19,160
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Assessment for inclusion: rethinking contemporary strategies in assessment design

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 483-497 | Received 27 Sep 2021, Accepted 03 Mar 2022, Published online: 15 Jun 2022

References

  • Ajjawi, R., Tai, J., Huu Nghia, T. L., Boud, D., Johnson, L., & Patrick, C.-J. (2020). Aligning assessment with the needs of work-integrated learning: The challenges of authentic assessment in a complex context. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(2), 304–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1639613
  • Ashworth, M., Bloxham, S., & Pearce, L. (2010). Examining the tension between academic standards and inclusion for disabled students: The impact on marking of individual academics’ frameworks for assessment. Studies in Higher Education, 35(2), 209–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070903062864
  • Bartolic, S. K., Boud, D., Agapito, J., Verpoorten, D., Williams, S., Lutze-Mann, L., Matzat, U., Moreno, M. M., Polly, P., Tai, J., Marsh, H. L., Lin, L., Burgess, J.-L., Habtu, S., Rodrigo, M. M. M., Roth, M., Heap, T., & Guppy, N. (2021). A multi-institutional assessment of changes in higher education teaching and learning in the face of COVID-19. Educational Review, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2021.1955830
  • Bearman, M., & Ajjawi, R. (2021). Can a rubric do more than be transparent? Invitation as a new metaphor for assessment criteria. Studies in Higher Education, 46(2), 359–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1637842
  • Bearman, M., Dawson, P., Bennett, S., Hall, M., Molloy, E., Boud, D., & Joughin, G. (2017). How university teachers design assessments: A cross-disciplinary study. Higher Education, 74(1), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0027-7
  • Bloxham, S., Den-Outer, B., Hudson, J., & Price, M. (2016). Let’s stop the pretence of consistent marking: Exploring the multiple limitations of assessment criteria. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(3), 466–481. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1024607
  • Boud, D. (2007). Reframing assessment as if learning was important. In D. Boud & N. Falchikov (Eds.), Rethinking assessment in higher education: Learning for the longer term (pp. 14–25). Routledge.
  • CAST. (2018). Universal design for learning guidelines version 2.2. http://udlguidelines.cast.org
  • Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039
  • Dawson, P. (2021). Defending assessment security in a digital world: Preventing e-cheating and supporting academic integrity in higher education. Routledge.
  • Dawson, P., Bearman, M., Boud, D. J., Hall, M., Molloy, E. K., Bennett, S., & Gordon, J. (2013). Assessment might dictate the curriculum, but what dictates assessment? Teaching & Learning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal, 1(1), 107–111. https://doi.org/10.2979/teachlearninqu.1.1.107
  • Fishman, T. (2014). The fundamental values of academic integrity. International Center for Academic Integrity, Clemson University. https://www.chapman.edu/academics/academic-integrity/_files/the-fundamental-values-of-academic-integrity.pdf
  • Gulikers, J. T. M., Bastiaens, T. J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2004). A five-dimensional framework for authentic assessment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(3), 67–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504676
  • Hockings, C. (2010). Inclusive learning and teaching in higher education: A synthesis of research. EvidenceNet, Higher Education Academy. www.heacademy.ac.uk/evidencenet
  • Hollnagel, E. (2015). Why is work-as-imagined different from work-as- done? In R. L. Wears, E. Hollnagel, & J. Braithwaite (Eds.), Resilient health care: The resilience of everyday clinical work (pp. 249–264). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315605739
  • Hurst, E., & Mona, M. (2017). “Translanguaging” as a socially just pedagogy. Education as Change, 21(2), 126–148. https://doi.org/10.17159/1947-9417/2017/2015
  • Jorre de St Jorre, T., Boud, D., & Johnson, E. D. (2021). Assessment for distinctiveness: Recognising diversity of accomplishments. Studies in Higher Education, 46(7), 1371–1382. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1689385
  • Jorre de St Jorre, T., & Oliver, B. (2018). Want students to engage? Contextualise graduate learning outcomes and assess for employability. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(1), 44–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1339183
  • Kaur, A., Noman, M., & Nordin, H. (2017). Inclusive assessment for linguistically diverse learners in higher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(5), 756–771. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1187250
  • Kurth, N., & Mellard, D. (2006). Student perceptions of the accommodation process in postsecondary education. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 19(1), 71–84. https://www.ahead.org/professional-resources/publications/jped/archived-jped/jped-volume-19
  • Lawrie, G., Marquis, E., Fuller, E., Newman, T., Qiu, M., Nomikoudis, M., Roelofs, F., & Van Dam, L. (2017). Moving towards inclusive learning and teaching: A synthesis of recent literature. Teaching and Learning Inquiry, 5(1), https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.5.1.3
  • Leathwood, C. (2005). Assessment policy and practice in higher education: Purpose, standards and equity. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(3), 307–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930500063876
  • Lewandowski, L., Cohen, J., & Lovett, B. J. (2013). Effects of extended time allotments on reading comprehension performance of college students with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 31(3), 326–336. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282912462693
