Doctoral intelligence: a framework for developing mindsets for doctorateness in changing doctoral contexts

References

• Acar, S., & Runco, M. A. (2015). Thinking in multiple directions: Hyperspace categories in divergent thinking. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(1), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahern, K., & Manathunga, C. (2004). Clutch-starting stalled research students. Innovative Higher Education, 28(4), 237–254. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:IHIE.0000018908.36113.a5
   Google Scholar
• Åkerlind, G., & McAlpine, L. (2017). Supervising doctoral students: Variation in purpose and pedagogy. Studies in Higher Education, 42(9), 1686–1698. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1118031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albertyn, R. (2022). Making a case for doctoral intelligence: Conceptualisation and insights for researcher development. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 59(6), 623–633. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2021.1899033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albertyn, R., & Bennett, K. (2021). Containing and harnessing uncertainty during postgraduate research supervision. Higher Education Research & Development, 40(4), 661–675. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1775559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashwin, P. (2022). Understanding educational development in terms of the collective creation of socially-just curricula. Teaching in Higher Education, 27(8), 979–991. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2022.2111208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baltes, P. B., & Staudinger, U. M. (2000). Wisdom: A metaheuristic (pragmatic) to orchestrate mind and virtue toward excellence. American Psychologist, 55(1), 122–136. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnacle, R., Cuthbert, D., Schmidt, C., & Batty, C. (2020). HASS PhD graduate careers and knowledge transfer: A conduit for enduring, multi-sector networks. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 19(4), 397–418. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022219870976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnacle, R., & Dal’Alba, G. (2017). Committed to learn: Student engagement and care in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(7), 1326–1338. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1326879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basadur, M. G. (1995). Optimal ideation-evaluation ratios. Creativity Research Journal, 8(1), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj0801_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastalich, W., & McCulloch, A. (2022). The ideal research degree supervisor ‘can play any role’: Rethinking institutional orientation and induction for commencing doctoral students. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2022.2158117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bengtsen, S. S., & McAlpine, L. (2022). A novel perspective on doctoral supervision interaction of time, academic work, institutional policies, and life course. Learning and Teaching, 15(1), 21–45. https://doi.org/10.3167/latiss.2022.150103
   Google Scholar
• Benmore, A. (2016). Boundary management in doctoral supervision: How supervisors negotiate roles and role transitions throughout the supervisory journey. Studies in Higher Education, 41(7), 1251–1264. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.967203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bieschke, K. J. (2006). Research self-efficacy beliefs and research outcome expectations: Implications for developing scientifically minded psychologists. Journal of Career Assessment, 14(1), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072705281366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud, D., & Lee, A. (2005). ‘Peer learning’ as pedagogic discourse for research education. Studies in Higher Education, 30(5), 501–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070500249138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Brodin, E. M. (2016). Critical and creative thinking nexus: Learning experiences of doctoral students. Studies in Higher Education, 41(6), 971–989. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.943656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, M., Taylor, J., Williams, J., & Tong, K. (2016). Student satisfaction and perceptions of quality: Testing the linkages for PhD students. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(6), 1153–1166. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1160873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, J. E., & Downing, C. L. (2000). Contemporary models for intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence (pp. 34–52). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, R. E. (2000). Critical thinking, scientific thinking and everyday thinking: Metacognition about cognition. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 4(3), 76–83. (Fall).
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, M., McCabe, C., Keogh, B., Brady, A., & McCann, M. (2020). An overview of the qualitative descriptive design within nursing research. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(5), 443–455. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987119880234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earley, P. C., & Ang, S. (2003). Cultural intelligence: Individual interactions across cultures. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elliot, D. L., Bengtsen, S. E., Guccione, K., & Kobayashi, S. (2020). The hidden curriculum in doctoral education. Palgrave MacMillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41497-9.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, L. (2011). The scholarship of researcher development: Mapping the terrain and pushing back boundaries. International Journal for Researcher Development, 2(2), 75–98. https://doi.org/10.1108/17597511111212691
   Google Scholar
• Fredua-Kwarteng, E. (2023). Africa needs more PhDs, but they must be of high quality. University World News, April 23. https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20230412130513149&
   Google Scholar
• French, R. P. (2016). The fuzziness of mindsets: Divergent conceptualizations and characterizations of mindset theory and praxis. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 24(4), 673–691. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-09-2014-0797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frick, B. L., Albertyn, R. M., & Bitzer, E. M. (2014). Conceptualising risk in doctoral education: Navigating boundary tensions. In E. M. Bitzer, R. Albertyn, L. Frick, B. Grant, & F. Kelly (Eds.), Pushing boundaries in postgraduate supervision (pp. 53–68). African Sun Media.
   Google Scholar
• Fritzsche, L. (2022). Integrating contemplative pedagogy and anti-oppressive pedagogy in geography higher education classrooms. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 46(2), 167–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2021.1946766
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioiamethodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerin, C. (2021). Researcher developers traversing the borderlands: Credibility and pedagogy in the third space. Teaching in Higher Education, 26(3), 518–524. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1894551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haggard, M., Rowatt, W. C., Leman, J. C., Meagher, R. R., Moore, C., Fergus, T., Whitcomb, D., Battaly, H., Baehr, J., & Howard-Snyder, D. (2018). Finding middle ground between intellectual arrogance and intellectual servility: Development and assessment of the limitations-owning intellectual humility scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 124(April), 184–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.12.014
   Google Scholar
• Hay, A. (2022). Exploring unknowingness in the DBA programme: Possibilities for developing an ‘attitude of wisdom’. Management Learning, 53(2), 269–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507621998565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgson, D. (2020). Helping doctoral students understand PhD thesis examination expectations: A framework and a tool for supervision. Active Learning in Higher Education, 21(1), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787417742020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holbrook, A., Bourke, S., & Fairbairn, H. (2015). Examiner reference to theory in PhD theses. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 52(1), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2014.981842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horta, H. (2018). PhD students’ self-perception of skills and career plans while in doctoral programs: Are they associated? Asia Pacific Education Review, 19(2), 211–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-018-9532-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, K. J., & Turner-Nash, K. (2011). Alimentar: Theorizing pedagogy, curriculum, and mentorship for democratic doctoral education. Equity & Excellence in Education, 44(1), 22–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2011.541344
   Google Scholar
• Lee, A. (2018). How can we develop supervisors for the modern doctorate? Studies in Higher Education, 43(5), 878–890. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1438116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McChesney, K. (2022). A rationale for trauma-informed postgraduate supervision. Teaching in Higher Education, https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2022.2145469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCray, J., & Joseph-Richard, P. (2020). Towards a model of resilience protection: Factors influencing doctoral completion. Higher Education, 80(4), 679–699. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00507-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenna, S., & van Schalkwyk, S. (2023). A scoping review of the changing landscape of doctoral education. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2023.2168121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Mowbray, S. L.-A., & Halse, C. (2010). The purpose of the PhD: Theorising the skills acquired by students. Higher Education Research & Development, 29(6), 653–664. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2010.487199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nerad, M., Bogle, D., Kohl, U., O’Carroll, C., Peters, C., & Scholz, B. (2022). Guiding principles. In M. Nerad, D. Bogle, U. Kohl, C. O’Carroll, C. Peters, & B. Scholz (Eds.), Towards a global core value system in doctoral education (pp. 43–50). UCL Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nisbett, R. E., Aronson, J., Blair, C., Dickens, W., Flynn, J., Halpern, D. F., & Turkheimer, E. (2012). Intelligence: New findings and theoretical developments. American Psychologist, 67(2), 130–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026699
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortwein, M. J. (2015). The regulation of understanding through intellectual virtue: Some implications for doctoral education. Journal of Thought, 49(1-2), 71–85. https://doi.org/10.2307/jthought.49.1-2.71
   Google Scholar
• Rockstuhl, T., Seiler, S., Ang, S., Van Dyne, L., & Annen, H. (2011). Beyond general intelligence (IQ) and emotional intelligence (EQ): The role of cultural intelligence (CQ) on cross-border leadership effectiveness in a globalized world. Journal of Social Sciences, 67(4), 825–840.
   Google Scholar
• Samuel, M., & Vithal, R. (2011). Emergent frameworks of research teaching and learning in a cohort-based doctoral programme. Perspectives in Education, 29(3), 76–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santelmann, L. M., Stevens, D. D., & Martin, S. B. (2018). Fostering master’s students’ metacognition and self-regulation practices for research writing. College Teaching, 66(3), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2018.1446898
   Google Scholar
• Senekal, J. S., Munnik, E., & Frantz, J. M. (2022). A systematic review of doctoral graduate attributes: Domains and definitions. Frontiers in Education, 7, 100910. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.1009106
   Google Scholar
• Slaughter, R. A. (2008). What difference does ‘integral’ make? Futures, 40(2), 120–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2007.11.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, T. (2018). The moral virtue of open-mindedness. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 48(1), 65–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.2017.1335566
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (2000). The concept of intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence (pp. 3–16). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (2012). The assessment of creativity: An investment-based approach. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.652925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stubb, J., Pyhältö, K., & Lonka, K. (2014). Conceptions of research: The doctoral student experience in three domains. Studies in Higher Education, 39(2), 251–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.651449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terenzini, P. T. (2013). “On the nature of institutional research” revisited: Plus ça change … ? Research in Higher Education, 54(2), 137–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-012-9274-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torka, M. (2018). Projectification of doctoral training? How research fields respond to a new funding regime. Minerva, 56(2), 59–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-018-9342-8
   Google Scholar
• Trafford, V., & Leshem, S. (2009). Stepping stones to achieving your doctorate: Focusing on your viva from the start. Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tymon, A., & Batistic, S. (2016). Improved academic performance and enhanced employability? The potential double benefit of proactivity for business graduates. Teaching in Higher Education, 21(8), 915–932. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1198761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yazdani, S., & Shokooh, F. (2018). Defining doctorateness: A concept analysis. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 13(February), 031–048. doi:10.28945/3939
   Google Scholar