Examining the vulnerability of ambivalent young adults to e-cigarette messages

References

• Allem, J., Escobedo, P., Chu, K., Soto, D., Cruz, T., & Unger, J. (2017). Campaigns and counter campaigns: Reactions on Twitter to e-cigarette education. Tobacco Control, 26(2), 226–229. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052757
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2000). Attitudinal ambivalence: A test of three key hypotheses. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(11), 1421–1432. doi:10.1177/0146167200263009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrington-Trimis, J. L., Urman, R., Berhane, K., Unger, J. B., Cruz, T. B., Pentz, M. A., … McConnell, R. (2016). E-cigarettes and future cigarette use. PEDIATRICS, 138. doi:10.1542/peds.2016-0379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, L. (2015). May 26). CDC anti-smoking ads target e-cigarettes for first time, highlight tobacco’s links to variety of diseases. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/to-your-health/wp/2015/03/26/cdc-anti-smoking-ads-target-vaping-for-the-first-time-highlight-tobaccos-links-to-variety-of-diseases/
   Google Scholar
• Chen, X., Sheng, J., Wang, X., & Deng, J. (2016). Exploring determinants of attraction and helpfulness of online product review: A consumer behaviour perspective. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2016, 1–19. doi:10.1155/2016/9354519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, K., & Forster, J. (2013). Characteristics associated with awareness, perceptions, and use of electronic nicotine delivery systems among young US Midwestern adults. American Journal of Public Health, 103(3), 556–561. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2012.300947
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comm, C. L. (1998). Demarketing products which may pose health risks: An example of the tobacco industry. Health Marketing Quarterly, 15(1), 95–102. doi:10.1300/J026v15n01_06
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Conner, M., Povey, R., Sparks, P., James, R., & Shepherd, R. (2003). Moderating role of attitudinal ambivalence within the theory of planned behavior. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42(1), 75–94. doi:10.1348/014466603763276135
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Curry, L. E., Pederson, L. L., & Stryker, J. E. (2011). The changing marketing of smokeless tobacco in magazine advertisements. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 13(7), 540–547. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntr038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai, H., & Hao, J. (2016). Exposure to advertisements and susceptibility to electronic cigarette use among youth. Journal of Adolescent Health, 59(6), 620–626. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.06.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobbs, P. D., Hammig, B., & Henry, L. J. (2017). E-cigarette use among US adolescents: Perceptions of relative addiction and harm. Health Education Journal, 76(3), 293–301. doi:10.1177/0017896916671762
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ein-Gar, D., Shiv, B., & Tormala, Z. L. (2012). When blemishing leads to blossoming: The positive effect of negative information. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(5), 846–859. doi:10.1086/660807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etter, J.-F., Bullen, C., Flouris, A. D., Laugesen, M., & Eissenberg, T. (2011). Electronic nicotine delivery systems: A research agenda. Tobacco Control, 20(3), 243–248. doi:10.1136/tc.2010.042168
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairchild, A. L., Bayer, R., & Colgrove, J. (2014). The renormalization of smoking? E-cigarettes and the tobacco “endgame”. New England Journal of Medicine, 370(4), 293–295. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1313940
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrelly, M. C., Duke, J. C., Crankshaw, E. C., Eggers, M. E., Lee, Y. O., Nonnemaker, J. M., … Porter, L. (2015). A randomized trial of the effect of e-cigarette TV advertisements on intentions to use e-cigarettes. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 49(5), 686–693. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2015.05.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, P. L. (1987). Measuring ambivalence to science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24(3), 241–247. doi:10.1002/tea.3660240305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, M. C. (2006). Narratives and cancer communication. Journal of Communication, 56(1), S163–S183. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00288.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701–721. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.79.5.701
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henningfield, J. E., & Zaatari, G. S. (2010). Electronic nicotine delivery systems: Emerging science foundation for policy. Tobacco Control, 19(2), 89–90. doi:10.1136/tc.2009.035279
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heuvinck, N., Vermeir, I., & Geuens, M. (2009). Underneath the skin of attitude ambivalence: Different types of ambivalence (PhD Thesis). Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Hodson, G., Maio, G., & Esses, V. (2001). The role of attitudinal ambivalence in susceptibility to consensus information. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 23(3), 197–205. doi:10.1207/S15324834BASP2303_6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonas, K., Broemer, P., & Diehl, M. (2000). Attitudinal ambivalence. European Review of Social Psychology, 11(1), 35–74. doi:10.1080/14792779943000125
   Google Scholar
• Jonas, K., Diehl, M., & Brömer, P. (1997). Effects of attitudinal ambivalence on information processing and attitude-intention consistency. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33(2), 190–210. doi:10.1006/jesp.1996.1317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, K. J. (1972). On the ambivalence-indifference problem in attitude theory and measurement: A suggested modification of the semantic differential technique. Psychological Bulletin, 77(5), 361–372. doi:10.1037/h0032590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. Y., & Sundar, S. S. (2013). To tweet or to retweet? That is the question for health professionals on Twitter. Health Communication, 28(5), 509–524. doi:10.1080/10410236.2012.700391
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipkus, I. M., & Noonan, D. (2016). Association between felt ambivalence and the desire to quit waterpipe use among college students. Journal of Health Psychology, 22(14), 1780–1788. doi:10.1177/1359105316636948
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maio, G. R., Bell, D. W., & Esses, V. M. (1996). Ambivalence and persuasion: The processing of messages about immigrant groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32(6), 513–536. doi:10.1006/jesp.1996.0023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattson, M., & Basu, A. (2010). The message development tool: A case for effective operationalization of messaging in social marketing practice. Health Marketing Quarterly, 27(3), 275–290. doi:10.1080/07359683.2010.495305
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mickle, T. (2015). U.S. ad campaign to challenge value of e-cigarettes in quitting smoking. The Wall Street Journal, Retrieved from http://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-ad-campaign-to-challenge-value-of-e-cigarettes-in-quitting-smoking-1427343161
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, S. T., Frank, L. B., Chatterjee, J. S., & Baezconde-Garbanati, L. (2013). Narrative versus nonnarrative: The role of identification, transportation, and emotion in reducing health disparities. Journal of Communication, 63(1), 116–137. doi:10.1111/jcom.12007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myslín, M., Zhu, S. H., Chapman, W., & Conway, M. (2013). Using Twitter to examine smoking behavior and perceptions of emerging tobacco products. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15(8), doi:10.2196/jmir.2534
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson, J. L., Richardson, A., Niaura, R. S., Vallone, D. M., & Abrams, D. B. (2012). e-Cigarette Awareness, Use, and Harm Perceptions in US Adults. American Journal of Public Health, 102(9), 1758–1766. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2011.300526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pokhrel, P., Fagan, P., Kehl, L., & Herzog, T. A. (2015). Receptivity to e-cigarette marketing, harm perceptions, and e-cigarette use. American Journal of Health Behavior, 39(1), 121–131. doi:10.5993/AJHB.39.1.13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priester, J. R., & Petty, R. E. (1996). The gradual threshold model of ambivalence: Relating the positive and negative bases of attitudes to subjective ambivalence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(3), 431–449. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.3.431
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priester, J. R., Petty, R. E., & Park, K. (2007). Whence univalent ambivalence? From the anticipation of conflicting reactions. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(1), 11–21. doi:10.1086/513042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rath, J. M., Villanti, A. C., Abram, D. B., & Vallone, D. M. (2012). Patterns of tobacco use and dual use in US college students: The missing link between youth prevention and adult cessation. Journal of Environmental and Public Health, 2012, 1. doi:10.1155/2012/679134
   Google Scholar
• Reich, T., & Tormala, Z. L. (2013). When contradictions foster persuasion: An attributional perspective. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(3), 426–439. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Kardes, F. R., & Herr, P. M. (1992). The role of prior knowledge and missing information in multiattribute evaluation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 51(1), 76–91. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(92)90005-R
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders‐Jackson, A., Schleicher, N. C., Fortmann, S. P., & Henriksen, L. (2015). Effect of warning statements in e‐cigarette advertisements: An experiment with college students in the United States. Addiction, 110(12), 2015–2024. doi:10.1111/add.12838
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sengupta, J., & Johar, G. V. (2002). Effects of inconsistent attribute information on the predictive value of product attitudes: Toward a resolution of opposing perspectives. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(1), 39–56. doi:10.1086/339920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, Y., Cummins, S. E., & Zhu, S. H. (2016). Use of electronic cigarettes in smoke-free environments. Tobacco Control, 2016(e1), e19–e22. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053118
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. M., Bansal-Travers, M., O’Connor, R. J., Goniewicz, M. L., & Hyland, A. (2015). Associations between perceptions of e-cigarette advertising and interest in product trial amongst US adult smokers and non-smokers: Results from an internet-based pilot survey. Tobacco Induced Diseases, 13(1), 14. doi:10.1186/s12971-015-0039-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stanford School of Medicine. (2017). Electronic cigarettes. Retrieved from http://tobacco.stanford.edu/tobacco_main/ecigs.php
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, M. M., Zanna, M. P., & Griffin, D. W. (1995). Let’s not be indifferent about (attitudinal) ambivalence. In R. E Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 361–386). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2016). The facts on the FDA’s new tobacco rule. Retrieved from http://www.fda.gov/ForConsumers/ConsumerUpdates/ucm506676.htm
   Google Scholar
• van Harreveld, F., Schneider, I. K., Nohlen, H. U., & van der Pligt, J. (2012). The dynamics of ambivalence: Evaluative conflict in attitudes and decision making. In B. Gawronski & F. Strack (Eds.), Cognitive consistency: A fundamental principle in social cognition (pp. 267–284). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Harreveld, F., van der Pligt, J., & de Liver, Y. N. (2009). The agony of ambivalence and ways to resolve it: Introducing the MAID model. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(1), 45–61. doi:10.1177/1088868308324518
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wackowski, O. A., & Delnevo, C. D. (2015). Smokers’ attitudes and support for e-cigarette policies and regulation in the USA. Tobacco Control, 24(6), 543–504. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051953
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2013). Tobacco Free Initiative. Questions and answers on electronic cigarettes or electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS). Retrieved from http://www.who.int/tobacco/communications/statements/eletronic_cigarettes/en/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, X., & Cappella, J. N. (2008). The influence of ambivalence on adolescents' reactions to anti-drug messages. Communication Quarterly, 56(2), 131–148. doi:10.1080/01463370802026885
   Google Scholar