  • Lipnevich, A. A., Panadero, E., Gjicali, K., & Fraile, J. (2021). What’s on the syllabus? An analysis of assessment criteria in first year courses across US and Spanish universities. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 33(4), 675–699. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-021-09357-9
  • Logan, C. (2020). Refusal, partnership, and countering educational technology’s harms. Hybrid Pedagogy. https://hybridpedagogy.org/refusal-partnership-countering-harms/
  • Marginson, S. (2016). The worldwide trend to high participation higher education: Dynamics of social stratification in inclusive systems. Higher Education, 72(4), 413–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0016-x
  • Matheson, R., & Sutcliffe, M. (2017). Creating belonging and transformation through the adoption of flexible pedagogies in masters level international business management students. Teaching in Higher Education, 22(1), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1221807
  • McArthur, J. (2016). Assessment for social justice: The role of assessment in achieving social justice. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(7), 967–981. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1053429
  • McArthur, J. (2018). Assessment for social justice: Perspectives and practices within higher education. Bloomsbury Academic.
  • Moriña, A., Sandoval, M., & Carnerero, F. (2020). Higher education inclusivity: When the disability enriches the university. Higher Education Research & Development, 39(6), 1202–1216. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1712676
  • Morris, C., Milton, E., & Goldstone, R. (2019). Case study: Suggesting choice: Inclusive assessment processes. Higher Education Pedagogies, 4(1), 435–447. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2019.1669479
  • Nieminen, J. H., & Pesonen, H. V. (2021). Politicising inclusive learning environments: How to foster belonging and challenge ableism? Higher Education Research & Development, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2021.1945547
  • O’Neill, G. (2017). It’s not fair! Students and staff views on the equity of the procedures and outcomes of students’ choice of assessment methods. Irish Educational Studies, 36(2), 221–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2017.1324805
  • O’Shea, S., Lysaght, P., Roberts, J., & Harwood, V. (2016). Shifting the blame in higher education – social inclusion and deficit discourses. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(2), 322–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2015.1087388
  • Ragpot, L. (2011). Assessing student learning by way of drama and visual art: A semiotic mix in a course on cognitive development. Education as Change, 15(Suppl. 1), S63–S78. https://doi.org/10.1080/16823206.2011.643625
  • Riddell, S., & Weedon, E. (2006). What counts as a reasonable adjustment? Dyslexic students and the concept of fair assessment. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 16(1), 57–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/19620210600804301
  • Roberts, K. D., Satlykgylyjova, M., & Park, H.-J. (2015). Universal design of instruction in postsecondary education: A literature review of empirically based articles. In S. Burgstahler (Ed.), Universal design in higher education: From principles to practice (pp. 65–80). Harvard Education Press.
  • Ryan, J., Goldingay, S., Macfarlane, S., & Hitch, D. (2020). Promoting equity by illuminating academic roles and identities in teaching students from diverse backgrounds. Teaching in Higher Education, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1852203
  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.55.1.68
  • Schuwirth, L. W. T., & Van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2011). Programmatic assessment: From assessment of learning to assessment for learning. Medical Teacher, 33(6), 478–485. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2011.565828
  • Smith, C., & Worsfold, K. (2015). Unpacking the learning–work nexus: ‘priming’ as lever for high-quality learning outcomes in work-integrated learning curricula. Studies in Higher Education, 40(1), 22–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.806456
  • Stentiford, L., & Koutsouris, G. (2021). What are inclusive pedagogies in higher education? A systematic scoping review. Studies in Higher Education, 46(11), 2245–2261. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1716322
  • Tai, J., Ajjawi, R., & Umarova, A. (2021). How do students experience inclusive assessment? A critical review of contemporary literature. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2021.2011441
  • Villarroel, V., Bloxham, S., Bruna, D., Bruna, C., & Herrera-Seda, C. (2018). Authentic assessment: Creating a blueprint for course design. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(5), 840–854. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1412396
  • Vu, T. T., & Dall’Alba, G. (2014). Authentic assessment for student learning: An ontological conceptualisation. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 46(7), 778–791. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2013.795110
  • Waterfield, J., & West, B. (2006). Inclusive assessment in higher education: A resource for change. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315045009
  • Watermeyer, R., Crick, T., Knight, C., & Goodall, J. (2020). COVID-19 and digital disruption in UK universities: Afflictions and affordances of emergency online migration. Higher Education, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00561-y
  • Willems, J. (2010). The equity raw-score matrix – a multi-dimensional indicator of potential disadvantage in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 29(6), 603–621. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294361003592058
  • Woldeab, D., & Brothen, T. (2019). 21st century assessment: Online proctoring, test anxiety, and student performance. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 34(1), 1–10. http://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/1106