The Psychological and Social Aspects of Single Female Home Buying

References

• Altman, K. (1990). Consuming ideology: The better homes in America campaign. Consumer Studies 7(3). 286-302.
   Google Scholar
• Anfara, V., Brown, K., & Mangione, T. (2002). Qualitative analysis on stage: Making the research process more public. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 28-38.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, C. (2007). A guide to qualitative field research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Beamish, J., Goss, R. C, & Emmel, J. (2001). Lifestyle influences on housing preferences. Housing and Society, 28(1&2), 1-28.
   Google Scholar
• Bucchianeri, G. W. (2009). The American dream or the American delusion? The private and external benefits of homeownership. Wharton School of
   Google Scholar
• Business. Retrieved July 31, 2009, from http://real.wharton.upenn. edu/~wongg/research/the American Dream.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Coontz, S. (2005). Marriage, a history: From obedience to intimacy or how love conquered marriage. New York:Viking.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among the five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cullen, J. (2003). The American dream: A short history of an idea that shaped a nation. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Danes, S., & Winter, M. (1990). The impact of employment of the wife on the achievement of homeownership. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 24(1), 148-222.
   Google Scholar
• Delgadillo, L. (2001). A model of factors correlated to homeownership: The case of Utah. Family and Consumer Science Research Journal, 30(1), 3-36.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (2003). Part II: Paradigms and perspectives in transition. In N. Denizen & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The landscape of qualitative research: Theories and issues (2nd ed., pp. 245-252). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Depres, C. (1991). The meaning of home: Literature review and directions for future research and theoretical development. The Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 8(2), 96-108.
   Google Scholar
• Dillman, D.,Tremblay, K., & Dillman, J. (1979). Influence of housing norms and personal characteristics on stated housing preferences. Housing and Society, 6(1), 2-19.
   Google Scholar
• DiPasquale, D., & Glaeser, E. (1999). Incentives and Social Capital: Are homeowners better citizens? Journal of Urban Economics, 45(2), 354-384.
   Google Scholar
• Dowling, R. (1998). Gender, class and home ownership: Placing the connections. Housing Studies, 13(4), 471-486.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, K. (July, 1992). The symbolic meaning of house and home. American Behavioral Scientist, 35(5), 790-802.
   Google Scholar
• Dupuis, A., & Thorns, D. (1996). Home, home ownership and the search for ontological security. The Editorial Board of the Sociological Review, 46(1), 24-47.
   Google Scholar
• Fannie Mae. (2004). Understanding America’s homeownership gaps. Retrieved November 15, 2009, from http://www.fanniemae.com/global/pdf/media/survey/survey2003.pdf;jsessionid=UPNBC4MFFHEFRJ2F QSISFGA
   Google Scholar
• Fontana, A., & Frey, J. (1994). Interviewing: The art of science. In N.Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 361-376). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gilman, CP. (1980).The home: Its work and influence. In E. Malos (Ed.), The politics of housework. London: Allison and Busby.
   Google Scholar
• Giuliani, M. (1991). Towards an analysis of mental representations of attachment to the home. The Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 8(2), 133-144.
   Google Scholar
• Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105-117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gyourko, J., & Linneman, P. (1993). The affordability of the American dream: An examination of the last 30 years. Journal of Housing Research, 4(1), 39-72.
   Google Scholar
• Hayden, D. (1984). Redesigning the American dream: The future of housing, work and family life. New York: Norton Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hesse-Biber, S.,&Leavy,P. (2006). The practice of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hoepfl, M. (1997). Choosing qualitative research: A primer for technology education researchers. Journal of Technology Education, 9, 47-63.
   Google Scholar
• Hubbard, M., & Davis, W. (2002). Community advantage panel study: Social impacts of homeownership. Chapel Hill, NC: Center for Community Capitalism. Retrieved March 12,2007, from http://www.ccc.unc.edu/ documents/CC_homeownership.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Joint Center for Housing Studies. (2005). The state of the nation’s housing:2005. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Joint Center for Housing Studies. (2009). The state of the nation’s housing: 2009. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Kamara, D. (1994). The effect of the probability of marriage on housing demand for single women. Journal of Housing Economics, 3, 296-311.
   Google Scholar
• Leonard, D. (1980). Sex and generations: A study of courtship and weddings. London: Tavistock.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, J. A., Parrott, K. R., & Beamish, J. O. (2009, November). “I Don’t Like the Carpet...” Introduction of a Purchasing Model. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Housing Education and Research Association, Santa Fe,NM.
   Google Scholar
• Lodl, K., & Combs, R. (1998). The achievement of cultural housing norms by mother-only families. Housing and Society, 25(1&2), 21-38.
   Google Scholar
• Luken, P. & Vaughan, S. (2005). “...be a genuine homemaker in your own home.” Gender and familial relations in state housing practices, 1917- 1922. Social Forces, 83(4), 1603-1623.
   Google Scholar
• Madigan, R., & Munro, M. (1996). House beautiful: Style and consumption in the home. Sociology, 30(1), 41-57.
   Google Scholar
• Madigan, R., Munro, M., & Smith, S. (1990). Gender and the meaning of home. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 14, 625-647.
   Google Scholar
• Mallett, S. (2004). Understanding home: A critical review of the literature. Sociological Review, 52(1), 62-89.
   Google Scholar
• Manzo, L. (2003). Beyond house and haven: Toward a revisioning of emotional relationships with phces.Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 47-61.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, C. (1995). House as a mirror of self: Exploring the deeper meaning of home. Berwick, ME: Nicolas-Hays, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, E., & Winter, M. (1978). Housing, family and society. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, E., & Winter, M. (1985). The microsociology of housing. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Sociological Society, St. Louis, MO.
   Google Scholar
• National Association of Realtors. (2006). Demographic profile of homebuyers in the United States. Retrieved May 20,2008, from http://knowhow-now.com/RealEstate-article64041-2006DemographicProfileOfHomeBuy ersInTheUnitedStates.html
   Google Scholar
• Oakley, A. (1981). Interviewing women: A contradiction in terms. In H. Roberts (Ed.), Doing feminist research (pp. 30-61). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Parrott, K. R., & Lloyd, J. A. (2009, September). Social identity & the single female homebuyer. Paper presented to the Housing Assets, Housing People Conference of the International Sociological Association, Research Committee 43, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Rohe, W., & Stegman, M. (1994). The effects of homeownership on the self-esteem, perceived control and life satisfaction of low-income people. Journal of the American Planning Association, 60(1), 173-184.
   Google Scholar
• Rossman, G., & Rallis, S. (2003). Learning in the field: An introduction to qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Sadalla, E. K., Venshore, B., & Burroughs, J. (1987). Identity symbolism in housing. Environment and Behavior, 17, 569-587.
   Google Scholar
• Samuelson, R.J. (2008, August 4).The homeownership obsession. Newsweek, p. 37.
   Google Scholar
• Sarkisian, N. (2006). Doing family ambivalence: Nuclear and extended families in single mother lives. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68(4), 804-811.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, P. (1990).A nation of homeowners. Boston, MA: Unwin Hyman.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, P., & Williams, P. (1988). The constitution of the home: Towards a research agenda. Housing Studies, 3(2), 81-93.
   Google Scholar
• Shlay, A. (2006). Low-income homeownership: American dream or delusion. Urban Studies, 43(3), 511-531.
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In W. G. Austin, & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33- 47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. J., & Bogdan, R. (1998). Introduction to qualitative research methods: A guidebook and resource. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Touliatos, J. (1988). Research methods in human ecology/home economics. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tremblay, K., & Dillman, D. (1983). Beyond the American housing dream: Accommodation to the 1980s. Washington, DC: University Press of America.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Census. (2000). Living together, living alone: Families and living arrangements. Retrieved April 24,2008, from http://www.census.gov/ population/pop-profile/2000/chap05.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Yalom, M. (2001). A history of the wife. New York: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, G. (1981). Building the dream: A social history of housing in America. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar