Using Historical Knowledge to Reason About Contemporary Political Issues: An Expert–Novice Study

REFERENCES

• Aldrich, J.H. (2011). Why parties?: A second Look. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• American Historical Association Committee of Seven, McLaughlin, A.C., Adams, H.B., Fox, G.L., Hart, A.B., Haskins, C.H., …, & Stephens, H.M. (1898). The study of history in schools. Retrieved from http://www.historians.org/pubs/archives/CommitteeofSeven/index.cfm
   Google Scholar
• American Political Science Association. (2013). What is political science. Retrieved from http://www.apsanet.org/content_9181.cfm?navID=727
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, T., & Burke, F. (2007). What does it mean to think historically? Perspectives, 45(1). Retrieved from http://www.historians.org/perspectives/issues/2007/0701/0701tea2.cfm
   Google Scholar
• Araton, H. (2008, February 14). Politicians turn steroid hearing into a partisan squabble. The New York Times
   Google Scholar
• Auerbach, C.F., & Silverstein, L.B. (2003). Qualitative data: An introduction to coding and analysis. New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bain, R.B. (2000). Into the breach: Using research and theory to shape history instruction. In P.N. Stearns, P. Seixas, & S. Wineburg (Eds.), Knowing, teaching & learning history: National and international perspectives (pp. 331–353). New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, K.C., & Levstik, L.S. (2004). Teaching history for the common good. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1993). Surpassing ourselves: An inquiry into the nature and implications of expertise. Chicago, IL: Open Court Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Berti, A.E. (1994). Children's understanding of the concept of the state. In M. Carretero & J.F. Voss (Eds.), Cognitive and instructional processes in history and the social sciences (pp. 49–75). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Bipartisanship. (2008). Issues & Controversies on file. Retrieved from http://www.2facts.com.proxy.lib.umich.edu/icof_story.aspx?PIN=i1300100&term=bipartisanship
   Google Scholar
• Blow, F. (2011). “Everything flows and nothing stays”: How students make sense of historical concepts of change, continuity, and development. Teaching History, 145, 47–55.
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, J., Brown, A.L., & Cocking, R.R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Britt, M.A., & Aglinskas, C. (2002). Improving students’ ability to identify and use source information. Cognition and Instruction, 20(4), 485–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broder, D.S. (2008, February 14). A did-something Congress. The Washington Post, p. A25.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, D. (2004). A polarized America. Hedgehog Review, 6(3), 19–23.
   Google Scholar
• Brophy, J., & Alleman, J. (2006). Government. In J. Brophy & J. Alleman, Children's thinking about cultural universals (pp. 313–370). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. (1991). The narrative construction of reality. Critical Inquiry, 18(1), 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnegie Corporation of New York & CIRCLE. (2003). The civic mission of schools. New York, NY: Carnegie Corporation of New York.
   Google Scholar
• Carretero, M., Jacott, L., Limon, M., Lopez-Manjon, A., & Leon, J.A. (1994). Historical knowledge: Cognitive and instructional implications. In M. Carretero & J.F. Voss (Eds.), Cognitive and instructional processes in history and the social sciences (pp. 357–376). Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Desilver, D. (2013, July 17). Partisan polarization, in Congress and among public, is greater than ever. Fact Tank: News in the Numbers. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2013/07/17/partisan-polarization-in-congress-and-among-public-is-greater-than-ever/
   Google Scholar
• Desilver, D. (2014, June 12). The polarized Congress of today has its roots in the 1970s. Fact Tank: News in the Numbers. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/06/12/polarized-politics-in-congress-began-in-the-1970s-and-has-been-getting-worse-ever-since/
   Google Scholar
• Donovan, S., & Bransford, J. (Eds.). (2005). How students learn: History, mathematics, and science in the classroom. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K.A., & Simon, H.A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (Rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA.: Bradford Books.
   Google Scholar
• Fiske, S.T., Kinder, D.R., & Larter, M.W. (1983). The novice and the expert: Knowledge-based strategies in political cognition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 381–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, S., Ashby, R., & Lee, P. (2008). Usable historical pasts: A study of students’ frameworks of the past. Swindon, UK: ESRC.
   Google Scholar
• Gaddis, J.L. (2002). The landscape of history: How historians map the past. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, H. (1991). The unschooled mind: How children think and how schools should teach. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gould, J., Jamieson, K.H., Levine, P., McConnell, T., & Smith, D.B. (Eds.). (2012). Guardian of democracy: The civic mission of schools. Silver Spring, MD: The Leonore Annenberg Institute for Civics of the Annenberg Public Policy Center at the University of Pennsylvania and the Campaign for the Civic Mission of Schools.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, L.M. (2012). Conceptual devices in the work of world historians. Cognition and Instruction, 30(4), 312–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herszenhorn, D.M., & Bajaj, V. (2008, April 2). A bipartisan bid on mortgage aid is gaining speed. The New York Times, p. 1.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, D.K., & Read, S.J. (2005). Expert-novice differences in the understanding and explanation of complex political conflicts. Discourse Processes, 39(1), 45–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinsley, M. (2007). In defense of partisan bickering. Time, 169, p. 41.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, P.J. (2005). Putting principles into practice: Understanding history. In J. Bransford & S. Donovan (Eds.), How students learn history, mathematics, and science in the classroom (pp. 31–78). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, P.J., & Ashby, R. (2000). Progression in historical understanding among students ages 7–14. In P.N. Stearns, P. Seixas, & S. Wineburg (Eds.), Knowing, teaching, and learning history: National and international perspectives (pp. 199–222). New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, P.J., & Shemilt, D. (2004). “I just wish we could go back in the past and find out what really happened”: Progression in understanding about historical accounts. Teaching History, 117, 25–32.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, P.J., & Shemilt, D. (2009). Is any explanation better than none? Teaching History, 137, 42–49.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, P.J., & Shemilt, D. (2011). The concept that dares not speak its name: Should empathy come out of the closet? Teaching History, 143, 39–48.
   Google Scholar
• Lengell, S. (2008, March 30). Election shaping on Hill—Democrats push bills that won't pass to outline differences with Republicans. The Washington Times, p. A01.
   Google Scholar
• Lupia, A., & McCubbins, M.D. (1998). The democratic dilemma: Can citizens learn what they really need to know? Cambridge, UK; Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Madison, J. (1787). The Federalist No. 10. Retrieved from http://www.constitution.org/fed/federa10.htm
   Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, J., & Martin, C.J. (Eds.). (2013). 2013 task force report: Negotiating agreement in politics. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.
   Google Scholar
• McKeown, M.G., & Beck, I.L. (1990). The assessment and characterization of young learners’ knowledge of a topic in history. American Educational Research Journal, 27(4), 688–726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Moje, E.B. (2008). Foregrounding the disciplines in secondary literacy teaching and learning: A call for change. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52(2), 96–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monte-Sano, C. (2010). Disciplinary literacy in history: An exploration of the historical nature of adolescents’ writing. Journal of Learning Sciences, 19(4), 539–568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosborg, S. (2002). Speaking of history: How adolescents use their knowlege of history in reading the daily news. Cognition and Instruction, 20(3), 323–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Council for Social Studies. (2013). The College, Career, and Civic Life (C3) Framework for Social Studies State Standards: Guidance for enhancing the rigor of K–12 civics, economics, geography, and history. Silver Spring, MD: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards for English language arts & literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Washington, DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers.
   Google Scholar
• Neuendorf, K.A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, A., & Simon, H.A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ,: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center for the People & the Press. (2009). Partisan bickering is back, says public. U.S. Politics (April 8). Retrieved from http://www.people-press.org/2009/04/08/partisan-bickering-is-back-says-public/
   Google Scholar
• Reisman, A. (2012). Reading like a historian: A document-based history curriculum intervention in urban high school. Cognition and Instruction, 30(1), 86–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenblum, N.L. (2010). On the side of the angels: An appreciation of parties and partisanship. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rouet, J.-F., Favart, M., Britt, M.A., & Perfetti, C.A. (1997). Studying and using multiple documents in history: Effects of discipline expertise. Cognition and Instruction, 15(1), 85–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schambra, W. (2006). America has always had divisive politics. In J. Bauder (Ed.), Is the political divide harming America? (pp. 68–72). Detroit, MI: Greenhaven Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seixas, P. (1994). Students’ understanding of historical significance. Theory and Research in Social Education, 22(3), 281–304.
   Google Scholar
• Seixas, P. (1997). Mapping the terrain of historical significance. Social Education, 61, 28–31.
   Google Scholar
• Shanahan, T., & Shanahan, C. (2008). Teaching disciplinary literacy to adolescents: Rethinking content-area literacy. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 40–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shemilt, D. (1987). Adolescent ideas about evidence and methodology in history. In C. Portal (Ed.), The history curriculum for teachers (pp. 39–61). London, UK: Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Shemilt, D. (2000). The caliph's coin: The currency of narrative frameworks in history teaching. In P.N. Stearns, P. Seixas, & S.S. Wineburg (Eds.), Knowing, teaching and learning history: National and international perspectives (pp. 83–101). New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shemilt, D. (2009). Drinking an ocean and pissing a cupful: How adolescents make sense of history. In L. Symcox & A. Wilschut (Eds.), The problem of the canon and the future of history teaching (pp. 141–209). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Someren, M.W. V., Barnard, Y.F., & Sandberg, J. (1994). The think aloud method: A practical guide to modelling cognitive processes. London, UK: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, S.A., Hynd, C.R., Britton, B.K., McNish, M.M., & Bosquet, D. (1996). What happens when students read multiple source documents in history? Reading Research Quarterly, 31(4), 430–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). The basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. London, UK: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Senate. (2000). Senator Joseph Lieberman speaking about “America's civic memory”. Congressional Record, 106th Congress, 2nd Sess., 146(85), S6260–6261.
   Google Scholar
• VanSledright, B., & Brophy, J. (1992). Storytelling, imagination, and fanciful elaboration in children's historical reconstructions. American Educational Research Journal, 29(4), 837–859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voss, J.F., Greene, T.R., Post, A.T., & Penner, B.C. (1983). Problem-solving skill in the social sciences. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 17, 165–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Washington, G. (1796). Farewell address. Retrieved from http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/washing.asp
   Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J.V. (2004). Specific narratives and schematic templates. In P. Seixas (Ed.), Theorizing historical consciousness (pp. 49–62). Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J.V. (2008). The narrative organization of collective memory. Ethos, 36(1), 120–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wills, J.S. (2011). Misremembering as mediated action: Schematic narrative templates and elementary students’ narration of the past. Theory and Research in Social Education, 39(1), 115–144.
   Google Scholar
• Wineburg, S. (1991). On the reading of historical texts: Notes on the breach between school and academy. American Educational Research Journal, 28(3), 495–519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wineburg, S., Mosborg, S., Porst, D., & Duncan, A. (2007). Common belief and the cultural curriculum: An intergenerational study of historical consciousness. American Educational Research Journal, 44(1), 40–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar