Benefit-cost analysis of flood-mitigated residential buildings in Louisiana

References

• Bohn, F. (2013). Design flood elevations beyond code requirements and current best practices [Master’s thesis]. Louisiana State University.
   Google Scholar
• Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority (CPRA). (2012). Louisiana’s comprehensive master plan for a sustainable coast. Coastal protection and restoration authority of Louisiana Retrieved from http://coastal.la.gov/a-common-vision/2012-coastalmaster-plan/
   Google Scholar
• de Moel, H., & Aerts, J. (2011). Effect of uncertainty in land use, damage models and inundation depth on flood damage estimates. Natural Hazards, 58(1), 407–425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-010-9675-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FEMA. (2002). Promoting mitigation in Louisiana: Performance analysis. Federal Emergency Management Agency.
   Google Scholar
• FEMA. (2009a). Final BCA reference guide. Federal Emergency Management Agency.
   Google Scholar
• FEMA. (2009b). Hazus-MH hurricane model technical manual. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Mitigation Division.
   Google Scholar
• FEMA. (2009c) . Loss avoidance study: Eastern Missouri, building acquisition. Federal Emergency Management Agency.
   Google Scholar
• FEMA. (2011a) . Coastal construction manual. Federal Emergency Management Agency.
   Google Scholar
• FEMA. (2011b). Supplement to the benefit-cost analysis reference guide (Department of Homeland Security, ed.). Federal Emergency Management Agency.
   Google Scholar
• FEMA. (2013a). Appendix B: Understanding the FEMA benefit-cost analysis process. Engineering principles and practices for retrofitting flood-prone residential structures . Federal Emergency Management Agency.
   Google Scholar
• FEMA. (2013b) . Loss avoidance study; St. Tammany Parish, Louisiana; Hurricane Isaac 2012. Federal Emergency Management Agency.
   Google Scholar
• FEMA. (2015a). Hazus–MH technical manual; Multi-hazard loss estimation methodology; Flood model. Federal Emergency Management Agency. Retrieved from www.fema.gov/plan/prevent/hazus
   Google Scholar
• FEMA. (2015b). Hazus–MH technical manual; Multi-hazard loss estimation methodology; Hurricane model. Federal Emergency Management Agency.
   Google Scholar
• FEMA. (2016) . Losses avoided from Hurricane Matthew in North Carolina. Federal Emergency Management Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Friedland, C. J. (2009). Residential building damage from hurricane storm surge: proposed methodologies to describe, assess and model building damage [Doctoral dissertation]. Louisiana State University.
   Google Scholar
• Gulf Engineers & Consultants (GEC). (2006). Depth-damage relationships for structures, contents, and vehicles and content-to-structure value ratios (CSVR) in support of the Donaldsonville to the gulf, Louisiana, feasibility study. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Retrieved from www.mvn.usace.army.mil/Portals/56/docs/PD/Donaldsv-Gulf.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Karamouz, M., Fereshtehpour, M., Ahmadvand, F., & Zahmatkesh, Z. (2016). Coastal flood damage estimator: An alternative to FEMA’s HAZUS platform. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 142(6), 04016016. Retrieved from http://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/%28ASCE%29IR.1943-4774.0001017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y. (2010). Assessment of damage risks to residential buildings and cost–benefit of mitigation strategies considering hurricane and earthquake hazards. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 26(1), 7-16.https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000204.
   Google Scholar
• Massarra, C. C., Friedland, C. J., Marx, B. D., & Dietrich, J. C. (2019). Predictive multi-hazard hurricane data-based fragility model for residential homes. Coastal Engineering, 151, 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2019.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merz, B., & Thieken, A. (2004). Flood risk analysis: Concepts and challenges. Österreichische Wasser-und Abfallwirtschaft, 56(3–4), 27–34. https://www.oieau.org/eaudoc/system/files/documents/39/195334/195334_doc.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Multihazard Mitigation Council (MMC). (2017). Natural hazard mitigation saves: 2017 interim report. National Institute of Building Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• National Hurricane Center (NHC). (2016). Storm surge overview. http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/surge/
   Google Scholar
• National Weather Service (NWS). (2014). Hydrologic information center - Flood loss data. Retrieved, 2018, from http://www.nws.noaa.gov/hic/
   Google Scholar
• National Weather Service (NWS). (2015) . Flood deaths and direct damages by State: Water year 2015 (October 1, 2014 - September 30, 2015). NOAA’s National Weather Service.
   Google Scholar
• National Weather Service (NWS). (2016) . Summary of natural hazard statistics for 2016 in the United States. National Weather Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
   Google Scholar
• National Weather Service (NWS). (2017) . Flood deaths and direct damages by State: Water year 2017 (October 1, 2016 - September 30, 2017). NOAA’s National Weather Service.
   Google Scholar
• Orooji, F., & Friedland, C. J. (2017). Cost-benefit framework to generate wind hazard mitigation recommendations for homeowners. Journal of Architectural Engineering, 23(4), 04017019. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, A., Porter, K., Dash, N., Bouabid, J., Huyck, C., Whitehead, J., Shaw, D., Eguchi, R., Taylor, C., & McLane, T. (2007). Benefit-cost analysis of FEMA hazard mitigation grants. Natural Hazards Review, 8(4), 97–111. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2007)8:4(97)
   Google Scholar
• Scawthorn, C., Blais, N., Seligson, H., Tate, E., Mifflin, E., Thomas, W., & Jones, C. (2006). HAZUS-MH flood loss estimation methodology. I: Overview and flood hazard characterization. Natural Hazards Review, 7(2), 60–71. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2006)7:2(60)
   Google Scholar
• Scawthorn, C., Flores, P., Blais, N., Seligson, H., Tate, E., Chang, S., Mifflin, E., Thomas, W., Murphy, J., & Jones, C. (2006). HAZUS-MH flood loss estimation methodology. II. Damage and loss assessment. Natural Hazards Review, 7(2), 72–81. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2006)7:2(72)
   Google Scholar
• Scorzini, A. R., & Frank, E. (2015). Flood damage curves: New insights from the 2010 flood in Veneto, Italy. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 10(3), 381-392. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12163
   Google Scholar
• Tate, E., Muñoz, C., & Suchan, J. (2015). Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of the HAZUS-MH flood model. Natural Hazards Review, 16(3), 04014030. Retrieved from http://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/%28ASCE%29NH.1527-6996.0000167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USACE. (2000). Economic guidance memorandum 01-03: Generic depth-damage relationships. US Army Corps of Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• USACE. (2003). Economic guidance memorandum 04-01: Generic depth-damage relationships for residential structures with basements. US Army Corps of Engineers.
   Google Scholar