191
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Variations of Board Writing Styles in Japanese Schools: How Is It Related to the Teaching of School Subjects?

References

  • Akita, K. (2016). Characteristics of innovative learning communities: Inquiries for deep learning. University of Tokyo. Retrieved September 5, from http://www.walsnet.org/2016/images/Keynote_presentations/without_photowals_2016akita.compressed.pdf
  • Arias Rivera, M. A. (2022). Bansho mathematics strategy as a means for enhancing writing skills in second graders, National Pedagogical University, Colombia. http://repositorio.pedagogica.edu.co/bitstream/handle/20.500.12209/17187/EnhancingEFLWritingthroughtheBansho.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  • Artemeva, N., & Fox, J. (2011). The writings on the board: The global and the local in teaching undergraduate mathematics through Chalk Talk. Written Communication, 28(4), 345–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088311419630
  • Baldry, F., Mann, J., Horsman, R., Koiwa, D., & Foster, C. (2022). The use of carefully planned board work to support the productive discussion of multiple student responses in a Japanese problem-solving lesson. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-021-09511-6
  • Bamkin, S. (2015). Moral education at Japanese elementary school. https://www.wcmt.org.uk/sites/default/files/report-documents/BamkinSReport2015Final_0.pdf
  • Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). The qualitative report qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544–599. https://citeulike-article-id:6670384
  • Becker, J. P., Silver, E. A., Kantowski, M. G., Travers, K. J., & Wilson, J. W. (1990). Some observations of mathematics teaching in Japanese elementary and junior high schools. The Arithmetic Teacher, 38(2), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.5951/AT.38.2.0012
  • Chiba, N. (2016). Bansho juu soku: bansho no kihon to kanousei (The ten commandments for writing on blackboard by teacher: The basic rules and the possibilities). The Japanese Journal of Primary Education, 17, 80–90. https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/120005960741
  • Clarke, D., Mesiti, C., O’Keefe, C., Xu, L. H., Jablonka, E., Mok, I. A. C., & Shimizu, Y. (2007). Addressing the challenge of legitimate international comparisons of classroom practice. International Journal of Educational Research, 46(5), 280–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2007.10.009
  • Ermeling, B. (2015). Lesson learned from a chalkboard: Slow and steady technology integration. Teachers College Record, 13, 1–6.
  • Goodson, I. F., & Mangan, J. M. (1995). Subject cultures and the introduction of classroom computers. British Educational Research Journal, 21(5), 613–628. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192950210505
  • Grasha, A. F. (1996). Teaching with style: A practical guide to enhancing learning by understanding teaching and learning styles. Alliance Publishers. https://www.academia.edu/6211237/Teaching_With_Style_by_Dr._Grasha
  • Greiffenhagen, C. (2014). The materiality of mathematics: Presenting mathematics at the blackboard. The British Journal of Sociology, 65(3), 502–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12037
  • Hatta, S. (1971). Shakaika bansho jikou no seisen to kouzouka [Selection and structuring of bansho of social studies].
  • Hendry, C. (2016). Chalkboard teaching in the age of technology. Carleton University Teaching and Learning Services, 1–2. https://carleton.ca/edc/?p=18091
  • Hennessy, S., Ruthven, K., & Brindley, S. (2005). Teacher perspectives on integrating ICT into subject teaching: Commitment, constraints, caution, and change. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(2), 155–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027032000276961
  • Ieda, H. (2014). Shougakko Sansuu: Jugyou ryoku o migaku (Primary school mathematics-polishing the lesson skills). Shinko Shuppansha Keirinkan. Retrieved October 24, from https://shinko-keirin.co.jp/keirinkan/pr/risukeirin/pdf/no006_09.pdf
  • Ikuta, A. (2017). Doutoku no jugyou ni okeru bansho no yakuwari towa (The role bansho in moral education lesson). Doutoku Kyouiku, 708, 7–9.
  • Karaseva, A., Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt, P., & Siibak, A. (2013). Comparison of different subject cultures and pedagogical use of ICTs in Estonian schools. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 8(3), 157–171. https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1891-943X-2013-03-03
  • Kounosu, Y. (1960). Kokugo no jugyou ni okeru bansho gijutsu (The skills of bansho in national language lessons). In Kounousu,Y (Ed.), Bansho no houhou (Methods of bansho) (pp. 13–26). Kamiya Printing.
  • Kurita, M. (2017). Kyuu wari no sensei ga shiranai: Sugoi bansho jutsu (Amazing bansho techniques that 90% of the teachers do not know). Gakuyou Shobou.
  • LaCapra, D. (2001). Writing history, writing trauma. Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Lewis, B. (2014). Blackboard: A personal history of the classroom. Graywolf Press.
  • Love, E., & Pimm, D. (1996). ‘This is so’: A text on texts. In A. J. Bishop, K. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & C. Laborde (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics education (Vol. 4, pp. 371–409). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1465-0_11
  • Maclaren, P. (2014). The new chalkboard: The role of digital pen technologies in tertiary mathematics teaching. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications, 33(1), 16–26. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hru001
  • Mami, M. (2014, November 24). With ethics classes receiving upgrade in 2018, worries of nationalism rise. The Japan Times.
