References
- Armstrong, N., & Chang, S. M. (2007). Location, location, location: Does seat location affect performance in large classes? Journal of College Science Teaching, 37(2), 54–58.
- Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
- Becker, F. D., Sommer, R., Bee, J., & Oxley, B. (1973). College classroom ecology. Sociometry, 36(4), 514–525. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2786247
- Benedict, M. E., & Hoag, J. (2004). Seating location in large lectures: Are seating preferences or location related to course performance? The Journal of Economic Education, 35(3), 215–231. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3200/jece.35.3.215-231
- Bergtold, J. S., Yeager, E. A., & Griffin, T. W. (2019). Spatial dynamics in the classroom: Does seating choice matter? PLoS One, 14(12), e0226953. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226953
- Biglan, A. (1973). The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(3), 195–203. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034701
- Braxton, J. M., Olsen, D., & Simmons, A. (1998). Affinity disciplines and the use of principles of good practice for undergraduate education. Research in Higher Education, 39(3), 299–318. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1018729101473
- Brophy, J. E. (1983). Research on the self-fulfilling prophecy and teacher expectations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(5), 631–661. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.75.5.631
- Carini, R. M., Kuh, G. D., & Klein, S. P. (2006). Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages. Research in Higher Education, 47(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-005-8150-9
- Chiu, P. H. P., & Cheng, S. H. (2016). Effects of active learning classrooms on student learning: A two-year empirical investigation on student perceptions and academic performance. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(2), 269–279. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1196475
- Devlin, M., & Samarawickrema, G. (2010). The criteria of effective teaching in a changing higher education context. Higher Education Research & Development, 29(2), 111–124. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360903244398
- Fenollar, P., Roman, S., & Cuestas, P. J. (2007). University students’ academic performance: An integrative conceptual framework and empirical analysis. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(Pt 4), 873–891. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1348/000709907X189118
- Fuller, K., & Stevenson, H. (2018). Global education reform: Understanding the movement. Educational Review, 71(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2019.1532718
- Gaff, J. G., & Wilson, R. C. (1971). Faculty cultures and interdisciplinary studies. The Journal of Higher Education, 42(3), 186–201. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1971.11776806
- Haghighi, M. M., & Jusan, M. M. (2012). Exploring students behavior on seating arrangements in learning environment: A review. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 36, 287–294. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.032
- Hayes, A. F., & Rockwood, N. J. (2017). Regression-based statistical mediation and moderation analysis in clinical research: Observations, recommendations, and implementation. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 98, 39–57. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2016.11.001
- Heng, K. (2013). The relationships between student engagement and the academic achievement of first-year university students in Cambodia. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 23(2), 179–189. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-013-0095-8
- Henshaw, R. G., Edwards, P. M., & Bagley, E. J. (2011). Use of swivel desks and aisle space to promote interaction in mid-sized college classrooms. Journal of Learning Spaces, 1(1), n1.
- Hung, M., Bounsanga, J., & Voss, M. W. (2017). Interpretation of correlations in clinical research. Postgraduate Medicine, 129(8), 902–906. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00325481.2017.1383820
- Jones, W. A. (2011). Variation among academic disciplines: An update on analytical frameworks and research. Journal of the Professoriate, 6(1), 9–27.
- Joshi, G. P., Jha, S., Cho, S., Seo, C., Son, L. H., & Thong, P. H. (2019). Influence of multimedia and seating location in academic engagement and grade performance of students. Computer Applications in Engineering Education. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22190
- Kahu, E. R., & Nelson, K. (2017). Student engagement in the educational interface: Understanding the mechanisms of student success. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(1), 58–71. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1344197
- Kaya, N., & Burgess, B. (2007). Territoriality: Seat preferences in different types of classroom arrangements. Environment and Behavior, 39(6), 859–876. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916506298798
- Koneya, M. (1976). Location and interaction in row-and-column seating arrangements. Environment and Behavior, 8(2), 265–282. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/001391657682005
- LaCroix, K., & LaCroix, S. (2017). Does seat location matter? A review of the proximity effect in large and small classrooms. Community College Enterprise, 23(2), 58–69.
- Leach, L. (2016). Exploring discipline differences in student engagement in one institution. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(4), 772–786. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2015.1137875
- Levine, D. W., O'Neal, E. C., Garwood, S. G., & McDonald, P. J. (1980). Classroom ecology: The effects of seating position on grades and participation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6(3), 409–412. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/014616728063012
- Long, J. A. (2018). jtools: Analysis and presentation of social scientific data. R package version, 1(0).
- Long, J. A. (2019). Interactions: Comprehensive, user-friendly toolkit for probing interactions. In: R package version.
- Losonczy-Marshall, M., & Marshall, P. D. (2013). Factors in students’ seat selection: An exploratory study. Psychological Reports, 112(2), 651–666. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2466/11.07.PR0.112.2.651-666
- McKenzie, K., & Schweitzer, R. (2001). Who succeeds at university? Factors predicting academic performance in first year Australian university students. Higher Education Research & Development, 20(1), 21–33. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07924360120043621
- Meeks, M., Knotts, T., James, K., Williams, F., Vassar, J., & Wren, A. (2013). The impact of seating location and seating type on student performance. Education Sciences, 3(4), 375–386. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci3040375
- Michel, J. O., Campbell, C. M., & Dilsizian, K. (2018). Is STEM too hard? Using Biglan to understand academic rigor and teaching practices across disciplines. Journal of the Professoriate, 9(2).
