What Motivates Consumers to Write Online Reviews? Qualitative Research in the Indian Cultural Context

References

• Agrawal, R., & Gupta, S. (2018). Consuming responsibly: Exploring environmentally responsible consumption behaviors. Journal of Global Marketing, 31(4), 231–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/08911762.2017.1415402
   Google Scholar
• Akram, Z., Shahid, M. N., Iqbal, Z., & Akram, H. R. (2019). How self-efficacy influences knowledge sharing and organizational citizenship behavior: A social approach from employees of pharmaceutical companies. Indo American Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 6(1), 643–651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Mana, A. M., & Mirza, A. A. (2013). The impact of electronic word of mouth on consumers’ purchasing decisions. International Journal of Computer Applications, 82(9), 23–31.
   Google Scholar
• Baek, H., Ahn, J., & Choi, Y. (2012). Helpfulness of online consumer reviews: Readers’ objectives and review cues. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 17(2), 99–126. https://doi.org/10.2753/JEC1086-4415170204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Batson, C. D. (1994). Why act for the public good? Four answers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(5), 603–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167294205016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berezan, O., Raab, C., Yoo, M., & Love, C. (2013). Sustainable hotel practices and nationality: The impact on guest satisfaction and guest intention to return. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 34, 227–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2013.03.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkowitz, L. (1970). Experimental investigations of hostility catharsis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 35(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0029607
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (1985). Culture and the evolutionary process. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyne, J. J., Vrijhoef, H. J., Spreeuwenberg, M., De Weerd, G., Kragten, J., & Gorgels, A. P., & TEHAF investigators. (2014). Effects of tailored telemonitoring on heart failure patients’ knowledge, self-care, self-efficacy and adherence: a randomized controlled trial. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 13(3), 243–252. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474515113487464
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, C. M., & Lee, M. K. (2012). What drives consumers to spread electronic word of mouth in online consumer-opinion platforms. Decision Support Systems, 53(1), 218–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.01.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, C. M., Lee, M. K., & Rabjohn, N. (2008). The impact of electronic word-of-mouth: The adoption of online opinions in online customer communities. Internet Research, 18(3), 229–247. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662240810883290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu, S. C., & Choi, S. M. (2011). Electronic word-of-mouth in social networking sites: A cross-cultural study of the United States and China. Journal of Global Marketing, 24(3), 263–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/08911762.2011.592461
   Google Scholar
• Chu, S. C., & Kim, Y. (2011). Determinants of consumer engagement in electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) in social networking sites. International Journal of Advertising, 30(1), 47–75. https://doi.org/10.2501/IJA-30-1-047-075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2015). 30 essential skills for the qualitative researcher. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative enquiry. Theory into Practice, 39(3), 124–130. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Ruyter, K., & Scholl, N. (1998). Positioning qualitative market research: Reflections from theory and practice. Qualitative Market Research. An International Journal, 1(1), 7–14.
   Google Scholar
• Dholakia, U. M., Bagozzi, R. P., & Pearo, L. K. (2004). A social influence model of consumer participation in network- and small-group-based virtual communities. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21(3), 241–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2003.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doh, S., & Hwang, J. (2009). How consumers evaluate eWOM (electronic word-of-mouth) messages. Cyberpsychology & Behavior: The Impact of the Internet, Multimedia and Virtual Reality on Behavior and Society, 12(2), 193–197. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2008.0109
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dworkin, S. L. (2012). Sample size policy for qualitative studies using in-depth interviews. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41(6), 1319–1320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-012-0016-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwyer, P. (2007). Measuring the value of electronic word of mouth and its impact in consumer communities. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 21(2), 63–79. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.20078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, Y. W., Miao, Y. F., Fang, Y. H., & Lin, R. Y. (2013). Establishing the adoption of electronic word-of-mouth through consumers’ perceived credibility. International Business Research, 6(3), 58–65. https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v6n3p58
   Google Scholar
• Filieri, R., & McLeay, F. (2014). E-WOM and accommodation: An analysis of the factors that influence travellers’ adoption of information from online reviews. Journal of Travel Research, 53(1), 44–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287513481274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Focus Economics. (2020). Economic forecasts from the world’s leading economists. https://www.focus-economics.com/blog/the-largest-economies-in-the-world
   Google Scholar
• Friese, S. (2016). ATLAS. ti 8 Windows: Quick tour. ATLAS. ti Scientific Software Development.
