Toward a consensual definition of educational research and development: a Delphi study

References

• Ashton, R. (2009). Using the research and development in organisations model to improve transition to high school. Educational Psychology in Practice, 25(3), 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/02667360903151783
   Google Scholar
• Bernanke, B. S. (2011). Promoting research and development: The government’s role. Issues in Science and Technology, 27(4), 37–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betz, F., Carayannis, E., Jetter, A., Min, W., Phillips, F., & Shin, D. W. (2016). Modeling an innovation intermediary system within a helix. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 7(2), 587–599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-014-0230-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, P. (2000). Research and the development of educational assessment. Oxford Review of Education, 26(3-4), 407–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/713688540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bos, F., Hollanders, H., & Keuning, S. (1992). A research and development module supplementing the national accounts: Statistics Netherland (The Netherlands, MPRA).
   Google Scholar
• Brattström, A., Löfsten, H., & Richtnér, A. (2012). Creativity, trust and systematic processes in product development. Research Policy, 41(4), 743–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Condliffe, L. A. (2000). An elusive science: The troubling history of education research. The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dearborn, D. C., Kneznek, R. W., & Anthony, R. N. (1953). Spending for industrial research 1951–1952. Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Drill, K., Miller, S., & Behrstock-Sherratt, E. (2013). Teachers’ perspectives on educational research. Brock Education: A Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.26522/BROCKED.V23I1.350
   Google Scholar
• Dutrenit, G., & Sutz, J. (2014). National systems of innovation, social inclusion and development: The Latin American experience. Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and “mode 2” to a triple helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulop, L., & Couchman, P. K. (2006). Facing up to the risks in commercially focused university–industry R&D partnerships. Higher Education Research & Development, 25(2), 163–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360600610396
   Google Scholar
• Giannarou, L., & Zervas, E. (2014). Using Delphi technique to build consensus in practice. International Journal of Business Science and Applied Management, 9(2), 65–82.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2009). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Godin, B. (2006). Research and development: How the ‘D’ got into R&D. Science and Public Policy, 33(1), 59–76. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154306781779190
   Google Scholar
• Hasson, F., & Keeney, S. (2011). Enhancing rigour in the Delphi technique research. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(9), 1695–1704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2011.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasson, F., Keeney, S., & McKenna, H. (2000). Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32(4), 1008–1015. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.t01-1-01567.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herstad, S. J., Bloch, C., Ebersberger, B., & van de Velde, E. (2010). National innovation policy and global open innovation: Exploring balances, tradeoffs and complementarities. Science and Public Policy, 37(2), 113–124. https://doi.org/10.3152/030234210X489590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hore, T. (1984). Future strategies for research and development. Higher Education Research & Development, 3(2), 177–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436840030206
   Google Scholar
• Ion, G., Stîngu, M., & Marin, E. (2019). How can researchers facilitate the utilisation of research by policy-makers and practitioners in education? Research Papers in Education, 34(4), 483–498. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2018.1452965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffery, G., Hache, G., & Lehr, R. (1995). A group–based Delphi application: Defining rural career counselling needs. Measurement and Evaluation in Counselling and Development, 28, 45–60.
   Google Scholar
• Joram, E., Gabriele, A. J., & Walton, K. (2020). What influences teachers’ “buy-in” of research? teachers’ beliefs about the applicability of educational research to their practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 88, 102980–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khirwadkar, A. (2009). Research and development in e-learning: A vision. International Forum of Teaching and Studies, 5(1), 44–51.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhlmann, S., & Edler, J. (2003). Scenarios of technology and innovation policies in Europe: Investigating future governance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 70(7), 619–637. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1625(03)00027-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louis, K. S. (1999). Making meaning of the relationship between research and policy: An epilogue. Educational Policy, 13(1), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904899131015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubienski, C., Scott, J., & DeBray, E. (2014). The politics of research production, promotion, and utilization in educational policy. Educational Policy, 28(2), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904813515329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, M., Crossley, M., & Bond, T. (2019). Changing modalities in international development and research in education: Conceptual and ethical issues. International Journal of Educational Development, 70, 102080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2019.102080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenna, H. P. (1994). The Delphi technique: A worthwhile research approach for nursing? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 19(6), 1221–1225. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.1994.tb01207.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J., Ramirez, F., Frank, D., & Schofer, E. (2005). Higher education as an institution. In P. Gumport (Ed.), Sociology of higher education: Contributions and their contexts (pp. 187–221). The Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mohrman, K., Ma, W., & Baker, D. (2007). The emerging global model of the research university. In P. G. Altbach, & P. M. Peterson (Eds.), Higher education in the new century: Global challenges and innovative ideas (pp. 145–177). Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Mohrman, K., Ma, W., & Baker, D. (2008). The research university in transition: The emerging global model. Higher Education Policy, 21(1), 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.hep.8300175
   Google Scholar
• Nakatsu, R. T., & Iacovou, C. L. (2009). A comparative study of important risk factors involved in offshore and domestic outsourcing of software development projects: A two-panel Delphi study. Information & Management, 46(1), 57–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2008.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Academy of Sciences. (1999). Improving student learning: A strategic plan for education research and its utilisation: Committee on a feasibility study for a strategic education research program, national research council. National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nobelius, D. (2004). Towards the sixth generation of R&D management. International Journal of Project Management, 22(5), 369–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2003.10.002
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (1993). The measurement of scientific and technical activities: Proposed standard practice for surveys of research and experimental development. OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2015). The measurement of scientific and technical activities: Frascati Manual: Guidelines for collecting and reporting data on research and experimental development. OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Ozga, J. (2007). Co-production of quality in the applied education research scheme. Research Papers in Education, 22(2), 169–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671520701296114
   Google Scholar
• Postholm, M. B., & Moen, T. (2011). Communities of development: A new model for R&D work. Journal of Educational Change, 12(4), 385–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-010-9150-x
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, C., & Mishra, P. (2018). Learning environments that support student creativity: Developing the SCALE. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 27, 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothwell, R. (1994). Towards the fifth-generation innovation process. International Marketing Review, 11(1), 7–31. https://doi.org/10.1108/02651339410057491
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, G., & Wright, G. (2001). Experts opinions in forecasting: The role of the Delphi technique. In J. Armstrong (Ed.), Principles of forecasting (pp. 125–144). Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Schutz, R. E. (1979). Educational R&D trends and implications for educational evaluation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1(6), 5–10.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. (2013). Common guidelines for education research and development: A report from the institute of education sciences. The Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education and the National Science Foundation.
   Google Scholar