The Effects of a Computer-Based Early Reading Program on the Literacy Skills of Kindergarten Students

References

• Al Otaiba, S., & Foorman, B. (2008). Early literacy instruction and intervention. Community Literacy Journal, 3(1), 21–37.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Al Otaiba, S., & Torgesen, J. (2007). Effects from intensive standardized kindergarten and first-grade interventions for the prevention of reading difficulties. In S. R.Jimerson, M. K.Burns, & A. M.VanDerHeyden (Eds.), Handbook of response to intervention: The science and practice of assessment and intervention (pp. 212–222). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Anthony, J. L., & Francis, D. J. (2005). Development of phonological awareness. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(5), 255–259. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00376.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, K., Savage, R., Sanghera-Sidhu, S., Wood, E., Gottardo, A., & Chen, V. (2014). Examining the effectiveness of technology use in classrooms: A tertiary meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 78, 140–149. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blok, H., Oostdam, R., Otter, M. E., & Overmaat, M. (2002). Computer-assisted instruction in support of beginning reading instruction: A review. Review of Educational Research, 72(1), 101–130. doi:10.3102/00346543072001101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, S. (2020). A 2020 perspective on research findings on alphabetics (phoneme awareness and phonics): Implications for instruction. The Reading League Journal, 1(3), 20–28.
   Google Scholar
• Cassady, J. C., Smith, L. L., & Thomas, C. L. (2018). Supporting emergent literacy for English language learners with computer‐assisted instruction. Journal of Research in Reading, 41(2), 350–369. doi:10.1111/1467-9817.12110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers, B., Abrami, P., Tucker, B., Slavin, R. E., Madden, N. A., Cheung, A., & Gifford, R. (2008). Computer-assisted tutoring in Success for All: Reading outcomes for first graders. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 1(2), 120–137. doi:10.1080/19345740801941357
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, A. C., & Slavin, R. E. (2012). How features of educational technology applications affect student reading outcomes: a meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 7(3), 198–215. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2012.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, A. C., & Slavin, R. E. (2013). Effects of educational technology applications on reading outcomes for struggling readers: A best-evidence synthesis. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(3), 277–299. doi:10.1002/rrq.50
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham, A. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (1998). The impact of print exposure on word recognition. In J. L.Metsala & L. C.Ehri (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 235–262). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Duke, N. K., & Pearson, P. D. (2009). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. Journal of Education, 189(1–2), 107–122. doi:10.1177/0022057409189001-208
   Google Scholar
• Dynarski, M., Agodini, R., Heaviside, S., Novak, T., Carey, N., Campuzano, L., Means, B., Murphy, R., Penuel, W., Javitz, H., et al. (2007). Effectiveness of reading and mathematics software products: Findings from the first student cohort. National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, U.S Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. https://telearn.archives-ouvertes.fr/file/index/docid/190019/filename/Dynarski-Mark-2007.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ehri, L. C. (2005). Learning to read words: Theory, findings, and issues. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9(2), 167–188. doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr0902_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foorman, B., Beyler, N., Borradaile, K., Coyne, M., Denton, C. A., Dimino, J., Furgeson, J., Hayes, L., Henke, J., Justice, L., Keating, B., Lewis, W., Sattar, S., Streke, A., Wagner, R., Wissel, S. (2016). Foundational skills to support reading for understanding in kindergarten through 3rd grade. Educator’s Practice Guide. National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, U.S Department of Education, Institute of Educational Sciences. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED566956.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Foster, K. C., Erickson, G. C., Forster, D. F., Brinkman, D., & Torgesen, J. K. (1994). Computer-administered instruction in phonological awareness: Evaluation of the Daisy Quest program. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 27(2), 126–137.
   Google Scholar
• Fountas, I. C., & Pinnell, G. S. (2007). Fountas and Pinnell Benchmark Assessment System 2. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Fountas, I. C., & Pinnell, G. S. (2009). Leveled Literacy Intervention. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Gambrell, L. B. (2011). Seven rules of engagement: What’s most important to know about motivation to read. The Reading Teacher, 65(3), 172–178. doi:10.1002/TRTR.01024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBM Corp . (2020). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows (Version 27.0) [Computer software]. IBM Corp.
   Google Scholar
• Jamshidifarsani, H., Garbaya, S., Lim, T., Blazevic, P., & Ritchie, J. M. (2019). Technology-based reading intervention programs for elementary grades: An analytical review. Computers & Education, 128, 427–451. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi, R. M., Binks, E., Hougen, M., Dahlgren, M. E., Ocker-Dean, E., & Smith, D. L. (2009). Why elementary teachers might be inadequately prepared to teach reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42(5), 392–402. doi:10.1177/0022219409338736
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyle, F., Kujala, J., Richardson, U., Lyytinen, H., & Goswami, U. (2013). Assessing the effectiveness of two theoretically motivated computer‐assisted reading interventions in the United Kingdom: GG Rime and GG Phoneme. Reading Research Quarterly, 48((1), 61–76. doi:10.1002/rrq.038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lonigan, C. J., Shanahan, T. (2009). Developing early literacy: Report of the national early literacy panel. Executive summary. A scientific synthesis of early literacy development and implications for intervention. National Institute for Literacy. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED508381.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Macaruso, P., & Rodman, A. (2011). Benefits of computer-assisted instruction to support reading acquisition in English language learners. Bilingual Research Journal, 34(3), 301–315. doi:10.1080/15235882.2011.622829
   Google Scholar
• Macaruso, P., & Walker, A. (2008). The efficacy of computer-assisted instruction for advancing literacy skills in kindergarten children. Reading Psychology, 29(3), 266–287. doi:10.1080/02702710801982019
   Google Scholar
• Metsala, J. L., & David, M. D. (2017). The effects of age and sublexical automaticity on reading outcomes for students with reading disabilities. Journal of Research in Reading, 40(1), S209–S227. doi:10.1111/1467-9817.12097
   Google Scholar
• Moats, L. C. (2020). Teaching reading "is" rocket science: What expert teachers of reading should know and be able to do. American Educator, 44(2), 4–9.
   Google Scholar
• National Assessment of Educational Progress . (2019). National achievement level results: Grade 7. National Center for Education Statistics, U.S Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/highlights/reading/2019/
   Google Scholar
• National Reading Panel . (2000). Teaching children to read. U.S Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. https://www.nichd.nih.gov/sites/default/files/publications/pubs/nrp/Documents/report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nova Scotia Department of Education and Early Childhood Development . (2019). Literacy assessment results. Microsoft Word - 2018-19 LM3 results release.docx (ednet.ns.ca).
   Google Scholar
• Ontario Human Rights Commission . (2022). Right to Read Public inquiry into human rights issues affecting students with reading disabilities Inquiry Report. Retrieved on July 30, 2022. Right to Read inquiry report | Ontario Human Rights Commission (ohrc.on.ca)
   Google Scholar
• Parker, D. C., Zaslofsky, A. F., Burns, M. K., Kanive, R., Hodgson, J., Scholin, S. E., & Klingbeil, D. A. (2015). A brief report of the diagnostic accuracy of oral reading fluency and reading inventory levels for reading failure risk among second-and third-grade students. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 31(1), 56–67. doi:10.1080/10573569.2013.857970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson, W. A., Henry, J. J., O'Quin, K., Ceprano, M. A., & Blue, E. V. (2003). Investigating the effectiveness of an integrated learning system on early emergent readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 38(2), 172–207. doi:10.1598/RRQ.38.2.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piquette, N. A., Savage, R. S., & Abrami, P. C. (2014). A cluster randomized control field trial of the ABRACADABRA web-based reading technology: replication and extension of basic findings. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–11. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01413
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prince Edward Island Department of Education . (2018). Provincial assessment results. https://www.princeedwardisland.ca/en/information/education-early-learning-and-culture/provincial-assessment-results.
   Google Scholar
• Saine, N. L., Lerkkanen, M. K., Ahonen, T., Tolvanen, A., & Lyytinen, H. (2011). Computer‐assisted remedial reading intervention for school beginners at risk for reading disability. Child Development, 82(3), 1013–1028. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01580.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savage, R. S., Abrami, P. C., Hipps, G., & Deault, L. (2009). A randomized controlled trial study of the ABRACADABRA reading intervention program in grade 1. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 590–604. doi:10.1037/a0014700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savage, R., Abrami, P. C., Piquette, N., Wood, E., Deleveaux, G., & Sanghera-Sidhu, S., & Burgos, G. (2013). A pan-Canadian cluster randomized control effectiveness trial of the ABRACADABRA web-based literacy program. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 310–328. doi:10.1037/a0031025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savage, R., Georgiou, G., Parrila, R., & Maiorino, K. (2018). Preventative reading interventions teaching direct mapping of graphemes and set-for-variability aid at-risk learners. Scientific Studies of Reading, 22(3), 225–247. doi:10.1080/10888438.2018.1427753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scammacca, N., Vaughn, S., Roberts, G., Wanzek, J., & Torgesen, J. K. (2007). Extensive reading interventions in grades k–3: From research to practice. RMC Research Corporation, Center on Instruction.
   Google Scholar
• Schechter, R., Macaruso, P., Kazakoff, E. R., & Brooke, E. (2015). Exploration of a blended learning approach to reading instruction for low SES students in early elementary grades. Computers in the Schools, 32(3–4), 183–200. doi:10.1080/07380569.2015.1100652
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholastic Canada . (2016). Ooka Island Curriculum Alignments 2016. https://s3.amazonaws.com/helpscout.net/docs/assets/5964f02e2c7d3a707d7bad15/attachments/597777f92c7d3a73488b5f3a/KindergartenCurriculumAlignments16.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Scholastic F.I.R.S.T.TM . (2017). https://www.scholastic.com/education/ookaisland/#/research
   Google Scholar
• Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55(2), 151–218. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spear-Swerling, L. (2019). Structured literacy and typical literacy practices: Understanding differences to create instructional opportunities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 51(3), 201–211. doi:10.1177/0040059917750160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SpellRead™ . (2012). SpellRead Teacher Cards & Materials Kit. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Torgesen, J. K., Rashotte, C. A., & Wagner, R. K. (1999). TOWRE: Test of word reading efficiency. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Vellutino, F. R., Fletcher, J. M., Snowling, M. J., & Scanlon, D. M. (2004). Specific reading disability (dyslexia): What have we learned in the past four decades?Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 45(1), 2–40. 10.1046/j.0021-9630.2003.00305.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Comprehensive test of phonological processing (CTOPP). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkes, S., Kazakoff, E. R., Prescott, J. E., Bundschuh, K., Hook, P. E., Wolf, R., Hurwitz, L. B., & Macaruso, P. (2020). Measuring the impact of a blended learning model on early literacy growth. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(5), 595–609. doi:10.1111/jcal.12429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, E., Grant, A. K., Gottardo, A., Savage, R., & Evans, M. A. (2017). Software to promote young children’s growth in literacy: A comparison of online and offline formats. Early Childhood Education Journal, 45(2), 207–217. doi:10.1007/s10643-016-0779-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodcock, R. W. (1987). Woodcock reading mastery tests–Revised (WRMT-R). American Guidance Service.
   Google Scholar
• Woodcock, R. W. (2011). Woodcock reading mastery tests–Third edition (WRMT-III). Pearson.
   Google Scholar