References
- Åkerlind, G. (2008). An academic perspective on research and being a researcher: An integration of the literature. Studies in Higher Education, 33(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070701794775
- Åkerlind, G. (2012). Variation and commonality in phenomenographic research methods. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(1), 115–127. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2011.642845
- Anderson-Rowland, M., Rodriguez, A., & Grierson, A. (2014). Determining student beliefs about engineering. In 2014 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) proceedings (pp. 1–7). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2014.7044108
- Barnett, R. (2006). Graduate attributes in an age of uncertainty. In P. Hager & S. Holland (Eds.), Graduate attributes, learning and employability (pp. 49–65). Springer.
- Besterfield-Sacre, M., Atman, C., Shuman, L., Porter, R., Felder, R., & Fuller, H. (1996). Changes in freshman engineers’ attitudes-a cross institutional comparison: What makes a difference? In Technology-based Re-engineering Engineering Education Proceedings of Frontiers in Education FIE’96 26th Annual Conference (Vol. 1, pp. 78–82). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.1996.567992
- Bobis, J., Khosronejad, M., Way, J., & Anderson, J. (2020). “Sage on the stage” or “meddler in the middle”: Shifting mathematics teachers’ identities to support student engagement. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 23(6), 615–632. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-019-09444-1
- Bowden, J., & Green, P. (2005). Doing developmental phenomenography. RMIT University Press.
- Cameron, R. B., & Rideout, C. A. (2020). ‘It’s been a challenge finding new ways to learn’: First-year students’ perceptions of adapting to learning in a university environment. Studies in Higher Education, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1783525
- Dabbagh, N., & Menascé, D. (2006). Student perceptions of engineering entrepreneurship: An exploratory study. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 153–164. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00886.x
- Daly, S., Adams, R., & Bodner, G. (2012). What does it mean to design? A qualitative investigation of design professionals’ experiences. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(2), 187–219. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00048.x
- Damşa, C., Nerland, M., & Jensen, K. (2017). Enrolment of first-year students in knowledge domains: Unpacking transformative practices in three introductory courses. In E. Kyndt, V. Donche, K. Trigwell, & S. Lindblom-Ylänne (Eds.), Higher education transitions: Theory and research (pp. 270–287). Routledge / EARLI book series ‘New perspectives on learning and instruction’.
- Dringenberg, E., & Purzer, Ş. (2018). Experiences of first-year engineering students working on Ill-structured problems in teams. Journal of Engineering Education, 107(3), 442–467. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20220
- Dunsmore, K., Turns, J., & Yellin, J. (2011). Looking toward the real world: Student conceptions of engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(2), 329–348. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00016.x
- Filho, W. L. (2000). Dealing with misconceptions on the concept of sustainability. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 1(1), 9–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/1467630010307066
- Gibbings, P., Lidstone, J., & Bruce, C. (2015). Students’ experience of problem-based learning in virtual space. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(1), 74–88. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.934327
- Hannon, J., Hocking, C., Legge, K., & Lugg, A. (2018). Sustaining interdisciplinary education: Developing boundary crossing governance. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(7), 1424–1438. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1484706
- Johri, A., & Olds, B. (2011). Situated engineering learning: Bridging engineering education research and the learning sciences. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(1), 151–185. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00007.x
- Jones, A. (2009). Redisciplining generic attributes: The disciplinary context in focus. Studies in Higher Education, 34(1), 85–100. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802602018
- Karataş, F., Bodner, G., & Unal, S. (2016). First-year engineering students’ views of the nature of engineering: Implications for engineering programmes. European Journal of Engineering Education, 41(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2014.1001821
- Marton, F. (1986). Phenomenography – a research approach to investigating different understandings of reality. Journal of Thought, 21(3), 28–49.
- Marton, F. (1994). Phenomenography. In T. Husén & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of education (2nd ed., Vol. 8, pp. 4424–4429). Pergamon.
- Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. L. Erlbaum Associates.
- Marton, F., & Pong, W. Y. (2005). On the unit of description in phenomenography. Higher Education Research and Development, 24(4), 335–348. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360500284706
- Muller, J. (2015). The future of knowledge and skills in science and technology higher education. Higher Education, 70(3), 409–416. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9842-x
- Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding learning and teaching: The experience in higher education. Open University Press.
- Reimann, P., & Markauskaite, L. (2018). Expertise. In F. Fischer, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, S. R. Goldman, & P. Reimann (Eds.), International handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 54–63). Routledge.
- Sandberg, J. (1994). Human competence at work: An interpretative approach. BAS.
- Sandberg, J. (1997). Are phenomenographic results reliable? Higher Education Research & Development, 16(2), 203–212. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436970160207
- Sandberg, J. (2000). Understanding human competence at work: An interpretative approach. Academy of Management Journal, 43(1), 9–25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/1556383
- Su, Y. (2014). Self-directed, genuine graduate attributes: The person-based approach. Higher Education Research and Development, 33(6), 1208–1220. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.911255
- Trigwell, K. (2000). A phenomenographic interview on phenomenography. In J. A. Bowden & E. Walsh (Eds.), Phenomenography (pp. 43–57). RMIT University Press.
- Trigwell, K. (2006). Phenomenography: An approach to research into geography education. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 30(2), 367–372. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03098260600717489
- Winters, K. E., Matusovic, H. M., Brunhaver, S., Chen, H. L., Yasuhara, K., & Sheppard, S. (2013, June 23–26). From freshman engineering students to practicing professionals: Changes in beliefs about important skills over time. 120th American society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta (pp. 1–10).
- Yates, C., Partridge, H., & Bruce, C. (2012). Exploring information experiences through phenomenography. Library and Information Research, 36(112), 96–119. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29173/lirg496
- Zoltowski, C., Oakes, W., & Cardella, M. (2012). Students’ ways of experiencing human-centered design. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(1), 28–59. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00040.x