Design of novel lead molecules against RhoG protein as cancer target – a computational study

References

• Accelrys Software Inc. (2013). Discovery studio Visualizer 3.5 version, San Diego.
   Google Scholar
• Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W., & Lipman, D. J. (1990). Basic local alignment search tool. Journal of Molecular Biology, 215, 403–410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhargavi, K., Kalyan Chaitanya, P., Ramasree, D., Vasavi, M., Murthy, D. K., & Uma, V. (2010). Homology modeling and docking studies of human Bcl-2L10 protein. Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics, 28, 379–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boettner, B., & Van Aelst, L. (2002). The role of Rho GTPases in disease development. Gene, 286, 155–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boureux, A., Vignal, E., Faure, S., & Fort, P. (2007). Evolution of the Rho family of ras-like GTPases in eukaryotes. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 24, 203–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bray, F., & Moller, B. (2006). Predicting the future burden of cancer. Nature Reviews Cancer, 6, 63–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cano, G., Garcia-Rodriguez, J., & Pirez-Sanchez, H. (2014). Improvement of virtual screening predictions using computational intelligence methods. Drug Design & Discovery, 11, 33–39.
   Google Scholar
• Chimini, G., & Chavrier, P. (2000). Function of Rho family proteins in actin dynamics during phagocytosis and engulfment. Nature Cell Biology, 2, E191–E196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, C., Barber, J. D., & Barton, G. J. (2008). The Jpred3 secondary structure prediction server. Nucleic Acids Research, 36, W197–W201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, D. R., Rossman, K. L., & Der, C. J. (2013). Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factors: Regulators of Rho GTPase activity in development and disease. Oncogene, 33, 4021–4035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da Silva Goncalves, A., Franca, T. C., Caetano, M. S., & Ramalho, T. C. (2014). Reactivation steps by 2PAM of tabuninhibited human acetylcholinesterase: Reducing the computational cost in hybrid QM/MM methods. Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics, 32, 301–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dundas, J., Ouyang, Z., Tseng, J., Binkowski, A., Turpaz, Y., & Liang, J. (2006). CASTp computed atlas of surface topography of proteins with structural and topographical mapping of functionally annotated residues. Nucleic Acids Research, 34, W116–W118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Empereur-Mot, C., Guillemain, H., Latouche, A., Zagury, J. F., Viallon, V., & Montes, M. (2015). Predictiveness curves in virtual screening. Journal of cheminformatics, 7, 1–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Essmann, U., Perera, L., Berkowitz, M. L., Darden, T. A., Lee, H., & Pedersen, L. G. (1995). A smooth particle mesh Ewald method. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 103, 8577–8593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feller, S. E., Zhang, Y., Pastor, R. W., & Brooks, B. R. (1995). Constant pressure molecular dynamics simulation: The Langevin piston method. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 103, 4613–4621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiser, A., & Sali, A. (2003). Modeller: Generation and refinement of homology-based protein structure models. Methods in Enzymology, 374, 461–491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franca, T. C., Guimaraes, A. P., Cortopassi, W. A., Oliveira, W. A., & Ramalho, T. C. (2013). Applications of docking and molecular dynamic studies on the search for new drugs against the biological warfare agents Bacillus anthracis and Yersinia pestis. Current Computer Aided Drug Design, 9, 507–517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friesner, R. A., Murphy, R. B., Repasky, M. P., Frye, L. L., Greenwood, J. R., & Halgren, T. A. (2006). Extra precision glide docking and scoring incorporating a model of hydrophobic enclosure for protein–ligand complexes. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 49, 6177–6196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasteiger, E., Gattiker, A., Hoogland, C., Ivanyi, I., Appel, R. D., & Bairoch, A. (2003). ExPASy proteomics server for in depth protein knowledge and analysis. Nucleic Acids Research, 31, 3784–3788.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genheden, S., & Ryde, U. (2015). The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities. Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery, 10, 449–461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halgren, T. A. (2009). Identifying and characterizing binding sites and assessing druggability. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 49, 377–389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halgren, T. A., Murphy, R. B., Friesner, R. A., Beard, H. S., Frye, L. L., Pollard, W. T., & Banks, J. L. (2004). Glide: A new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 2. Enrichment factors in database screening. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 47, 4750–4759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamza, A., Wei, N. N., Hao, C., Xiu, Z., & Zhan, C. G. (2013). A novel and efficient ligand-based virtual screening approach using the HWZ scoring function and an enhanced shape-density model. Journal of Biomolecular Structure & Dynamics, 31, 1236–1250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamza, A., Wei, N. N., & Zhan, C. G. (2012). Ligand-based virtual screening approach using a new scoring function. Journal of Chemical Information Modeling, 52, 963–974.