Effect of U-Pace Instruction on Academic Success, Learning, and Perceptions in Younger and Older Undergraduates

References

• ACT, Inc. (2015). National collegiate retention and persistence to degree rates. Retrieved from http://www.act.org/content/dam/act/unsecured/documents/retain_2015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, L. W., Krothwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., … Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, S. K. (2012). Testing enhances the transfer of learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 279–283. doi:10.1177/0963721412452728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denley, T. (2016, February). Predictive analytics, choice architecture, and tailored education. Paper presented at the meeting of EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative, San Antonio, TX.
   Google Scholar
• DiBiase, D., & Kidwai, K. (2010). Wasted on the young? Comparing the performance and attitudes of younger and older US adults in an online class on geographic information. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 34(3), 299–326. doi:10.1080/03098265.2010.490906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eastmond, D. V. (1998). Adult learners and Internet-based distance education. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 78, 33–41. doi:10.1002/ace.7804
   Google Scholar
• Eyre, H. L. (2007). Keller’s personalized system of instruction: Was it a fleeting fancy or is there a revival on the horizon?. Behavior Analyst Today, 8(3), 317–324. doi:10.1037/h0100623
   Google Scholar
• Fleming, R., Stoiber, L. C., Pfeiffer, H. M., Kienzler, S. E., Fleming, R. R., Pedrick, L. E., … Reddy, D. M. (2016). Using U-Pace instruction to improve the academic performance of economically disadvantaged undergraduates.”. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32, 304–313. doi:10.1111/jcal.12133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, E. (2004). Personalized system of instruction: A flexible and effective approach to mastery learning. In D. J. Moran & R. W. Malott (Eds.), Evidence-based educational methods (pp. 201–221). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ironsmith, M., & Eppler, M. (2007). Mastery learning benefits low-aptitude students. Teaching of Psychology, 34(1), 28–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. L. (2008). The critical importance of retrieval for learning. Science, 319, 966–968. doi:10.1126/science.1152408
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenner, C., & Weinerman, J. (2011). Adult learning theory: Applications to non-traditional college students. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 41(2), 87–96. doi:10.1080/10790195.2011.10850344
   Google Scholar
• Kreiner, D. S. (2006). A mastery-based approach to teaching statistics online. International Journal of Instructional Media, 33(1), 73–80.
   Google Scholar
• Kulik, C. C., Kulik, J. A., & Bangert-Downs, R. L. (1990). Effectiveness of mastery-learning programs: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 60(2), 269–299. doi:10.3102/00346543060002265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDaniel, M. A., Howard, D. C., & Einstein, G. O. (2009). The read–recite–review study strategy: Effective and portable. Psychological Science, 20, 516–522. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02325.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B., Caffarella, R. S., & Baumgartner, L. M. (2007). Learning in adulthood: A comprehensive guide. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Educational Statistics (NCES). (2013). Distance learning fast fact. Institute of Education Sciences. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=80
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, Y., & Neumann, E. (2016). Lessons about online learning. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2016/05/03/what-weve-learned-after-several-decades-online-learning-essay
   Google Scholar
• Newbold, J. J., Mehta, S. S., & Forbus, P. (2010). A comparative study between non-traditional and traditional students in terms of their demographics, attitudes, behavior and educational performance. International Journal of Education Research, 5(1), 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Park, J., & Choi, H. K. (2009). Factors influencing adult learners’ decision to drop out or persist in online learning. Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 207–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pear, J. J., & Crone-Todd, D. E. (1999). Personalized system of instruction in cyberspace. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 205–209. doi:10.1901/jaba.1999.32-205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rae, A., & Samuels, P. (2011). Web-based personalised system of instruction: An effective approach for diverse cohorts with virtual learning environments? Computers & Education, 57, 2423–2431. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy, D. M., Fleming, R., Pedrick, L. E., Jirovec, D. L., Pfeiffer, H. M., Ports, K. A., … Swain, R. A. (2013). U-Pace instruction: Improving student success by integrating content mastery and amplified assistance. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 17(1), 145–152.
   Google Scholar
• Reddy, D. M., Fleming, R., Pedrick, L. E., Ports, K. A., Barnack-Tavlaris, J. L., Helion, A. M., & Swain, R. A. (2011). U-Pace: Facilitating academic success for all students. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 34(4). Retrieved from http://er.educause.edu/articles/2011/12/upace-facilitating-academic-success-for-all-students
   Google Scholar
• Roediger, H., & Karpicke, J. (2006). Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17, 249–255. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Springer, C., & Pear, J. J. (2008). Performance measures in courses using computer-aided personalized system of instruction. Computers & Education, 51, 829–835. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stinard, T., & Dolphin, W. (1981). Which students benefit from self-paced mastery instruction and why. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(5), 754–763. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.73.5.754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svenningsen, L., & Pear, J. J. (2011). Effects of computer-aided personalized system of instruction on developing knowledge and critical thinking in blended learning courses. The Behavior Analyst Today, 12(1), 34–40. doi:10.1037/h0100709
   Google Scholar