, D. (2011). Progress and challenges to the recognition and reward of the scholarship of teaching in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(1), 25–38.
  • Clegg, S. (2009). Forms of knowing and academic development practice. Studies in Higher Education, 34(4), 403–416.
  • Clegg, S., & Stevenson, J. (2013). The interview reconsidered: Context, genre, reflexivity and interpretation in sociological approaches to interviews in higher education research. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(1), 5–16.
  • Deaker, L., Stein, J., & Spiller, D. (2016). You can’t teach me: Exploring academic resistance to teaching development. International Journal for Academic Development, 21(4), 299–311.
  • Elen, J., Lindblom-Ylänne, S., & Clement, M. (2007). Faculty development in research-intensive universities: The role of academics’ conceptions on the relationship between research and teaching. International Journal for Academic Development, 12(2), 123–139.
  • Felten, P., Kalish, A., Pingree, A., & Plank, K. (2007). Toward a scholarship of teaching and learning in educational development. In D. Robertson & L. Nilson (Eds.), To improve the academy: Resources for faculty, instructional and organizational development (pp. 93–108). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Fyffe, J. M. (2018). Getting comfortable with being uncomfortable: A narrative account of becoming an academic developer. International Journal for Academic Development, 23(4), 355–366.
  • Geertsema, J. (2016). Academic development, SoTL and educational research. International Journal for Academic Development, 21(2), 122–134.
  • Geertsema, J., Chng, H.-H., Gan, M., & Soong, A. (2018). Teaching excellence and the rise of education-focused employment tracks. In C. Broughan, G. Steventon, & L. Clouder (Eds.), Global perspectives on teaching excellence: A new era for higher education (pp. 130–142). London: Routledge.
  • Gibbs, G. (2013). Reflections on the changing nature of educational development. International Journal for Academic Development, 18(1), 4–14.
  • Golding, C. (2014). Blinkered conceptions of academic development. International Journal for Academic Development, 19(2), 150–152.
  • Harland, T. (2016). Teaching to enhance research. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(3), 461–472.
  • Harland, T., & Wald, N. (2018). Curriculum, teaching and powerful knowledge. Higher Education . Advance online publication. doi: 10.1007/s10734-017-0228-8
  • Havnes, A., & Stensaker, B. (2006). Educational development centres: From educational to organisational development? Quality Assurance in Education, 14(1), 7–20.
  • Healey, M., & Jenkins, A. (2018). The role of academic developers in embedding high-impact undergraduate research and inquiry in mainstream higher education: Twenty years’ reflection. International Journal for Academic Development, 23(1), 52–64.
  • Heng, S. K. (2014, December 4). Speech at the opening ceremony of the Association of Southeast Asian Institutions of Higher Learning conference, Singapore.
  • Ho, A., Watkins, D., & Kelly, M. (2001). The conceptual change approach to improving teaching and learning: An evaluation of a Hong Kong staff development programme. Higher Education, 42, 143–169.
  • Hutchings, P., Huber, M. T., & Ciccone, A. (2011). The scholarship of teaching and learning reconsidered: Institutional integration and impact. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Jenkins, A., Breen, R., Lindsay, R., & Brew, A. (2003). Re-shaping higher education: Linking teaching and research. London: Routledge.
  • Joseph-Richard, P., & Jessop, T. (2018). A phenomenographic study of research informed teaching through the eyes of masters’ students. Studies in Higher Education . Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2018.1554640
  • King, N. (2004). Using templates in the thematic analysis of text. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research (pp. 256–270). London: Sage.
  • Kreber, C. (2003). The scholarship of teaching: A comparison of conceptions held by experts and regular academic staff. Higher Education, 46, 93–121.
  • Land, R. (2001). Agency, context and change in academic development. International Journal for Academic Development, 6(1), 4–20.
  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lee, A., Manathunga, C., & Kandlbinder, P. (2010). Shaping a culture: Oral histories of academic development in Australian universities. Higher Education Research & Development, 29(3), 307–318.
  • Leibowitz, B., Cilliers, F., du Plessis, J., Kafaar, Z., van der Merwe, A., Viljoen, S., & Young, G. (2011). Orientations to academic development: Lessons from collaborative study at a research-led university. International Journal for Academic Development, 16(1), 19–32.
  • Macfarlane, B. (2011). The morphing of academic practice: Unbundling and the rise of the para-academic. Higher Education Quarterly, 65(1), 59–73.
  • Marton, W. Y., & Pong, F. M. (2005). On the unit of description in phenomenography. Higher Education Research & Development, 24, 335–348.
  • Mårtensson, K., Roxå, T., & Olsson, T. (2011). Developing a quality culture through the scholarship of teaching and learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(1), 51–62.
  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Murphy, J. (1994). Improving the effectiveness of educational development: Concerns, constraints and recommendations. Higher Education Research & Development, 13, 213–230.
  • Shulman, L. S. (2000). Teacher development: Roles of domain expertise and pedagogical knowledge. Journal of Applied Development Psychology, 21(1), 129–135.
  • SkillsFuture Singapore. (2017). Annual report. Retrieved from http://www.skillsfuture.sg/
  • Smith, P., & Rust, C. (2011). The potential of research-based learning for the creation of truly inclusive academic communities of practice. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 48(2), 115–125.
  • Stake, R. E. (1988). Case study methods in educational research: Seeking sweet water. In R. M. Jaeger (Ed.), Complementary methods for research in education (pp. 253–300). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
  • Stensaker, B. (2018). Quality assurance and the battle for legitimacy – discourses, disputes and dependencies. Higher Education Evaluation and Development, 12(2), 54–62.
  • Stensaker, B., Van der Vaart, R., Solbrekke, T. D., & Wittek, A. L. (2017). The expansion of academic development: The challenges of organizational coordination and collaboration. In B. Stensaker, G. Bilbow, L. Breslow, & R. Van der Vaart (Eds.), Strengthening teaching and learning in research universities: Strategies and initiatives for institutional change (pp. 19–41). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Sugrue, C., Englund, T., Solbrekke, T. D., & Fossland, T. (2017). Trends in the practices of academic developers: Trajectories of higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 43(12), 2336–2353.
  • Sutherland, K. A. (2018). Holistic academic development: Is it time to think more broadly about the academic development project? International Journal for Academic Development, 23(4), 261–273.
  • Trigwell, K. (2013). Evidence of the impact of scholarship of teaching and learning purposes. Teaching and Learning Inquiry, 1(1), 95–105.
  • Trigwell, K., Martin, E., Benjamin, J., & Prosser, M. (2000). Scholarship of teaching: A model. Higher Education Research & Development, 19(2), 155–168.
  • University Grants Committee. (2010). Aspirations for the higher education system in Hong Kong. Retrieved from https://www.ugc.edu.hk/eng/ugc/about/publications/report/her2010/her2010.html
  • Wheelahan, L. (2010). Why knowledge matters in curriculum: A social realist argument. London: Routledge.
  • Young, M. (2008). Bringing knowledge back in: From social constructivism to social realism in the sociology of education. London: Routledge.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.