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harada, K., Hiramoto-Yamaki, N., Negishi, M., & Katoh, H. (2011). EphA4 and EphA2 mediate resistance to anoikis through RhoG and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase. Experimental Cell Research, 317, 1701–1713.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heasman, S. J., & Ridley, A. J. (2008). Mammalian Rho GTPases new insights into their functions from in vivo studies. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 9, 690–701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernandez, M., Ghersi, D., & Sanchez, R. (2009). SITEHOUND-web: A server for ligand binding site identification in protein structures. Nucleic Acids Research, 37, W413–W416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiramoto, K., Negishi, M., & Katoh, H. (2006). Dock4 is regulated by RhoG and promotes Rac -dependent cell migration. Experimental Cell Research, 312, 4205–4216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiramoto-Yamaki, N., Takeuchi, S., Ueda, S., Harada, K., Fujimoto, S., & Negishi, M. (2010). Ephexin4 and EphA2 mediate cell migration through a RhoG-dependent mechanism. The Journal of Cell Biology, 190, 461–477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollingsworth, S. A., & Karplus, P. A. (2010). A fresh look at the Ramachandran plot and the occurrence of standard structures in proteins. Biomolecular Concepts, 1, 271–283.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Humphrey, W., Dalke, A., & Schulten, K. (1996). VMD: Visual molecular dynamics. Journal of Molecular Graphics, 14, 33–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A. B., & Hall, A. (2005). Rho GTPases: Biochemistry and biology. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, 21, 247–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorgensen, W. L., Maxwell, D. S., & Tirado-Rives, J. (1996). Development and testing of the OPLS all-atom force field on conformational energetics and properties of organic liquids. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 118, 11225–11236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawai, H., Kobayashi, M., Hiramoto-Yamaki, N., Harada, K., Negishi, M., & Katoh, H. (2013). Ephexin4-mediated promotion of cell migration and anoikis resistance is regulated by serine 897 phosphorylation of EphA2. FEBS Open Bio, 3, 78–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchen, D. B., Decornez, H., Furr, J. R., & Bajorath, J. (2004). Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: Methods and applications. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 3, 935–949.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larkin, M. A., Blackshields, G., Brown, N. P., Chenna, R., McGettigan, P. A., McWilliam, H., … Higgins, D. G. (2007). Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics, 23, 2947–2948.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laskowski, R. A., MacArthur, M. W., Moss, D. S., & Thornton, J. M. (1993). Procheck a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. Journal of Applied Crystallography, 26, 283–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, B., & Richards, F. M. (1971). The interpretation of protein structures: Estimation of static accessibility. Journal of Molecular Biology, 55, 379–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LigPrep. (2010). Version 2.4, Schrödinger, LLC, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Luthy, R., Bowie, J. U., & Eisenberg, D. (1992). Assessment of protein models with three-dimensional profiles. Nature, 356, 83–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maheshwari, S., & Brylinski, M. (2015). Prediction of protein–protein interaction sites from weakly homologous template structures using meta-threading and machine learning. Journal of Molecular Recognition, 28, 35–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malkhed, V., Mustyala, K. K., Potlapally, S. R., & Vuruputuri, U. (2013). Identification of novel leads applying in silico studies for Mycobacterium multidrug resistant (MMR) protein. Journal of Bio molecular Structure and Dynamics, 32, 1889–1906.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murga, C., Zohar, M., Teramoto, H., & Gutkind, J. S. (2002). Rac1 and RhoG promote cell survival by the activation of PI3K and Akt independently of their ability to stimulate JNK and NF-kB. Oncogene, 21, 207–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mysinger, M. M., Carchia, M., Irwin, J. J., & Shoichet, B. K. (2012). Directory of useful decoys, enhanced (DUD-E): Better ligands and decoys for better benchmarking. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 55, 6582–6594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel, M., Chiang, T. C., Tran, V., Lee, F. J., & Cote, J. F. (2011). The arf family GTPase Arl4A complexes with ELMO proteins to promote actin cytoskeleton remodeling and reveals a versatile ras-binding domain in the ELMO proteins family. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 286, 38969–38979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, J. C., Braun, R., Wang, W., Gumbart, J., Tajkhorshid, E., Villa, E., … Schulten, K. (2005). Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 26, 1781–1802.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powers, R., Copeland, J. C., Germer, K., Mercier, K. A., Ramanathan, V., & Revesz, P. (2006). Comparison of protein active site structures for functional annotation of proteins and drug design. Proteins, 65, 124–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Protein Preparation Wizard. (2010). Epik version 2.1, Schrödinger, LLC, New York.
   Google Scholar
• PyMOL Molecular Graphics System. (2010). Version 1.3, Schrödinger, LLC, New York.
   Google Scholar
• QikProp. (2010). Version 3.3, Schrödinger, LLC, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Ramakrishna, D., Ramasree, D., Bhargavi, K., Vishwanath, R., Santhiprada, V., Rajender, V., & Uma, V. (2016). Suppressor of cytokine signalling-3 as a drug target for type 2 diabetes mellitus: A structure-guided approach. ChemistrySelect, 1, 2502–2514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramatenki, V., Potlapally, S. R., Dumpati, R. K., Vadija, R., & Vuruputuri, Uma (2015). Homology modeling and virtual screening of ubiquitin conjugation enzyme E2A for designing a novel selective antagonist against cancer. Journal of Receptors and Signal Transduction, 35, 536–549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Lafuente, N., Alcaraz-Garcia, M. J., Garcia-Serna, A. M., Sebastian-Ruiz, Silvia, Moya-Quiles, M. R., Garcia-Alonso, A. M., & Parrado, A. (2015). Dock10, a Cdc42 and Rac1 GEF, induces loss of elongation, filopodia, and ruffles in cervical cancer epithelial HeLa cells. Journal of Biology Open, 4, 627–635.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schachter, M. (2004). Chemical, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics properties of statins an updates. Fundamental & Clinical Pharmacology, 19, 117–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneidman-Duhovny, D., Inbar, Y., Nussinov, R., & Wolfson, H. J. (2005). PatchDock and SymmDock servers for rigid and symmetric docking. Nucleic Acids Research, 33, 363–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel, R., Ma, J., Zou, Z., & Jemal, A. (2014). Cancer statistics 2014. Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 64, 9–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sit, S.-T., & Manser, E. D. (2011). Rho GTPases and their role in organizing the actin cytoskeleton. Journal of Cell Science, 124, 679–683.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stathis, A., & Moore, M. J. (2010). Advanced pancreatic carcinoma: Current treatment and future challenges. Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, 7, 163–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takeshi, K., Yusuke, S., Yoshifumi, F., & Haruki, N. (2013). LigandBox: A database for 3D structures of chemical compounds. Biophysics, 9, 113–121.
   Google Scholar
• Ting, D., Wang, G., Shapovalov, M., Mitra, R., Jordan, M. I., & Dunbrack, R. L. (2010). Neighbor-dependent Ramachandran probability distributions of amino acids developed from a hierarchical Dirichlet process model. PLoS Computational Biology, 6, 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ubersax, J. A., & Ferrell, J. E. (2007). Mechanisms of specificity in protein phosphorylation. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 8, 530–541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UniProt Consortium. (2011). Ongoing and future developments at the Universal Protein Resource. Nucleic Acids Research, 39, D214–D219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urruticoechea, A., Alemany, R., Balart, J., Villanueva, A., Vinals, F., & Capella, G. (2010). Recent advances in cancer therapy: An overview. Current Pharmaceutical Design, 16, 3–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vadija, R., Mustyala, K. K., Nambigari, N., Dulapalli, R., Dumpati, R. K., Ramatenki, V., … Vuruputuri, U. (2016). Homology modeling and virtual screening studies of FGF-7 protein-a structure-based approach to design new molecules against tumor angiogenesis. Journal of Chemical Biology, 9, 69–78.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vanommeslaeghe, K., Hatcher, E., Acharya, C., Kundu, S., Zhong, S., Shim, J., … Mackerell, A. D. (2010). CHARMM general force field: A force field for drug-like molecules compatable with the CHARMM all-atom additive biological force fields. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 31, 671–690.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vignal, E., Blangy, A., Martin, M., Gauthier-Rouviere, C., & Fort, P. (2001). Kinectin is a key effector of RhoG microtubule dependent cellular activity. Molecular and Cellular Biology, 21, 8022–8034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigorito, E., Billadeu, D. D., Savoy, D., McAdam, S., Doody, G., & Fort, P. (2003). RhoG regulates gene expression and the actin cytoskeleton in lymphocytes. Oncogene, 22, 330–342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent, S., Jeanteur, P., & Fort, P. (1992). Growth-regulated expression of rhoG, a new member of the ras homolog gene family. Molecular and Cellular Biology, 12, 3138–3148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallach, I., & Lilien, R. (2011). Virtual decoy sets for molecular docking benchmarks. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 51, 196–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., Xiao, J., Suzek, T. O., Zhang, J., Wang, J., & Bryant, S. H. (2009). PubChem: A public information system for analyzing bioactivities of small molecules. Nucleic Acids Research, 37, W623–W633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts, K. S., Dalal, P., Murphy, R. B., Sherman, W., Friesner, R. A., & Shelley, J. C. (2010). ConfGen: A conformational search method for efficient generation of bioactive conformers. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 50, 534–546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, Z., Kirk, E. H., Stephen, W. W., Richard, E. L., & James, M. B. (2009). A statistical framework to evaluate virtual screening. BMC Bioinformatics, 10, 1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiederstein, M., & Sippl, M. J. (2007). ProSA-web interactive web service for the recognition of errors in three-dimensional structures of proteins. Nucleic Acids Research, 35, W407–W410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, K. F., Erickson, J. W., Antonyak, M. A., & Cerione, R. A. (2013). Rho GTPases and their roles in cancer metabolism. Trends in Molecular Medicine, 19, 74–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, J., Roy, A., & Zhang, Y. (2013). Protein–ligand binding site recognition using complementary binding-specific substructure comparison and sequence profile alignment. Bioinformatics, 29, 2588–2595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar