1,449
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Behavioural and emotional strengths of sociometrically popular, rejected, controversial, neglected, and average children

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 557-571 | Received 01 Jun 2018, Accepted 14 Dec 2018, Published online: 07 Jan 2019

References

  • Adler, P. A., and P. Adler. 1998. Peer Power: Preadolescent Culture and Identity. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
  • Almquist, Y. B., and L. Brännström. 2014. “Childhood Peer Status and the Clustering of Social, Economic, and Health-Related Circumstances in Adulthood.” Social Science and Medicine 105: 67–75. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.01.011.
  • Asher, S. R., and K. Dodge. 1986. “Identifying Children Who are Rejected by Their Peers.” Developmental Psychology 22: 444–449. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.22.4.444.
  • Asher, S. R., J. T. Parkhurst, S. Hymel, and G. A. Williams. 1990. “Peer Rejection and Loneliness in Childhood.” In Peer Rejection in Childhood, edited by S. R. Asher and J. D. Coie, 253–273. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bell-Dolan, B. J., S. L. Foster, and J. S. Christopher. 1995. “Girls’ Peer Relations and Internalizing Problems: Are Socially Neglected, Rejected, and Withdrawn Girls at Risk?” Journal of Clinical Child Psychology 24: 463–473. doi:10.1207/s15374424jccp2404_10.
  • Bierman, K. L. 2004. Peer Rejection: Developmental Processes and Intervention Strategies. New York: Guilford Press.
  • Blöte, A. W., C. L. Bokhorst, A. C. Miers, and P. M. Westenberg. 2012. “Why are Socially Anxious Adolescents Rejected by Peers? the Role of Subject-Group Similarity Characteristics.” Journal of Research on Adolescence 22: 123–134. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2011.00768.x.
  • Borg, A. M., P. Kaukonen, R. Salmelin, M. Joukamaa, and T. Tamminen. 2012. “Reliability of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire among Finnish 4-9-Year-Old Children.” Nordic Journal of Psychiatry 66: 403–413. doi:10.3109/08039488.2012.660706.
  • Braza, F., P. Braza, M. R. Carreras., J. M. Muñoz, J. R. Sánchez-Martin, A. Azurmendi, A. Sorozapal, A. Carcía, and J. Cardas. 2007. “Behavioral Profiles of Different Types of Social Status in Preschool Children: An Observational Approach.” Social Behavior and Personality 35: 195–212. doi:10.2224/sbp.2007.35.2.195.
  • Bukowski, W. M., B. Hoza, and M. Boivin. 1994. “Measuring Friendship Quality during Pre- and Early Adolescence: The Development and Psychometric Properties of the Friendship Qualities Scale.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 11: 471–484. doi:10.1177/0265407594113011.
  • Cantrell, V. L., and R. J. Prinz. 1985. “Multiple Perspectives of Rejected, Neglected, and Accepted Children: Relation between Sociometric Status and Behavioral Characteristics.” Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 53: 884–889.
  • Cillessen, A. H. N. 2009. “Sociometric Methods.” In Handbook of Peer Interactions, Relationships and Groups, edited by K. H. Rubin, W. M. Bukowski, and B. Laursen, 82–99. New York: Guilford.
  • Clark, K. E., and G. W. Ladd. 2000. “Connectedness and Autonomy Support in Parent–Child Relationships: Links to Children’s Socioemotional Orientation and Peer Relationships.” Developmental Psychology 36: 485–498. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.36.4.485.
  • Coie, J. D., K. A. Dodge, and H. Coppotelli. 1982. “Dimensions and Types of Social Status: A Cross-Age Perspective.” Developmental Psychology 18: 557–570. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.18.4.557.
  • Coie, J. D., K. A. Dodge, and J. B. Kupersmidt. 1990. “Peer Group Behavior and Social Status.” In Peer Rejection in Childhood, edited by S. R. Asher and J. D. Coie, 17–59. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • DeRosier, M. E., and J. M. Thomas. 2003. “Strengthening Sociometric Prediction: Scientific Advances in the Assessment of Children’s Peer Relations.” Child Development 75: 1379–1392. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00613.
  • Epstein, M. H. 2004. Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale: A Strength-Based Approach to Assessment. 2nd ed. Austin, TX: PRO-Ed.
  • Faris, R., and S. Ennett. 2012. “Adolescent Aggression: The Role of Peer Group Status Motives, Peer Aggression, and Group Characteristics.” Social Networks 34: 371–378. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2010.06.003.
  • Gest, S. D., A. Sesma Jr., A. S. Masten, and A. Tellegen. 2006. “Childhood Peer Reputation as a Predictor of Competence and Symptoms 10 Years Later.” Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 34: 509–526. doi:10.1007/s10802-006-9029-8.
  • Gibb, S. J., D. M. Fergusson, and R. J. Horwood. 2008. “Gender Differences in Educational Achievement to Age 25.” Australian Journal of Education 52: 63–80. doi:10.1177/000494410805200105.
  • Goodman, R. 1997. “The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A Research Note.” Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 38: 581–586.
  • Goodman, R. 2001. “Psychometric Properties of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire.” Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 40: 1337–1345. doi:10.1097/00004583-200111000-00015.
  • Goodman, R., D. L. Lamping, and G. B. Ploubidis. 2010. “When to Use Broader Internalising and Externalising Subscales Instead of the Hypothesised Five Subscales on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ): Data from British Parents, Teachers and Children.” Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 38: 1179–1191. doi:10.1007/s10802-010-9434-x.
  • Hill, D. K., and K. W. Merrell. 2004. “Characteristics of “Controversial” Children: An Exploration of Teacher and Parent Social Behavior Rating Scale Datasets.” Psychology in the Schools 41: 497–507. doi:10.1002/pits.10175.
  • Kiuru, N., K. Haverinen, K. Salmela-Aro, J.-E. Nurmi, H. Savolainen, and L. Holopainen. 2011. “Students with Reading and Spelling Disabilities: Peer Groups and Educational Attainment in Secondary Education.” Journal of Learning Disabilities 44: 556–569. doi:10.1177/0022219410392043.
  • Koskelainen, M., A. Sourander, and A. Kaljonen. 2000. “The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire among Finnish School-Aged Children and Adolescents.” European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 9: 277–284. doi:10.1007/s007870070031/2443.
  • Koskelainen, M., A. Sourander, and M. Vauras. 2001. “Self-Reported Strengths and Difficulties in a Community Sample of Finnish Adolescents.” European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 10:180–185. doi:10.1007/s007870170024/2443.
  • Kuhn, C., M. Aebi, H. Jakobsen, T. Banaschewski, L. Poustka, Y. Grimmer, R. Goodman, and H.-C. Steinhausen. 2017. “Effective Mental Health Screening in Adolescents: Should We Collect Data from Youth, Parents, or Both?” Child Psychiatry and Human Development 48: 385–392. doi:10.1007/s10578-016-0665-0/2048.
  • LaFontana, K. M., and A. H. N. Cillessen. 2002. “Children’s Perceptions of Popular and Unpopular Peers: A Multimethod Assessment.” Developmental Psychology 38: 635–647. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.38.5.635.
  • Laine, K., M. Neitola, J. Auremaa, and E. Laakkonen. 2010. “Longitudinal Study on the Co-Occurrence of Peer Problems at Daycare Centre, in Preschool and First Grade of School.” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 54: 471–485. doi:10.1080/00313831.2010.508917.
  • Lambert, M. C., E. T. Sointu, and M. H. Epstein. 2018. “A Comprehensive Review of International Research Using the Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale.” International Journal of School & Educational Psychology 1–12. doi:10.1080/21683603.2017.1422061.
  • Lappalainen, K., H. Savolainen, M. Kuorelahti, and M. H. Epstein. 2009. “An International Assessment of the Emotional and Behavioral Strengths of Youth.” Journal of Child and Family Studies 18: 746–753. doi:10.1007/s10826-009-9287-5.
  • Marryat, L., L. Thompson, H. Minnis, and P. Wilson. 2014. “Associations between Social Isolation, Pro-Social Behaviour and Emotional Development in Preschool Aged Children: A Population Based Survey of Kindergarten Staff.” BMC Psychology 2: 44. doi:10.1186/s40359-014-0044-1.
  • McMullen, J. A., K. Veermans, and K. Laine. 2014. “Tools for the Classroom? An Examination of Existing Sociometric Methods for Teacher Use.” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 58: 624–638. doi:10.1080/00313831.2013.838694/2443.
  • Nelson, D. A., K. C. Burner, S. M. Coyne, C. H. Hart, and C. C. Robinson. 2016. “Correlates of Sociometric Status in Russian Preschoolers: Aggression, Victimization, and Sociability.” Personality and Individual Differences 94: 332–336. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.01.054.
  • Nelson, D. A., C. C. Robinson, G. H. Hart, A. D. Albano, and S. J. Marshall. 2010. “Italian Preschoolers’ Peer-Status Linkages with Sociability and Subtypes of Aggression and Victimization.” Social Development Theory 19: 698–720. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2009.00551.x.
  • Newcomb, A. F., and W. M. Bukowski. 1983. “Social Impact and Social Preference as Determinants of Children’s Peer Group Status.” Developmental Psychology 19: 856–867. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.19.6.856.
  • Newcomb, A. F., W. M. Bukowski, and L. Pattee. 1993. “Children’s Peer Relations: A Meta-Analytic Review of Popular, Rejected, Neglected, Controversial, and Average Sociometric Status.” Psychological Bulletin 113: 99–128.
  • Nickerson, A. B. 2007. “The Use and Importance of Strength-Based Assessment.” School Psychology Forum: Research in Practice 2: 15–25.
  • Parker, J. G., and S. R. Asher. 1987. “Peer Relations and Later Personal Adjustment: Are Low-Accepted Children at Risk?” Psychological Bulletin 102: 357–389.
  • Parker, J. G., and S. R. Asher. 1993. “Friendship and Friendship Quality in Middle Childhood: Links with Peer Group Acceptance and Feelings of Loneliness and Social Dissatisfaction.” Developmental Psychology 29: 611–621. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.29.4.611.
  • Parkhurst, J. T., and S. R. Asher. 1992. “Peer Rejection in Middle School: Subgroup Differences in Behavior, Loneliness, and Interpersonal Concerns.” Developmental Psychology 28: 231–241. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.28.2.231.
  • Parkhurst, J. T., and S. R. Hopmeyer. 1998. “Sociometric Popularity and Peer-Perceived Popularity.” The Journal of Early Adolescence 18: 125–144. doi:10.1177/0272431698018002001.
  • Patterson, C. J., N. A. Vaden, and J. B. Kupersmidt. 1991. “Family Backround, Recent Life Events and Peer Rejection during Childhood.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 8: 347–361. doi:10.1177/0265407591083003.
  • Penner, L. A., J. F. Dovidio, J. A. Piliavin, and D. A. Schroeder. 2005. “Prosocial Behavior: Multilevel Perspectives.” Annual Review of Psychology 56: 365–392. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070141.
  • Renato, G. G. C. 2016. “Gender Differences in Academic Achievement: The Mediating Role of Personality.” Personality and Individual Differences 94: 54–58. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.01.011.
  • Rodkin, P., and C. Berger. 2008. “Who Bullies Whom? Social Status Asymmetries by Victim Gender.” International Journal of Behavioral Development 32: 473–485. doi:10.1177/0165025408093667.
  • Sointu, E. T., H. Savolainen, M. C. Lambert, K. Lappalainen, and M. H. Epstein. 2012. “Cross Informant Agreement of Behavioral and Emotional Strengths between Finnish Students and Teachers.” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 56: 625–636. doi:10.1080/00313831.2011.621135.
  • Sointu, E. T., H. Savolainen, M. C. Lambert, K. Lappalainen, and M. H. Epstein. 2014. “Behavioral and Emotional Strength-Based Assessment of Finnish Elementary Students: Psychometrics of the BERS-2.” European Journal of Psychology of Education 29: 1–19. doi:10.1007/s10212-013-0184-3.
  • Soponaru, C., C. Tincu, and M. Iorga. 2014. “The Influence of the Sociometric Status of Students on Academic Achievement.” Agathos: an International Review of the Humanities and Social Sciences 2: 149–168.
  • Steinmayr, R., and B. Spinath. 2008. “Sex Differences in School Achievement: What are the Roles of Personality and Achievement Motivation?” European Journal of Personality 22: 185–209. doi:10.1002/per.676.
  • Stipek, D. 1984. “Young Children’s Performance Expectations: Logical Analysis or Wishful Thinking?” In Advances in Motivation and Achievement: Vol. 3. The Development of Achievement Motivation, edited by J. G. Nicholls, 33–56. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Teunissen, H. A., C. B. Adelman, M. J. Prinstein, J. Spijkerman, E. A. P. Poelen, R. C. M. E. Engels, and R. H. J. Scholte. 2011. “The Interaction between Pubertal Timing and Peer Popularity for Boys and Girls: An Integration of Biological and Interpersonal Perspectives on Adolescent Depression.” Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 39: 413–423. doi:10.1007/s10802-010-9467-1.
  • Voyer, D., and S. D. Voyer. 2014. “Gender Differences in Scholastic Achievement: A Meta-Analysis.” Psychological Bulletin 140: 1174–1204. doi:10.1037/a0036620.
  • Wentzel, K. R., and S. R. Asher. 1995. “Academic Lives of Neglected, Rejected, Popular, and Controversial Children.” Child Development 66: 754–763. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.ep9506152723.
  • Woodward, L. J., and D. M. Fergusson. 2000. “Childhood Peer Relationship Problems and Later Risks for Educational Under-Achievement and Unemployment.” Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 41: 191–201.
  • Zakriski, A. L., and J. D. Coie. 1996. “A Comparison of Aggressive-Rejected and Nonaggressive-Rejected Children’s Interpretations of Self-Directed and Other-Directed Rejection.” Child Development 67: 1048–1070. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.ep9704150183.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.