The effects of CLIL on oral comprehension and production: a longitudinal case study

References

• Ackerl, C. (2007). Lexico-grammar in the essays of CLIL and non-CLIL students: Error analysis of written production. Vienna English Working Papers, 16(3), 6–11.
   Google Scholar
• Admiraal, W., Westhoff, G., & de Bot, K. (2006). Evaluation of bilingual secondary education in the Netherlands: Students’ language proficiency. English Educational Research and Evaluation, 12(1), 75–93. doi: 10.1080/13803610500392160
   Google Scholar
• Bruton, A. (2011a). Are the differences between CLIL and non-CLIL groups in Andalusia due to CLIL? A reply to Lorenzo, Casal and Moore (2010). Applied Linguistics, 2011, 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Bruton, A. (2011b). Is CLIL so beneficial, or just selective? Re-evaluating some of the research. System, 39, 523–532. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2011.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruton, A. (2013). CLIL: Some of the reasons why … and why not. System, 41, 587–597. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2013.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruton, A. (2015). CLIL: Detail matters in the whole picture. More than a reply to J. Hüttner and U. Smit (2014). System, 53, 119–128. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2015.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabezas Cabello, J. M. (2010). A SWOT analysis of the Andalusian Plurilingualism Promotion Plan (APPP). In M. L. Pérez (Ed.), Proceedings of the 23rd GRETA convention (pp. 83–91). Jaén: Joxman.
   Google Scholar
• Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton-Puffer, C. (2007). Discourse in content and language integrated (CLIL) classrooms. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Eurydice. (2006). Content and language integrated learning (CLIL) at school in Europe. Brussels: Eurydice.
   Google Scholar
• Gallardo del Puerto, F., Gomez Lacabex, E., & García Lecumberri, M. L. (2009). Testing the effectiveness of content and language integrated learning in foreign language contexts: The assessment of English pronunciation. In Y. Ruiz de Zarobe & R.M. Jiménez Catalán (Eds.), Content and language integrated learning. Evidence from research in Europe (pp. 63–80). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Gassner, D., & Maillat, D. (2006). Spoken competence in CLIL: A pragmatic take on recent Swiss data. Vienna English Working Papers, 15(3), 15–22.
   Google Scholar
• Hüttner, J., & Rieder-Bünemann, A. (2007). The effect of CLIL instruction on children’s narrative competence. Vienna English Working Papers, 16(3), 20–27.
   Google Scholar
• Hüttner, J., & Rieder-Bünemann, A. (2010). A cross-sectional analysis of oral narratives by children with CLIL and non-CLIL instruction. In C. Dalton-Puffer, T. Nikula, & U. Smit (Eds.), Language use and language learning in CLIL classrooms (pp. 61–79). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Hüttner, J., & Smit, U. (2014). CLIL (content and language integrated learning): The bigger picture. A response to: A. Bruton. 2013. CLIL: Some of the reasons why … and why not. System, 44, 160–167. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2014.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, S. (2010). The effectiveness of bilingual education: A case study. Paper presented at the 25th GRETA Convention: Celebrating 25 years of teacher inspiration, University of Granada, Granada.
   Google Scholar
• Lancaster, N. (2016). Stakeholder perspectives on CLIL in a monolingual context. English Language Teaching, 9(2), 148–177. doi: 10.5539/elt.v9n2p148
   Google Scholar
• Lasagabaster, D. (2008). Foreign language competence in content and language integrated courses. The Open Applied Linguistics Journal, 1, 31–42. doi: 10.2174/1874913500801010030
   Google Scholar
• Lorenzo, F. (2007). The sociolinguistics of CLIL: Language planning and language change in 21st century Europe. RESLA, 1, 27–38.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenzo, F., Casal, S., Moore, P., & Afonso, Y. M. (2009). Bilingüismo y educación. Situación de la red de centros bilingües en Andalucia. Sevilla: Fundación Centro de Estudios Andaluces.
   Google Scholar
• Madrid, D., & Hughes, S. (2011). Introduction to bilingual and plurilingual education. In D. Madrid & S. Hughes (Eds.), Studies in bilingual education (pp. 17–50). Frankfurt-am-Main: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, D. (2006). English as a medium of instruction in the new global linguistic order: Global characteristics, local consequences. Finland: UNICOM, Continuing Education Centre, University of Jyväskylä. Retrieved from http://www.metsmac.org./2007/proceedings/2006/Marsh-D-METSMaC-2006.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz, C. (2007). CLIL: Some thoughts on psycholinguistic principles. RESLA, 1, 17–26.
   Google Scholar
• Paran, A. (2013). Content and language integrated learning: Panacea or policy borrowing myth? Applied Linguistics Review, 4(2), 317–342. doi: 10.1515/applirev-2013-0014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez Cañado, M. L. (2011). The effects of CLIL within the APPP: Lessons learned and ways forward. In R. Crespo & M. García de Sola (Eds.), Studies in honour of Ángeles Linde López (pp. 389–406). Granada: Universidad de Granada.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez Cañado, M. L. (2012). CLIL research in Europe: Past, present and future. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 15(3), 315–341. doi: 10.1080/13670050.2011.630064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez Cañado, M. L., & Ráez Padilla, J. (2015). Introduction and overview. In D. Marsh, M. L. Pérez Cañado, & J. Ráez Padilla (Eds.), CLIL in action: Voices from the classroom (pp. 1–12). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Vidal, C. (2013). Perspectives and lessons from the challenge of CLIL experiences. In C. Abello-Contesse, P. M. Chandler, M. D. López-Jiménez, & R. Chacón-Beltrán (Eds.), Bilingual and multilingual education in the 21st century. Building on experience (pp. 59–82). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Vidal, C., & Roquet, H. (2015). CLIL in context: Profiling language abilities. In M. Juan-Garau & J. Salazar Noguera (Eds.), Content-based language learning in multilingual educational environments (pp. 237–255). Amsterdam: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Prieto-Arranz, J. I., Rallo Fabra, L., Calafat-Ripoll, C., & Catrain González, M. (2015). Testing progress on receptive skills in CLIL and non-CLIL contexts. In M. Juan-Garau & J. Salazar Noguera (Eds.), Content-based language learning in multilingual educational environments (pp. 123–137). Amsterdam: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rallo Fabra, L., & Jacob, K. (2015). Does CLIL enhance oral skills? Fluency and pronunciation errors by Spanish-Catalan learners of English. In M. Juan-Garau & J. Salazar Noguera (Eds.), Content-based language learning in multilingual educational environments (pp. 163–177). Amsterdam: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz de Zarobe, Y. (2008). CLIL and foreign language learning: A longitudinal study in the Basque Country. International CLIL Research Journal, 1(1), 60–73.
   Google Scholar
• Rumlich, D. (2014). Prospective CLIL and non-CLIL students’ interest in English (classes): A quasi-experimental study on German sixth-graders. In R. Breeze, C. Martínez Pasamar, C. Llamas Saíz, & C. Tabernero Sala (Eds.), Integration of theory and practice in CLIL (pp. 75–96). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
   Google Scholar
• Rumlich, D. (2016). Evaluating bilingual education in Germany: CLIL students’ general English proficiency, EFL self-concept and interest. Frankfurt-am-Main: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• San Isidro, X. (2010). An insight into Galician CLIL: Provision and results. In D. Lasagabaster & Y. Ruiz de Zarobe (Eds.), CLIL in Spain: Implementation, results and teacher training (pp. 55–78). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Stotz, D., & Meuter, T. (2003). Embedded English: Integrating content and language learning in a Swiss primary school project. Le Bulletin Suisse de Linguistique Appliquée, 77, 83–101.
   Google Scholar
• Verspoor, M., de Bot, K., & Xu, X. (2015). The effects of English bilingual education in the Netherlands. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 3(1), 4–27. doi: 10.1075/jicb.3.1.01ver
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villarreal Olaizola, I., & García Mayo, M. P. (2009). Tense and morphology in the interlanguage of Basque/Spanish bilinguals: CLIL versus non-CLIL. In Y. Ruiz de Zarobe & R. M. Jiménez Catalán (Eds.), Content and language integrated learning. Evidence from research in Europe (pp. 152–175). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Wiesemes, R. (2009). Developing theories of practices in CLIL: CLIL as post-method pedagogies? In Y. Ruiz de Zarobe & R. M. Jiménez Catalán (Eds.), Content and language integrated learning. Evidence from research in Europe (pp. 41–59). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, D. (2005). Approaching CLIL. In the quality CLIL matrix (Central workshop report, coord. D. Marsh). Retrieved from http://www.ecml.at/mtp2/CLILmatrix/pdf/wsrepD3E2005_6.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Zydatiß, W. (2007). Deutsch-Englische Züge in Berlin: Eine evaluation des bilingualen sachfachunterrichts an gymnasien. Kontext, kompetenzen, konsequezen [ English-German courses in Berlin: An evaluation of bilingual teaching in secondary schools. Context, competencies, consequences]. Frankfurt-am-Main: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar