A meta-methodology to enhance pluralist qualitative research: One man’s use of socio-sexual media and midlife adjustment to HIV

References

• Bradbury-Jones, C., Breckenridge, J., Clark, M. T., Herber, O. R., Wagstaff, C., & Taylor, J. (2017). The state of qualitative research in health and social science literature: A focused mapping review and synthesis. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 20(6), 627–645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2016). (Mis)conceptualising themes, thematic analysis, and other problems with Fugard and Potts’ (2015) sample-size tool for thematic analysis. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 19, 739–743.10.1080/13645579.2016.1195588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. (2006). Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done? Qualitative Research, 6, 97–113.10.1177/1468794106058877
   Google Scholar
• Caddick, N., Smith, B., & Phoenix, C. (2015). The effects of surfing and the natural environment on the well-being of combat veterans. Qualitative Health Research, 25, 76–86.10.1177/1049732314549477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2008). Constructionism and the grounded theory method. In J. A. Holstein & J. F. Gubrium (Eds.), Handbook of constructionist research (pp. 397–412). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, N. J., Caddick, N., & Frost, N. (2016). Pluralistic data analysis theory and practice. In B. Smith & A. C. Sparkes (Eds.), Routledge handbook of qualitative research in sport and exercise (pp. 368–381). Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2018). Using thematic analysis in counselling and psychotherapy research: A critical reflection. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 18(2), 107–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coyle, A. (2010). Qualitative research and anomalous experience: A call for interpretative pluralism. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 7, 79–83.10.1080/14780880903304600
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dewe, M., & Coyle, A. (2014). Reflections on a study of the responses to research on smoking: A pragmatic, pluralist variation on a qualitative psychological theme. Review of Social Studies, 1, 21–36.10.21586/0000000
   Google Scholar
• Frankis, J., Flowers, P., Lorimer, K., & Davis, M. (2013). Social media, men who have sex with men and sexual health in Lanarkshire. Retrieved August 2, 2017, from http://www.sexualhealthnetwork.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/2014-05-23-01.38.46-PM-Lanarkshire-SMMaSH-Survey-Report-2013-For-Circulation.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Frost, N. A., Holt, A., Shinebourne, P., Esin, C., Nolas, S. M., Mehdizadeh, L., & Brooks-Gordon, B. (2011). Collective findings, individual interpretations: An illustration of a pluralistic approach to qualitative data analysis. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 8, 93–113.10.1080/14780887.2010.500351
   Google Scholar
• Frost, N. A., & Nolas, S. M. (2013). The contribution of pluralistic qualitative approaches to mixed methods evaluations. In S. Hesse-Biber & D. Mertens (Eds.), Mixed methods and credibility of evidence in evaluation: New directions for evaluation (pp. 75–84). London: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Frost, N., Nolas, S. M., Brooks-Gordon, B., Esin, C., Holt, A., Mehdizadeh, L., & Shinebourne, P. (2010). Pluralism in qualitative research: The impact of different researchers and qualitative approaches on the analysis of qualitative data. Qualitative Research, 10, 441–460.10.1177/1468794110366802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New Brunswick, NJ: Aldine Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Hesse-Biber, S. (2010). Qualitative approaches to mixed methods practice. Qualitative Inquiry, 16, 455–468.10.1177/1077800410364611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33, 14–26.10.3102/0013189X033007014
   Google Scholar
• Josselin, D., & Willig, C. (2014). Layering the wounded self: Using a pluralistic qualitative approach to explore meaning-making around self-injury. Qualitative Methods in Psychology Bulletin, 17(Spring). http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/4836/
   Google Scholar
• Labov, W. (1972). The transformation of experience in narrative syntax. In W. Labov (Ed.), Language in the Inner City: Studies in the Black English vernacular (pp. 354–396). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lacan, J. (2004). The four fundamental concepts of psycho-analysis. London: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Madill, A. (2008). Realism. In L. M. Given (Ed.), The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (pp. 731–735). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Madill, A., & Gough, B. (2008). Qualitative research and its place in psychological science. Psychological Methods, 13, 254–271.10.1037/a0013220
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madill, A., Jordan, A., & Shirley, C. (2000). Objectivity and reliability in qualitative analysis: Realist, contextualist, and radical constructionist epistemologies. British Journal of Psychology, 91, 1–20.10.1348/000712600161646
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, C. (2011). Critical realist grounded theory: A new approach for social work research. British Journal of Social Work, 42, 371–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Roseneil, S. (2006). The ambivalences of Angel’s ‘arrangement’: A psychosocial lens on the contemporary condition of personal life. The Sociological Review, 54, 847–869.10.1111/j.1467-954X.2006.00674.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Osborn, M. (1997). Interpretative phenomenological analysis and the psychology of health and illness. In Material discourses of health and illness (pp. 68–91). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, P. (2012). Qualitative data analysis using a dialogical approach. London: Sage.10.4135/9781446268391
   Google Scholar
• Wetherell, M., & Edley, N. (2014). A discursive psychological framework for analyzing men and masculinities. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 15, 355–364.10.1037/a0037148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yardley, L. (2008). Demonstrating validity in qualitative psychology. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (2nd ed., pp. 235–251). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar