899
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Frame analysis in critical ethnography: applications for ELT research

ORCID Icon
Pages 307-320 | Received 24 Jul 2020, Accepted 27 Nov 2020, Published online: 08 Dec 2020

References

  • Alshammari, A. (2020). Job advertisements for English teachers in the Saudi Arabian context: Discourses of discrimination and inequity. TESOL Quarterly, (Advance online access). https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.542
  • Appleby, R. (2014). White Western male teachers constructing academic identities in Japanese higher education. Gender and Education, 26(7), 776–793. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2014.968530
  • Babaii, E., & Sheikhi, M. (2018). Traces of neoliberalism in English teaching materials: A critical discourse analysis. Critical Discourse Studies, 15(3), 247–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2017.1398671
  • Bell, M. (2017). Criminalization of Blackness: Systemic racism and the reproduction of racial inequality in the US criminal justice system. In R. Thompson-Miller & K. Ducey (Eds.), Systemic racism (pp.163-183). Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Block, D. (2018). Political economy and sociolinguistics: Neoliberalism, inequality, and social class. Bloomsbury.
  • Bloor, M., & Bloor, T. (2007). The practice of critical discourse analysis: An introduction. Hodder Education.
  • Brutt-Griffler, J., & Samimy, K. K. (2001). Transcending the nativeness paradigm. World Englishes, 20(1), 99–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-971X.00199
  • Canagarajah, A. S. (2012). Teacher development in a global profession: An autoethnography. TESOL Quarterly, 46(2), 258–279. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.18
  • Carspecken, P. (1996). Critical ethnography in educational research: A theoretical and practical guide. Routledge.
  • Daiute, C. (2014). Narrative inquiry: A dynamic approach. SAGE Publications.
  • Diani, M. (1992). The concept of social movement. The Sociological Review, 40(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1992.tb02943.x
  • Feagin, J. R. (2013). The white racial frame: Centuries of racial framing and counter-framing (2nd ed). Routledge.
  • Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Northeastern University Press.
  • Hadley, G. (2019). Critical grounded theory. In T. Bryant, & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of current developments in grounded theory (pp. 564–592). SAGE Publications.
  • Hammond, K. (2012). More than a game: A critical discourse analysis of a Racial Inequality Exercise in Japan. TESOL Quarterly, 40(3), 545–571. https://doi.org/10.2307/40264543
  • Holliday, A. (2005). The struggle to teach English as an international language. Oxford University Press.
  • Hooper, D., & Iijima, A. (2019). Examining the “invisible wall” of native-speakerism in Japanese ELT: A duoethnography of teacher experience. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, 28, 1–27.
  • Horkheimer, M. (1972). Critical theory: Selected essays. Herder and Herder.
  • Johnston, H. (1995). A methodology for frame analysis: From discourse to cognitive schema. In H. Johnston, & B. Klandermans (Eds.), Social movements and culture (pp. 217–246). University of Minneapolis Press.
  • King, J. (2013). Silence in the second language classroom. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Lawrence, L., & Nagashima, Y. (2020). The intersectionality of gender, sexuality, race, and native-speakerness: Investigating ELT teacher identity through duoethnography. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 19(1), 42–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2019.1672173
  • Lowe, R. J. (2020a). Selected poster presentations from the British Association of applied linguistics conference, Manchester Metropolitan University, UK, August 2019: Exploring ideology in ELT: A frame analysis approach. Language Teaching, 53(3), 383–386. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444820000166
  • Lowe, R. J. (2020b). Uncovering ideology in English language teaching: Identifying the ‘native speaker’ frame. Springer.
  • Machin, D., & Mayr, A. (2012). How to do critical discourse analysis. Sage.
  • Oliver, P., & Johnston, H. (2000). What a good idea! frames and ideologies in social movement research. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 5(1), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.17813/maiq.5.1.g54k222086346251
  • Pennycook, A. (2001). Critical applied linguistics: A critical introduction. Routledge.
  • Ramjattan, V. A. (2019). The white native speaker and inequality regimes in the private English language school. Intercultural Education, 30(2), 126–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/14675986.2018.1538043
  • Reese, S. D. (2007). The framing project: A bridging model for media research revisited. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 148–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00334.x
  • Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
  • Setyono, B. (2018). The portrayal of women in national-endorsed English as a foreign language (EFL) textbooks for senior high school students in Indonesia. Sexuality & Culture, 22(4), 1077–1093. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-018-9526-2
  • Snow, D. (2004). Framing processes, ideology, and discursive fields. In D. Snow, S. Soule, & H. Kriesi (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 380–412). Blackwell Publishing.
  • Snow, D., & Benford, R. (2000). Clarifying the relationship between framing and ideology in the study of social movements: A comment on Oliver and Johnston. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 5(1), 55–60. https://doi.org/10.17813/maiq.5.1.976335015g30u5j9
  • Stanley, P. (2013). A critical ethnography of ‘westerners’ teaching English in China: Shanghaied in Shanghai. Routledge.
  • Sudbury, J. (2005). Celling Black bodies: Black women in the global prison industrial complex. Feminist Review, 80(1), 162–179. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.fr.9400215
  • Thompson, J. B. (1984). Studies in the theory of ideology. Polity Press.
  • Troudi, S. (2015). Critical research in TESOL and language education. In J. D. Brown, & C. Coombe (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to research in language teaching and learning (pp. 89–98). Cambridge University Press.
  • Verschueren, J. (2012). Ideology in language use: Pragmatic guidelines for empirical research. Cambridge University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.