References
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
- Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Sage Publications, University of California.
- Gläser, J., Ash, M., Buenstorf, G., Hopf, D., Hubenschmid, L., Janßen, M., Laudel, G., Schimank, U., Stoll, M., Wilholt, T., Zechlin, L., & Lieb, K. (2022). The independence of research – a review of disciplinary perspectives and outline of interdisciplinary prospects. Minerva, 60(1), 105–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-021-09451-8
- Gläser, J., & Laudel, G. (2016). Governing science. European Journal of Sociology, 57(1), 117–168. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975616000047
- Hoffman, S. G. (2021). A story of nimble knowledge production in an era of academic capitalism. Theory and Society, 50(4), 541–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-020-09422-0
- Holloway, K., & Herder, M. (2019). A responsibility to commercialize? Tracing academic researchers’ evolving engagement with the commercialization of biomedical research. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 6(3), 263–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2019.1608615
- Kaltenbrunner, W. (2020). Managing budgetary uncertainty, interpreting policy. How researchers integrate “grand challenges” funding programs into their research agendas. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 7(3), 320–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2020.1744401
- Laudel, G. (2023). Researchers’ responses to their funding situation. In B. Lepori, B. Jongbloed, & D. Hicks (Eds.), Handbook of public research funding (pp. 261–278). Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800883086.00024
- Laudel, G., & Gläser, J. (2014). Beyond breakthrough research: Epistemic properties of research and their consequences for research funding. Research Policy, 43(7), 1204–1216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.02.006
- Lee, J., & Stuen, E. (2016). University reputation and technology commercialization: Evidence from nanoscale science. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(3), 586–609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-015-9430-y
- Luukkonen, T., & Thomas, D. A. (2016). The ‘negotiated space’ of university researchers’ pursuit of a research agenda. Minerva, 54(1), 99–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-016-9291-z
- Mendoza, P. (2007). Academic capitalism and doctoral student socialization: A case study. The Journal of Higher Education, 78(1), 71–96. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2007.0004
- Mendoza, P., & Öcal, S. D. (2022). Faculty engagement in university–industry linkages in Turkey and the United States: National technocenters versus ecosystems of knowledge. Higher Education, 84(4), 723–740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-021-00796-3
- MOE, MIIT, State Intellectual Property Office. (2022, July 05). Notice of “Thousands of Schools and Ten Thousand Enterprises” Collaborative Innovation Partnership Action. [Jiaoyububangongting gongyehexinxihuabubangongting Guojiazhichichanquanjubangongshi Guanyukaizhan ‘Qianxiaowanqi’ Xietongchuangxin huobanxingdong de tongzhi]. https://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A16/s7062/202207/t20220708_644510.html
- Perkmann, M., Salandra, R., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., & Hughes, A. (2021). Academic engagement: A review of the literature 2011-2019. Research Policy, 50(1), 104114–104114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104114
- Ramos-Vielba, I., Thomas, D., & Aagaard, K. (2022). Societal targeting in researcher funding: An exploratory approach. Research Evaluation, 31(2), 202–213. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvab044
- Slaughter, S. A., & Leslie, L. L. (1997). Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. The Johns Hopkins University Press.
- Szelényi, K., & Bresonis, K. (2014). The public good and academic capitalism: Science and engineering doctoral students and faculty on the boundary of knowledge regimes. The Journal of Higher Education, 85(1), 126–153. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2014.0004
- Välikangas, A. (2022). The uses of grand challenges in research policy and university management: Something for everyone. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 9(1), 93–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2022.2040870
- van Rijnsoever, F. J., & Hessels, L. K. (2021). How academic researchers select collaborative research projects: A choice experiment. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 46(6), 1917–1948. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-020-09833-2
- Whitley, R., Gläser, J., & Laudel, G. (2018). The impact of changing funding and authority relationships on scientific innovations. Minerva, 56(1), 109–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-018-9343-7
- Yang, X., Zhu, G., Lv, F., & Dai, Y. (2021). How could the university-industry collaboration improve the academic performance of researchers from university scientific research teams———Multiple case study based on behavioral perspective [Chanxueyanhezuo Ruhetisheng Gaoxiaokeyantuanduixuezhe de Xueshujixiao]. Management Review [Guanli Pinglun], 33((02|2)), 338–352.
- Zhao, X., & Cui, H. (2022). Impact of university-industry collaborative research with different dimensions on university patent commercialisation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 34(11), 1235–1248. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2021.1950677