- Montello, D. R. (1988). Classroom seating location and its effect on course achievement, participation, and attitudes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 8(2), 149–157. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(88)80005-7
- Navarro Jover, J. M., & Martínez Ramírez, J. A. (2018). Academic performance, class attendance and seating location of university students in practical lectures. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 8(4), 337. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.353
- Nelson Laird, T. F., Shoup, R., Kuh, G. D., & Schwarz, M. J. (2008). The effects of discipline on deep approaches to student learning and college outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 49(6), 469–494. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-008-9088-5
- Ogilvie, C. A. (2008). Swivel seating in large lecture theaters and its impact on student discussions and learning. Journal of College Science Teaching, 37(3), 50.
- Parker, T., Hoopes, O., & Eggett, D. (2011). The effect of seat location and movement or permanence on student-initiated participation. College Teaching, 59(2), 79–84. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2010.538766
- Perkins, K. K., & Wieman, C. E. (2005). The surprising impact of seat location on student performance. The Physics Teacher, 43(1), 30–33. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1845987
- Philips, B., McNaught, C., & Kennedy, G. (2012). Evaluating e-learning: Guiding research sand practice. Routledge.
- Pichierri, M., & Guido, G. (2016). When the row predicts the grade: Differences in marketing students’ performance as a function of seating location. Learning and Individual Differences, 49, 437–441. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.04.007
- Pike, G. R., Smart, J. C., & Ethington, C. A. (2011). The mediating effects of student engagement on the relationships between academic disciplines and learning outcomes: An extension of Holland’s theory. Research in Higher Education, 53(5), 550–575. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-011-9239-y
- Rosenman, R., Tennekoon, V., & Hill, L. G. (2011). Measuring bias in self-reported data. International Journal of Behavioural and Healthcare Research, 2(4), 320–332. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBHR.2011.043414
- Sahlberg, P. (2016). The Global Educational Reform Movement and Its Impact on Schooling. In 128–144. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118468005.ch7
- Salter, D., Thomson, D. L., Fox, B., & Lam, J. (2013). Use and evaluation of a technology-rich experimental collaborative classroom. Higher Education Research & Development, 32(5), 805–819. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2013.777033
- Samaha, M., & Hawi, N. S. (2016). Relationships among smartphone addiction, stress, academic performance, and satisfaction with life. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 321–325. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.045
- Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1999). Theory testing and measurement error. Intelligence, 27(3), 183–198. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-2896(99)00024-0
- Sedgwick, P. (2014). Cross sectional studies: Advantages and disadvantages. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 348(2), g2276. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g2276
- Sharma, S., Durand, R. M., & Gur-Arie, O. (1981). Identification and analysis of moderator variables. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 291–300. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/3150970
- Shernof, D. J., Ruzek, E. A., Sannella, A. J., Schorr, R. Y., Sanchez-Wall, L., & Bressler, D. M. (2017). Student engagement as a general factor of classroom experience: Associations with student practices and educational outcomes in a university gateway course. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 994. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00994
- Shernoff, D. J., Sannella, A. J., Schorr, R. Y., Sanchez-Wall, L., Ruzek, E. A., Sinha, S., & Bressler, D. M. (2017). Separate worlds: The influence of seating location on student engagement, classroom experience, and performance in the large university lecture hall. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 49, 55–64. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.12.002
- Smart, J. C., & Ethington, C. A. (1995). Disciplinary and institutional differences in undergraduate education goals. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1995(64), 49–57. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.37219956408
- Smart, J. C., Ethington, C. A., Umbach, P. D., & Rocconi, L. M. (2009). Faculty emphases on alternative course-specific learning outcomes in Holland’s Model environments: The role of Environmental consistency. Research in Higher Education, 50(5), 483–501. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-009-9125-z
- Smart, J. C., & Umbach, P. D. (2007). Faculty and academic environments: Using Holland's theory to explore differences in how faculty structure undergraduate courses. Journal of College Student Development, 48(2), 183–195. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2007.0021
- Totusek, P. F., & Staton-Spicer, A. Q. (1982). Classroom seating preference as a function of student personality. The Journal of Experimental Education, 50(3), 159–163. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1982.11011818
- Umbach, P. D. (2006). The contribution of faculty of color to undergraduate education. Research in Higher Education, 47(3), 317–345. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-005-9391-3
- Van Horne, S., Murniati, C., Gaffney, J. D., & Jesse, M. (2012). Promoting active learning in technology-infused TILE classrooms at the University of Iowa. Journal of Learning Spaces, 1(2), n2.
- Zomorodian, K., Parva, M., Ahrari, I., Tavana, S., Hemyari, C., Pakshir, K., Jafari, P., & Sahraian, A. (2012). The effect of seating preferences of the medical students on educational achievement. Medical Education Online, 17(1), 10448. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3402/meo.v17i0.10448