  • Matoba, M. (2013). Jugyou bunseki no houhou to kadai (Methods and issues in lesson analysis). In M. Matoba & Y. Shibata (Eds.), Jugyou kenkyuu to jugyou no souzou (Lesson study and creation of lessons) (pp. 5–20). Keisui Publishing Company.
  • Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education (2nd ed.) Jossey-Bass.
  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. (2017a). Shougakusei gakushu shidou youryou: kokugohen (Curriculum guidelines of primary school: National Language version). http://www.mext.go.jp/component/a_menu/education/micro_detail/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2018/09/03/1387017_2_1.pdf
  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. (2017b). Shougakusei gakushu shidou youryou: tokubetsu kyouka (Curriculum guidelines of primary school: Special subject Moral Education version).
  • Nagano, F. (2017). Bansho no aidia to aitemu: Bamen e (Ideas and items of bansho: Illustrations of story scenes). Doutoku kyouiku, 708, 11.
  • Nakane, C. (1970). Japanese society. University of California Press.
  • Nikolajeva, M. (2012). Reading other people’s minds through word and image. Children’s Literature in Education, 43(3), 273–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10583-012-9163-6
  • Okazaki, Y., Noguchi, S., & Yoshikawa, A. (2014). Kaku katei no teiji ni okeru gakushuusha no shukan hyouka to shisen bunseki (Gage analysis and subjective assessment of learners in the presentation of the writing processes). Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers Technical Report. Education Technology, 114(82), 39–44.
  • Olivier, C., & Bowler, R. F. (1996). Learning to learn. Simon & Schuster.
  • Oomae, A. (2012). Bansho tsukuri: seikou no gokui (Creation of bansho: Secrets of success (1st ed.) Meiji Tosho.
  • Pepin, B., Artigue, M., Gitirana, V., Miyakawa, T., Ruthven, K., & Xu, B. (2019). Mathematics teachers as curriculum designers: An international perspective to develop a deeper understanding of the concept. In L. Trouche, G. Gueudet, & B. Pepin (Eds.), The 'resource’ approach to mathematics education (pp. 121–143). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20393-1_6
  • Rini, D. S. (2021). The learning model of SPS-Bansho to improve student mathematics learning activities at SMPN 18 Tangerang. Indonesian Digital Journal of Mathematics and Education, 8(2), 79–93.
  • Robinson, D. (2021). Lesson study: Generating, accumulating and sharing professional knowledge. In D. Burghes & J. Hunter (Eds.), Mathematics education for sustainable economic growth and job creation (pp. 125–154). Taylor & Francis.
  • Rohlen, T., & LeTendre, G. (1998). Teaching and learning in Japan. Cambridge University Press.
  • Sarkar Arani, M. R., Shibata, Y., Christine Lee, K. E., Kuno, H., Matoba, M., Lay Lean, F., & Yeo, J. (2014). Reorienting the cultural script of teaching: Cross cultural analysis of a science lesson. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 3(3), 215–235. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-10-2013-0056
  • Saroyan, A., & Snell, L. S. (1997). Variations in lecturing styles. Higher Education, 33(1), 85–104. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002992423519
  • Shimizu, Y. (2002). Capturing the structure of Japanese mathematics lessons: Some findings of the international comparative studies [Paper presentation]. ICMI-Second East Asia Regional Conference on Mathematics Education and Ninth Southeast Asian Conference on Mathematics Education.
  • Shiraishi, N. (2012). Kodomo no shikoukatei wo hyougenshita bansho wo mezashite (Aiming for bansho that illustrates students’ thinking processes). Teada, 11, 4–7.
  • Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage Publications.
  • Stigler, J., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. Free Press.
  • Strauss, A., Corbin, J. M., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
  • Streb, C. K. (2010). Encyclopedia of case study research. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412957397
  • Takahashi, A. (2006). Characteristics of Japanese mathematics lessons. Tsukuba Journal of Educational Study in Mathematics, 25, 37–44.
  • Tan, S. (2021a). Bansho as part of lesson and lesson study: From the origins to the present. International Journal for Lesson & Learning Studies, 10(4), 378–392. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-09-2021-0076
  • Tan, S. (2021b). The explication of cultural scripts of Japanese classrooms through bansho analysis [Doctorate]. Nagoya University.
  • Tan, S., Fukaya, K., & Nozaki, S. (2018). Development of bansho (board writing) analysis as a research method to improve observation and analysis of instruction in lesson study. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 7(3), 230–247. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-02-2018-0011
  • Tan, S., Nozaki, S., Fu, H., & Shibata, Y. (2021). The principles of teacher’s decision-making in Japanese board writing (bansho) process. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 28, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2021.1924119
  • Tellis, W. (1997). Introduction to case study. The Qualitative Report, 3(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/1997.2024
  • The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat. (2011). Bansho (Board Writing) (Vol. 17, pp. 1–8).
  • Tokyo Gakugei University. (2014, January). IMPULS Lesson Study Immersion Program 2013 overview report. Tokyo Gakugei University.
  • Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. SAGE Publications. https://books.google.ch/books?id=8U9qAAAAMAAJ
  • Yoshida, M., & Jackson, W. (2010). Improving blackboard organization to enhance students’ mathematical thinking and understanding. Retrieved April 23, from http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/literacynumeracy/inspire/research/CBS_bansho.pdf

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.