Situated Expertise in Literary Interpretation: An Expert-Expert Study of High School and PhD Students Reading Canonical Hip-Hop and Poetry

References

• Alim, H. S. (2011). Global ill-literacies: Hip hop cultures, youth identities, and the politics of literacy. Review of Research in Education, 35(1), 120–146. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X10383208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alim, H. S. (2006). Roc the mic right: The language of hip-hop culture. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Alvermann, D., Marshall, J. D., McLean, C. A., Huddleston, A. P., Joaquin, J., & Bishop, J. (2012). Adolescents’ web-based literacies, identity construction, and skill development. Literacy Research and Instruction, 51(3), 179–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2010.523135
   Google Scholar
• Applebee, A. N. (1993). Literature in the secondary school: Studies of curriculum and instruction in the United States. National Council of Teachers of English.
   Google Scholar
• Baker-Bell, A. (2013). “I never really knew the history behind African American language”: Critical language pedagogy in an advanced placement English Language Arts class. Equity & Excellence in Education, 46(3), 355–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2013.806848
   Google Scholar
• Banks, A. J. (2006). Race, rhetoric, and technology: Searching for higher ground. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, A. C., & Tan, E. (2009). Funds of knowledge and discourses and hybrid space. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(1), 50–73. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bey, Y., & Kweli, T. (2018). Yasmin Bey And Talib Kweli discuss what hip-hop means to them in new interview. Retrieved April 7, 2019, from Okayplayer website.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, W. C. (1983). The rhetoric of fiction. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, A. (2017). Book of rhymes: The poetics of hip-hop. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, A., & DuBois, A. (Eds.). (2010). The anthology of rap. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, C. (1947). The well-wrought urn. Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• Castro-Gómez, S. (2021). Zero-point hubris: Science, race, and enlightenment in eighteenth-century Latin America. Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Charity Hudley, A., Mallinson, C., Berry-McCrea, E., & Muwwakkil, J. (2020). Empowering African-American student voices in college. In A. Kibler, G. Valdés, & A. Walqui (Eds.), Reconceptualizing the role of critical dialogue in American classrooms: Promoting equity through dialogic education. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chinn, C. A., Anderson, R. C., & Waggoner, M. (2001). Patterns of discourse in two kinds of literature discussion. Reading Research Quarterly, 36(4), 378–411. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.36.4.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobb, W. J. (2008). To the break of dawn: A freestyle on the hip-hop aesthetic. NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Common. (2012). One day it’ll all make sense. Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (2014). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (Fourth Edition edition). SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• de los Ríos, C. V., Martinez, D. C., Musser, A. D., Canady, A., Camangian, P., & Quijada, P. D. (2019). Upending colonial practices: Toward repairing harm in English Education. Theory into Practice, 58(4), 359–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2019.1626615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delpit, L. (2006). Other people’s children: Cultural conflict in the classroom (1st edition). The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dorfman, M. H. (1996). Evaluating the interpretive community: Evidence from expert and novice readers. Poetics, 23(6), 453–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(96)00004-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earthman, E. (1992). Creating the virtual work: Readers’ processes in understanding literary texts. Research in the Teaching of English, 26(4), 351–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K., & Simon, H. A. (1984). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fahnestock, J., & Secor, M. (1988). The stases in scientific and literary argument. Written Communication, 5(4), 427–443. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088388005004002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahnestock, J., & Secor, M. (1991). The rhetoric of literary criticism. In C. Bazerman & J. Paradis (Eds.), Textual dynamics of the professions: Historical & contemporary studies of writing in professional communities. University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (1995). Discourse and social change. Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Faust, M., & Dressman, M. (2009). The other tradition: Populist perspectives on teaching poetry, as published in “English Journal,” 1912–2005. English Education, 41(2), 114–134.
   Google Scholar
• Fiasco, L. (2006). Interview: Lupe Fiasco. Retrieved January 3, 2020, from Verbicide website: https://www.verbicidemagazine.com/2006/11/07/interview-lupe-fiasco/
   Google Scholar
• Fish, S. E. (1980). Is there a text in this class? The authority of interpretive communities. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, M. (2005). From the coffee house to the school house: The promise and potential of spoken word poetry in school contexts. English Education, 37(2), 115–131.
   Google Scholar
• Furman, M. (1999). Music review: Mos Def – “Black on both sides.” Retrieved December 13, 2019, from Tiny Mix Tapes website.
