Publication Cover
Rethinking Marxism
A Journal of Economics, Culture & Society
Volume 29, 2017 - Issue 1
827
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
SYMPOSIUM: LANDSCAPES OF SOCIALISM: ROMANTIC ALTERNATIVES TO SOVIET ENLIGHTENMENT

In Search of a Humane Environment: Environment, Identity, and Design in the 1960s–70s

References

  • Arvatov, B. 1972. Die Kunst im System der proletarischen Kultur. In Kunst und Produktion, 11– 36. Translated and edited by H. Günther and K. Helscher. München: Carl Hanser Verlag.
  • Arvatov, B. 1997. Everyday life and the culture of the thing. Trans. C. Kiaer. October 81 (Summer): 119–28. doi: 10.2307/779022
  • Asi, V., and V. Tamm. 1969. Näitus Ruum ja Vorm. Sirp ja Vasar, 4 April, 1.
  • Bill, M. 2008. Die Gute Form. In Funktion und Funktionalismus: Schriften 1945–1988, ed. J. Bill, 27–30. Bern: Benteli.
  • Blum, R. 1969. Võõrandumisprobleem marksismis. Looming, no. 3: 441–58.
  • Bocharnikova, D. 2014. Inventing socialist modern: A history of architectural profession in the USSR, 1954–1971. Ph.D. diss., European University Institute, Florence.
  • Brecht, B. 1972. Vaseost. Valik teatriteoreetilisi töid. Trans. E. Kampus and A. Kaalep. Ed. E. Kampus. Tallinn: Eesti Raamat.
  • Buchli, V. 1997. Khrushchev, modernism, and the fight against petit-bourgeois consciousness in the Soviet home. Journal of Design History 10 (2): 161–76. doi: 10.1093/jdh/10.2.161
  • Buck-Morss, S. 2000. Dreamworld and catastrophe: The passing of mass utopia in East and West. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
  • Crowley, D. 2009. Socmodernism and the architecture of leisure in Eastern/Central Europe in the 1960s and 1970s. In Different modernisms, different avant-gardes: Problems in Central and Eastern European art after World War II, ed. S. Helme, 246–58. Tallinn: Art Museum of Estonia, Kumu Art Museum.
  • Cubbin, T. 2014. The domestic information machine: Futurological experiments in the Soviet domestic interior, 1968–76. Home Cultures 11 (1): 5–32. doi: 10.2752/175174214X13807024691142
  • Cubbin, T. 2015. Critical Soviet design: Senezh studio and the utopian imagination in late socialism. Ph.D. diss., Department of Russian and Slavonic Studies, School of Language and Cultures, University of Sheffield.
  • Debord, G. 1996. Die Gesellschaft des Spektakels. Trans. J.-J. Raspaud. Berlin: Verlag Klaus Bittermann.
  • Eimermacher, K. 1991. Funktionswandel in der sowjetischen Nachkriegskunst. In Bildende Kunst in Osteuropa im 20. Jahrhundert, ed. H.-J. Drengenberg, 105–33. Berlin: Verlag A. Spitz.
  • Epner, L. 2010. Unt ja Brecht: Võõritused “Sügisballis.” In Sügisball: Etüüde nüüdiskultuurist, ed. V. Sarapik and P. Viires, 17–27. Tartu: Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus.
  • Gens, L. 1972a. Artists’ Union of the Estonian SSR: Record of the discussion of the exhibition Space and Form. Estonian State Archives, ERA.R-1665.2.657: 6–20.
  • Gens, L. 1972b. Inimene ja tema keskkond: Näituselt “Ruum ja vorm” Tallinna kunstihoones. Sirp ja Vasar, 7 April, 8–9.
  • Gerchuk, I. 2000. The aesthetics of everyday life in the Khrushchev thaw in the USSR (1954–1964). In Style and socialism: Modernity and material culture in post-war Eastern Europe, ed. D. Crowley and S. E. Reid, 81–100. Oxford: Berg.
  • Glazychev, V. 1972. Artists’ Union of the Estonian SSR: Record of the discussion of the exhibition Space and Form. Estonian State Archives, ERA.R-1665.2.657: 47–50.
  • Gough, M. 2003. Constructivism disoriented: El Lissitzky’s Dresden and Hannover Demonstrationsräume. In Situating El Lissitzky: Vitebsk, Berlin, Moscow, ed. N. Perloff and B. Reed, 77–125. Los Angeles: Getty Publications.
  • Heidmets, M. 1978. Mustamäestumise tagamaadest. Sirp ja Vasar, 4 August, 4.
  • Henning, M. 2007. Legibility and affect: Museums as new media. In Exhibition experiments, ed. S. Macdonald and P. Basu, 25–46. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Heynen, H. 2005. The jargon of authenticity: Modernism and its (non)political position. In Constructed happiness: Domestic environment in the cold war era, ed. M. Kalm and I. Ruudi, 10–26. Tallinn: Estonian Academy of Arts.
  • Ivask, U. 1971. Arhitekti kodu. Kunst ja Kodu 37 (1): 9–11.
  • Ivask, U. 1972a. Artists’ Union of the Estonian SSR: Record of the discussion of the exhibition Space and Form. Estonian State Archives, ERA.R-1665.2.657: 57–61.
  • Ivask, U. 1972b. Süntees ja aeg. Mõttevahetuseks. Sirp ja Vasar, 23 June, 8.
  • Ivask, U. 1973. Vorm. Kunst ja Kodu 41 (3): 12–23.
  • Kangilaski, J. 1965. Vaidlustest marksistlikus esteetikas. Looming, no. 11: 1707–18.
  • Kantor, K. 1963. Chelovek i zhilishche. In Iskusstvo i byt, ed. N. Matveeva, 1: 26–48. Moscow: Sovetskii khudozhnik.
  • Kantor, K. 1967. Krasota i polza. Moscow: Iskusstvo.
  • Keskküla, A. 1974. Disaini kõrval. Kunst ja Kodu 42 (1): 41–3.
  • Khrushchev, N. 1993. Remove shortcomings in design, improve the work of architects. In Architecture culture: 1943–1968, A documentary anthology, ed. J. Ockman, 185–8. New York: Rizzoli.
  • Kiaer, C. 2005. Imagine no possessions: The socialist objects of Russian constructivism. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
  • Kodres, K. 1999. Space and form is coming back. Estonian Art 6 (2). http://www.estinst.ee/Ea/2_99/kodres.html.
  • Kodres, K. 2002. Modernismi kehtestamise klassikaline retoorika. In Kohandumise märgid, ed. V. Sarapik, M. Kalda, and R. Veidemann, 128–41. Tallinn: Eesti TA Underi ja Tuglase Kirjanduskeskus.
  • Kurg, A. 2014. Boundary disruptions: Late-Soviet transformations in art, space and subjectivity in Tallinn 1968–1979. Dissertationes Academiae Artium Estoniae 15. Tallinn: Institute of Art History, Estonian Academy of Arts.
  • Kurg, A., and M. Laanemets, eds. 2008. Environment, projects, concepts: Architects of the Tallinn School, 1972–1985. Tallinn: Eesti Arhitektuurimuuseum.
  • Lachmann, R. 1984. Die “Verfremdung” und das “Neue Sehen” bei Viktor Sklovskij. In Verfremdung in der Literatur, ed. H. Helmers, 321–51. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
  • Lapin, L. 1973. Romantismist ja ratsionalismist: Oma maja. Kunst ja Kodu 40 (2): 37–41.
  • Lapin, L. 1974. Kunstide süntees kaasaegses arhitektuuris—“sünteetiline arhitektuur.” Kunst 45 (1): 53–7.
  • Lapin, L. 1980. Tallinna kesklinna (city) arhitektuurne keskkond. In Tallinna Seminar, ed. I. Fjuk, 12–20. Tallinn: ENSV Arhitektide Liit.
  • Lapin, L. 1997. Taie kujundamas keskkonda. In Kaks kunsti: Valimik ettekandeid ja artikleid kunstist ning ehituskunstist 1971–1995, 16–8. Tallinn: Kunst.
  • Lapin, L. 2013. Objective art. Trans. A. Kurg and K. Kaer. Art Margins 2 (2): 172–85.
  • Lapin, S. 1975. Tallinna kesklinna miljöö kujundamise võimalusi (Explanatory note for the diploma work). Diploma work, Estonian State Art Institute, Department of Industrial Art.
  • Lapin, S., and L. Lapin. 1997. On sügis, lehed langevad. In Thespis: Meie teatriuuendused 1972/73, ed. V. Vahing, 288–96. Tartu: Ilmamaa.
  • Lauristin, M., and P. Vihalemm. 1998. Tartu 1968: Kolmkümmend aastat hiljem. Looming, no. 9: 1386–98.
  • Lehari, K. 1972. Süntees ja aeg. Sirp ja Vasar, 25 August, 13.
  • Lehari, K. 1976. Ruumitaju ja kompositsioon. In Ruum ja vorm, ed. V. Reinholm. Tallinn: Eesti NSV Kunstnike Liit, Eesti NSV Kunstifond.
  • Lindpere, P. 1999. 1955–1970: The renewal of modernism. In Space in 20th century Estonia, trans. L. Linask, ed. L. Lapin, 194–211. Tallinn: Eesti Arhitektuurimuuseum.
  • Lissitzky, E. 1967. Demonstrationsräume. In El Lissitzky: Maler, Architekt, Typograf, Fotograf—Erinnerungen, Briefe, Schriften, ed. S. Lissitzky-Küppers, 362–3. Dresden: Verlag der Kunst.
  • Lissitzky, E. 1989. Korterikultuur. In Arhitektid arhitektuurist. Nõukogude arhitektuurimeistrid arhitektuurist, trans. J. Pärni, ed. L. Lapin, 128–9. Tallinn: Kunst.
  • Margolin, V. 1997. The struggle for utopia: Rodchenko, Lissitzky, Moholy-Nagy, 1917–1946. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Marx, K. 2008. Das Kapital: Kritik der politischen Ökonomie. Vol 1. Berlin: Karl Dietz Verlag.
  • Marx, K., and F. Engels. 1978. Werke. Vol. 3. 1845–1846. Berlin: Dietz-Verlag.
  • McLuhan, M. 1964. Understanding media: The extensions of man. New York: Signet Books.
  • Mirov, B. 1966. Kuidas me elame. Kunst ja Kodu, no. 2: 2–5.
  • Nugis, K. 2013. Eesti tarbekunsti identiteedi kujundamine ja 1960–1970: Aastate vastandlikud diskursused. Kunstiteaduslikke Uurimusi 22 (1): 79–97.
  • Ojari, T. 2004. Elamispind: Modernistlik elamuehitusideoloogia ja Mustamäe. Kunstiteaduslikke Uurimusi 13 (2): 42–65.
  • Olep, J. 1972. Pilguga tulevikku: Vastab ERKI disainikateedri juhataja dotsent Bruno Tomberg. Sirp ja Vasar, 4 August, 9.
  • Pavitt, J., and D. Crowley. 2008. The hi-tech Cold War. In Cold war modern: Design 1945–1970, ed. D. Crowley and J. Pavitt, 163–91. London: V&A Publishing.
  • Reid, S. E. 2009. The Soviet “contemporary style”: A socialist modernism. In Different modernisms, different avant-gardes: Problems in Central and Eastern European art after World War II, ed. S. Helme, 89–106. Tallinn: Art Museum of Estonia, Kumu Art Museum.
  • Reid, S. E. 2013. This is tomorrow! Becoming a consumer in the Soviet sixties. In The socialist sixties: Crossing borders in the Second World, ed. A. E. Gorsuch and D. P. Koenker, 25–65. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  • Sarap, R. 1975. Teaduslik-tehniline revolutsioon ja esteetika. Tallinn: Kunst.
  • Sarapik, V. 2014. The beginnings of the department of design: A seeping utopia. In From the school of arts and crafts to the academy of arts: 100 years of art education in Tallinn, trans. J. Ristsoo, ed. M. Kalm, 332–63. Tallinn: Eesti Kunstiakadeemia.
  • Scanlan, J. P. 1985. Marxism in the USSR: A critical survey of current Soviet thought. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
  • Shklovsky, V. 1965. Art as technique. In Russian formalist criticism: Four essays. Trans. L. T. Lemon and M. J. Reis, 3–24. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
  • Soloviev, Y. 1973. “VNIITE,” E l’industrial design in URSS. Domus 524 (7): 33–5.
  • Starr, F. S. 1971. Writings from the 1960s on the modern movement in Russia. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians 30 (2): 171–2. doi: 10.2307/988633
  • Summatavet, M. 1972. Artists’ Union of the Estonian SSR: Record of the discussion of the exhibition Space and Form. Estonian State Archives, ERA.R-1665.2.657: 62–4.
  • Tafuri, M. 1976. Architecture and utopia: Design and capitalist development. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
  • Tatlin, V. 1989. “Uut tüüpi monumentidest.” In Arhitektid arhitektuurist: Nõukogude arhitektuurimeistrid arhitektuurist, trans. J. Pärni, ed. L. Lapin, 97. Tallinn: Kunst.
  • Tolli, L. 1984. Kunsti ja arhitektuuriteaduskonna loomingulisest koostööst. Ehitus ja Arhitektuur, no. 1: 24–8.
  • Tomberg, B. 1961. Kongressieelseid mõtteid: Vaba tee uuele kvaliteedile. Sirp ja Vasar, 22 September, 3.
  • Tomberg, B. 1972. Artists’ Union of the Estonian SSR: Record of the discussion of the exhibition Space and Form. Estonian State Archives ERA.R-1665.2.657: 38–43.
  • Tomberg, B. 1973. Mis on disain. Pioneer, no. 11: 36–7.
  • Tret’iakov, S. 2006. Art in the revolution and the revolution in art (aesthetic consumption and production). October 118 (Fall): 11–8. doi: 10.1162/octo.2006.118.1.11
  • Uudislooming monumentaalkunsti näitusel. 1978. Kunst 52 (2): 35–8.
  • Werckmeister, O. K. 1974. Ideologie und Kunst bei Marx u.a. Essays. Frankfurt: S. Fischer.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.