   Google Scholar
• Fu, J. R., Ju, P. H., & Hsu, C. W. (2015). Understanding why consumers engage in electronic word-of-mouth communication: Perspectives from theory of planned behavior and justice theory. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 14(6), 616–630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2015.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2003). Educational research: An introduction (7th ed.). A and B Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Gearing, R. (2004). Bracketing in research: A typology. Qualitative Health Research, 14(10), 1429–1452. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732304270394
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G. R. (2007). Qualitative Research kit: Analyzing qualitative data. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Gioia, D. A. (2004). A renaissance self: Prompting personal and professional revitalization. In P. J. Frost and R. E. Stablein (Eds.), Renewing research practice: Scholars’ journeys (pp. 97–114). Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorsuch, R. L., & Ortberg, J. (1983). Moral obligation and attitudes: Their relation to behavioral intentions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(5), 1025–1028. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.5.1025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guarin, A., & Knorringa, P. (2014). New middle-class consumers in rising powers: Responsible consumption and private standards. Oxford Development Studies, 42(2), 151–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600818.2013.864757
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, A. (2013). Altruism in Indian religions: Embracing the biosphere. In Altruism in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 101–112). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, P., & Harris, J. (2010). How e-WOM recommendations influence product consideration and quality of choice: A motivation to process information perspective. Journal of Business Research, 63(9–10), 1041–1049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.01.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gvili, Y., & Levy, S. (2018). Consumer engagement with eWOM on social media: The role of social capital. Online Information Review, 42(4), 482–505. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-05-2017-0158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., Walsh, G., & Gremler, D. D. (2004). Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the internet? Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(1), 38–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.10073
   Google Scholar
• Hennig-Thurau, T., Walsh, G., & Walsh, G. (2003). Electronic word-of-mouth: Motives for and consequences of reading customer articulations on the Internet. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 8(2), 51–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.2003.11044293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, J. (1984). Human altruism and sociocultural fitness. Journal of Social and Biological Systems, 7(1), 17–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-1750(84)90062-9
   Google Scholar
• Ho, J. Y., & Dempsey, M. (2010). Viral marketing: Motivations to forward online content. Journal of Business Research, 63(9–10), 1000–1006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.08.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. (2007). Asian management in the 21st century. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 24(4), 411–420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-007-9049-0
   Google Scholar
• Indian Brand Equity Foundation. (2020). Indian E-commerce industry analysis. https://www.ibef.org/archives/industry/ecommerce
   Google Scholar
• Ismagilova, E., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Slade, E. (2020). Perceived helpfulness of eWOM: Emotions, fairness and rationality. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 53, 1–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, Y., Hall, J., Hong, R., Goh, T., Ong, N., & Tan, N. (2014). Payback: Effects of relationship and cultural norms on reciprocity. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 17(3), 160–172. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katzenbach, J. R., Steffen, I., & Kronley, C. (2012). Cultural change that sticks. Harvard Business Review, 90(7–8), 110–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaur, K., & Singh, T. (2020). Visual information impacting electronic word of mouth adoption: Mediating role of perceived eWOM review credibility. International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management, 21(1), 78–93. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJICBM.2020.109351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khare, A. (2012). Influence of culture on Indian consumers’ preference to shop at small retail stores. Journal of Global Marketing, 25(2), 100–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/08911762.2012.720536
   Google Scholar
