Cherished World Thinking: Developing a Maintenance Mindset in Family Caregiving Contexts

References

• Ahmed, S. (2017). Living a feminist life. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anzaldúa, G., & Keating, A., Eds. (2002). This bridge we call home: Radical visions for transformation. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Anzaldúa, G. (1987). Borderlands/La frontera: The new mestiza. Aunt Lute Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bakke, G. (2016). The grid: The fraying wires between Americans and our energy future. Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bang, M., & Marin, A. (2015). Nature-culture constructs in science learning: Human/non-human agency and intentionality. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(4), 530–544. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bang, M., Faber, L., Gurneau, J., Marin, A., & Soto, C. (2016). Community-based design research: Learning across generations and strategic transformations of institutional relations toward axiological innovations. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 23(1), 28–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2015.1087572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bang, M., Marin, A., Faber, L., & Suzukovich, E. S. III., (2013). Repatriating indigenous technologies in an urban Indian community. Urban Education, 48(5), 705–733. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085913490555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bang, M., Marin, A., Wemigwase, S., Nayak, P., & Nxumalo, F. (2022). Undoing human supremecy and white supremecy to transform relationships: An interview with Megan Bang and Ananda Marin. Curriculum Inquiry, 52(2), 150–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/03626784.2022.2052635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barron, B., Martin, C. K., Takeuchi, L., & Fithian, R. (2009). Parents as learning partners in the development of technological fluency. International Journal of Learning and Media, 1(2), 55–77. https://doi.org/10.1162/ijlm.2009.0021
   Google Scholar
• Behar, R. (1996). The vulnerable observer: Anthropology that breaks your heart. Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, R. (2020). Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the new Jim Code. Social Forces, 98(4), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soz162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernal, D. D., Elenes, C. A., Godinez, F. E., & Villenas, S, (Eds.). (2006).Chicana/Latina education in everyday life: Feminista perspectives on pedagogy and epistemology. State University of New York.,
   Google Scholar
• Bowden, H. M., & Gustafson, K. (2022). Embodied spatial learning in the mobile preschool: The socio-spatial organization of meals as interactional achievement. Children's Geographies, 20(2), 234–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2021.1936454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowker, G., & Star, S. L. (1999). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brand, S. (1994). How buildings learn: What happens after they’re built. Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Brand, S. (1999). The clock of the long now: Time and responsibility. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Brody, D. (2016). Housekeeping by design: Hotels and labor. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, A. (2014). Feminism, grounded theory, and situational analysis revisited. In S. N. Hesse- Biber (Ed.), Handbook of feminist research: Theory and praxis. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, A., & Star, S. L. (2008). The social worlds framework: A theory/methods package. In E. Hackett, O. Armsterdamska, M. Lynch, & J. Wajcman (Eds.), The handbook of science and technology studies (pp. 113–137). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, M. (2017). The living hand of the past: Re-covering the role of technology in human development [Paper presentation]. The Jean Piaget Society Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, P. H. (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment (2nd ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cowan, R. S. (1983). More work for mother: The ironies of household technology from the open hearth to the microwave. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039
   Google Scholar
• Cruz, C. (2006). Toward an epistemology of a brown body. In D. D. Bernal, C. A. Elenes, F. E. Godinez, & S. Villenas (Eds.), Chicana/Latina education in everyday life: Feminista perspectives on pedagogy and epistemology. SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Rochberg-Halton, E. (1981). The meaning of things: Domestic symbols and the self. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, I. M. (2001). The ‘untidy’ Japanese house. In D. Miller (Ed.), Home possessions: Material culture behind closed doors. Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, B. (1992). Women’s subjectivity and feminist stories. In C. Ellis & M. Flaherty (Eds.), Investigating subjectivity: Research on lived experience. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, A. (1984). Women, race & class. Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• de Wilde, M. (2021). “A heat pump needs a bit of care”: On maintainability and repairing in gender-technology relations. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 46(6), 1261–1285. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243920978301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deb, S., & Homes, A. (2015, July 14). What are the consequences of our cultural obsession with newness? New York Times.
   Google Scholar
• DeLiema, D., Hufnagle, A., Rao, V. N. V., Baker, J., Valerie, J., & Kim, J. (2021). Methodological innovations at the intersection of video-based educational research traditions: Reflections on relevance, data selection, and phenomena of interest. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2021.2011196
   Google Scholar
• Denis, J., & Pontille, D. (2015). Material ordering and the care of things. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 40(3), 338–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243914553129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denis, J., Mongilig, A., & Pontille, D. (2016). Maintenance & repair in science and technology studies. Tecnoscienza, 6(2), 5–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duclos, V., & Criado, T. S. (2020). Care in trouble: Ecologies of support from below and beyond. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 34(2), 153–173. https://doi.org/10.1111/maq.12540
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elenes, C. A. (2006). Borderlands, pedagogies, and epistemologies. In D. D. Bernal, C. A. Elenes, F. E. Godinez, & S. Villenas (Eds.), Chicana/Latina education in everyday life: Feminista perspectives on pedagogy and epistemology. SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, F. Talk and social theory: Ecologies of speaking and listening in everyday life. Polity Press (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, F. (1982). Money tree, lasagna bush, salt and pepper: Social construction of topical cohesion in a conversation among Italian-Americans. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Georgetown University roundtable on language and linguistics: Analyzing discourse: Text and talk. Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frankenberg, R. (1993). Growing up white: Feminism, racism and the social geography of childhood. Feminist Review, 45(1), 51–84. https://doi.org/10.2307/1395347
   Google Scholar
• Frize, M., Lhotska, L., Marcu, L. G., Stoeva, M., Barabino, G., Ibrahim, F., Lim, S., Kaldoudi, E., Marques da Silva, A. M., Tan, P. H., Tsapaki, V., & Bezak, E. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on gender-related work from home in STEM fields- report of the WiMPBME Task Group. Gender, Work, and Organization, 28(Suppl 2), 378–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12690
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gabrys, J. (2013). Digital rubbish: A natural history of electronics. University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, E., Takeuchi, L. M., & Wartella, E. (Eds.). (2018). Children and families in the digital age: Learning together in a media saturated culture. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Glenn, E. N. (2010). Forced to care: Coercion and caregiving in America. Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Anchor Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, N., Moll, L. C., & Amanti, C. (2005). Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms. Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2013). The co-operative, transformative organization of human action and knowledge. Journal of Pragmatics, 46(1), 8–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2018). Co-operative action. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. C., & Goodwin, C. (2013). Nurturing. In E. Ochs & T. Kremer-Sadlik (Eds.), Fast- forward family: Home, work, and relationships in middle-class America. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. H., & Cekaite, A. (2018). Embodied family choreography: Practices of control, care, and mundane creativity. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Thrift, N. (2007). Out of order: Understanding repair and maintenance. Theory, Culture, & Society, 24(3), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276407075954
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, K. D., Becker, B. L. C., Espinoza, M. L., Cortes, K. L., Cortez, A., Lizárraga, J. R., Rivero, E., Villegas, K., & Yin, P. (2019). Youth as historical actors in the production of possible futures. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 26(4), 291–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2019.1652327
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, K. D., Cortes, K., Cortez, A., DiGiacomo, D., Higgs, J., Johnson, P., Ramón Lizárraga, J., Mendoza, E., Tien, J., & Vakil, S. (2017). Replacing representation with imagination: Finding ingenuity in everyday practices. Review of Research in Education, 41(1), 30–60. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X16687523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, R., & Jurow, S. (2015). Changing concepts in activity: Descriptive and design studies of consequential learning in conceptual practices. Educational Psychologist, 50(3), 173–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2015.1075403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, R., & Stevens, R. (2016). Interaction analysis approaches to knowledge in use. In A. A. diSessa, M. Levin, & N. J. S. Brown (Eds.), Knowledge and interaction: A synthetic agenda for the Learning Sciences. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, S. B. (2012). Words at work and play: Three decades in family and community life. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henke, C. R., & Sims, B. (2020). Repairing infrastructures: The maintenance of materiality and power. The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henke, C. R. (2000). The mechanics of workplace order: Toward a sociology of repair. Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 44, 55–81.
   Google Scholar
• Hochschild, A. R. (1989). The second shift: Working families and the revolution at home. Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, C. (2016). Ecological borderlands: Body, nature, and spirit in Chicana feminism. University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hooks, b. (2015). Feminism is for everybody: Passionate politics. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Houston, L. (2017). The timeliness of repair. Continent, 6(1), 51–55.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Illich, I. (1973). Tools for conviviality. Harper & Row Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Irani, L., Dourish, P., & Mazmanian, M. (2010). Shopping for sharpies in Seattle: Mundane infrastructures of transnational design [Paper presentation]. ICIC ‘10, August 19–20, Copenhagen, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Ito, M., Baumer, S., Bittanti, M., Boyd, d., Cody, R., & Tripp, L. (2010). Hanging out, messing around, and geeking out: Kids living and learning with new media. MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Jaber, L. Z. (2021). “He got a glimpse of the joys of understanding” – The role of epistemic empathy in teacher learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 30(3), 433–465. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2021.1936534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, S. (2014). Rethinking repair. In T. Gillespie, P. J. Boczkowski, & K. A. Foot (Eds.), Media technologies: Essays on communication, materiality, and society. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jagger, A. M. (1995). Caring as a feminist practice of moral reason. In V. Held (Ed.), Justice and care: Essential readings in feminist ethics. Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(1), 39–103. [Database] https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0401_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jurow, S., Teeters, L., Shea, M., & Van Steenis, E. (2016). Extending the consequentiality of “invisible work” in the food justice movement. Cognition and Instruction, 34(3), 210–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2016.1172833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keifert, D. (2021). Family culture as context for learning through inquiry. Cognition and Instruction, 39(3), 242–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2021.1913162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, W., & Goodwin, M. H. (2013). Chores. In E. Ochs & T. Kremer-Sadlik (Eds.), Fast- forward family: Home, work, and relationships in middle-class America. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, W., Izquierdo, C., & Bradbury, T. N. (2013). Housework. In E. Ochs & T. Kremer-Sadlik (Eds.), Fast-forward family: Home, work, and relationships in middle-class America. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kremer-Sadlik, T., & Gutiérrez, K. (2013). Homework and recreation. In E. Ochs & T Kremer- Sadlik (Eds.), Fast-forward family: Home, work, and relationships in middle-class America. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krist, C., & Suarez, E. A. (2018). Doing science with fidelity to persons: Instantiations of caring participation in science practices. In J. Kay & R. Luckin (Ed.), Proceedings of ICLS 2018 (Vol.1, pp. 424–431). London: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Kullman, K. (2015). The mobile life of screens: Digital imaging on school journeys in Helsinki. In Bates, C. (Ed.), Video methods: Social science in motion. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1990). Technology is society made durable. The Sociological Review, 38(1_suppl), 103–131. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1990.tb03350.x
   Google Scholar
• LeGuin, U. (2012). The unreal and the real: Volume 2. Orion.
   Google Scholar
• Liboiron, M. (2021). Pollution is colonialism. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S., & Sefton-Green, J. (2016). The class: Living and learning in the digital age. New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marin, A. (2020). Ambulatory sequences: Ecologies of learning by attending and observing on the move. Cognition and Instruction, 38(3), 281–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2020.1767104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marin, A., & Bang, M. (2018). “Look it, this is how you know:” Family forest walks as a context for knowledge-building about the natural world. Cognition and Instruction, 36(2), 89–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2018.1429443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, A., Myers, N., & Viseu, A. (2015). The politics of care in technoscience. Social Studies of Science, 45(5), 625–641. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312715602073
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marin, A., Taylor, K. H., Shapiro, B. R., & Hall, R. (2020). Why learning on the move: Intersecting research pathways for mobility, learning and teaching. Cognition and Instruction, 38(3), 265. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2020.1769100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattern, S. (2018). Maintenance and care: A working guide to the repair of rust, dust, cracks, and corrupted code in our cities, our homes, and our social relations. Places Journal. https://doi.org/10.22269/181120
   Google Scholar
• McDonough, W., & Braungart, M. (2002). Cradle to cradle: Remaking the way we make things. North Point Press.
   Google Scholar
• McKinney de Royston, M., Vakil, S., Nasir, N. S., Ross, K. M., Givens, J., & Holman, A. (2017). “He’s more like a ‘brother’ than a teacher”: Politicized caring in a program for African American males. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 119(4), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811711900401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, C. C. (2019). October 23). Stay-at-home parents work hard. Should they be paid? New York Times.
   Google Scholar
• Mol, A., Moser, I., & Pols, J., Eds. (2010). Care in practice: On tinkering in clinics, homes and farms. Transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Monteiro, M. (2019). Ruined by design: How designers destroyed the world, and what we can do to fix it. Mike Monteiro.
   Google Scholar
• Myrick, B. (2015). Area trail history. https://www.twbc.org/index.php/history/area-trail-history.
   Google Scholar
• Nieto, S. (2008). Nice is not enough: Defining caring for students of color. In M. Pollock (Ed.), Everyday antiracism: Getting real about race in school (pp. 28–31). The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Noddings, N. (1984). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Noddings, N. (2001). Beyond “add women and stir”. Theory into Practice, 40(1), 29–34. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4001_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nxumalo, F., Nayak, P., & Tuck, E. (2022). Education and ecological precarity: Pedagogical, curricular, and conceptual provocations. Curriculum Inquiry, 52(2), 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/03626784.2022.2052634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ochs, E., Beck, M. (2013). Dinner. In E. Ochs & T. Kremer-Sadlik (Eds.),Fast-forward family: Home, work, and relationships in middle-class America(pp. 48–66). University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ochs, E., & Kremer-Sadlik, T. (2013). Introduction. In E. Ochs & T Kremer-Sadlik (Eds.), Fast-forward family: Home, work, and relationships in middle-class America (pp. 1–12). University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pea, R., Nass, C., Meheula, L., Rance, M., Kumar, A., Bamford, H., Nass, M., Simha, A., Stillerman, B., Yang, S., & Zhou, M. (2012). Media use, face-to- face communication, media multitasking, and social well-being among 8–12-year-old girls. Developmental Psychology, 48(2), 327–336. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellow, D. N. (2018). What is critical environmental justice? Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Pellow, D. N., & Matthews, G. (2006). Immigrant workers in two eras: Struggles and successes in Silicon Valley. In T. Smith, D.A. Sonnenfeld, & D. N. Pellow (Eds.), Challenging the chip: Labor rights and environmental justice in the global electronics industry (pp. 129–138). Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Philip, T. M., & Sengupta, P. (2020). Theories of learning as theories of society: A contrapuntal approach to expanding disciplinary authenticity in computing. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 30, 14–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2020.1828089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philip, T. M., Gupta, A., Elby, A., & Turpen, C. (2018). Why ideology matters for learning: A case of ideological convergence in an engineering ethics classroom discussion on drone warfare. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 27(2), 183–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2017.1381964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, N. C., & Lund, V. K. (2019). Sustaining affective resonance: Co-constructing care in a school-based digital design studio. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(4), 1532–1543. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pink, S. (2004). Home truths: Gender, domestic objects and everyday life. Berg Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S., & Mackley, K. L. (2013). Saturated and situated: Expanding the meaning of media in the routines of everyday life. Media, Culture & Society, 35(6), 677–691. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443713491298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pink, S., Hjorth, L., Horst, H., Nettheim, J., & Bell, G. (2017). Digital work and play: Mobile technologies and new ways of feeling at home. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 21, 26–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pink, S., Horst, H., Postill, J., Hjorth, L., Lewis, T., & Tacchi, J. (2016). Digital ethnography: Principles and practice. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2011). Matters of care in technoscience: Assembling neglected things. Social Studies of Science, 41(1), 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312710380301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2017). Matters of care: Speculative ethics in more than human worlds. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ribes, D. (2017). The rub and chafe of maintenance and repair. Continent, 6(1), 71–76.
   Google Scholar
• Ribes, D., & Finholt, T. A. (2009). The long now of technology infrastructure: Articulating tensions in development. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 10(5), 375–398. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rideout, V., & Katz, V. (2016). Opportunity for all? Technology and learning in lower-income families. A report of the Families and Media Project. The Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop.
   Google Scholar
• Rogoff, B., Callanan, M., Gutiérrez, K. D., & Erickson, F. (2016). The organization of informal learning. Review of Research in Education, 40(1), 356–401. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X16680994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogoff, B., Najafi, B., & Mejía-Arauz, R. (2014). Constellations of cultural practices across generations: Indigenous American heritage and learning by pitching in. Human Development, 57(2-3), 82–95. https://doi.org/10.1159/000356761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rollins, J. (1985). Between women: domestics and their employers. Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosa-Aquino, P. (2020, October 23). Fix or toss? The “right to repair’ movement gains ground. New York Times.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, M. (2004). The mind at work: Valuing the intelligence of the American worker. Viking.
   Google Scholar
• Rosner, D. K., & Ames, M. G. (2014). Designing for repair?: Infrastructures and materialities of breakdown. CSCW.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, A., & Vinsel, L. (2017, July 22). Let’s get excited about maintenance! New York Times.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, A., & Vinsel, L. (2018). After innovation, turn to maintenance. Technology and Culture, 59(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2018.0004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, A., & Vinsel, L. (2019). Make maintainers: Engineering education and an ethics of care. In M. Wisnioski, E. S. Hintz, & M. S. Kleine (Eds.), Does America need more innovators? (pp. 249–269). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandoval, C. (2000). Methodology of the oppressed. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1992). Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology, 97(5), 1295–1345. https://doi.org/10.1086/229903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, L., & Gutiérrez, K. (2015). Literacy studies and situated methods: Exploring the social organization of household activity and family media use. In J. Rowsell & K. Pahl (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of literacy studies (pp. 575–592). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shove, E. (2003). Comfort, cleanliness, convenience: The social organization of normality. Berg Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Silvis, D. (2022). Renewing learning: Reimagining the newness of families’ sociotechnical practices towards ecologically sustainable media engagement. Learning, Culture & Social Interaction, 35, 100644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2022.100644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvis, D., Clarke-Midura, J., Shumway, J., Lee, V., & Mullen, S. (2022). Children caring for robots: Expanding computational thinking frameworks to include a technological ethic of care. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 33, 100491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2022.100491
   Google Scholar
• Silvis, D., Taylor, K. H., & Stevens, R. (2018). Community technology mapping: Inscribing places when ‘everything is on the move. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 13(2), 137–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-018-9275-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobel, K., Bhattacharya, A., Hiniker, A., Lee, J. H., Kientz, J. A., & Yip, J. C. (2017). “It wasn’t really about the Pokémon”: Parents’ perspectives on a location-based mobile game. CHI 2017, May 06–11, Denver, CO.
   Google Scholar
• Spellman, E. V. (1988). Inessential woman: Problems of exclusion in feminist thought. Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Star, L. S., & Ruhleder, K. (1996). Steps towards and ecology of infrastructure: Design and access for large information spaces. Information Systems Research, 7(1), 111–134. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.7.1.111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Star, S. L. (1991). Power, technologies, and the phenomenology of conventions: On being allergic to onions. In J. Law (Ed.), A Sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology, and domination (pp. 26–56). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1990.tb03347.x
   Google Scholar
• Star, S. L. (1996). From Hestia to home page: Feminism and the concept of home in cyberspace. In N. Lykke & R. Braidotti (Eds.), Between monsters, goddesses, and cyborgs: Feminist confrontations with science, medicine and cyberspace (pp. 30–46). Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Star, S. L. (1999). The ethnography of infrastructure. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(3), 377–391. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027649921955326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Star, S. L., & Strauss, A. (1999). Layers of silence, arenas of voice: The ecology of visible and invisible work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 8(1–2), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008651105359
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, R., Satwicz, T., & McCarthy, L. (2008). In-game, in-room, in-world: Reconnecting video game play to the rest of kids’ lives. In K. Salen, (Ed.), The ecology of games: Connecting youth, games, and learning (pp. 41–66). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, L. (1995). Making work visible. Communications of the ACM, 38(9), 56–64. https://doi.org/10.1145/223248.223263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takeuchi, L., & Stevens, R. (2011). The new co-viewing: Designing for learning through joint media engagement. A report of The Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop and LIFE Center. The Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, K. H. (2021, March). The school of working women: A letter to my mother. Pangyrus. https://www.pangyrus.com/in-sickness-and-in-health/working-to-care-a-letter-to-my-mother/
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, K. H., Silvis, D., & Stevens, R. (2018). Collecting and connecting: Intergenerational learning with new media. In E. Gee, L.M. Takeuchi, & E. Wartella (Eds.), Children and families in the digital age: Learning together in a media saturated culture (pp. 56–76). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, K. H., Silvis, D., Bell, A., Henriquez, A., Cramer, C., & Negron, A. (2019). Supporting public- facing education for youth: Spreading (not scaling) ways to learn data science with mobile and geospatial technologies. Contemporary Issues in Technology & Teacher Education, 19(3), 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, K. H., Takeuchi, L., & Stevens, R. (2018). Mapping the daily media round: Methodological innovations for understanding families’ mobile technology in use. International Journal of Learning and Media, 43(1), 70–84.
   Google Scholar
• Tolmie, P., Crabtree, A., Rodden, T., Greenhalgh, C., & Benford, S. (2007). Making the home network at home: Digital housekeeping. In L. Bannon, I Wagner, C. Gutwin, R. Harper, & K. Schmidt (Eds.), ECSCW ‘07: Proceedings of the Tenth European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 24–28 September 2007, Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Tronto, J. (1993). Moral boundaries: A political argument for the ethics of care. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tsing, A., Swanson, H., Gan, E., & Bubandt, N., Eds. (2017). Arts of living on a damaged planet. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tulbert, E., & Goodwin, M. H. (2011). Choreographies of attention: Multimodality in a routine family activity. In J. Streeck, C. Goodwin, & C. LeBaron (Eds.), Embodied interaction: Language and body in the material world (pp. 79–92). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turkle, S. (2007). The things that matter. In S. Turkle (Ed.), Evocative objects: Things we think with (pp. 3–11). The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Uttamchandani, S. (2021). Educational intimacy: Learning, prefiguration, and relationships in an LGBTQ + group’s advocacy efforts. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 30(1), 52–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2020.1821202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vakil, S., & McKinney de Royston, M. (2019). Exploring politicized trust in a racially diverse computer science classroom. Race Ethnicity and Education, 22(4), 545–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2019.1592846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vea, T. (2020). The learning of emotion in/as sociocultural practice: The case of animal rights activism. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 29(3), 311. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2020.1748036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villenas, S. (2006). Pedagogical moments in the Borderlands: Latina mothers teaching and learning. In D. D. Bernal, C. A. Elenes, F. E. Godinez, & S. Villenas (Eds.), Chicana/Latina education in everyday life: Feminista perspectives on pedagogy and epistemology (pp. 147–160). SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vinsel, L., & Russell, A. L. (2020). The innovation delusion: How our obsession with the new has disrupted the work that matters most. Currency Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vossoughi, S., Hooper, P., & Escude, M. (2016). Making through the lends of culture and power: Toward transformative visions for educational equity. Harvard Educational Review, 86(2), 206–232. https://doi.org/10.17763/0017-8055.86.2.206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vossoughi, S., Jackson, A., Chen, S., Roldan, W., & Escudé, M. (2020). Embodied pathways and ethical trails: Studying learning in and through relational histories. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 29(2), 183–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2019.1693380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wacjman, J. (1991). Feminism confronts technology. Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wacjman, J. (2015). Pressed for time: The acceleration of life in digital capitalism. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar