The Influence of Motivational Regulation Strategies on Online Students’ Behavioral, Emotional, and Cognitive Engagement

References

• Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2016). Online report card: Tracking online education in the United States. Babson Park, MA: Babson Survey Research Group and Quahog Research Group. Retrieved from http://onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/onlinereportcard.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Artino, A. R., & Stephens, J. M. (2009). Academic motivation and self-regulation: A comparative analysis of undergraduate and graduate students learning online. The Internet and Higher Education, 12(3), 146–151. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azevedo, R. (2005). Using hypermedia as a metacognitive tool for enhancing student learning? The role of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 40, 199–209. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4004_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boekaerts, M. (1996). Self-regulated learning at the junction of cognition and motivation. European Psychologist, 1(2), 100–112. doi:10.1027/1016-9040.1.2.100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, L. (2012). Differences in procrastination and motivation between undergraduate and graduate students. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 12(2), 39–64.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, -M.-M. (2005). Applying self-regulated learning strategies in a web-based instruction: An investigation of motivation perception. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18(3), 217–230. doi:10.1080/09588220500178939
   Google Scholar
• Dabbagh, N., & Bannan-Ritland, B. (2005). Online learning: Concepts, strategies, and application. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2004). Supporting self-regulation in student-centered web-based learning environments. International Journal on E-Learning, 3(1), 40–47.
   Google Scholar
• Eccles, J., Midgley, C., Wigfield, A., Buchanan, C., Reuman, D., & Flanagan, C. (1993). Development during adolescence: The impact of stage-environment fit on young adolescents’ experiences in schools and in families. American Psychologist, 48, 90–101. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.48.2.90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertmer, P. A., Newby, T. J., & MacDougall, M. (1996). Students’ responses and approaches to case-based instruction: The role of reflective self-regulation. American Educational Research Journal, 33(3), 719–752. doi:10.3102/00028312033003719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. doi:10.3102/00346543074001059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujita-Starck, P. J., & Thompson, J. A. (1994). The effects of motivation and classroom environment on the satisfaction of noncredit continuing education students. Paper presented at the Annual Forum of the Association for Institutional Research, New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Green, J. A., & Azevedo, R. (2007). A theoretical review of Winne and Hadwin’s model of self-regulated learning: New perspectives and directions. Review of Educational Research, 77, 334–372. doi:10.3102/003465430303953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haag, L., & Gӧtz, T. (2012). Mathe ist schwierig und Deutsch aktuell: Vergleichende Studie zur Charakterisierung von Schulfa¨chern aus Schülersicht [Math is difficult and German up to date: A study on the characterization of subject domains from students’ perspectives]. Psychology in Education and Instruction, 59, 32–46.
   Google Scholar
• Hartley, K., & Bendixen, L. D. (2001). Educational research in the Internet age: Examining the role of individual characteristics. Educational Researcher, 30(9), 22–26. doi:10.3102/0013189X030009022
   Google Scholar
• Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, C. (2011). Achievement goals and achievement emotions: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 23, 359–388. doi:10.1007/s10648-011-9155-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulleman, C. S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2009). Promoting interest and performance in high-school science classes. Science, 326, 1410–1412. doi:10.1126/science.1177067
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller. (2008). An integrative theory of motivation, volition, and performance. Technology, Instruction, Cognition & Learning, 6(2), 79–104.
   Google Scholar
• Lepper, M. R., & Cordova, D. I. (1992). A desire to be taught: Instructional consequences of intrinsic motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 16, 187–208. doi:10.1007/BF00991651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, D. H. (2004). Cross cultural differences in online learning motivation. Educational Media International, 41(2), 163–173. doi:10.1080/09523980410001685784
   Google Scholar
• Liu, O. L., Bridgeman, B., & Adler, R. M. (2012). Measuring learning outcomes in higher education: Motivation matters. Educational Researcher, 41(9), 352–362. doi:10.3102/0013189X12459679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rakes, G. C., & Dunn, K. E. (2010). The impact of online graduate students’ motivation and self-regulation on academic procrastination. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 9(1), 78–93.
   Google Scholar
• Renninger, K. A., & Bachrach, J. E. (2015). Studying triggers for interest and engagement using observational methods. Educational Psychologist, 50(1), 58–69. doi:10.1080/00461520.2014.999920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. C., & Newby, T. (2006). The role of students’ cognitive engagement in online learning. American Journal of Distance Education, 20(1), 23–37. doi:10.1207/s15389286ajde2001_3
   Google Scholar
• Schwinger, M., Steinmayr, R., & Spinath, B. (2009). How do motivational regulation strategies affect achievement: Mediated by effort management and moderated by intelligence. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 621–627. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2009.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwinger, M., Steinmayr, R., & Spinath, B. (2012). Not all roads lead to Rome: Comparing different types of motivational regulation profiles. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 269–279. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2011.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwinger, M., & Steinsmeier-Pelster, J. (2012). Effects of motivational regulation on effort and achievement: A mediation model. International Journal of Educational Research, 56, 35–47. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2012.07.005
   Google Scholar
• Smit, K., De Brabander, C. J., Boekaerts, M., & Martens, R. L. (2017). The self-regulation of motivation: Motivational strategies as mediator between motivational beliefs and engagement for learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 82, 124–134. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2017.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, J. C., & Rueda, R. (2012). Situational interest, computer self-efficacy and self-regulation: Their impact on student engagement in distance education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(2), 191–204. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01157.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2014). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Essex, UK: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., Blais, M. R., Briere, N. M., & Senecal, C. B. (1992). The academic motivation scale: A measure of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52(4), 1003–1019. doi:10.1177/0013164492052004025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanZile-Tamsen, C., & Livingston, J. A. (1999). The differential impact of motivation on the self-regulated strategy use of high- and low-achieving college students. Journal of College Student Development, 40, 54–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, M., & Eccles, J. S. (2011). Adolescent behavioral, emotional, and cognitive engagement trajectories in school and their differential relations to educational success. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 22(1), 31–39. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2011.00753.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, S. L., & Lin, S. J. (2007). The application of social cognitive theory to web-based learning through NetPorts. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(4), 600–612. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00645.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winne, P. H., & Marx, R. W. (1989). A cognitive processing analysis for motivation within classroom tasks. In C. Ames & R. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education (Vol. 3, pp. 223–257). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wisneski, J. E., Ozogul, G., & Bichelmeyer, B. A. (2017). Investigating the impact of learning environments on undergraduate students’ academic performance in a prerequisite and post-requisite course sequence. The Internet and Higher Education, 32, 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolters, C. A. (2003). Regulation of motivation: Evaluating an under emphasized aspect of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 38, 189–205. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3804_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolters, C. A., & Mueller, S. A. (2010). Motivation Regulation. In Baker, E., McGaw, B., & Peterson, P. (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Education (3rd ed., pp. 631–635). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Association, 45(1), 166–183. doi:10.3102/0002831207312909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar