An Exploration of Conferences Between a Preservice and Inservice Teacher About Mathematical Discourse

References

• Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators (AMTE). (2017). Standards for preparing teachers of mathematics. Retrieved from amte.net/standards
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. (1984). Problems of Doestoevsky’s poetics (C. Emerson, Trans.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blue Ribbon Panel on Clinical Preparation and Partnerships for Improving Student Learning. (2010). Transforming teacher education through clinical practice: A national strategy to prepare effective teachers. Washington, DC: The National Council for the Accreditation of Teacher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Boerst, T., Sleep, L., Ball, D., & Bass, H. (2011). Preparing teachers to lead mathematics discussions. Teachers College Record, 13(12), 2844–2877.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. L., Quincy, C., Osserman, J., & Pedersen, O. K. (2013). Coding in-depth semistructured interviews: Problems of unitization and intercoder reliability and agreement. Sociological Methods & Research, 42(3), 294–320. doi:10.1177/0049124113500475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casa, T. M. (2013). Capturing thinking on the talk frame. Teaching Children Mathematics, 19(8), 516–523.
   Google Scholar
• Cazden, C. B., & Beck, S. W. (2003). Classroom discourse. In A. C. Graesser, M. A. Gernsbacher, & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), Handbook of discourse processes (pp. 165–197). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chapin, S. H., O’Connor, C., & Anderson, N. C. (2009). Classroom discussions: Using math talk to help students learn, grades 1-6 (2nd ed.). Sausalito, CA: Math Solutions Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Common Core State Standards Initiative (CCSSI). (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/assets/CCSSI_Math%20Standards.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gardiner, W. (2018). Rehearsals in clinical placements: Scaffolding teacher candidates' literacy instruction. The Teacher Educator, 53(4), 384–400. doi:10.1080/08878730.2018.1441348
   Google Scholar
• Goos, M. (2004). Learning mathematics a classroom community of inquiry. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(4), 258–291. doi:10.2307/30034810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorodetsky, M., & Barak, J. (2008). The educational-cultural edge: A participative learning environment for co-emergence of personal and institutional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(7), 1907–1918. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2008.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, P. (2011). A framework for teaching practice: A brief history of an idea. Teachers College Record, 113(12), 2836–2843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, P., Compton, C., Igra, D., Ronfeldt, M., Shahan, E., & Williamson, P. W. (2009). Teaching practice: A cross-professional perspective. Teachers College Record, 111(9), 2055–2100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2017). Visible learning for mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. doi:10.1177/1049732305276687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imm, K., & Stylianou, D. A. (2012). Talking mathematically: An analysis of discourse communities. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31(1), 130–148. doi:10.1016/j.jmathb.2011.10.001
   Google Scholar
• Kersaint, G. (2015). Orchestrating mathematical discourse to enhance student learning. Curriculum Associates, LLC. Retrieved from https://ttaconline.org/Document/zxbIhX_YCJNP0qvIYsAjT0x-qdzE3VlX/WP-Curriculum_Associates–Orchestrating_Mathematical_Discourse.pdf0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lampert, M., Franke, M. L., Kazemi, E., Ghousseini, H., Turrou, A. C., Beasley, H., … Crowe, K. (2013). Keeping it complex: Using rehearsals to support novice teacher learning of ambitious teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(3), 226–243. doi:10.1177/0022487112473837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemov, D. (2015). Teach like a champion 2.0: 62 techniques that put students on the path to college. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Manouchehri, A., & Enderson, M. C. (1999). Promoting mathematical discourse: Learning from classroom examples. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 4(4), 216–222.
   Google Scholar
• Margolis, J. (2007). Improving relationships between mentor teachers and student teachers: Engaging in a pedagogy of explicitness. The New Educator, 3(1), 75–94. doi:10.1080/15476880601141540
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, M., Kazemi, E., & Kavanagh, S. S. (2013). Core practices and pedagogies of teacher education: A call for a common language and collective activity. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(5), 378–386. doi:10.1177/0022487113493807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Michaels, S., O’Connor, C., & Resnick, L. B. (2008). Deliberative discourse idealized and realized: Accountable talk in the classroom and in civic life. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 27(4), 283–297. doi:10.1007/s11217-007-9071-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2014). Principles to action: Ensuring mathematical success for all. Reston, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• O’Halloran, K. (1998). Classroom discourse in mathematics: A multisemiotic analysis. Linguistics and Education, 10(3), 359–388. doi:10.1016/s0898-5898(99)00013-3
   Google Scholar
• Ostrosky, M. M., Mouzourou, C., Danner, N., & Zaghlawan, H. Y. (2013). Improving teacher practices using microteaching: Planful video recording and constructive feedback. Young Exceptional Children, 16(1), 16–29. doi:10.1177/1096250612459186
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pimm, D. (1987). Speaking mathematically: Communication in mathematics classrooms. New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• QSR International Pty Ltd. (2010). NVivo qualitative data analysis software, Version 9. Retrieved from http://www.qsrinternational.com
   Google Scholar
• Radford, L., Edwards, L., & Arzarello, F. (2009). Beyond words. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70(2), 91–95. doi:10.1007/s10649-008-9172-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossman, G. B., & Rallis, S. F. (1998). Learning in the field: An introduction to qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Schaffer, C., & Welsh, K. (2014). Transforming field experiences to create authentic teaching opportunities. The Nebraska Educator: A Student-Led Journal. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebeducator/21
   Google Scholar
• Stein, M. K., Engle, R. A., Smith, M. S., & Hughes, E. K. (2008). Orchestrating productive mathematical discussions: Five practices for helping teachers move beyond show and tell. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10(4), 313–340. doi:10.1080/10986060802229675
   Google Scholar
• Steinberg, R., Empson, S. B., & Carpenter, T. P. (2004). Inquiry into children’s mathematical thinking as a means to teacher change. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7(3), 237–267. doi:10.1023/B:JMTE0000033083.04005.d3
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Truxaw, M. P., & DeFranco, T. C. (2008). Mapping mathematics classroom discourse and its implications for models of teaching. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(5), 489–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasburn-Moses, L., Kopp, T., & Hettersimer, J. E. (2012). Prospective teachers’ perceptions of the value of an early field experience in a laboratory setting. Issues in Teacher Education, 21(2), 7–22.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, T. (2002). What does it mean to teach mathematics differently? In B. Barton, K. Irwin, M. Pfannkuch, & M. Thomas (Eds.), Mathematics education in the South Pacific (Proceedings of the 25th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Vol. 1, pp. 61–67). Sydney: Merga.
   Google Scholar
• Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 2, 458–477. doi:10.2307/749877
   Google Scholar
• Zeichner, K. (2010). Rethinking the connections between campus courses and field experiences in college- and university-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 89–99. doi:10.1177/0022487109347671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar