The right to housing in an ownership society

References

• Anderson, E. (1999). What is the point of equality? Ethics, 109, 287–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arendt, H. (1973). The origins of totalitarianism. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Bentham, J. (1843). Principles of the civil code. In J. Bowring (Ed.), The works of Jeremy Bentham (Vol. 1).pp. 297-364. Edinburgh: William Tait.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, C. (1991). Beyond homelessness: An entitlement to housing. University of Miami Law Review, 45, 315–335.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, T., & Culhane, D. P. (2011). Right to housing: An effective means for addressing homelessness. University of Pennsylvania Journal of Law and Social Change, 14(3), 379–390.
   Google Scholar
• Callahan v. Carey, No. 79-42582 (Sup. Ct. N.Y. County, Cot. 18, 1979).
   Google Scholar
• Christman, J. (1991). Self-ownership, equality, and the structure of property rights. Political Theory, 19(1), 28–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR). (1991). CESCR general comment no. 4: The right to adequate housing (Art. 11 (1) of the covenant). United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights.
   Google Scholar
• Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR). (1997). CESCR general comment no. 7: The right to adequate housing (Art. 11 (1) of the covenant): Forced evictions. Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights.
   Google Scholar
• Dawkins, C. (2017). Autonomy and housing policy. Housing, Theory and Society, 34(4), 420–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vita, A. (2007). Inequality and poverty in global perspective. In T. Pogge (Ed.), Freedom from poverty as a human right, pp. 103-132. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dorsey v. Stuyvesant Town Corp., 299 N.Y. 512 (1949).
   Google Scholar
• Drier, P. (1984). The tenants’ movement in the United States. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 8(2), 255–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dworkin, R. (2008). Is democracy possible here? Principles for a new political debate. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dworkin, R. M. (1978). Taking rights seriously. London: Duckworth.
   Google Scholar
• Eldredge v. Koch, 98 A.D.2d 675 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983).
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. J. (1992). Radical Lockeanism in American political culture. The Western Political Quarterly, 45(4), 825–849.
   Google Scholar
• Essert, C. (2016). Property and homelessness. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 44(4), 266–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foscarinis, M. (2004). Homelessness, litigation and law reform strategies: a united states perspective. Australian Journal Of Human Rights, 10(1 2), 105–132. doi:10.1080/1323238X.2004.11910784
   Google Scholar
• Foscarinis, M. (2006). Advocating for the human right to housing: Notes from the United States. NYU Review of Law and Social Change, 30, 447–481.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, R. H. (2007). Falling behind: How rising inequality harms the middle class. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gallaher, C. (2016). The politics of staying put: Condo conversion and tenant right-to-buy in Washington, D.C. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gaus, G. (2011). The order of public reason: A theory of freedom and morality in a diverse and bounded world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gold, R. (2014). When tenants claimed the city: The struggle for citizenship in New York City housing. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254, 90 S. Ct. 1011 (1970).
   Google Scholar
• Gray, J. (1993). Post-enlightenment liberalism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grey, T. (1980). The disintegration of property. Nomos, 22, 69-85.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, J. (2008). On human rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hacker, J. (2011). The institutional foundations of middle-class democracy. London: Policy Network.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, H. L. A. (1955). Are there any natural rights? Philosophical Review, 64, 175–191.
   Google Scholar
• Hartman, C. (1984/2002). The right to stay put. In Hartman, C (Ed), Between eminence and notoriety: Four decades of radical urban planning (pp. 120–133). New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban and Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (2008). The right to the city. New Left Review, 53, 23–40.
   Google Scholar
• Hohmann, J. (2014). The right to housing: Law, concepts, possibilities. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Honoré, A. M. (1961). Ownership. In A. Guest (Ed.), Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence (pp. 107–147). London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Housing Act of 1949, 42 USC § 1441 (1949).
   Google Scholar
• Huron, A. (2018). Carving out the commons: Tenant organizing and housing cooperatives in Washington, D.C. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knafo, S. (2015, September 2). Is gentrification a human rights violation? The Atlantic.
   Google Scholar
• Kwak, N. H. (2015). A world of homeowners: American power and the politics of housing aid. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. (1968). Le droit `a la ville. Paris: Anthropos.
   Google Scholar
• Lehrer, J. D. (1973). Housing and land use – Lindsey v. Normet: A Supreme Court refusal to federalize Oregon’s landlord-tenant procedure. Urban Law Annual, January, 1973, 309–318.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsey v. Normet, 405 U.S. 56 (1972).
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, D. (1982). Utility and rights. Nomos, 24, 107–138.
   Google Scholar
• Mack, E. (2000). In defense of the jurisdiction theory of rights. The Journal of Ethics, 4(1/2), 71–98.
   Google Scholar
• Madden, D., & Marcuse, P. (2016). In defense of housing. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, T. H. (1950). “Citizenship and social class” and other essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Michelman, F. I. (1970). The advent of a right to housing: A current appraisal. Harvard Civil Rights – Civil Liberties Law Review, 5(2), 207–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, D. (2003). The right to the city: Social justice and the fight for public space. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Housing Strategy. (2017). Canada’s national housing strategy. Retrieved from www.placetocallhome.ca/pdfs/Canada-National-Housing-Strategy.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Law Center on Homelessness and Poverty (NLCHP). (2014). Human rights to human reality: A 10 step guide to strategic human rights advocacy. Washington, DC: National Law Center on Homelessness and Poverty.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, E. (2008). From primary goods to capabilities: Distributive justice and the problem of neutrality. Political Theory, 36(1), 93–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• New York Constitution, article XVII, § 1.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. C. (1992). Human functioning and social justice: In defense of Aristotelian essentialism. Political Theory, 20(2), 202–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. C. (2000). Women and human development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. C. (2006). Frontiers of justice: Disability, nationality, species membership. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, A. (1999). Which equalities matter? Oxford: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Ponder, E. (2016). Gentrification and the right to housing: How hip becomes a human rights violation. Southwestern Journal of International Law, 22, 359–383.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, C. (2008). Human rights at home: A domestic policy blueprint for the new administration. Washington, DC: American Constitution Society.
   Google Scholar
• Purcell, M. (2002). Excavating Lefebvre: The right to the city and its urban politics of the inhabitant. GeoJournal, 58, 99–108.
   Google Scholar
• Purcell, M. (2013). Possible worlds: Henri Lefebvre and the right to the city. Journal of Urban Affairs, 36(1), 141–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radin, M. J. (1993). Reinterpreting property. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raz, J. (1986). The morality of freedom. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Right to the City Alliance. (2015). Block by block: Renter nation assembly toolkit. Brooklyn, NY: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Risse, M. (2012). On global justice. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sandel, M. J. (1998a). Democracy’s discontent: America in search of a public philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sandel, M. J. (1998b). Liberalism and the limits of justice (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. (1827). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Edinburgh: Thomas Nelson and Peter Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. (2004). The second bill of rights: FDR’s unfinished revolution and why we need it more than ever. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, C. (1999). Durable inequality. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• von Hoffman, A. (2000). A study in contradictions: The origins and legacy of the housing act of 1949. Housing Policy Debate, 11(2), 299–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldron, J. (2009, April 21–23). Dignity, rank, and rights. The Tanner lectures on human values. Berkeley: Delivered at University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Walzer, M. (1983). Spheres of justice: a defense of pluralism and equality. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Williams v. Barry, 708 F.2d 789, 793 (D.C. Cir. 1983).
   Google Scholar