• King, R. A., Racherla, P., & Bush, V. D. (2014). What we know and don’t know about online word-of-mouth: A review and synthesis of the literature. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 28(3), 167–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2014.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotler, P. (2019). Marketing management. Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Kundu, A. (2020). Toward a framework for strengthening participants' self-efficacy in online education. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 15(3), 351–370. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-06-2020-0039
   Google Scholar
• Lather, P. (1993). Fertile obsession: Validity after post structuralism. The Sociological Quarterly, 34(4), 673–693. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1993.tb00112.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, M. K., Cheung, C. M., Lim, K. H., & Ling Sia, C. (2006). Understanding customer knowledge sharing in web-based discussion boards: An exploratory study. Internet Research, 16(3), 289–303. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662240610673709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S. H., Noh, S. E., & Kim, H. W. (2013). A mixed-methods approach to electronic word-of-mouth in the open-market context. International Journal of Information Management, 33(4), 687–696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerrthaitrakul, W., & Panjakajornsak, V. (2014). The impact of electronic word-of-mouth factors on consumers ’ buying decision -making processes in the low-cost carriers: A conceptual framework. International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance, 5(2), 142–146. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJTEF.2014.V5.357
   Google Scholar
• Lin, C. L., Lee, S. H., & Horng, D. J. (2011). The effects of online reviews on purchasing intention: The moderating role of need for cognition. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 39(1), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2011.39.1.71
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Lisa, M. G. (2008). The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Litvin, S. W., Goldsmith, R. E., & Pan, B. (2008). Electronic word-of-mouth in hospitality and tourism management. Tourism Management, 29(3), 458–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2007.05.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, R. R., & Zhang, W. (2010). Informational influence of online customer feedback: An empirical study. Journal of Database Marketing & Customer Strategy Management, 17(2), 120–131. https://doi.org/10.1057/dbm.2010.11
   Google Scholar
• Ma, W. W., & Chan, A. (2014). Knowledge sharing and social media: Altruism, perceived online attachment motivation and perceived online relationship commitment. Computers in Human Behavior, 39, 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.06.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malhotra, N. K., & Dash, S. (2019). Marketing research: An applied orientation (7th ed). Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Mishra, A., & Satish, S. M. (2016). eWOM: Extant research review and future research avenues. Vikalpa, 41(3), 222–233.
   Google Scholar
• Nam, K., Baker, J., Ahmad, N., & Goo, J. (2020). Dissatisfaction, disconfirmation, and distrust: An empirical examination of value co-destruction through negative electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM). Information Systems Frontiers, 22(1), 113–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-018-9849-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngarmwongnoi, C., Oliveira, J. S., AbedRabbo, M., & Mousavi, S. (2020). The implications of eWOM adoption on the customer journey. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 37(7), 749–759. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-10-2019-3450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, K., & Marx, S. (2011). How young, technical consumers assess online WOM credibility. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 14(4), 330–359. https://doi.org/10.1108/13522751111163191
   Google Scholar
• Pathak, B., Garfinkel, R., Gopal, R. D., Venkatesan, R., & Yin, F. (2010). Empirical analysis of the impact of recommender systems on sales. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27(2), 159–188. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222270205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phelps, J. E., Lewis, R., Mobilio, L., Perry, D., & Raman, N. (2004). Viral marketing or electronic word-of-mouth advertising: Examining consumer responses and motivations to pass along email. Journal of Advertising Research, 4(4), 333–348.
   Google Scholar
• Podium. (2017). State of online reviews. http://learn.podium.com/rs/841-BRM-380/images/Podium-2017-State-of-Online-Reviews.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Price, L. L., Feick, L. F., & Guskey, A. (1995). Everyday market helping behaviour. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 14(2), 255–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/074391569501400207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rialti, R., Zollo, L., Pellegrini, M. M., & Ciappei, C. (2017). Exploring the antecedents of brand loyalty and electronic word of mouth in social-media-based brand communities: do gender differences matter? Journal of Global Marketing, 30(3), 147–160.
   Google Scholar
• Richins, M. L. (1983). Negative word-of-mouth by dissatisfied consumers: A pilot study. Journal of Marketing, 47(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298304700107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richmond, V. P. (1977). The relationship between opinion leadership and information acquisition. Human Communication Research, 4(1), 38–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1977.tb00594.x
   Google Scholar
• Rossmann, A., Ranjan, K. R., & Sugathan, P. (2016). Drivers of user engagement in eWoM communication. Journal of Services Marketing, 30(5), 541–553. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-01-2015-0013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senecal, S., & Nantel, J. (2004). The influence of online product recommendations on consumers’ online choices. Journal of Retailing, 80(2), 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2004.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, D., Song, J. H., & Biswas, A. (2014). Electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) generation in new media platforms: The role of regulatory focus and collective dissonance. Marketing Letters, 25(2), 153–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-013-9248-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1990). A mechanism for social selection and successful altruism. Science (New York, NY), 250(4988), 1665–1668. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2270480
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, T., Youn, S., Wu, G., & Kuntaraporn, M. (2006). Online word-of-mouth (or mouse): An exploration of its antecedents and consequences. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(4), 1104–1127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00310.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundaram, D. S., Mitra, K., & Webster, C. (1998). Word-of-mouth communications: A motivational analysis. Advances in Consumer Research, 25(1), 527–531.
   Google Scholar
• Tedeschi, J. T., Lindskold, S., & Rosenfeld, P. (1985). Introduction to social psychology. West Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• The Statistics Portal. (2017). Global internet users posting reviews online 2017, by age. Retrieved March 5, 2020 from https://www.statista.com/statistics/307050/online-adults-posting-product-or-brand-reviews-on-the-internet-by-generation/
   Google Scholar
• Tong, Y., Wang, X., & Teo, H. H. (2007). Understanding the intention of information contribution to online feedback systems from social exchange and motivation crowding perspectives. In 2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS’07), January (pp. 1–10). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, W. H. S., & Zhang, J. (2016). Understanding the global phenomenon of online group buying: Perspective from China and the United States. Journal of Global Marketing, 29(4), 188–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/08911762.2016.1138565
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., & Fesenmaier, D. R. (2004). Towards understanding members’ general participation in and active contribution to an online travel community. Tourism Management, 25 (6), 709–722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2003.09.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wetzer, I. M., Zeelenberg, M., & Pieters, R. (2007). Never eat in that restaurant, I did!: Exploring why people engage in negative word‐of‐mouth communication. Psychology and Marketing, 24(8), 661–680. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolny, J., & Mueller, C. (2013). Analysis of fashion consumers’ motives to engage in electronic word-of-mouth communication through social media platforms. Journal of Marketing Management, 29 (5–6), 562–583. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2013.778324
   Google Scholar
• Yang, F. X. (2013). Effects of restaurant satisfaction and knowledge sharing motivation on eWOM intentions: The moderating role of technology acceptance factors. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research, 18(X), 1–35.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, M. X., Chan, H., Yu, I. Y., & Fock, H. (2019). Consumer motivation for reward pursuit: A culture-based and progress-based model of loyalty program effectiveness. Journal of Global Marketing, 32(4), 255–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/08911762.2019.1569743
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., & Coffey, A. J. (2014). Audience valuation in the new media era: Interactivity, online engagement, and electronic word-of-mouth value. International Journal on Media Management, 16(2), 77–103.
   Google Scholar
• Yap, K. B., Soetarto, B., & Sweeney, J. C. (2013). The relationship between electronic word-of-mouth motivations and message characteristics: The sender’s perspective. Australasian Marketing Journal, 21(1), 66–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2012.09.001
   Google Scholar
• Yeap, J. A., Ignatius, J., & Ramayah, T. (2014). Determining consumers’ most preferred eWOM platform for movie reviews: A fuzzy analytic hierarchy process approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 250–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoo, K. H., & Gretzel, U. (2011). Influence of personality on travel-related consumer-generated media creation. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 609–621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, K. Z., Zhao, S. J., Cheung, C. M., & Lee, M. K. (2014). Examining the influence of online reviews on consumers’ decision-making: A heuristic–systematic model. Decision Support Systems, 67, 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2014.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, F., & Zhang, X. M. (2010). Impact of online consumer reviews on sales: The moderating role of product and consumer characteristics. Journal of Marketing, 74(2), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.74.2.133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar