Understanding how and why students use academic file-sharing and homework-help websites: implications for academic integrity

References

• Amigud, A., & Lancaster, T. (2019). 246 reasons to cheat: An analysis of students’ reasons for seeking to outsource academic work. Computers & Education, 134, 98–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awdry, R. (2020). Assignment outsourcing: Moving beyond contract cheating. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1765311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bretag, T., Harper, R., Burton, M., Ellis, C., Newton, P., Rozenberg, P., Saddiqui, S., & van Haeringen, K. (2019). Contract cheating: A survey of Australian university students. Studies in Higher Education, 44(11), 1837–1856. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1462788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clare, J., Walker, S., & Hobson, J. (2017). Can we detect contract cheating using existing assessment data? Applying crime prevention theory to an academic integrity issue. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-017-0015-4
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, R., & Lancaster, T. (2006). Eliminating the successor to plagiarism? Identifying the usage of contract cheating sites. In Proceedings of 2nd Plagiarism: Prevention, Practice and Policy Conference June 2006, pp. 19–21. Newcastle, UK: JISC Plagiarism Advisory Service
   Google Scholar
• Curtis, G. J., Clare, J., Rundle, K., Eaton, S. E., Stoesz, B. M., & Seeland, J. (2022a). Contract cheating: An introduction to the problem. In S. E. Eaton, G. J. Curtis, B. M. Stoesz, J. Clare, K. Rundle, & J. Seeland (Eds.), Contract cheating in higher education: Global perspectives on theory, practice, and policy (pp. 1–13). Palgrave MacMillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12680-2_1.
   Google Scholar
• Curtis, G. J., Clare, J., Vieira, E., Selby, E., & Jonason, P. K. (2022b). Predicting contract cheating intentions: Dark personality traits, attitudes, norms, and anticipated guilt and shame. Personality and Individual Differences, 185, 111277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis, G. J., McNeill, M., Slade, C., Tremayne, K., Harper, R., Rundle, K., & Greenaway, R. (2022c). Moving beyond self-reports to estimate the prevalence of commercial contract cheating: An Australian study. Studies in Higher Education, 47(9), 1844–1856. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2021.1972093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon, Z., & George, K. (2021). Monitoring uncharted communities of crowdsourced plagiarism. Journal of Academic Ethics, 19(2), 291–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-020-09381-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eaton, S. E. (2021). Plagiarism in higher education: Tackling tough topics in academic integrity. ABC-CLIO.
   Google Scholar
• Eaton, S. E., Curtis, G. J., Stoesz, B. M., Clare, J., Rundle, K., & Seeland, J. (Eds.) (2022). Contract cheating in higher education: Global perspectives on theory, practice, and policy. Palgrave MacMillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12680-2
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, D. J., & Smith, K. J. (2022). Student use of homework assistance websites. Accounting Education, 31(3), 273–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2021.1971095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, D., Patch, A., McNally, D., & Harris, L. (2021). Student and faculty perceptions of study helper websites: A new practice in collaborative cheating. Journal of Academic Ethics, 19(4), 483–500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-020-09373-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancaster, T. (2022). The past and future of contract cheating. In D. Rettinger, & T. B. Gallant (Eds.), Cheating academic integrity: Lessons from 30 years of research (pp. 45–63). Jossey-Bass/Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Lancaster, T., & Cotarian, C. (2021). Contract cheating by STEM students through a file sharing website: A COVID-19 pandemic perspective. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 17(3), https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-021-00070-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayr, P., & Weller, K. (2017). Think before you collect: Setting up a data collection approach for social media studies. In L. Sloan, & A. Quan-Haase (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social media research methods (Chapter 8). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• McCay-Peet, L., & Quan-Haase, A. (2017). What is social media and what questions can social media research help US answer? In L. Sloan, & A. Quan-Haase (Eds.), SAGE handbook of social media research methods (Chapter 2). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Newton, D. (2022, 9 March). Course hero to host some other something with teachers. https://thecheatsheet.substack.com/p/course-hero-to-host-some-other-something.
   Google Scholar
• Newton, P. M. (2018). How common is commercial contract cheating in higher education and is it increasing? A systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 3(67), https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00067
   Google Scholar
• Perriam, J., Birkbak, A., & Freeman, A. (2020). Digital methods in a post-API environment. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2019.1682840
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogerson, A. M. (2022). The encouragement of file sharing behaviours through technology and social media: Impacts on student cheating behaviours and academic piracy. In S. E. Eaton, G. J. Curtis, B. M. Stoesz, K. Rundle, J. Clare, & J. Seeland (Eds.), Contract cheating in higher education: Global perspectives on theory, practice, and policy (pp. 77–89). Palgrave-McMillian.
   Google Scholar
• Rogerson, A. M. (2023). Student peer-to-peer file sharing as an academic integrity issue. In S. E. Eaton (Ed.), Handbook of academic integrity (2nd ed.). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rogerson, A. M., & Basanta, G. (2016). Peer-to-Peer file sharing and academic integrity in the internet Age. In T. Bretag (Ed.), Handbook of academic integrity (pp. 273–283). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, J. (2023, 18 May). Australian quality agency contacts v-cs on Chegg. Times Higher Education. ‘concerns’. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/australian-quality-agency-contacts-v-cs-chegg-concerns.
   Google Scholar
• Rundle, K., Curtis, G. J., & Clare, J. (2019). Why students do not engage in contract cheating. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2229. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, K. J., Emerson, D. J., & Mauldin, S. (2021). Online cheating at the intersection of the dark triad and fraud diamond. Journal of Accounting Education, 57, 100753. doi:10.1016/j.jaccedu.2021.100753
   Google Scholar