21
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric

References

  • Amaudo, P. (1991). Resident initiatives: Anew HUD commitment. Journal of Housing, 48 (1), 13–15.
  • Barnes, K. (1982). Housing associations: European ideas, American applications. Journal of Housing, 39 (1), 10–13.
  • Bratt, R.G. (1986). Public housing: The controversy and contribution. In R.G. Bratt, C. Hartman, and A. Meyerson (Eds.), Critical perspectives on housing (pp.335–361). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
  • Burgess, J.S. (1993). Program management: Modernization help for LHAs. Journal of Housing, 50 (5), 200–205.
  • Clapham, D., & English, J. (1987). Public housing: Current trends and future developments. Wolfeboro, NH: Croom Helm.
  • Diaz, W.A. (1979). Tenant management: An historical and analytical overview. Los Angeles: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation
  • Elazar, D.J. (1966). American federalism: A view from the states. New York: Thomas Y. Cromwell.
  • Elazar, D.J. (1994). The American mosaic: The impact of space, time and culture on American politics. Boulder: Westview Press.
  • Flynn, R. (1988). Political acquiescence, privatization and residualisation in British housing policy. Journal of Social Policy 17 (3), 289–312.
  • Forrest, R., & Murie, A. (1990). A dissatisfied state? Consumer preferences and council housing in Britain. Urban Studies, 27 (5), 617–635.
  • Fuerst, J.S. (1988). Tenant management in low-rent public housing. Social Service Review, 62, 37–45.
  • Graft: Public Housing (1995). The Economist, 335 (7917), 10–15.
  • Hall, L.M. (1993). The houses messiah builds. Shelterforce, 16 (1), 12–14.
  • Hartman, C., & Stone, M.E. (1986). A socialist housing alternative for the United States. In R.G. Bratt, C. Hartman, & A. Meyerson (Eds.), Critical perspectives on housing (pp.484–513). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
  • Hays, R.A. (1995). The federal government and urban housing. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • Ho, L.S. (1995). Privatization of public housing: An analysis of policy alternatives. Economic Policy, 13 (3), 53–64.
  • Hula, R. (1991). Alternative management strategies for public housing. In W. Gromley (Ed.), Privatization and its alternatives (pp.134–162). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
  • Hula, R. & Hall, L.M. (1994). Resident initiatives in public housing. Lansing, MI: Center for Urban Affairs.
  • Johnson, I. (Personal interview conducted by Charles James, April 11, 1991).
  • Kinnaird, S.B. (1994). Public housing: abandon HOPE, but not privatization. Yale Law Journal, 103 (4), 961–995.
  • Kolodny, R. (1983). What happens when tenants manage their own public housing. NAHRO report submitted to the Office of Policy Development and Research, U.S. Department of HUD.
  • Kolodny, R. (1986). The emergence of self-help as a housing strategy for the urban poor. In R.G. Bratt, C. Hartman, & A. Meyerson (Eds.), Critical Perspectives on Housing (pp.447–462). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
  • Kuntz, P. (May 6, 1989). Expiring federal subsidies raise a policy dilemma. Congressional Quarterly, 1041–1045.
  • Lamberg, K. (Telephone conversation, September 7, 1995). U.S. Department of HUD, Indianapolis Office.
  • Marabella, S. (1991). Resident responsibility: The participation continuum. Journal of Housing, 48 (1), 16–18.
  • McCain, A. (Personal interview at Resident Management Corporation, Dearborn Homes, Chicago, IL, Aprill 11, 1991).
  • Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation (MDRC) (1981). Tenant management: Findings from a three-year experiment in public housing. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Company.
  • Monti, D.J. (1989). The organizational strengths and weaknesses of resident managed public housing sites. Journal of Urban Affairs, 11 (1), 39–52.
  • National Association of Housing and Redevelopment Officials (NAHRO) (January/February, 1988). Keeping the commitment: An action plan for better housing and communities for all. Journal of Housing, 45, 11–22.
  • Nelson, K.P. (1992). Housing assistance needs and the housing stock. Journal of the American Planning Association, 58 (1), 85–102.
  • Nenno, M.K. (1988). Housing and community development: A new cycle of policies and partners. Journal of Housing, 45 (1), 75–82.
  • Nenno, M. K. (1991). National housing policy: A national policy perspective on three strategic issues. Public Administration Review, 51 (1), 86–90.
  • Peterman, W.A. (1993). Resident management: Putting it in perspective. Journal of Housing, 45 (3), 111–115.
  • Rainwater, L. (1967). The lessons of Pruitt-Igoe. The Public Interest, 29, 116–126.
  • Rohe, W.M., & Stegman, M.A. (1992). Public housing home-ownership: Will it work and for whom? Journal of the American Planning Association, 58 (2), 144–156.
  • Russ, M., & Rouse, J.W. (1993). Is public housing the most effective way to address the country’s low-income housing needs? CQ Researcher, 3 (34), 809–829.
  • Schill, M.H. (1994). The role of the nonprofit sector in low-income housing production: A comparative perspective. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 30 (1), 74–102.
  • Schill, M.H., & Wachter, S.M. (1995). The spatial bias of federal housing law and policy. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 143, 1285–1342.
  • Silver, H., McDonald, J., & Ortiz, R.J. (1 November/December, 1985). Selling public housing: The methods and the motivations. Journal of Housing, 42 (6), 213–228.
  • Suchman, D.R., Middleton, D.S., & Giles, S.L. (1990). Public/Private Housing Partnerships. Washington, D.C.: Urban Land Institute.
  • U. S. Congress (1985). Homeownership demonstration program. Hearings before a subcommittee of the Committee on Government Operations, House of Representatives, 99th Congress, First Session.
  • U. S. Department of HUD (1994). Public and indian housing amendment to the tenant participation and tenant opportunities in public and indian housing: Final rule. Federal Register, 59 (163), 43622–43645.
  • Webdale, W.D. (1993). Streamlining HUD: Making LHAs more efficient. Housing and Urban Development, 50 (5), 192–197.
  • Williams, M.A. (Personal correspondence, September 25, 1995). U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Indianapolis Office.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.