   Google Scholar
• Garvin, P. L. (1964). A Prague school reader on esthetics, literary structure, and style. Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (2015). Discourse, small d, Big D. In K. Tracy, C. Ilie, & T. Sandel (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of language and social interaction (pp. 1–5). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, N., Moll, L. C., Tenery, M. F., Rivera, A., Rendon, P., Gonzales, R., & Amanti, C. (1995). Funds of knowledge for teaching in Latino households. Urban Education, 29(4), 443–470. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085995029004005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graff, G. (2003). Clueless in academe: How schooling obscures the life of the mind. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graves, B. (1996). The study of literary expertise as a research strategy. Poetics, 23(6), 385–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(95)00008-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graves, B., & Frederiksen, C. H. (1991). Literary expertise in the description of a fictional narrative. Poetics, 20(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(91)90031-J
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, K. D. (2008). Developing a sociocritical literacy in the third space. Reading Research Quarterly, 43, 148–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, K. D., & Jurow, A. S. (2016). Social design experiments: Toward equity by design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(4), 565–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2016.1204548
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harker, W. (1994). Plain sense” and “poetic significance”: Tenth-grade readers reading two poems. Poetics, 22(3), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(94)90005-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hiatt, B, & Will.i.am. (2018). Will.i.am on the weird future of entertainment and his problems with modern hip-hop. Rolling Stone,
   Google Scholar
• Hill, M. L. (2009). Beats, rhymes, and classroom life: Hip-hop pedagogy and the politics of identity. Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holt, M., (2011). Literature: Teacher’s edition, Grade 10. Holt McDougal.
   Google Scholar
• Hook, J. N. (1979). A long way together: A personal view of NCTE’s first sixty-seven years. National Council of Teachers of English.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, T. (2005). Collected poems. Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, R. A., & Vipond, D. (1985). Crash-testing a transactional model of literary learning. Reader, 14, 23–39.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, P. (2016). If Mos Def’s “Black on Both Sides” came out today. Retrieved December 13, 2019, from Very Smart Brothas website: https://verysmartbrothas.theroot.com/if-mos-def-s-black-on-both-sides-came-out-today-it-m-1822522513.
   Google Scholar
• Janssen, T., Braaksma, M., Rijlaarsdam, G., & van den Bergh, H. (2012). Flexibility in reading literature: Differences between good and poor adolescent readers. Scientific Study of Literature, 2(1), 83–107. https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.2.1.05jan
   Google Scholar
• Jocson, K. M. (2006). Bob Dylan and Hip Hop”: Intersecting literacy practices in youth poetry communities. Written Communication, 23(3), 231–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088306288154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinloch, V. (2012). Crossing boundaries: Teaching and learning with urban youth. Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knoester, M. (2009). Inquiry into urban adolescent independent reading habits: Can Gee’s theory of discourses provide insight? Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52(8), 676–685. https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.52.8.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langer, J. A. (1986). Children reading and writing: Structures and strategies. Ablex Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C. D. (1995). A culturally based cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching African American high school students skills in literary interpretation. Reading Research Quarterly, 30(4), 608–630. https://doi.org/10.2307/748192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C. D. (2007). Culture, literacy, & learning: Taking bloom in the midst of the whirlwind. Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, S. (2019). A century of change in high school English assessments: An analysis of 110 New York State Regents exams, 1900–2018. Research in the Teaching of English, 54(1), 27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, S., Hall, A. H., Goldman, S. R., & Lee, C. D. (2018). A design architecture for engaging middle and high school students in epistemic practices of literary interpretation. In M. Nachowitz & K. C. Wilcox (Eds.), High literacy in secondary english language arts: Bridging the gap to college and career. Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, S., & Horton, W. S. (2015). Helping high school students read like experts: Affective evaluation, salience, and literary interpretation. Cognition and Instruction, 33(2), 125–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2015.1029609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, S., Trepper, K., Chung, R. H., & Coelho, R. (2021). How feeling supports students’ interpretive discussions about literature. Journal of Literacy Research, 53(4), 491–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X211052249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luttrell, W., & Parker, C. (2001). High school students’ literacy practices and identities, and the figured world of school. Journal of Research in Reading, 24(3), 235–247. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.00146
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, K. S., & Goldman, S. R. (2015). Comprehension of short stories: Effects of task instructions on literary interpretation. Discourse Processes, 52(7), 585–608. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2014.967610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, K. S., & Goldman, S. R. (2019). Constructing interpretive inferences about literary text: The role of domain-specific knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 60, 245–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod, K. (1999). Authenticity within hip-hop and other cultures threatened with assimilation. Journal of Communication, 49(4), 134–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02821.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrell, E., & Duncan-Andrade, J. (2005). What they do learn in school: Hip-hop as a bridge to canonical poetry. In J. Mahiri (Ed.), What they don’t learn in school: Literacy in the lives of urban youth. Peter Lang International Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, V. I. (2012). The readers’ advisory guide to street literature. American Library Association.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, T. (2007). Playing in the dark. Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, T. (1988). Unspeakable things unspoken: The Afro-American presence in American literature. Tanner Lectures.
   Google Scholar
• Mos Def (1999). Mathematics [Song]. On Black on Both Sides. Rawkus; Priority.
   Google Scholar
• NCTE. (1917). Reorganization of English in secondary schools. U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Nasir, N., Rosebery, A., Warren, B., & Lee, C. D. (2006). Learning as a cultural process: Achieving equity through diversity. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 489–504). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neal, M. A. (2004). That’s the Joint!: The hip-hop studies reader. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nenadić, F., Vejnović, D., & Marković, S. (2019). Subjective experience of poetry: Latent structure and differences between experts and non-experts. Poetics, 73, 100–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2018.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, H. (2014). Hip-hop gem: Kool Moe Dee graded his rapper peers in 1987. Retrieved May 31, 2019, from Stop the Breaks: Independent Music Grind website.
   Google Scholar
• Nystrand, M., Wu, L. L., Gamoran, A., Zeiser, S., & Long, D. A. (2003). Questions in time: Investigating the structure and dynamics of unfolding classroom discourse. Discourse Processes, 35(2), 135–198. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326950DP3502_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nzinga, K. L. K., & Medin, D. L. (2018). The moral priorities of rap listeners. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 18(3–4), 312–342. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685373-12340033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paris, D., & Alim, H. S. (2017). Culturally sustaining pedagogies: Teaching and learning for justice in a changing world. Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peskin, J. (1998). Constructing meaning when reading poetry: An expert-novice study. Cognition and Instruction, 16(3), 235–263. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1603_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peskin, J., & Ellenbogen, B. (2019). Cognitive processes while writing poetry: An expert-novice study. Cognition and Instruction, 37(2), 232–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2019.1570931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabinowitz, P. (1987). Before reading: Narrative conventions and the politics of interpretation. Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rainey, E. (2017). Disciplinary literacy in English Language Arts: Exploring the social and problem-based nature of literary reading and reasoning. Reading Research Quarterly, 52(1), 53–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reznitskaya, A. (2012). Dialogic teaching: Rethinking language use during literature discussions. The Reading Teacher, 65(7), 446–456. https://doi.org/10.1002/TRTR.01066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, E. (2006). Hip-hop literacies. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, J. (2019). Looking like a language, sounding like a race: Raciolinguistic ideologies and the learning of Latinidad. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, T. (1991). Fear of a Black Planet”: Rap music and Black cultural politics in the 1990s. The Journal of Negro Education, 60(3), 276–290. https://doi.org/10.2307/2295482
   Google Scholar
• Sewell, W. C. (2008). Entrenched pedagogy: A history of stasis in the English language arts curriculum in United States secondary schools. Changing English, 15(1), 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/13586840701825345
   Google Scholar
• Skerrett, A., & Bomer, R. (2011). Borderzones in adolescents’ literacy practices: Connecting out-of-school literacies to the reading curriculum. Urban Education, 46(6), 1256–1279. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085911398920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smagorinsky, P. (2008). The method section as conceptual epicenter in constructing social science research reports. Written Communication, 25(3), 389–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088308317815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smitherman, G. (1973). The power of the rap: The black idiom and the new black poetry. Twentieth Century Literature, 19(4), 259–274. https://doi.org/10.2307/440543
   Google Scholar
• Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5), 797–811. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.797
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sypherd, W. O., & Messersmith, G. S. (1908). The high school course in English. Delaware College.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, A., & “Questlove,” & Greenman, B. (2013). Mo’ meta blues: The world according to Questlove. Grand Central Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, E. E. (2015). We always talk about race”: Navigating race talk dilemmas in the teaching of literature. Research in the Teaching of English, 50(2), 154–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Someren, M. W., Barnard, Y. F., & Sandberg, J. (1994). The think aloud method: A practical guide to modelling cognitive processes (vol. 11). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Verdonk, P. (1993). Twentieth-century poetry: From text to context. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, B., Vossoughi, S., Rosebery, A. S., Bang, M., & Taylor, E. V. (2020). Multiple ways of knowing: Re-imagining disciplinary learning. In Handbook of the cultural foundations of learning. (pp. 277–294). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, J. E. (2006). Literary scholars processing poetry and constructing arguments. Written Communication, 23(2), 202–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088306286864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, J. E. (2011). Generic” and “specific” expertise in English: An expert/expert study in poetry interpretation and academic argument. Cognition and Instruction, 29(4), 349–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2011.607929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilder, L. (2002). “Get comfortable with uncertainty”: A study of the conventional values of literary analysis in an undergraduate literature course. Written Communication, 19(1), 175–221.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R. L. (1972). The BITCH-100: A culture-specific test [Paper]. American Psychological Association (APA) Conference 1973, Honolulu, Hawaii, United States.
   Google Scholar
• Wineburg, S. S. (1998). Reading Abraham Lincoln: An expert/expert study in the interpretation of historical texts. Cognitive Science, 22(3), 319–346. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2203_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeitz, C. M. (1994). Expert-novice differences in memory, abstraction, and reasoning in the domain of literature. Cognition and Instruction, 12(4), 277–312. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1204_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar