Online discussion effects on intention to participate in genetic research: A longitudinal experimental study

References

• Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action control: From cognitions to behavior (pp. 11–39). Heidelberg: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2
   Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. (2011). The theory of planned behaviour: Reactions and reflections. Psychology & Health, 26, 1113–1127. doi:10.1080/08870446.2011.613995
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 471–499. doi:10.1348/014466601164939
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bargh, J. A., McKenna, K. Y. A., & Fitzsimons, G. M. (2002). Can you see the real me? Activation and expression of the “true self” on the Internet. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 33–48. doi:10.1111/1540-4560.00247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaudoin, C. E., & Tao, C. C. (2007). Benefiting from social capital in online support groups: An empirical study of cancer patients. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10, 587–590.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: Wiley.10.1002/9781118619179
   Google Scholar
• Botoseneanu, A., Alexander, J. A., & Banaszak-Holl, J. (2011). To test or not to test? The role of attitudes, knowledge, religious involvement among U.S. adults on intention-to-obtain adult genetic testing. Health Education & Behavior, 38, 617–628. doi:10.1177/1090198110389711
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, D., Sutton, S., & Steggles, N. (2002). Intention to participate in predictive genetic testing for hereditary cancer: The role of attitude toward uncertainty. Psychology and Health, 17, 761–772. doi:10.1080/0887044021000054764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, D. O., Waldron, V. R., & Finn, J. (1999). Communication of social support in computer-mediated groups for people with disabilities. Health Communication, 11, 123–151.10.1207/s15327027hc1102_2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sage Focus Editions, 154, 136–136.
   Google Scholar
• Cappella, J. N., Zhang, J., & Price, V. (2014). Collective intelligence: The wisdom and foolishness of deliberating groups. In K. Kenski & K. H. Jamieson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political communication (pp. 1–12). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199793471.013.014
   Google Scholar
• Chung, J. E. (2014). Social networking in online support groups for health: How online social networking benefits patients. Journal of Health Communication, 19, 639–659.10.1080/10810730.2012.757396
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clayton, E. W. (2003). Ethical, legal, and social implications of genomic medicine. The New England Journal of Medicine., 349, 562–569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Codori, A., Peterson, G. M., Miglioretti, D. L., Larkin, E. K., Bushey, M. T., Young, C., Brensinger, J. D., Johnson, K., Bacon, J. A., & Booker, S. V. (1999). Attitudes toward colon cancer gene testing: Factors predicting test uptake. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention, 8, 345–351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conner, M., & Armitage, C. (1998). Extending the theory of planned behavior: A review and avenues for further research. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 1429–1464. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01685.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conner, M., & Sparks, P. (2005). The theory of planned behaviour and health behaviours. In M. Conner & P. Norman (Eds.), Predicting health behaviour (pp. 121–162). Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, F. S. (1999). The human genome project and the future of medicine. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 882, 42–55. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb08532.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croyle, R. T., & Lerman, C. (1993). Interest in genetic testing for colon cancer susceptibility: Cognitive and emotional correlates. Preventive Medicine, 22, 284–292. doi:10.1006/pmed.1993.1023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis, A. R. (1996). Information exchange and use in group decision making: You can lead a group to information, but you can't make it think. MIS Quarterly, 20, 433–457. doi:10.2307/249563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis, J. M. (2010). KnowledgePanel®: Processes & procedures contributing to sample representativeness & tests for self-selection bias. Retrieved February 05, 2016, from http://www.knowledgenetworks.com/ganp/reviewer-info.html
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1927). The public and its problems. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Dresser, R. (2014). Public preferences and the challenge to genetic research policy. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 1, 52–67. doi:10.1093/jlb/lst001
   Google Scholar
• Etchegary, H., Green, J., Dicks, E., Pullman, D., Street, C., & Parfrey, P. (2013). Consulting the community: Public expectations and attitudes about genetics research. European Journal of Human Genetics, 21(12), 1338–1343. doi:10.1038/ejhg.2013.64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farmer, D. F., Jackson, S. A., Camacho, F., & Hall, M. A. (2007). Attitudes of African American and low socioeconomic status white women toward medical research. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 18, 85–99.10.1353/hpu.2007.0008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M. (1997). Predicting, understanding, and changing socially relevant behaviors: Lessons learned. In C. McGarty & S. A. Haslam (Eds.), The message of social psychology (pp. 77–91). Oxford,: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. New York, NY: Psychology Press (Taylor & Francis).
   Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., & Yzer, C. M. (2003). Using theory to design effective health behavior interventions. Communication Theory, 13, 164–183. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2003.tb00287.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishkin, J. S. (2000, November). Virtual democratic possibilities: Prospects for Internet democracy. In Paper presented at the conference on Internet, Democracy and Public Goods. Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
   Google Scholar
• Frost, S., Myers, L. B., & Stanton, P. N. (2001). Genetic screening for alzheimer's disease: What factors predict intentions to take a test? Behavioral Medicine, 27, 101–109. doi:10.1080/08964280109595776
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunzler, D., Chen, T., Wu, P., & Zhang, H. (2013). Introduction to mediation analysis with structural equation modeling. Shanghai Archives of Psychiatry, 25, 390–394. http://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-0829.2013.06.009
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kaplan, D. (2008). Structural equation modeling: Foundations and extensions (Vol. 10). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39, 1123–1134. doi:10.1037//0003-066X.39.10.1123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kontos, E., Blake, K. D., Chou, W. Y. S., & Prestin, A. (2014). Predictors of eHealth usage: Insights on the digital divide from the Health Information National Trends Survey 2012. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16, e172. doi:10.2196/jmir.3117
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lemke, A. A., Wolf, W. A., Hebert-Beirne, J., & Smith, M. E. (2010). Public and biobank participant attitudes toward genetic research participation and data Sharing. Public Health Genomics, 13, 368–377. doi:10.1159/000276767
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lippmann, W. (1922). Public opinion. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
   Google Scholar
• Madden, T. J., Ellen, P. S., & Ajzen, I. (1992). A comparison of the theory of planned behavior and the theory of reasoned action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 3–9. doi:10.1177/0146167292181001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, S. C., Jacobsen, P. B., Lucas, D. J., Branch, K. A., & Ferron, J. M. (1999). Predicting children’s sunscreen use: Application of the theories of reasoned action and planned behavior. Preventive Medicine, 29, 37–44. doi:10.1006/pmed.1999.0500
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manstead, A. S. R., & Parker, D. (1995). Evaluating and extending the theory of planned behaviour. European Review of Social Psychology, 6, 69–95. doi:10.1080/14792779443000012
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, B., & Muthén, B. O. (2009). Statistical analysis with latent variables. Hoboken: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Pan, Z., Shen, L., Paek, H. J., & Sun, Y. (2006). Mobilizing political talk in a presidential campaign: An examination of campaign effects in a deliberative framework. Communication Research, 33, 315–345. doi:10.1177/0093650206291478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrin, A., & Duggan, M. (2015, June). Americans’ Internet access: 2000–2015. Retrieved December 5, 2015, from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/06/26/americans-internet-access-2000-2015/?beta=true&utm_expid=53098246-2.Lly4CFSVQG2lphsg-KopIg.1&utm_referrer=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pewinternet.org%2Fsearch%2Finternet%2Buser%2F%3Fsite%3Dpewinternet
   Google Scholar
• Price, V. (2006). Citizens deliberating online: Theory and some evidence. In T. Davies & S. P. Gangadharan (Eds.),Online discussion: Design, research, and practice (pp. 37–58). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Price, V., & Cappella, J. N. (2002). Online discussion and its influence: The Electronic Dialogue Project in campaign 2000. IT and Society, 1, 303–328.
   Google Scholar
• Price, V., & Cappella, J. N. (2005). Constructing electronic interactions among citizens, issue publics, and elites: The healthcare dialogue project. Proceedings of the National Conference on Digital Government Research (pp. 139–140). Atlanta, GA: Digital Government Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Price, V., Nir, L., & Cappella, J. N. (2006). Normative and informational influences in online political discussions. Communication Theory, 16, 47–74. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00005.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.10.1145/358916
   Google Scholar
• Rains, S. A. (2005). Leveling the organizational playing field – Virtually: A meta-analysis of experimental research assessing the impact of group support system use on member influence behaviors. Communication Research, 32, 193–234. doi:10.1177/0093650204273763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, S. D. (2004). Hookups or health promotion? An exploratory study of a chat room-based HIV prevention intervention for men who have sex with men. AIDS Education and Prevention, 16, 315–327.10.1521/aeap.16.4.315.40399
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, L. W., Warner, T. D., Geppert, C. M. A., Rogers, M., & Hammond, K. A. G. (2005). Employees’ perspectives on ethically important aspects of genetic research participation: A pilot study. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 46, 27–33. doi:10.1016/j.comppsych.2004.07.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, K., & Williams, M. (2005). Researching online populations: The use of online focus groups for social research. Qualitative Research, 5, 395–416.10.1177/1468794105056916
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. (2001). Republic.com. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tanis, M. (2008). Health-related on-line forums: What’s the big attraction? Journal of Health Communication, 13, 698–714. doi:10.1080/10810730802415316
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The European Commission. (2004). 25 recommendations on the ethical, legal, and social implications of genetic testing. Retrieved October 19, 2013, from http://ec.europa.eu/research/conferences/2004/genetic/pdf/recommendations_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• The National Human Genome Research Institute. (2013, October). Community engagement and community health resources. Retrieved October 19, 2013, from http://www.genome.gov/27541345
   Google Scholar
• Tidwell, L. C., & Walther, J. B. (2002). Computer-mediated communication effects on disclosure, impressions, and interpersonal evaluations: Getting to know one another a bit at a time. Human Communication Research, 28(3), 317–348. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00811.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B. (1995). Relational aspects of computer-mediated communication: Experimental observations over time. Organization Science, 6, 186–203. doi:10.1287/orsc.6.2.186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar