Publication Cover
Chronobiology International
The Journal of Biological and Medical Rhythm Research
Latest Articles
77
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original article

Gender and circadian preferences influence emotions and motivation in secondary mathematics classrooms

ORCID Icon, , , &
Received 24 Jan 2024, Accepted 05 Jun 2024, Published online: 19 Jun 2024

References

  • Adan A, Archer SN, Hidalgo MP, Di Milia L, Natale V, Randler C. 2012. Circadian typology: a comprehensive review. Chronobiol Int. 29:1153–1175. doi: 10.3109/07420528.2012.719971.
  • Allen M. 2010. Learner error, affectual stimulation, and conceptual change. J Res Sci Teach. 47:151–173. doi: 10.1002/tea.20302.
  • Arbabi T, Vollmer C, Dörfler T, Randler C. 2015. The influence of chronotype and intelligence on academic achievement in primary school is mediated by conscientiousness, midpoint of sleep and motivation. Chronobiol Int. 32:349–357. doi: 10.3109/07420528.2014.980508.
  • Archer SN, Robilliard DL, Skene DJ, Smits M, Williams A, Arendt J, von Schantz M. 2003. A length polymorphism in the circadian clock gene Per3 is linked to delayed sleep phase syndrome and extreme diurnal preference. Sleep. 26:413–415. doi: 10.1093/sleep/26.4.413.
  • Baehr EK, Revelle W, Eastman CI. 2000. Individual differences in the phase and amplitude of the human circadian temperature rhythm: with an emphasis on morningness–eveningness. J Sleep Res. 9:117–127. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2869.2000.00196.x.
  • Borbély AA. 1982. A two process model of sleep regulation. Hum Neurobiol. 1:195–204.
  • Bošnjak S. 2001. The declaration of Helsinki: The cornerstone of research ethics. Archive of Oncol. 9:179–184.
  • Deci EL, Ryan RM. 2000. The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits. Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychol Inq. 11:227–268. doi: 10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01.
  • Deci EL, Ryan RM. 2012. Self-determination theory. Handbook Theor Soc Psychol. 1:416–436.
  • Demirhan E, Önder İ, Horzum MB, Masal E, Beşoluk Ş. 2019. Adaptation of the morningness–eveningness stability scale improved (MESSi) into Turkish. Chronobiol Int. 36:427–438. doi: 10.1080/07420528.2018.1560307.
  • Díaz-Morales JF, Escribano C, Jankowski KS. 2015. Chronotype and time-of-day effects on mood during school day. Chronobiol Int. 32:37–42. doi: 10.3109/07420528.2014.949736.
  • Díaz-Morales JF, Randler C, Arrona-Palacios A, Adan A. 2017. Validation of the MESSi among adult workers and young students: general health and personality correlates. Chronobiol Int. 34:1288–1299. doi: 10.1080/07420528.2017.1361437.
  • Duman İ, Horzum MB, Randler C. 2020. Adaptation of the short form of the intrinsic motivation inventory to Turkish. Int J Psychol Educ Stud. 7:26–33. doi: 10.17220/ijpes.2020.03.003.
  • Eccles J, Wang MT. 2012. Part I commentary: so what is student engagement anyway? In: Christenson SL, editor. Handbook of research on student engagement. Boston (MA): Springer US.
  • Eckes A, Großmann N, Wilde M. 2018. Studies on the effects of structure in the context of autonomy-supportive or controlling teacher behavior on students’ intrinsic motivation. Learn Individ Differ. 62:69–78. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2018.01.011.
  • Frenzel AC, Goetz T, Pekrun R, Watt HM. 2010. Development of mathematics interest in adolescence: influences of gender, family, and school context. J Res Adolescence. 20:507–537. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00645.x.
  • Frenzel AC, Pekrun R, Goetz T. 2007. Girls and mathematics—a “hopeless” issue? A control-value approach to gender differences in emotions towards mathematics. Eur J Psychol Educ. 22:497–514. doi: 10.1007/BF03173468.
  • Gignac GE, Szodorai ET. 2016. Effect size guidelines for individual differences researchers. Pers Indiv Differ. 102:74–78. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.069.
  • Gläser-Zikuda M, Fuß S, Laukenmann M, Metz K, Randler C. 2005. Promoting students’ emotions and achievement–instructional design and evaluation of the ECOLE-approach. Eur Res Int. 15:481–495. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.07.013.
  • Hofferber N, Basten M, Großmann N, Wilde M. 2016. The effects of autonomy-supportive and controlling teaching behaviour in biology lessons with primary and secondary experiences on students’ intrinsic motivation and flow-experience. Int J Sci Educ. 38:2114–2132. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2016.1229074.
  • Horzum MB, Duman İ, Demir Kaymak Z. 2020. Reliability and validity of Turkish version of situational emotions scale. Sakarya Univ J Educ Fac. 20:46–59.
  • Horzum MB, Önder İ, Beşoluk Ş. 2014. Chronotype and academic achievement among online learning students. Learn Individ Differ. 30:106–111. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2013.10.017.
  • Hull JT, Wright KP Jr, Czeisler CA. 2003. The influence of subjective alertness and motivation on human performance independent of circadian and homeostatic regulation. J Biol Rhythms. 18:329–338. doi: 10.1177/0748730403253584.
  • Itzek-Greulich H, Randler C, Vollmer C. 2016. The interaction of chronotype and time of day in a science course: adolescent evening types learn more and are more motivated in the afternoon. Learn Individ Differ. 51:189–198. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2016.09.013.
  • Jones SE, Tyrrell J, Wood AR, Beaumont RN, Ruth KS, Tuke MA, Weedon MN, Hu Y, Teder-Laving M, Hayward C. 2016. Genome-wide association analyses in 128,266 individuals identifies new morningness and sleep duration loci. PLOS Genet. 12:e1006125. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006125.
  • Kalajas-Tilga H, Koka A, Hein V, Tilga H, Raudsepp L. 2020. Motivational processes in physical education and objectively measured physical activity among adolescents. J Sport Health Sci. 9:462–471. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2019.06.001.
  • Lok R, Woelders T, van Koningsveld MJ, Oberman K, Fuhler SG, Beersma DGM, Hut RA. 2022. Bright light increases alertness and not cortisol in healthy men: a forced desynchrony study under dim and bright light (I). J Biol Rhythms. 37:403–416. doi: 10.1177/07487304221096945.
  • Murray G, Nicholas CL, Kleiman J, Dwyer R, Carrington MJ, Allen NB, Trinder J. 2009. Nature’s clocks and human mood: the circadian system modulates reward motivation. Emotion. 9:705. doi: 10.1037/a0017080.
  • Pekrun R, Goetz T, Frenzel AC, Barchfeld P, Perry RP. 2011. Measuring emotions in students’ learning and performance: the achievement emotions questionnaire (AEQ). Contemp Educ Psychol. 36:36–48. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.10.002.
  • Pintrich PR, Marx RW, Boyle RA. 1993. Beyond cold conceptual change: the role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Rev Educ Res. 63:167–199. doi: 10.3102/00346543063002167.
  • Preckel F, Lipnevich AA, Boehme K, Brandner L, Georgi K, Könen T, Mursin K, Roberts RD. 2013. Morningness‐eveningness and educational outcomes: the lark has an advantage over the owl at high school. Br J Educ Psychol. 83:114–134. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02059.x.
  • Rahafar A, Randler C, Vollmer C, Kasaeian A. 2017. Prediction of school achievement through a multi-factorial approach–the unique role of chronotype. Learn Individ Differ. 55:69–74. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2017.03.008.
  • Randler C, Bausback V. 2010. Morningness-eveningness in women around the transition through menopause and its relationship with climacteric complaints. Biol Rhythm Res. 41:415–431. doi: 10.1080/09291010903407631.
  • Randler C, Díaz-Morales JF, Rahafar A, Vollmer C. 2016. Morningness–eveningness and amplitude–development and validation of an improved composite scale to measure circadian preference and stability (MESSi). Chronobiol Int. 33:832–848. doi: 10.3109/07420528.2016.1171233.
  • Randler C, Engelke J. 2019. Gender differences in chronotype diminish with age: a meta-analysis based on morningness/chronotype questionnaires. Chronobiol Int. 36:888–905. doi: 10.1080/07420528.2019.1585867.
  • Randler C, Faßl C, Kalb N. 2017. From lark to owl: Developmental changes in morningness-eveningness from new-borns to early adulthood. Sci Rep. 7:45874.
  • Randler C, Freyth-Weber K, Rahafar A, Jurado AF, Kriegs JO. 2016. Morningness-eveningness in a large sample of German adolescents and adults. Heliyon. 2:e00200. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2016.e00200.
  • Randler C, Horzum MB, Vollmer C. 2014. The influence of personality and chronotype on distance learning willingness and anxiety among vocational high school students in Turkey. Int Rev Res Open Dis. 15:93–110. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v15i6.1928.
  • Randler C, Hummel E, Glaser-Zikuda M, Vollmer C, Bogner FX, Mayring P. 2011. Reliability and validation of a short scale to measure situational emotions in science education. Int J EnvironSci Educ. 6:359–370.
  • Randler C, Rahafar A, Arbabi T, Bretschneider R. 2014. Affective state of school pupils during their first lesson of the day—effect of morningness–eveningness. Mind Brain Educ. 8:214–219. doi: 10.1111/mbe.12060.
  • Randler C, Vollmer C, Beşoluk Ş, Önder İ, Horzum MB. 2014. Age and gender differences in morningness–eveningness in Turkish adolescents and young adults. Biol Rhythm Res. 45:277–284. doi: 10.1080/09291016.2013.805915.
  • Randler C, Vollmer C, Kalb N, Itzek-Greulich H. 2019. Breakpoints of time in bed, midpoint of sleep, and social jetlag from infancy to early adulthood. Sleep Med. 57:80–86. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2019.01.023.
  • Randler C, Weber V. 2015. Positive and negative affect during the school day and its relationship to morningness–eveningness. Biol Rhythm Res. 46:683–690. doi: 10.1080/09291016.2015.1046249.
  • Randler C, Wüst-Ackermann P, Vollmer C, Hummel E. 2012. The relationship between disgust, state-anxiety and motivation during a dissection task. Learn Individ Differ. 22:419–424. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2012.01.005.
  • Roenneberg T, Kuehnle T, Pramstaller PP, Ricken J, Havel M, Guth A, Merrow M. 2004. A marker for the end of adolescence. Curr Biol. 14:R1038–R1039. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.11.039.
  • Ryan RM. 1982. Control and information in the intrapersonal sphere: an extension of cognitive evaluation theory. J Pers Soc Psychol. 43:450–461. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.43.3.450.
  • Ryan RM, Deci EL. 2017. Self-determination theory – basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York (NY): Guilford Press.
  • Ryan RM, Deci EL. 2019. Brick by brick: The origins, development, and future of self-determination theory. Adv Motiv Sci. 6:111–156.
  • Sievertsen HH, Gino F, Piovesan M. 2016. Cognitive fatigue influences students’ performance on standardized tests. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 113:2621–2624. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1516947113.
  • Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL, Lushene RE. 1970. Stai. Manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory (self evaluation questionnaire). Vol. 22. Palo Alto (CA): Consulting Psychologist.
  • Spinath B, Eckert C, Steinmayr R. 2014. Gender differences in school success: what are the roles of students’ intelligence, personality and motivation? Educ Res. 56:230–243. doi: 10.1080/00131881.2014.898917.
  • Staller N, Kalbacher L, Randler C. 2022. Impact of pandemic lockdown on learning behaviour and sleep quality in German students: results of an online survey before and during the pandemic. Somnologie. 26:98–105. doi: 10.1007/s11818-022-00346-8.
  • Süren N, Kandemir MA. 2020. The effects of mathematics anxiety and motivation on students’ mathematics achievement. Int J Educ Math Sci Technol. 8:190–218. doi: 10.46328/ijemst.v8i3.926.
  • Tonetti L, Natale V, Randler C. 2015. Association between circadian preference and academic achievement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Chronobiol Int. 32:792–801. doi: 10.3109/07420528.2015.1049271.
  • Voyer D, Voyer SD. 2014. Gender differences in scholastic achievement: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 140:1174–1204. doi: 10.1037/a0036620.
  • Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. 1988. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 54:1063. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063.
  • Wilde M, Bätz K, Kovaleva A, Urhahne D. 2009. Überprüfung einer Kurzskala intrinsischer Motivation (KIM) [Review of a short scale of intrinsic motivation]. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften [J Sci Didactics]. 15:31–45.