How a centralised approach to learning design influences students: a mixed methods study

References

• Badley, G. (2003). The crisis in educational research: A pragmatic approach. European Educational Research Journal, 2(2), 296–308. doi: 10.2304/eerj.2003.2.2.7
   Google Scholar
• Badwan, B., Bothara, R., Latijnhouwers, M., Smithies, A., & Sandars, J. (2018). The importance of design thinking in medical education. Medical Teacher, 40(4), 425–426. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1399203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, S., Agostinho, S., & Lockyer, L. (2015). Technology tools to support learning design: Implications derived from an investigation of university teachers’ design practices. Computers & Education, 81, 211–220. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, S., Agostinho, S., & Lockyer, L. (2016). Investigating university educators’ design thinking and the implications for design support tools. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1, 9.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, S., Agostinho, S., & Lockyer, L. (2017). The process of designing for learning: Understanding university teachers’ design work. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(1), 125–145. doi: 10.1007/s11423-016-9469-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. (2013). Receiving the gift of teaching: From ‘learning from’ to ‘being taught by’. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 32(5), 449–461. doi: 10.1007/s11217-012-9312-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5–21. doi: 10.2307/1511637
   Google Scholar
• Dalsgaard, P., 2014. Pragmatism and design thinking. International Journal of design, 8(1), 143–155.
   Google Scholar
• Dorst, K. (2011). The core of ‘design thinking’ and its application. Design Studies, 32(6), 521–532. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2011.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodyear, P. (2005). Educational design and networked learning: Patterns, pattern languages and design practice. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 21(1), 82–101. doi: 10.14742/ajet.1344
   Google Scholar
• Goodyear, P. (2015). Teaching as design. HERDSA Review of Higher Education, 2, 27–50.
   Google Scholar
• Harper, B., Agostinho, S., Bennett, S., Lukasiak, J., & Lockyer, L. (2005). Constructing high quality learning environments using learning designs and learning objects (pp. 266–270). Fifth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT'05), Kaohsiung. doi:10.1109/ICALT.2005.91
   Google Scholar
• Johansson-Sköldberg, U., Woodilla, J., & Çetinkaya, M. (2013). Design thinking: Past, present and possible futures. Creativity and Innovation Management, 22(2), 121–146. doi: 10.1111/caim.12023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimber, K., & Wyatt-Smith, C. (2006). Using and creating knowledge with new technologies: A case for students-as-designers. Learning, Media and Technology, 31(1), 19–34. doi: 10.1080/17439880500515440
   Google Scholar
• Laurillard, D. (2013). Teaching as a design science: Building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Laurillard, D., Kennedy, E., Charlton, P., Wild, J., & Dimakopoulos, D. (2018). Using technology to develop teachers as designers of TEL: Evaluating the learning designer. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(6), 1044–1058. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, J. H., & Wrigley, C. (2017). Design and design thinking in business and management higher education. Journal of Learning Design, 10(1), 41–54. doi: 10.5204/jld.v9i3.294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAndrew, P., Goodyear, P., & Dalziel, J. (2006). Patterns, designs and activities: Unifying descriptions of learning structures. International Journal of Learning Technology, 2(2–3), 216–242. doi: 10.1504/IJLT.2006.010632
   Google Scholar
• Morris, A. K., & Hiebert, J. (2011). Creating shared instructional products: An alternative approach to improving teaching. Educational Researcher, 40(1), 5–14. doi: 10.3102/0013189X10393501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muñoz-Cristóbal, J. A., Hernández-Leo, D., Carvalho, L., Martinez-Maldonado, R., Thompson, K., Wardak, D., & Goodyear, P. (2018). 4FAD: A framework for mapping the evolution of artefacts in the learning design process. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(2), 16–34. doi: 10.14742/ajet.3706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. (2014). Digital technology and the contemporary university: Degrees of digitization. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sharples, M., Delgado Kloos, C., Dimitriadis, Y., Garlatti, S., & Specht, M. (2015). Mobile and accessible learning for MOOCs. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1(4), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Toetenel, L., & Rienties, B. (2016). Analysing 157 learning designs using learning analytic approaches as a means to evaluate the impact of pedagogical decision making. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(5), 981–992. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar