Winning in a “lose-lose” environment of economic development: housing, community empowerment, and neighborhood redevelopment in the Columbia Heights neighborhood of Washington, DC

References

• Abrams, C. (1962). Criteria for urban renewal. Architectural Record, 155–158.
   Google Scholar
• American Institute of Planners. (1959). Urban renewal: A policy statement of the American institute of planners. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 25(4), 217–221.
   Google Scholar
• Asch, C. M., & Musgrove, G. D. (2017). Chocolate city: A history of race and democracy in the nation’s capital. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bechtel, D. (2007). Forming entities to negotiate community benefits agreements. Journal of Affordable Housing & Community Development Law, 17(1/2), 145–154.
   Google Scholar
• Belongie, N., & Silverman, R. M. (2018). Model CBAs and community benefits ordinances as tools for negotiating equitable development: Three critical cases. Journal of Community Practice, 26(3), 308–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bockmeyer, J. L. (2003). Devolution and the transformation of community housing activism. The Social Science Journal, 40, 175–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, M. P. (2002). Planning theory for practitioners. Chicago: Planners Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chaskin, R. J., & Joseph, M. L. (2015). Contested space: Design principals and regulatory regimes in mixed-income communities in Chicago. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 660, 136–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Checkoway, B. (1985). Neighborhood planning organizations: Perspectives and choices. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 21(4), 471–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, K. S. (2015). Both process and outcome are essential to planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 35(2), 188–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Congress for the New Urbanism. (2009). CNU Announces 2009 charter award recipients Congress for the New Urbanism. Retrieved from https://www.cnu.org/2009_CharterAwards
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J. E. (1991). Contested ground: Collective action and the urban neighborhood. Ithaca, NY: Cornel University Press.
   Google Scholar
• DC Office of Planning. (2012). Central 14th street vision plan and revitalization strategy. Retrieved from https://planning.dc.gov/sites/default/files/dc/sites/op/publication/attachments/finalDraft14th%2520Street%2520Corridor%2520Plan%25207-16-12%2520edit%5B1%5D.pdf
   Google Scholar
• DC Office of the Deputy Mayor for Planning and Economic Development. (2008). DC USA. DMPED Real Estate Development ( blog). Retrieved from https://dmped.dc.gov/page/dc-usa
   Google Scholar
• DCCH. (2007). Tivoli square and DC USA. DCCH. Retrieved from http://www.dcch.org/html/hcdd_commercial.html
   Google Scholar
• De Barbieri, E. (2016, June). Do community benefits agreements benefit communities? Cardozo Law Review, 462(37), 1773-1825.
   Google Scholar
• Fainstein, S., & Hurst, C. (1995). Urban social movements. In D. Judge, H. Wolman, & G. Stoker (Eds.), Theories of urban politics (pp. 181–204). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gallaher, C. (2016). The politics of staying put: Condo conversion and tenant right-to-buy in Washington, DC. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gittel, R., & Vidal, A. (1998). Community organizing: Building social capital as a development strategy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. (2014). Cities of tomorrow. Maldon, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (2008). The right to the city. The New Left Review. Volume 53 SEPT/OCT edition, pages 23-40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell, K. (2016a). Planning for empowerment: Upending the traditional approach to planning for affordable housing in the face of gentrification. Planning Theory & Practice, 17(2), 210–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell, K. (2016b). Preservation from the bottom up: Preservation from the bottom up: Affordable housing, redevelopment, and negotiation in Washington, DC. Housing Studies, 31(3), 305–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huron, A. (2014). Creating a commons in the capital: The emergence of limited-equity housing cooperatives in Washington, D.C. Washington History, 26(2), 56–67.
   Google Scholar
• Huron, A. (2018). Carving out the Commons: Tenant Organizing and Housing Cooperatives in Washington, D.C Diverse Economies and Livable Worlds 2. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, K. T. (1985). Crabgrass fronteir: The suburbanization of the United States. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, M. I. (2008). Model city blues: Urban space and organized resistance in New Haven. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, R. M. (1976). Community participation in directing economic development. Cambridge, MA: CCED.
   Google Scholar
• Khare, A. T., Joseph, M. L., & Chaskin, R. J. (2015). The enduring significance of race in mixed-income developments. Urban Affairs Review, 51(4), 474–503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleit, R. G. (2005). HOPE VI new communities: neighborhood relationships in mixed-income housing. Environment and Planning, 37, 1413–1441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefebrvre, H. (1991). The social production of space. Translated by Donald Nicholson-Smith. Malden, MA: Blackwell Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leventhal, T., Brooks-Gunn, J., & Kamerman, S. B. (2000). Communities as place, face, and space: provision of services to poor urban children and their families. In Jeane Brooks-Gunn Duncan and Lawrence Aber (Eds.), Neighborhood poverty: Contexts and consequences for children, by Greg. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, D., Comey, J., & Padilla, S. (2007). In the face of gentrification: Case studies of local efforts to mitigate displacement. Journal of Affordable Housing & Community Development Law, 16(3), 238–315.
   Google Scholar
• Lowe, J. S. (2008). Limitations of community development partnerships: Cleveland Ohio and neighborhood progress Inc. Cities, 25(1), 37–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, E. L. (1972). 14th St. Plan voted despite some protests. The Washington Post, October 13, 1972. sec. C.
   Google Scholar
• Mid-Atlantic Construction. (2006). Columbia Heights revitalization; Cost $390 Million Mid-Atlantic Construction. 1.
   Google Scholar
• Nugent, J. (2017). The right to build the city: Can community benefits agreements bring employment equity to the construction sector? Labour/Le Travail, 80, 81–114.
   Google Scholar
• O’Toole, A., & Jones, B. (2009). Tenant purchase laws as a tool for affordable housing preservation: The D.C. experience. Journal of Affordable Housing & Community Development Law, 18(4), 367–388.
   Google Scholar
• Oversight hearing and markup on H. Con. Res. 420 - To disapprove rental housing conversion and sale act of 1980. (1980). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office (GPO).
   Google Scholar
• Peterman, W. (2000). Neighborhood planning and community-based development: The potential and limits of grassroots action. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Quick, K. S., & Feldman, M. S. (2011). Distinguishing participation and inclusion. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 31, 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, H. J. (2000). Renewing hope within neighborhoods of despiar: The community-based development model. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salkin, P. E. (2007). Community benefits agreements: Opportunities and traps for developers, municipalities, and community organizations. Planning & Environmental Law, 59(11), 3–8.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, A. F. (2015). Housing policy in the United States. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, R. M. (2003). Progressive reform, gender and institutional structure: A critical analysis of citizen participation in Detroit’s Community Development Corporations (CDCs). Urban Studies, 40(13), 2731–2750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoecker, R. (1997). The CDC model of urban redevelopment: A critique and an alternative. Journal of Urban Affairs, 19(1), 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoecker, R. (2003). Understanding the development-organizing dialectic. Journal of Urban Affairs, 25(4), 493–513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Summers, B. (2015). H street, main street, and The Neoliberal aesthetics of cool. In D. Hyra & S. Prince (Eds.), pp. 299-314. Capital Dilemma: Growth and inequality in Washington, DC. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Twelvetrees, A. (1989). Organizing for neighborhood development. Brookfield: Avebury.
   Google Scholar
• The Urban Institute. (1995). Federal funds, local choices: An evaluation of the. In Community development block grant program Vol. 1 Washington, DC: US Department of Housing and Urban Development.
   Google Scholar
• Vale, L. (2013). Purging the poorest: Public housing and the design politics of twice-cleared communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Washington Architectural Foundation. (1998). Columbie heights community-based plan for the metro station area. Author. Washington, DC: Washington Architectural Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Washington Metropolitan Transit Authority. (2016). Data Download: Metrorail Ridership by Station by Month, 2010-2015. PlanIt Metro (blog). Retrieved from https://planitmetro.com/2016/03/24/data-download-metrorail-ridership-by-station-by-month-2010-2015/
   Google Scholar
• Wilgoren, D. (2002). City picks developers for 6 Columbia Heights sites. The Washington Post, April 25, 2002. sec. T1.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf-Powers, L. (2010). Community benefits agreements and local government: A review of recent evidence. Journal of the American Planning Association, 76(2), 141–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyly, E., & James, D. (2008). Running to stand still: Through the looking glass with federally subsidized housing in New York City. Urban Affairs Review, 43(6), 777–816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar